ILLINOIS POLLUTION CONTROL BOARD
    April 29, 1982
    LOMBARD PINES SHOPPING CENTER,
    )
    Petitioner,
    P03 82—8
    ILLINOIS ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
    AGENCY,
    Respondent.
    NORMAN K. SACKAR, PETITIONER, APPEARED PRO SE.
    WAYNE WIEMERSLAGE, ESQ., APPEARED ON BEHALF OF RESPONDENT.
    RITA ELSNER, ESQ., APPEARED ON BEHALF OF THE VILLAGE OF LOMBARD.
    OPINION AND ORDER OF THE BOARD (by I. Goodman):
    On January 27, 1982, Lombard Pines Shopping Center (Lombard
    Pines) filed a Petition for Variance from Rule 962(a) of Chapter
    3: Water Pollution of the Board~sRegulations to allow a sewer
    connection of a proposed development
    located
    in the Village of
    Lombard, Illinois. Lombard Pines subsequently filed an Ainended
    Petition in response to a Board Order and, on March 19, 1982,
    the Board joined the Village of Lombard (Lombard) as a Respondent
    herein and ordered the matter set for hearing since three
    objections to the Petition had been timely filed. The hearing
    was held April 19, 1982, at which a number of citizens expressed
    their concern about the proposed variance, On April 21, 1982,
    Lombard Pines moved for expedited consideration in this matter,
    which motion is hereby granted~ Jewel Food Stores (Jewel) having
    filed an appearance herein and having participated in the hearing,
    the Board ou its own motion hereby joins Jewel as co—petitioner
    pursuant ~o Procedural Rule 303(c),
    Lombard Pines presently owns and operates the Lombard Pines
    Shopping Center located at Roosevelt Road and Main Street in
    Lombard, Illinois. Jewel operates a combination grocery—drug
    store in the shopping center, which also contains a number of
    other stores and a large parking lot~ Lombard Pines proposes
    to build a new and larger facility to be leased to Jewel on the
    Lombard Pines site, The existing facility would then be rented
    to others for use other than as a grocery—type store pursuant to
    an agreement between Jewel and Lombard Pines. The proposed new
    facility will create an estimated sewage flow of approximately
    2,300 gallons per day. The additional discharge requires a
    46—2 11

    2
    permit to construct and operate a sewer extension pursuant to
    Rule 95l(b)(2) of Chapter 3: Water Pollution. Construction of
    the new facility was expected to start in April or May of 1982,
    and the need for the sewer extension and connection to the
    Lombard sewer system anticipated in September or October of 1982.
    Discharge from the old facility is expected to be reduced to a
    total of 285 gallons per day which, when added to the wastewater
    discharge of the new facility, would result in a net increase of
    48 gallons per day of wastewater generated by the shopping center.
    The Lombard sewer system is presently under restricted status
    imposed by the Illinois Environmental Protection Agency (Agency)
    due to surcharging sewers, overflows, and basement back—ups.
    Lombard has a population of approximately 38,800 persons. The
    existing sewer facilities are both combined and separate sewers
    which are tributary to the new Glenbard Sewage Treatment Plant,
    Variance is requested from Rule 962(a) in order to allow the
    construction and connection of the sewer extension thereto.
    The Agency recommends that the variance be granted with a
    number of conditions, the total effect of which will maintain the
    status quo with regard to discharge to the sewer system from the
    shopping center. This result will occur because not only is the
    new facility more efficient in its use of water, but Jewel
    proposes to limit its total water usage to no more than an average
    of approximately 2,400 gallons per day until completion of a new
    interceptor sewer which will eliminate potential problems down-
    stream of the shopping center. In addition, Lombard Pines
    proposes to leave the existing facility empty until such time as
    the interceptor is completed and operating. This results in
    slightly less sewage to be discharged than that which is presently
    discharged by the existing facility. There thus appears to be an
    environmental improvement under the conditions proposed by the
    Agency for the variance.
    Another potential environmental problem may occur due to the
    increased roof area and the attendant runoff. At hearing, both
    the engineer retained by Lombard Pines and the City Engineer of
    Lombard testified that if runoff from the shopping center were to
    go either east or west, it would be contained by a retention basin
    or conducted through storm sewers to a local stream (R. 5, 11 and
    20).
    The citizens that testified at the hearing brought up a
    number of problems concerning the Lombard sewer system. Jeanne
    Greenwald expressed concern about the 48 additional gallons per
    day originally predicted from the new facility. This situation
    will be corrected if the Agency~sproposed conditions are
    accepted by the Board. Peter Davis appeared in support of the
    variance. Flora Allen appeared on behalf of a Not—For-Profit
    Citizens group known as “We The People.” ¶‘~s, ~tllenmentioned
    potential runoff problems and the fact that certain citizens
    46—212

