~:i~LIi~Gt~

?11;~L~UI

it.if~

•JNTROL BOARD

September 5, 1985

UANILEY INDUSTRIES, INC.,

Petitioner,

v.

)

PCB 85—125

ILLINOIS ENVIRONMENTAL

PRCTEC~LION AGENCC~

Respondent

ORDER OF THE BOARD (by Cl. Anderson):

On August 23, i985~Hanley filed an amendment to its August

20 variance petition, requesting a hearing. This amendment does

not address the other informational deficiencies noted by the

Board in its august 2:L Order, as it does not:

a) specify the procedures to be used during burns, such as

operating protocol, safety and emergency procedures, and

atmospheric conditions during which burns would be

conducted;

b) contain details concerning the costs and availability of

alternative disposal ootions;

c)

contain comp:Liance p:L~iri

other than

an

indicated intent

to ask for an extension of variance next year. The

En~iironmentai Protection

Act contemplates that variance

will lead to

com~i:iance; if Hanley wishes to continue

open burning

through

the

indefinite future, a petition

for si~e~specificrule change might be the more

appropriate procedural mechanism.

By the terms of the August 21 Orders if an amended petition

curing these deficionc~esis not filed on or before October 7,

1985, this petition will be scbject to dismissal. Hearing will

not be scheduled in this matter until the Board receives an

amended petition~

IT IS SO ORDERED~

65~44?

---

I, Dorothy M. Gunn, Cier~ oi~ t~i’~Illinois Pollution Control

Board, hereby certify that the above Order was adopted on

the ~R- day of

~

1985, by a vote

of

________

Dc

tr~T7~i7Ciêr k

:L~i;~no.~s

Pollutlon

Control Board

135-448