ILLINOIS POLLUTION CONTROL BOARD
December 2, 1976
ADELLA VALLERIUS,
Petitioner,
v.
)
PCB 76—243
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY,
Respondent.
OPINION AND ORDER OF THE BOARD (by Mr. Zeitlin):
This matter is before the Board on a Petition for Variance
filed on September 29, 1976 by Mrs. Adella Vallerius. The Petition
seeks a variance from Rule 962(a) of Chapter 3: Water Pollution, of
this Board’s Rules and Regulations. An Objection to Petition for
Variance and Motion for Hearing was filed by Respondent Environmental
Protection Agency (Agency) on October 12, 1976, On October 14, 1976,
the Board set the matter for hearing.
On November
3,
1976 the Agency filed a Motion for Leave to
Withdraw its Objection, and a Motion for Decision Without Hearing.
Those Motions were granted by the Board. The Agency’s Recommendation
was filed concurrently with its Motion for Decision Without Hearing.
The subject matter of this case is a motel, service station,
and restaurant located at the intersection of Illinois Route 138
and U. S. Interstate 55, in Mt. Olive, Macoupin County, called the
Sunset Inn. The motel has 15 units, the restaurant seats 85 persons,
and the service station has four gas pumps. Petitioner estimates
that the effluent from the entire facility amounts to 5,150 gallons
per day (qpd), for a hydraulic populritiofl
equIvalent
(PE) of 51.5.
1~1~
1 oad I nq:;
I
~r HOl)5 .iird ~u:;pen(lid
~ 1
HI:; (
)
h~
V(~ I~)
hecn deter—
mi ned, hut t~u:;t
:; hy
Lliv
A~~micy
in
d
modd:-; ide di
eli
current.
ly
receiving the Sunset Inn’s
effluent indicate the following:
DOD5
150 mg/l
SS
110 mg/l
Ammonia—N
54 mg/i
pH
7.5
Fecal Col.
110,000/100 ml
24
—
359
—2—
That effluent is presently discharged into the roadside ditch
after simple solid separation in a septic tank system; the septic
tank does not have a lateral system, but instead discharges directly
to the ditch. As a result of a percolation test, it has been
determined that the soil in the area of Mrs. Vallerius’ facility
is unsuitable for a tile field.
After letters from both the Agency and the Illinois Department
of Public Health to the effect that this illegal discharge to the
roadside ditch must be eliminated, Mrs. Vallerius was faced with
three choices:
1. construction of a separate sewage treatment
plant, designed to meet a 4 mg/i BOD5 limitation, and a
5 mg/l SS limitation;
2. connection by force main to the north sewage
treatment plant of the City of Mt. Olive, Illinois;
3. cessation of operations.
Mrs. Vallerius contends, and the Agency in its Recommendation
agrees, that the construction of a separate sewage treatment plant
for the Sunset I-nfl would be economically impractical and would
constitute a hardship upon Mrs. Vallerius. The connection to Mt.
Olive, even though economically reasonable, nonetheless presents
problems. Mt. Olive is presently on Agency-imposed restricted
status, as a result of inadequate treatment at both its north and
south sewage treatment plants. There can be no question of the
fact that Mt. Olive’s north sewage treatment plant is totally
inadequate. See, e.g., EPA v. City of Mt. Olive, PCB 74-431
(Aug. 14, 1975); see also, City of Mt. Olive v. EPA, PCB 74-183
(May 23, 1974) (Variance Petition dismissed without prejudice for
inadequacy). Because the many problems at Mt. Olive have already
been discussed, they will not be repeated here. We will only note
that there is a possibilit.y that certain problems are continuing;
the Agency’s Recommendation indicates that, at its request, the
Attorney General on October 4, 3.976 illed an injunction
action with
the Circuit Court of Macoupin County, Illinois
to enforce the Board’s
Order in PCB 74-431.
Mt. Olive is included, however, in the southeast Macoupin
County Facilities Planning Area. The City of Staunton, designated
as “Lead Agency” of the planning area, was awarded a Step I state
grant on April 14, 1976, for the development of service areas. The
Agency has determined (Rec., ¶6) that Mt. Olive will be one of the
six facility planning areas, and has been advised that it will have
to submit a plan of study. As grant funding proceeds, the existing
problems with the north sewage treatment plant of the City of Mt.
Olive should be abated.
24
—
360
—3—
Pending such grant funding, the Agency pleads that the denial
of this Variance, or a requirement that a separate sewage treatment
plant be constructed for the Sunset Inn, would be contrary to the
regionalization concept for that area. Based on that fact, and on
the hardship which the Agency agrees is present in this case, the
Agency recommends that the variance be granted. The Agency notes
that while the effluent downstream of Mt. Olive’s north sewage
treatment plant causes semi-polluted conditions, this alternative
poses less pollution potential than the present discharge of the
Sunset Inn’s raw sewage after simple septic tank separation.
Balancing this fact, along with the imminent grant funding of
Mt. Olive to upgrade sewage treatment facilities, against the hard-
ship involved in requiring construction of separate facilities for
the Sunset Inn, we find that a Variance grant is warranted.
We shall, however, condition our grant of this variance upon
an agreement by Mrs. Vallerius that the Sunset Inn complex not be
expanded until such time as the Mt. Olive north sewage treatment
plant is removed from the Agency’s restricted status,
This Opinion constitutes the findings of fact and conclusions
of law of the Board in this matter.
ORDER
IT IS THE ORDER OF THE POLLUTION CONTROL BOARD that Petitioner
Adella Vallerius be granted a variance from Rule 962(a) of Chapter 3:
Water Pollution, of this Board’s Rules and Regulations, to allow the
connection of the Sunset Inn complex, in Mt. Olive, Illinois, to the
Mt. Olive north sewage treatment plant by means of sewer extensions
and force mains, as described in the Petition herein, Such variance
grant is conditioned upon:
a. Said Sunset Inn complex shall not be expanded
until such
time as
the
Mt.
Olive north sewac;e
Lreatment
1)1~1r1t I:;
rcmmiuved I
rum Lhe inv
i
rounmeuLa
I
Pro!
(‘Ct
ion
/\;eney
‘:~
rest r
i
c
ted s
t
(1
tn:; I
I st
,
~W rsuami t I o 1~u
I
e
604 I Chaj ter ~
Waler Pollution;
b. Petitioner shall, within twenty-eight (28)
days of the date of this Order, execute, and forward to
the Environmental Protection Agency, Control Program
Coordinator, 2200 Churchill Road, Springfield, Illinois,
62706, a Certificate of Acceptance in the following form:
24
—
361
—4—
I, (We),
_______________
____
having read
the Order of the Illinois Pollution Control Board in
case No. PCB 76—243, understand and accept said Order,
realizing that such acceptance renders all terms and
conditions thereto binding and enforceable.
SIGNED
TITLE
DATE
I, Christan L. Moffett, Clerk
of the Illinois Pollution
Control Board, her~y certif the above Opinion and Order weçe
adopted on the ~ day of
1976, by a vote of $~.-O
Christan L. Moffet lerk
Illinois Pollution Control Board
24
—
362