ILLINOIS POLLUTION CONTROL BOARD
    April 21, 1988
    ILLINOIS ENVIRONMENTAL
    PROTECTION AGENCY,
    Complainant,
    v.
    )
    PCB 85—18
    CONCENTRATE CORPORATION, an
    Illinois Corporation;
    ALBA MARKETING CORPORATION,
    an Illinois Corporation; and
    ROBERT K. ARUNDALE II,
    Respondents.
    MS. MARCIA BELLOWS AND MR. JOSEPH ANNUNZIO APPEARED ON BEHALF OF
    COMPLAINANT, ILLINOIS ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY;
    MR. JOHN GOSSELIN APPEARED ON BEHALF OF ALL RESPONDENTS.
    OPINION AND ORDER OF THE BOARD (by J.D. Dumelle):
    This matter comes before the Board upon Complainant’s
    February 1, 1985, seven count complaint, filed by the Attorney
    General’s Office on behalf of the Illinois Environmental
    Protection Agency (IEPA). Count I alleged that employees of
    Respondent Alba Marketing improperly discharged vegetable oil
    wastes into the sewer system of the City of Lemont, Cook County,
    Illinois. Count II alleged that the above referenced discharge
    illegally occurred at an unpermitted facility. Count III alleged
    that the above referenced waste was illegally delivered to an
    unlicensed hauler. Count IV alleged violation of waste manifest
    requirements. Count V alleged that respondent Alba Marketing
    hauled or transported special waste without a valid waste hauling
    permit. Count VI alleged that during its transport of the
    special waste, Respondent Alba Marketing failed to adhere to
    required manifest requirements. Count VII the alleged that
    Respondent Arundale disposed of the waste at an unpermitted
    facility.
    The Attorney General’s Office’s March 22, 1985 Motion For
    Change Of Venue was granted; hearing was held on November 4, 1987
    at 4711 W. Golf Road, Skokie, Cook County, Illinois. No members
    of the public attended. At hearing the parties introduced a
    partially executed Stipulation. Signature for the IEPA was
    subsequently obtained. On March 30, 1988 the Attorney General’s
    Office motioned for leave to amend the complaint to conform with
    the terms of the Stipulation. The Board granted this Motion on
    April 7, 1988.
    88—291

    —2—
    In evaluating this enforcement action and proposed
    settlement agreement, the Board has considered the facts and
    circumstances in light of the specific criteria set forth at Ill.
    Rev. Stat. ch. 111 1/2 par. 1033(c) and finds the Stipulation and
    Proposal For Settlement acceptable under 35 Ill. Adm. Code
    103.180. Accordingly the Board orders Respondent to comply with
    the Order
    set
    forth below.
    This Opinion and Order constitutes the Board’s findings of
    fact and conclusions of law in this matter.
    ORDER
    It is the Order of the Illinois Pollution Control Board
    that:
    1. The Board hereby accepts the March 30, 1988 Stipulation
    Of Facts And Proposed Settlement executed by the
    Illinois Attorney General’s Office and Respondents
    Concentrate Corporation, Alba Marketing Corporation and
    Robert K. Arundale II. The terms and conditions of the
    Stipulation; which is attached hereto, are incorporated
    into this Order.
    2. The Board finds that Respondents have violated Section
    21(e) of the Illinois Environmental Protection Act
    Ill. Rev. Stat. ch. ill 1/2 par. 1021(e).
    3. Respondent shall pay a civil penalty of three thousand
    dollars ($3,000). The penalty shall be paid at the
    rate of three hundred dollars ($300) per month, with
    the first payment to commence 30 days after the entry
    of this Order. Payment shall be made by certified
    check or money order payable to the Environmental
    Protection Trust fund and delivered to:
    Illinois Environmental Protection Agency
    Fiscal Services Division
    2200 Churchill Road
    Springfield, IL 62706
    IT IS SO ORDERED.
    I, Dorothy M. Gunn, Clerk of the Illinois Pollution Control
    Board, hereby certify that the above Opinion, and Order was
    adopted on the
    _______________
    day of
    _____________,
    1988 by a vote
    of
    I~
    .
    Dorothy M.’Gunn, Clerk
    Illinois Pollution Control Board
    88—292

