ILLINOIS POLJIUTION CONTROL BOARD
    Octofler 28, 1976
    COMMONWEALTH EDISON COMPANY,
    )
    (LAKE
    SANGCHRIS),
    )
    Petitioner,
    v.
    )
    PCB 76—198
    ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY,
    Respondent.
    OPINION AND ORDER OF THE BOARD (by Mr. Zeitlin):
    This matter is before the Board on a Variance Petition filed
    by Commonwealth Edison Company (Edison) on July 27, 1976. That
    Petition seeks a Variance from Rule 203(1)
    (5)
    of Chapter 3: Water
    Pollution, allowing the hearing required under that Rule to be held
    prior to April 16, 1977. Ill. PCB Regs., Ch. 3, Rule 203 (1) (5) (1976).
    A Recommendation was filed by the Environmental Protection Agency
    (Agency) on September 8, 1976. No hearing was held in this matter.
    Edison’s Kincaid generating station, located in Christian
    County, Illinois, discharges heated effluent into Edison’s Lake
    Sangchris. The heated effluent from Kincaid station, and Lake
    Sangchris generally, have been discussed by this Board previously
    and need not again be described. Citizens fora Better Environment
    v. Commonwealth Edison Company, PCB 73—245, -248, 13 PCB 69 (1974);
    In The Matter of Water Quality Standards Revisions, Cooling Lakes,
    R75—2, 18 PCB 381 (Aug. 14, 1975), Opinion at 18 PCB 681 (Sept. 29,
    1975)
    Rule 203(i) (5) provides, in pertinent part:
    The
    owner
    of operator of a source oF cer~a in
    thermal discharges
    shall demonstrate
    iii
    a hearinq
    before this Board not less
    than 5
    years nor more than
    6 years after the effective date of these regulations
    that discharges
    from that source have not caused
    and cannot reasonably be expected to cause significant
    ecological damage to the receiving waters. (emphasis
    added.)
    Rule 203(1) (5) was adopted on March 7, 1972. In The Matter of Water
    Quality Standards Revisions, R71—14, 4 PCB 3, 12 (1972). Therefore,
    the hearing required under Rule 203(i) (5) cannot normally take place
    until April 16, 1977. Edison requests that it be allowed to seek
    that hearing now.
    24
    159

    —2—
    Edison
    ‘S
    Petition notes that the Board has presently pending
    before
    it a Regulatory Proposal for the establishment of a specific
    thermal standard for Lake Sanqchris.
    in The Matter of Water_Quality
    Standards_Revisions, Lake Sangchris, R II~rinç~ set for
    October 27, 1976)
    .
    Edison alleges that the testimony and data to
    be presented in R76-ll will, in substantial part, be identical to
    that needed for a showing under Rule 203 (i) (5). Edison claims that
    updating the matters to be presented in R76-ll for presentation
    under Rule 203(i) (5) only a few months later will be needlessly
    duplicative, wasteful, unduly expensive and will in light of the
    fact that no environmental harm will occur
    —-
    cause an arbitrary
    and unreasonable hardship on Edison. Edison alleges that, because
    Kincaid station has been in operation for approximately ten years,
    no useful purpose would be served by waiting for several additional
    months to hold the hearings required under Rule 203(i) (5).
    The Agency agrees in its Recommendation that a failure to grant
    the requested Variance would indeed cause an arbitrary and unreasonable
    hardship. We agree, and shall grant the Variance. See, Union Electric
    v. EPA, PCB 76—89,
    PCB
    (July 8, 1976).
    Edison’s Petitic~.~equests, as part of the relief ~o be granted,
    that the hearing to bc. held for Rule 203(1) (5) purposes under this
    Variance be concurrent to that to be held for R76—ll. The Agency
    also recommends that this relief be granted. The Board finds that
    such concurrent hearings would present procedural difficulties
    which
    need not be encountered. If it wishes, Edison may obtain essentially
    the same result through incorporation of the record in R76-ll, or
    any other prior record, in its showing under Rule 203(i) (5)
    This Opinion constitutes the findings of fact and conclusions
    of law of the Board in this
    mattet.
    ORDER
    IT IS THE ORDER OF THE
    POLI,UTTON
    CONTROL BOARD that Commonwealth
    Ed i Son Company ho (J
    ran (‘
    a var a r
    ~‘
    br i
    I
    Jal:
    ~
    nqc~ii
    i
    from the
    fi vu (5
    )
    yea r (Iu~ay pr I or 1 o
    hear I fl(J
    lii1((
    r
    hit
    ()
    3 ( I ) (5)
    01:
    Chdpbc?r 3
    Wa
    Ler ho
    Jut ion, oF
    I
    r i1oa rd
    Lu I e~:and
    hiiu a
    I
    i olr:
    I, Christan L. Moffett, Clerk of the Illinois Pollution
    Control Board, hereby certify the abpve~Final Opinion and Order
    were adopted on the ~ day of ~
    1976, by a vote of~O
    Christan L. Moffett’,,/ç4Jerk
    Illinois Pollution ~~trol Board
    24
    160

    Back to top