ILLINOIS POLLUTION CONTROL B02\RD
    March 25, 1976
    LEWIS UNIVERSITY,
    Petitioner,
    v.
    )
    PCB 75—504
    ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY,
    )
    Respondent.
    OPINION AND ORDER OF THE BOARD (by Mr. Zeitlin):
    The matter before us here is the third Variance Petition
    concerning a sewage treatment plant operated by Petitioner Lewis
    University, a private university in Will County, Illinois. In
    the instant case Lewis University asks that the
    relief granted
    in PCB 74—478, 16 PCB 137 (March 13, 1975), from the requirements
    of Rule 404(f) of the Board’s Water Pollution Regulations (BOD and
    Suspended Solids) be extended until December 31, 1976. (The
    University’s previous Variance expired on December 31, 1975.)
    PCB
    Regs., Ch. 3: Water Pollution, Rule 404(f) (1972). No hearing was
    held in this matter; a Recommendation from the Environmental
    Protection Agency (Agency) was received on February 9, 1976.
    Lewis University’s first Variance Petition was filed on
    November 8, 1973. In that case, PCB 73—475, 11 PCB 105 (Jan. 31,
    1974), the Board found that it would indeed be a hardship to require
    that Lewis University upgrade its sewage treatment plant to provide
    tertiaryand
    5 mg/itreatmentsuspendedso solidsthat
    itrequirementscould meet theof
    Ruleapplicable404 (f).
    4 mg/i(The BOD5
    operations, capacity and performance of the University’s sewage
    treatment plant are fully described in PCB 73—475 and PCB 74—478,
    and need not be reiterated here.) Based on that finding, the Board
    approved the University’s plan to disannex from the City of Lockport,
    which was allegedly unable to provide sewage treatment for the
    University, and to annex to the Village of Romeoville, which had
    agreed to provide such treatment if annexation could be accomplished.
    The University’s suit against Lockport for disannexation was at that
    time pending in the Circuit Court. The Variance in PCB 73-475 was
    granted until December 31, 1974, with the expectation that the dis-
    annexation suit would be settled expeditiously.
    20 —409

    —2—
    In its Petition in PCB 74—478, Lewis University asked for further
    extension of its variance based on delays in trial court adjudication
    of its disannexation from Lockport. The Board again found the
    University’s hardship, when balanced against the relatively good
    performance of its sewage treatment plant, to be sufficient for the
    grant of a Variance, this time until December 31, 1975.
    In the instant Petition (PCB 75-504) Lewis University noted that
    the Circuit Court of Will County had allowed the University’s dis-
    annexation petition on April 3, 1975. However, the City of Lockport
    had appealed to the Appellate Court (3rd District); that appeal was
    denied on September 9, 1975. Lockport’s Petition for Rehearing was
    also denied by the Appellate Court on October 7, 1975. Subsequently,
    the City of Lockport filed a Petition for Leave to Appeal with the
    Supreme Court of Illinois.
    The Agency Recommendation in this matter, received Feb. 9, 1976,
    again supports a further grant of the University’s variance, until
    December 31, 1976. As conditions to such a grant, the Agency asked
    that the Board require that Lewis University retain a properly certified
    operator for its treatment plant, for so long as the plant remains
    functional and, as in the prior cases, that the University be required
    to make all reasonable effort to further reduce concentrations of BOD
    and suspended solids in its effluent. The Agency also asked for conditi
    requiring early connection of the University to the Village of Rorneovi1.~,
    should the University’s disannexation suit prevail in the Supreme Court,
    or the immediate upgrading of its sewage treatment plant, should its
    suit not prevail.
    These last conditions, as suggested in the Agency Recommendation,
    are no longer applicable. We take notice of the fact that the Illinois
    Supreme Court has denied the City of Lockport’s Petition for Leave to
    Appeal. Lewis University, et. al v. City of Lockport, Docket No. 47994
    (January 23, 1976).
    The hardship found in the two earlier Opinions remain. The
    University’s compliance plan now appears to be finally ready for
    immediate implementation. The Agency Recommendation notes that Lewis
    University has, as required in the previous cases, made every reasonable
    effort under the preceding variances to reduce the BOIJ and suspended
    solids concentration in its effluent. It had additionally made the
    reports required under those variances. In addition, for the months
    of April through December, 1975, the University’s average BOD5 and
    suspended solids concentrations were 12 and 10 mg/i respectively
    (Rec., p.5).
    20_ 410

    —3—
    Balancing this performance of the University’s sewage treatment
    plant against the continuing hardship, in light of an acceptable
    compliance plan, we shall again grant the requested Variance. The
    Order will reflect our expectation that the University will immediately
    commence implementation of its compliance plan, and that this matter
    may thus be resolved without further need of Variance relief.
    This Opinion constitutes the findings of fact and conclusions of
    law of the Board in this matter.
    ORDER
    IT IS THE ORDER OF THE POLLUTION CONTROL BOARD that Lewis
    University be granted a Variance from Rule 404(f) of Chapter 3: ~1ater
    Pollution, of the Pollution Control Board’s Rules and Regulations for
    the period December 31, 1975 to and including December 31, 1976, subject
    to the following conditions:
    1. Petitioner shall retain a properly certified
    treatment plant operator for its sewage treatment plant
    for so long as such plant remains functional.
    2. Petitioner shall continue to make all reasonable
    efforts to reduce the concentrations of BOD~and suspended
    solids in the effluent from its sewage treatment plant.
    3. Petitioner shall, within ninety (90) days of
    the date of this Order, apply to the Illinois Environmental
    Protection Agency for all permits necessary for the
    construction of any facilities needed to connect its
    present sewage system to the facilities of the Village
    of Rorneoville.
    4. Petitioner shall commence construction of
    all facilities necessary for the connection of its
    present sewage system to the facilities of the Village
    of Romeoville, under appropriate Agency permits, within
    one hundred eighty (180) days of the date of this Order.
    Nr. James Young abstained.
    I, Christan L. Moffett, Clerk of the Illinois Pollution
    Control Board, her~JD~certify the ove Opinion and Order were
    adopted on the ~ day of
    I)’)
    ,
    1976, by a vote of
    ~3-o
    C ristan L. o ett, er
    Illinois Pollution trol Board
    20
    411

    Back to top