    BEFORE THE ILLINOIS POLLUTION CONTRO
    ~A~30~j~
    ~ATU~
    tWW~S
    Po~unoN~ ø~
    ILLINOIS
    ENVIRONMENTAL
    PROTECTION AGENCY,
    Conp)ainant,
    vs.
    PCB 8~-18
    CONCENTRA1E CORPORATION,
    an
    )
    Illinois corporation;
    ALBA MARKETING CCi~’ORATICN,
    an Illinois
    corn:rcition;
    and
    ROBEFF
    K. ARUNDALE II,
    Rescn~s.
    STI1~ULATION 01 FACT~ ANT: P1~OPOSE1)_SETTLEMEN’I
    Complainant, ILLINOIS
    ENVIR0N~ENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
    (‘Agency”),
    by Neil F. Hartigan,
    Attorn?y General of Illinois,
    and
    Respc’ndentr,
    CONCENTRATE COR~’ORATIOrJ (“Concentrate”),
    ALBA
    MARKETING
    CORPOI~ATI0N (“A1b~ N~irk~~irtg”) and ROBERT K. AJ~UNCALE
    II (“Arun~le”)
    ,
    by their
    atthr:~ey, Joh:. Ccsselin,
    su~~t th’~
    following
    Stipulation
    of Facts
    and Proposed Settlement
    to the
    Pollution
    Control
    Board pursuant
    to 35 Ill.
    Adm. Code 103.180.
    The parties agree that the interest
    of the public and the parties
    hereto
    will
    bc’st he served
    b~ resolution
    of the prc’cecdin’j
    without further litigation
    under the terms and conditions provided
    herein
    and they offer
    this
    Statement
    of Facts
    and Proposal
    for Settlement in lieu of
    a
    full evideritiary hearing.
    88-293

    STATEMENT OF FACTS
    1.
    At a1
    times pertinent
    hereto,
    Concentrate
    was
    a corporation organized
    and existing under the laws of Illinois.
    2.
    At
    all times pertinent hereto, Concentrate operated
    a business for the
    processing and sale of waste vegetable oils
    at. 611
    Sc.~th SpR~ldi~g St~~t
    ,
    Spr i:~g Vul le~
    ,
    Bure~i Cour~y
    Illinois
    (“Concentrate facility”~.
    3.
    At all times pertinent
    hereto,
    Respondent Arundale
    was the president of Concentrate and active
    in and responsible
    for
    the operation of the Concentrate facility.
    At all times pertinent heretu, Alba r~etir~j
    ~.
    crp~r~.~
    end exist~r~g undcr the le
    1111 ne s
    5.
    At
    all
    times
    pertinent
    hereto,
    Alba Mar ket
    opereted a business at. SOS Clearweter Dr ~vc, North Aur ~x
    Karrc
    Coun4.~y
    ,
    Iii mci
    S
    6.
    Consequent to its business,
    Alba Marketing contracted
    to haul and dispose of wastes.
    7. At all timcs pertinent, hereto, Respondent
    Ar’~:~ir
    was president of Alba Marketing and
    was active in and responsible
    for its operations.
    8. On July 5, 1983, Alba Marketing entered into
    a lease, as lessee, of certain premises located at One West
    River Road, Lemont, Cook County, Illinois (“River Road site”).
    -2-
    I
    88—294

    9.
    On July
    (3~
    ~ 1983, Concentrate and, Alba Marketing,
    by and through their mutual president, Robert K. Arundale II,
    entered into an agreement for Alba Marketing to transport and
    dispose of 40,000 pounds of vegetable oil wastes generated
    at the Concentrate facility.
    10. On Jul.y 12, 1983,, Metropolitan District investiga-
    tars observed employees of Al~a Marketing discharging the afore-
    mentioned vegetable oil wastes into the Lemont Sewer System
    at the River Road site leased by Alba Marketing.
    ii. By discharging the wastes
    into the Lemont Sewer
    Systen, Concentrate,
    Alba Marketina, and Robert K. Ar,nd~le
    II disposed of waste at a site that did not. meet the requirer~ents
    of the IllinoLs Environmental Protection Act (‘Act”), Ill.
    Rev. Stat., Ch. 111—1/2, et seq. in violation of Section 21
    (e) of the Act (Count I
    -
    Amended Complaint).
    12. The vegetable oil wastes were wastes as defined
    in Section 21(e) of the Act.
    13. The vegetable oil wastes were generated at the
    Concentrate facility in Illinois.
    14. On July 12, 1983 the Agency contends that Alba
    Marketing did not have a valid special waste hauling permit
    issued by the Agency but Alba Marketing denies that it needed
    such a waste hauling permit.
    15. On July 12, 1983, the Agency contends that Concen-
    trate and Arundale delivered special wastes generated in Illinois
    to a hauler (Alba Marketing) who did not have a special waste
    —3—
    88—295

