ILLINOIS POLLUTION CONTROL BOARD
    December 19, 1974
    VILLAGE OF ADDISON,
    Petitioner,
    vs.
    )
    PCB 74-288
    ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY,
    Respondent.
    )
    OPINION AND ORDER OF THE BOARD (by Mr. Duaielle):
    This is a Petition for a Variance filed by the Village of Addison
    (hereinafter Addison) with the Environmental Protection Agency (here-
    inafter Agency) on July 29, 1974.
    On August 15, 1974, the Board found the petition to be inadequate
    in that it did not address the issue of environmental impact of the
    discharge on Salt Creek. On September 4, 1974, the Agency received
    Petitioner’s amended petition.
    Petitioner seeks a variance from certain rules of Chapter 3:
    Water Pollution Regulations of Illinois (hereinafter Chapter 3) to
    continue operation of the existing wastewater treatment facilities at
    the South Plant in Addison until the proposed improvements can be
    designed, constructed, and placed into service. The Agency interprets
    the petition as requesting a variance from Rule 2O3(d’)., 203(f), 203(g),
    and 4O4(c)(ii) of Chapter 3, Water Pollution Regulations.
    Addison’s South Sewage Treatment Plant consists of two plants
    operating in parallel. The first plant is a high-rate trickling filter
    plant and the second is an activated sludge plant. The effluent is
    presently passed through tertiary filters and discharged through a
    comon pipe. Total plant effluent presently meets the current BOD
    and suspended solids standards of 20/25 mg/i but will be unable to meet
    the 10/12 mg/i standard of Rule 404(c)(ii) upon the effective date
    of December 31, 1974. The Agency calculated the low flow of Salt Creek
    to be 6.2 MGD using the discharges of the sewage treatment plants into
    Salt Creek above the Addison South Plant. Using the design average
    flow of the South Plant of 2.1 MGD the dilution ratio is about 3 to 1.
    Listed below are BOD and suspended solids concentrations as reported
    by Petitioner in its monthly operational reports to the Agency.
    14
    719

    -2-
    DATE
    BOD
    July 1973
    16
    11
    August 1973
    14
    10
    September 1973
    16
    12
    October 1973
    20
    November 1973
    15
    1
    December 1973
    11
    9
    January 1974
    13
    10
    February 1974
    16
    9
    March 1974
    12
    12
    April 1974
    12
    7
    May 1974
    12
    11
    June 1974
    11
    July 1974
    31
    15
    The subject plant has been designated as a regional wastewater
    treatment facility. A 2.0 MGD expansion has been proposed for the
    activated sludge process with the elimination of the trickling
    filter operation. Petitioner believes that the proposed improvements
    should produce an effluent conforming to the standards of Rule 404(c)
    (ii).
    The Step 1 grant priority for this project is #40. Petitioner
    alleges that the Village would suffer an unreasonable hardship if
    required to meet the December 31, 1974 deadline since it would have
    to relinquish its grant for Federal assistance. The estimated cost
    for the upgrading project is $5,281,500.
    The impact of the Addison South Sewage Treatment Plant on Salt
    Creek is difficult to assess.. Nine treatment plants discharging
    above Addison South Sewage Treatment Plant have a total dry weather
    flow of 6.23 MGD. There are five more discharges with a combined dry
    weather flow of 9.73 MGD below the plant.
    The following Agency data indicate that the stream below Addison
    is of lesser quality than upstream for the parameters of dissolved
    oxygen, ammonia, and fecal coliform.
    1973
    ABOVE ADDISON
    BELOW ADDISON
    LOCATION:
    IRVING PARK RD. RR. AT WOOD DALE
    ST CHARLES RD. RR. AT VILLA PARK
    AMMONIA
    AMMONIA
    PARAMETER
    D.O.
    FECAL COLI.
    AS N.
    D.O.
    FECAL COLI.
    AS N.
    # of Analysis
    9
    9
    9
    11
    11
    11
    Max. Value
    11.9
    30000
    1.80
    10.4
    880000
    4.10
    Mm. Value
    4.0
    10
    .13
    1.5
    100
    .37
    Mean
    7.5
    389
    .64
    5.7
    4939
    1.37
    Median
    7.7
    500
    .44
    6.0
    3700
    .90
    Criterion
    5.0
    200
    1.50
    5.0
    200
    1.50
    14
    — 720

    -3-
    1972
    ABOVE ADDISON
    BELOW ADDISON
    LOCATION
    IRVING PARK RD.
    RR. AT WOOD DALE
    ST. CHARLES RD. RR. AT VILLA PARK
    AMMONIA
    AMMONIA
    PARAMETER
    D.O.
    FECAL COLI.
    AS N.
    D.O.
    FECAL COLI.
    AS N.
    # of Analysis
    4
    2
    3
    3
    3
    4
    Max. Value
    10.0
    400
    .70
    10.0
    16000
    2.30
    Mm. Value
    7.5
    200
    .20
    7.5
    100
    .20
    Mean
    8.6
    199
    .40
    8.5
    2519
    .89
    Median
    8.5
    250
    .30
    8.0
    10000
    .53
    Criterion
    5.0
    200
    1.50
    5.0
    200
    1.50
    It is clear from the above that Petitionerts effluent diminishes
    water quality and results in apparent violation of Rules 203(d),
    203(f) (Ammonia Nitrogen), and 203(g). The Agency believes that the
    operation and maintenance of the Addison South Sewage Treatment Plant
    and other sewage dischargers to Salt Creek must be continued and
    optimized to produce the best effluent possible from existing
    facilities to prevent critical stream degradation until upgraded
    treatment facilities are in operation.
    The Agency believes that it will be at least 1 1/2 to 2 years
    before construction can begin on the addition to Plant No. 2 and may
    take even longer depending on design approval and grant priority.
    Thus, in the event the requested variance is~granted, renewal will
    apparently be required.
    Balanced against the adverse environmental harm described above,
    we must weigh the hardship to Petitioner in the event the variance
    is denied and must consider the explanations or justifications for
    the delay in compliance. In the event Petitioner proceeded with
    upgrading, the possibility of grant assistance would be eJimi~ated.
    Requiring the ‘Village to bear the total cost in excess of $5 million
    would impose an extreme financial burden on the municipality and
    its taxpayers.
    The Agency has recommended a grant of the Variancewith certain
    conditions and we agree.
    This Opinion constitutes the findings of fact and conclusions of
    law of the Board.
    IT IS THE ORDER of the Pollution Control Board that:
    1. A Variance from Rules 203(d), 203(f) (Ammonia Nitrogen),
    and Rule 203(g) of the Water Pollution Regulations be granted
    for a period of one year;
    14
    721

    -4-
    2. That a Variance from Rule 404(c)(ii) be granted fora period
    from December 31, 1974 until one year from the date of the Board
    Order in this matter; and
    3. That the above Variances be granted subject to the
    following conditions during the term of the variances:
    i. That Petitioner not increase the strength
    or quantity of contaminants discharged;
    ii. That plant BOO and suspended solids concentrations
    at no time exceed 20/25 mg/i.
    I, Christan L. Moffett, Clerk of the Illinois Pollution Control
    Board, hereby certify the above Opinion and Order were adopted was on
    /71*
    day of December, 1974 by a vote of
    1/
    Christan L. Moffett, Cler
    Illinois Pollution Control Board
    14—722

    Back to top