    who were currently utilizing septic fields should be given
    consideration for hook—up to the sewer system before a business.
    The City Engineer of Lombard pointed out, in cross—examination,
    that the people with the septic fields cited by the Du Page
    Health Department and ordered to connect to the available sewer
    system before May 1, 1982, are in Du Page County, and not under
    the control of the Village of Lombard.
    George Fyler presented a rather lengthy statement citing
    allegations of widespread, long—time sewer neglect by the Village,
    allegations of false statements issued by the Lombard Adminis-
    tration concerning the sewer problems, and alleging poor design
    of the Agency—approved interceptor sewer. Mr. Fyler’s statement
    rambled a bit, hut the gist of his argument appeared to be that
    Village and Agency engineers were incompetent and that other more
    serious problems in the Village should be addressed before the
    new interceptor is constructed. During cross—examination, the
    City Engineer explained that the new interceptor was merely a
    part of a larger plan to relieve the entire area and that it had
    not only been carefully designed, hut it had been reviewed by the
    Village, the Agency, and by an outside engineering firm.
    The Board is well aware of the problems associated with the
    sewer system in the Village of Lombard. It has granted variances
    in this area only after careful consideration of the effect on
    downstream connections and have insisted that any variance granted
    be conditioned upon the protection of the downstream citizens. In
    this case, it appears that by incorporating certain conditions the
    Board may recognize the arbitrary and unreasonable hardship that
    Lombard Pines would incur should it be unable to provide Jewel
    with the new facility at the shopping center, while protecting
    the interests of the downstream citizens at the same time. The
    concerns about runoff at the facility appear to have been already
    addressed and the problem corrected. If the variance is
    conditioned as the Agency proposes, there will be a net decrease
    in the amount of wastewater discharge into the sewer system from
    the shopping center, The issue of whether or not some other
    citizen should somehow stand in line ahead of Lombard Pines is not
    before the Board. Any citizen who feels he/she is sustaining an
    arbitrary and unreasonable hardship with regard to the restricted
    status of the Lombard sewer system has the right to come before
    this Board with a variance petition and have it considered on its
    own merits without regard to other similar situations.
    The Board finds that denial of the proposed variance would
    work an arbitrary and unreasonable hardship on Lombard Pines and
    will therefore grant the variance from Rule 962(a) to allow the
    construction and operation of the sewer extension, as requested,
    but will condition such variance pursuant to the Agency recom-
    mendation so as to give protection to downstream citizens from
    any increase in sewer problems.
    46—213

    4
    This Opinion constitutes a finding of facts and conclusions
    of
    law of the Board in this matter,
    ORDER
    Lombard Pines Shopping Center, the Village of Lombard, and
    the Jewel Food Stores are hereby granted variance from Rule 962(a)
    of Chapter 3: Water Pollution Control Regulations to allow the
    connection of a facility located at Roosevelt Road and Main Street,
    Lombard, Illinois, to the Village of Lombard sewer system subject
    to the following conditions:
    1. Petitioner shall comply with subparagraphs a) through g)
    of paragraph 51 of the Illinois Environmental Protection
    Agency~s Recommendation, filed April 19, 1982, which
    Recommendation is incorporated by reference as if fully
    set forth herein,
    2. Within forty—five days of the date of this Order, Petitioner
    shall execute and forward to the Illinois Environmental
    Protection Agency, PWS Enforcement Programs, 2200 Churchill
    Road, Springfield, Illinois 62706, a Certificate of
    Acceptance and Agreement to be bound to all terms and
    conditions of this variance, This forty—five day period
    shall he held in abeyance for any period this matter is
    being appealed. The form of the certificate shall be as
    follows:
    CERTIFICATE
    I,
    (We), _________________________________,
    having read
    the Order of the Illinois Pollution Control Board in P03 82-8,
    ~‘
    Order, realizing that such acceptance renders all terms and
    conditions thereto binding and enforceable.
    Petitioner
    By: Authorized Agent
    Title
    Date
    IT IS SO ORDERED,
    I, Christan L. Moffett, Clerk of the Illinois
    Pollution
    Control
    Board, hereby certify that
    the above Opinion and
    Order was
    adopted on the~~
    day of
    ~
    1982 by a vote of
    ~
    C1c~~d~Lk1~LLLLL
    __
    Christan L. Moffet~
    /
    rk
    Illinois Pollution
    ol Board
    46—214

    Back to top