    hauling permit in violation of 35 Ill. Adm. Code 809.301 and
    SectIon 21(d) of the Act (Count II
    Amended Complaint), but
    Alba Marketing denies that it required such a special waste
    hauling permit.
    16
    Pursuant to court order in civil case nu~ber
    83
    OH 2/,, Bureau County, I11i~iois, Concentrate has ceased doing
    business.
    17. Pursuant to court. order in criminal case number
    83 C 10047, Cook County, Illinois, Concentrate and Aruridale
    paid 513,0CC to the Metropalitan Sanitary District in restituticu
    fo~ da::u~.
    c~~d to the Lcr~tt Sewer System by the
    aforeiu’nt
    io~~ed
    d~scharue cf wn~t~:c’~
    ~Tu~y
    12, 1983.
    18. The
    cost
    of disposing of 40,000 pounds
    of waste
    vegetable
    oil
    at a local
    landfill
    is approximately
    7 centu
    per pound or $2,RCC.CC.
    19.
    By disposing
    of the wastes
    in a sewer rather
    than a landfill, Respondents had economic savings of $2,800.00.
    TERMS OF SETTLEMENT
    The parties agree that this proposed settlement is
    expressly conditioned upon and effective only with the approval.
    thereof in all respects by the Board. The parties also agree
    that they shall not be bound by the terms and conditions hereof
    and this Statement of Facts and Proposal for Settlement shall
    be void and of no effect in the event the Board fails to approve
    the following terms in all respects:
    -4-
    88—296

    A. Respondents admit to have violated Section 21(e)
    of the Environmental Protection Act, Ili.Rev.Stat.
    ,
    Ch. 111-1/2,
    par. 1021(e).
    B. The Agency contends and Respondents neither admit’
    nor deny that
    Res~:ondent~
    have violated Section 21(d) of the
    Environmental Protection Act, fll.Rev.Stat.
    ,
    ch. 111-1/2, par.
    1021(d), 35 Ill.
    Acm.
    Code 809.301, and 35 Ill. Ad~ Code 809.501
    as set out in Counts II and III of Complainant’s First Amended
    Complaint.
    C. Respondents shal 1 pay a civil penal t.y of $3 ,000 .00.
    ihe pctrties asrc
    that
    a pearl ty in this care is neccu~
    to pronot
    e
    enforcer’ ‘nt. of the Act due to th~ severe harm caused
    by the violations. Payment of restitution by the .Respondents
    and the fact that Respondent. Concentrate has ceased doing business
    were considered in determining the penalty. The standard for
    the penalty was economic savings.
    The penalty shall be paid at the rate of $300.00
    per month, with the first payntent to commence 30 days after’
    the date of the Order of the Board accepting this Stipulation.
    Payments shall be made by certified check or money order payable
    to the Environmental Protection Trust Fund and delivered to:
    ILLINOIS
    ENVIH0N~ENTAL
    PROTECTION AGENCY
    Fiscal Services Division
    2200 Churchill Road
    Springfield, Illinois 62706
    —5—
    38—297

    ALBA M~~’TIN0,CORP~Rf1’ION
    ~
    1~-
    By:__
    _____
    Dated:~C~’~
    ~
    ‘~‘
    ~
    .1
    ~ii~
    ~\i~ ~
    F~OR~TK. ARUNDALE II
    Datad:~~k
    _______
    -6-
    88—298

    Back to top