ILl XNOIS POLLtJTtON CONTROL BOARI)
December
1.5,
1983
(2tTY
OF
WOOD
RIVE~R,
Petitioner,
PCJ3
83—232
tLLINOIS ENVIRONMENTAL
PROTI~’CT(ON
AGFNCY,
Respondent.
OONCURRflJG OPIWION (by J. D.
Dumelle)~
My reason fec concurring is that the alternative of using
~i
portable power source (i.e. skid—mounted,
etc.)
seems not to
have
been examined.
Since the wet well and interceptor sewer have a one hour
~iolding capacity, the system could have been pumped down,
d.sconnected for up to an hour from the portable power supply
while the new hookup occurred and then restarted with no by-
passing at all tD
the
Mississippi River.
The environmental effect of the instant provisional variance
qrant is admittedly minimal. But an examination of the portable
power supply alternative might have made that effect non-existent.
Respectfully submitted,
~,
(,
7
Ja~obD. Dumelle
Chairman
I, Christan L. Moffett, Clerk of the Illinois Pollution
Control Board,
do
hereby cer~if~ythat the above Concurring
Opiniofl was filed on the ~
_day of
~~1983.
Christan L. MZ~~tt,Clerk
Illinois Pollution Control Board
55-271