1. CERTI FICATION
      2. Title
      3. IT IS SO ORDERED.
      4. 53-196

ILLINOIS POLLUTION CONTROL BOARD
August 10, 1983
DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY,
Petitioner,
PCB 83—109
ILLINOIS ENVIRONMENTAL
PROTECTION AGENCY,
)
Respondent.
OPINION AND ORDER OF THE BOARD (by W.J. Nega):
This emergency provisional variance request comes before the
Board upon an August 8~ 1983 Recommendation of the Illinois
Environmental Protection Agency (Agency). The Agency recommends
that a 45—day provisional variance from Rule 502 of Chapter 2:
Air Pollution be granted to the u.S. Department of the Army
(Army) to allow the open burning of approximately 300,000 pounds
of nitrocellulose ammunition propellant.
The Petitioner~s Joliet Army M~inunitionPlant in Joliet,
Will County, Illinois currently has in storage approximately
300,000 pounds of reclaimed ammunition propellant which is made
of the highly volatile, explosive material known as nitrocellulose.
This propellant was removed from the ammunition during demilitari-
zation operations in the 1370’s and has beer: in storage since
that time, (Rec. 2).
The Army generally disposes of stored propellant in one of
two ways; it either can be sold to a private company or destroyed.
A critical factor in determining whether a specific propellant
can be sold is the propellant~s stability. Thus, the Army conducts
routine stabilizer analyses pursuant to a Propellant Stability
Program. Only those propellants which have been certified as to
stabilizer content can be offered for sale and those that cannot
be certified must be destroyed. In the present case, the
nitrocellulose—based propellant is inherently unstable and will
self-ignite when the stabilizer ingredient becomes ex~iausted.
(Rec. 2).
In the Army’s Propellant Stability Program, ammunition
stocks are labelled by assigning lot numbers to consecutive
quantities manufactured together. These identification lot
numbers, which are assigned at the time of manufacture, are used
to identify related ammunition which is withdrawn from field
units due to ammunition failure or unsafe conditions.
53493

—2
Unfortunately, the nitroceilulose—based propellant involved
in this case lost its lot identity when incorporated into
ammunition and when it was subsequently reclaimed during demili-
tarization, Since the lot that the 300,000 pounds of nitrocellulose
propellant came from cannot be ascertained, it is impossible to
establish a baseline for the propellant, its history cannot be
known, and its degradation profile (i~e., how soon the stabilizer
ingredients will degrade and result in an explosion) cannot be
developed. (Rec. 2).
Both the Army and the Agency agree that, because no assurance
of the stability of the nitrocellulose-based propellant can he
given, the continued storage of the propellant creates an extremely
hazardous and dangerous situation which requires the immediate
disposal of this material. (Rec. 3), The Army has developed
procedures for disposal action which it asserts will be followed
to assure the safety of personnel, structures, and grounds.
(See: Exhibit 1). The Army asserts that the residue from burnt
propellant will be deposited in the sanitary landfill which is
located on the plant grounds and operated in strict accordance
with applicable regulations.
The Agency has concluded that prohibiting the Army from the
one—time open burning of the nitrocellulose—based propellant
under Rule 502 of Chapter 2: Air Pollution would not only be
extremely dangerous and present a safety hazard to human life,
but would also impose an arbitrary and unreasonable hardship upon
the Army. Therefore, the Agency recommends that the Board grant
the Army a provisional variance from Rule 502 of Chapter 2: Air
Pollution for a period of
45
days, subject to certain conditions.
The conditions suggested by the Agency provide only that variance
is limited to the 300,000 pounds which was the subject of the
request, and that the Army comply with Section 725,482 of the
RCRA rules requiring only that certain distances be maintained
from neighbor~sproperty lines depending on the amount of explosive
waste destroyed.
The Board finds these suggested conditions to be wholly
inadequate to protect the environment even during emergency
destruction of these unstable wastes, The provisional variance
as recommended essentially gives the Army carte blanche to
dispose of these wastes in any manner whatsoever, as long as
the property line distances are observed, The suggested conditions
do not even require the Army to follow its own procedures,
They do not address issues such as daytime versus nighttime
burning, assessment of atmospheric and meteorlogica. conditions
affecting smoke dissipation, or notification and reporting to
the Agency of circumstances of burns or even when the variance
burns have been completed. Such conditions were essential to the
BoarcPs grant of variance in Trojan Corp. v. IEPA
,
PCB 82—23,
October 5, 1982, to allow destruction of gunpowder—contaminated
buildings and wastes,
53-194

—3—
Section 35(b) of the Act severely limits the Board~s
discretion in dealing with a provisional variance request and
recommendation which meet the requirements of Sections 37(b) and
35(b), Were
the Board free to exercise full discretion in this
matter, the Board would impose additional conditions to remedy
the noted deficiencies, As a minimum, given the scanty data
before the Board, such conditions would include conditions 11,
14, 15, 16, 17 and 20 of the ~2jan order, and a condition
requiring the Army to follow its standard procedures.
Under the circumstances, however, the Board can only direct
the Clerk to serve the Army with a
copy
of that Order, arid to
strongly
urge
the Army to
comply with the above-enumerated
conditions, in addition to its own “Standards Operating
Procedure
For Burning Propellant Powder,” As directed by
Section 35(b) of
the Illinois Environmental Protection Act, the Board hereby
grants
the provisional variance as recommended.
ORDER
The U.S. Department of the Army is hereby granted a provisional
variance from the open burning provisions of Rule 502 of Chapter
2: Air Pollution for a period
of 45 days from the
date of this
Order, subject to the
following conditions:
1. Only the 300,000 pounds of nitrocellulose propellant
which are the subject
of the variance petition may
be openly
burned.
2. The
Army shall conduct such open burning in full
compliance with the
Section 725.482 of the Board~s RCRA Rules.
(35 Ill, Adm, Code
725,482),
3. Within 10 days of the date of the Board’s Order, the
Department of the Army shall execute a Certificate of Acceptance
and Agreement which shall
be sent to: Illinois Environmental
Protection Agency, Division
of Air Pollution Control,
Compliance
Assurance Section, 2200 Churchill Road, Springfield, Illinois
62706. This certification
shall
have the
following
form:
53-195

—4—
CERTI FICATION
I,
(We)
having read the Order of the Illinois Pollution Control Board in
PCB 83—109 dated August
10,
1983, understand and accept said Order,
realizing that such acceptance renders all terms and conditions
thereto binding and enforceable,
Petitioner
By: Authorized Agent
Title
Date
IT IS SO ORDERED.
I, Christan L. Moffett, Clerk of the Illinois Pollution
Control Board hereby cerjify that the above
was adopted on the
1O”
day of
~inio~~on
and Order
1983 by a vote of
,3-~
Illinois Pollution
53-196

Back to top