1. 17—430A

Zj.LZNOIS PuLLLflIDN CONTROL
aaicc.
June
26, 1975
Z~1
-ILLINOIS GAS AND ELECTRIC
)
)
Petitioner,
V.
)
PCB 75—150
N’s
.i4OM’41flAZ.
PROTECTION
s...opOnuut
t.
i~’t_’,WtiN~
on~io~:(by
Mr. Dumelle):
rt
ia
this
cease follows the reasons advanced by me
-
iv d. o
aaaj
Opinion
in She”J. Oil Co;pa~y~ Environmental
___
io
J’1~j.~,
PCB 7590, Muy 22, l9~S
11.. 1
.
e
:‘~hed” affected by tite .Dulfur dioxide emissions
.
—-
i’.o~Ct&.. and Electnc Coinprny may be the Mettopolitan
)‘‘
‘i
. ‘.
1
c:
;~-it
Mr flualaty Conti.ol. Region. This AQCR ‘was
- ‘n
a~,
ti.c
?~~ccrzàgovernmeLlt effective December 8, 1970.
.t
n..L
t -n ~
Z~LJ.3.oic counc~ec~of Carroll, Henry, Mercer, Rock
-
‘1
-
s
:ossdc 4~.ndthe Iowa counties of Clinton, Louisa,
I --c ~..a .4ncz
.~cott.
;~
&Ct.I .‘oitcj’
itself ha& presented no cdr quality data in
cc
.
-re gavcJ
OTly
a conclusory statement (Pet.p.lO). The
u.
-_
;~
j
: ty o~inicnfinds that the U.S. Supreme Court require—
~- .‘
.L
~L
in Pr’ n v.
NROC,
April 16, 1975, are met in this
-
q’~~tityd’u~afrom a sinc’ie monitoring station located
sr~
,,: Cn~
tno Jubject facility.
--
t
tx.ô
if
ths~single measuring station is upwind or
,,C~
~
t.nai
cv~.i.a-yo using wind directions) from the
~‘a ‘*
S:
‘ii.
caso the Board at least had data from not one,
-
•~.
1Th~ataons
in
the vicinity of the source. My
— ..-
4.
to thc background contribution of that dis-
.~‘ -*
r. a:tj violations of Federal air standards.
-
-
it Ct. sulfur
dioxide
air standards are being
a
s.~’~aLtC
n
tlao asae counties listed. As a minimum, data
17—430A

\~11
eb s~
j
ast across ~hc hiSs1SsiiJ~
should
7
j5itt~ ~
~‘iOQaJ line or
ifiUS:LoIi
deta deunwind from the
- 7
~LC
PJVL
d±-~U
~)e7
sU~mutted since we have no
s ow c~
an 1h r~coru of the stack
heights
at this location.
~nd
t
1
~roçei
c1i~
bCuu
argument, we are left with nothing
• co~e to deeci
I
be the uphysical
rehed” of the Quad—Cl ties
Latee in sh~i 1, a r~ver—tased region can experience
C cc
~‘
(1
pci~ ~ioa clung a valley because of bluffs which act
gu~c
wuli~
for wsnds.
~ iy~ Lii~ altcrnet~’~cs
0r
(a) seil~ng the 0.5
sulfur oil
~t with ie~cmhan
0,27~
sulfur oil to consume it in
~o ~i ~i
‘IiC~
tO t~ rccJu~ation, were not explored.
~ ~ai~ ~ imie Variance without prejudice and the
oc~d hc~c later presenLed information on the points
C
e’~
a
the
:
naic Pollution Control
Fy c~ above ~i seen
mj U~inion was submitted on
~
,
l97b
~e
I~
~
C~is~an L. Moftett, C~r~
Illinois
Pollution Control Board
17
430 B

Back to top