ILLINOIS POLLUTION CONTROL BOARD
    March 28, 1977
    DE SOTO, INC.,
    Petitioner,
    v.
    )
    PCB 76—257
    ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY, )
    Respondent.
    OPINION AND ORDER OF THE BOARD (by Mr. Zeitlin):
    This matter is before the Board on a Petition for Variance
    filed October 15, 1976, by Petitioner De Soto, Inc. (DeSoto), seeking
    Variance from Rule 702 of Chapter 3: Water Pollution, of the Board’s
    Rules and Regulations. PCB Regs., Ch. 3, Rule 702 (1976). The
    Environmental Protection Agency (Agency) filed its Recommendation
    on November 24, 1976. No hearing was held in this matter.
    DeSoto’s paint manufacturing plant in Chicago Heights has been
    the subject of two prior Variance cases. De Soto, Inc. v. EPA,
    PCB 75-277, 19 Ill. PCB 53 (1975) (Rehearing Denied, 19 Iii. PCB
    296). De Soto, Inc. v. EPA, PCB 75—449, 19 Iii PCB 781 (1976).
    The nature and extent of DeSoto’s operations are detailed in those
    cases and need not be repeated here. It is sufficient to note that
    DeSoto used phenyl mercurial preservatives in its latex paint prior
    to 1973, and again briefly in 1975.
    In the more recent of the previous Variance cases, DeSoto was
    granted relief from the 0.0005 mg/i limitations on mercury discharges
    to sewers for a period ending October 16, 1976. Through a gradual
    process of dilution, the mercury remaining in its wastewater treat-
    ment lagoons was to have been discharged over the Variance period
    until compliance was attained.
    However, DeSoto found in September and October of 1976 that
    the levels of mercury compound in its treatment lagoons (and there-
    fore in its discharges) was actually increasing. DeSoto determined
    that, as a result of extremely dry weather during the summer of
    1976 and resulting low water levels in the lagoons, the floating
    aerators in the lagoons were causing the resuspension or solution
    of mercury compounds previously trapped in sludge at the bottom of
    those lagoons.
    25
    201

    —2—
    To correct this problem, DeSoto proposed to sequentially dry
    and dredge each of five lagoons in its wastewater treatment system.
    DeSoto estimated that this would take approximately 62 working days,
    after which mercury levels would gradually decrease to compliance
    with the 1/2 ppb level required by Rule 702. DeSoto also anticipated
    that, because of poor winter weather and the several holidays during
    the work period, an additional two to three weeks would be required
    to complete the necessary dredging. After that work was completed,
    the remaining mercury in the various lagoons would be discharged
    gradually in a manner similar to that required in PCB 75-449.
    DeSoto estimated that during the first 18 weeks of the Variance
    period, mercury levels might reach 20 ppb, with levels during the
    next 10 weeks as high as 15 ppb. Compliance was to have been reached
    by October 1, 1977.
    Before the Board could enter a decision on those facts, however,
    DeSoto filed a Motion on December 10, 1977, asking that the entry
    of a final Opinion and Order in this matter be deferred. DeSoto
    stated that the information submitted to the Board in the Oct. 15, 1977
    Petition contained significant errors as to mercury concentrations.
    DeSoto had found that a reagent used in its laboratory for mercury
    analysis actually contained mercury itself, so that all prior analyses
    were incorrect by up to 12 ppb. In an Interim Order entered Dec. 16,
    1977, the Board granted DeSoto eight weeks for further analysis and
    the submission of additional documents.
    DeSoto filed a “Response to Recommendation” on February 10, 1977,
    to which the Agency replied on March 24, 1977. During the interim,
    DeSoto proceeded with the dredging program outlined above, and
    reanalyzed the concentration of mercury in its wastewater system.
    It is now apparent that DeSoto’s mercury problem is not as great as
    previously estimated, although some mercury does remain. DeSoto
    has adjusted the Variance request to reflect this change, and now
    seeks permission to discharge 3 ppb to the Bloom Township sewers
    initially, with gradual decrease until the .5 ppb standard is
    achieved in September 1977.
    The Board has previously found that DeSoto’s effluent has
    little or no effect on the final effluent of the Bloom Township
    Sanitary District; DeSoto contributes less than 1 percent of the
    District’s total flow. In addition, the Agency’s Recommendation
    notes that no mercury has been detected in tests of that Sanitary
    District’s effluent.
    In light of these facts, and DeSoto’s continuing good faith
    efforts to eliminate its mercury discharges (in addition to $400,000
    spent on research and study of non—mercurial biocides, and a $100,000
    cost of the dredging required under DeSoto’s compliance plan), we
    feel that a Variance is warranted. As noted in PCB 75—449, we agree
    with DeSoto and the Agency that mercury removal at the levels indicated
    is impractical.
    25
    202

    —3.—
    Because of the greatly decreased concentrations of mercury to
    be discharged during the Variance, we shall release DeSoto from the
    strict monitoring and reporting requirements which were present in
    the prior Variance. A standard Certificate of Acceptance shall be
    required.
    This Opinion constitutes the findings of fact and conclusions
    of law of the Board in this matter.
    ORDER
    IT IS THE ORDER OF THE POLLUTION CONTROL BOARD that:
    1. Petitioner De Soto, Inc., be granted a Variance from
    Rule 702 of Chapter 3: Water Pollution, from October 16, 1976 until
    October 1, 1977, subject to the following conditions:
    a. The average concentrations of mercury in DeSoto’s
    final effluent shall not exceed the following levels:
    Through May 31, 1977
    3 ppb
    June 1, 1977
    July 31, 1977
    2 ppb
    July 31, 1977
    Sept. 30, 1977
    1 ppb
    October 1, 1977
    0.5 ppb
    2. Within thirty (30) days of the date of this Order, Peti-
    tioner shall execute and forward to the Environmental Protection
    Agency, Control Program Coordinator, 2200 Churchill Road, Springfield,
    Illinois 62706, a Certificate of Acceptance in the following form:
    I, (We), ____________________________ having read
    the Order of the Illinois Pollution Control Board in
    case No. PCB 76-257, understand and accept said Order,
    realizing that such acceptance renders all terms and
    conditions thereto binding and enforceable.
    SIGNED
    TITLE
    DATE
    25
    203

    —4—
    I, Christan L. Moffett, Clerk of the Illinois Pollution
    Control Board, hereby certify the a1bove Opinion and Order weçe
    adopted on the
    ~
    day of
    /)‘7444i~
    ,
    1977, by a vote of
    5-.~
    Christan L.
    Mof±~~t,
    Clerk
    Illinois Pollution Control Board
    25
    204

    Back to top