ILLINOIS POLLUTION CONTROL BOARD
    May 20, 1976
    ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY,
    Complainant,
    V.
    )
    PCB 75—437
    ELGIN SALVAGE & SUPPLY CO., INC.,
    Respondent.
    OPINION AND ORDER OF THE BOARD (by Mr. Zeitlin):
    This matter is before the Board on a Complaint filed by the
    Environmental Protection Agency (Agency) on November 10, 1975,
    alleging that Respondent Elgin Salvage
    &
    Supply Co., Inc. (Elgin)
    operated both existing and new emission sources without operating
    permits from the Agency, in violation of §9(b) of the Environmental
    Protection Act (Act) and Rules 103(b) (1) and 103(b) (2) of Chapter 2:
    Air Pollution, of the Pollution Control Board Rules and Regulations.
    Ill. Rev. Stat., Ch. 111—1/2, §1009(b) (1975); PCB Regs., Ch. 2,
    Rules 103 (b) (1)
    ,
    103 (b) (2) (1972)
    A hearing was held on January 9, 1976 in the City of Elgin,
    Illinois, at which time the parties stated their intent to file a
    Stipulation and Proposal for Settlement (Stipulation). The Stipu-
    lation was filed February 9, 1976, but was rejected by the Board in
    an Interim Order entered April 8, 1976. Communications filed by
    the Agency on April 16, 1976 and by Elgin on May 3, 1976 resolved
    the problems in the Stipulation, which forms the basis for this
    Opinion and Order.
    Elgin has operated its facility for the purchase and sale of
    industrial iron and steel, and metal salvage, in the City of Elgin
    since 1933. Among its operations Elgin has an incinerator for the
    reclamation of copper wire by burning off the insulation. This
    “wire reclaimer and incinerator” was installed in 1971 under an
    Agency construction permit. Although various correspondence on the
    subject was exchanged between Elgin and the Agency, (Stip. Ex. 1-7),
    Elgin did not apply for an operating permit until July 14, 1975.
    That application was rejected as insufficient on July 25, 1975,
    (Stip. Ex. 8).
    Elgin now stipulates to violation of §9(b) of the Act and Rule
    103(b) (2) of Chapter 2: Air Pollution and, by way of settlement,
    has agreed to install a new model incinerator at a cost of $3,000,
    and to pay a civil penalty of $2,000. We find this Stipulation
    acceptable as an adequate aid to the enforcement of the Act. The
    terms of settlement under which Elgin is purchasing and installing
    new equipment acceptable to the Agency, and will pay a penalty,
    adequately protect the integrity of the permit system.
    21 —429

    —2—
    The Stipulation does not, however, address the allegation in
    the Complaint that Elgin also violated Rule 103(b) (1) of Chapter 2:
    Air Pollution, by operating a “refuse incinerator” constituting a
    new emission source. That allegation shall therefore be dismissed.
    This Opinion constitutes the findings of fact and conclusions
    of law of the Board in this matter.
    ORDER
    IT IS THE ORDER OF THE POLLUTION CONTROL BOARD that:
    1. Respondent Elgin Salvage & Supply Co.,
    Inc. is found to have operated its wire reclaimer
    and incinerator without an operating permit from the
    Agency from December 1, 1972 until November 10, 1975,
    in violation of Section 9(b) of the Environmental
    Protection Act and Rule 103(b)
    (2)
    of Chapter
    2:
    Air
    Pollution, of the Pollution Control Board Rules and
    Regulations.
    2. Respondent shall pay as a penalty for the
    above violations the sum of Two Thousand Dollars
    ($2,000), payment to be made within thirty—five (35)
    days of the date of this Order to:
    State of Illinois
    Environmental Protection Agency
    Division of Air Pollution Control
    Control Program Coordinator
    2200 Churchill Road
    Springfield, Illinois 62706
    3. Respondent shall, upon installation of its
    new incinerator or within 120 days of the date of this
    Order, whichever is sooner, file for an operating permit
    with the Environmental Protection Agency, and shall in
    all other ways comply with Paragraph B of the Terms of
    Settlement of the Stipulation and Proposal for Settlement
    submitted by the parties in this action.
    4. Allegations in paragraphs 9 and 10 of the
    Complaint in this matter of violation of Rule 103(b) (1)
    of Chapter 2: Air Pollution, are dismissed.
    21—430

    —3—
    I, Christan L. Moffett, Clerk of the Illinois Pollution
    Control Board, her~bycertify the above Opinion and Order weçe
    adopted on the
    ~p
    ~ day of
    ,
    1976, by a vote of ~
    Illinois Pollution
    rol Board
    21—431

    Back to top