ILLINOIS POLLUTION CONTROL BOARD
January 23, 1975
MASONITE CORPORATION,
Petitioner,
v.
)
PCB 74—365
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY,
Respondent,
OPINION AND ORDER OF THE BOARD (by Mr. Dumelle):
Masonite Corporation (Masonite) filed a variance petition
on October 10, 1974 which sought an extension of a previously
granted variance from the fluoride effluent standard found
in Rule 408(a) of the Water Pollution Regulations. The
Illinois Environmental Protection Agency (Agency) filed a
recommendation to grant the requested variance on November
18, 1974. A hearing was held on December 3, 1974.
Masonite operates the Illinois Research and Development
Center located in St. Charles. At this research center,
Masonite carries out limited electroplating operations which
utilize hydrofluoric acid. Masonite has spent approximately
$200,000 in an attempt to bring its industrial discharge
into compliance with both the nickel and fluoride effluent
limitations found in the Water Pollution Regulations.
Masonite operates an industrial waste treatment system which
reduces the nickel concentrations to acceptable limits and
reduces fluoride levels to approximately 8 to 18 mg/l. The
effluent from this industrial waste facility is combined
with domestic waste. This combined waste stream is then
treated in an activated sewage treatment facility. This
activated waste treatment facility was supposed to achieve
a fluoride effluent within the 2.5 mg/l prescribed level of
Rule 408 (a). However, this discharge averages approximately
6.5 mg/i of fluoride. For this reason Masonite has requested
the present variance.
Masonite discharges into Kress Creek, which is a tributary
to the west branch of the Des Plaines River. Because of
discharges from Owens—Illinois plant, located adjacent to
Masonite, Kress Creek presently affords a minimum of 60 to 1
dilution, The fluoride concentration present downstream
from Masonite’s discharge averages 0.2 ppm. The Agency
calculates if a dilution of only 20 to 1 were present
15— 311
that Masonite’s effluent would not cause the fluoride level
in the stream to exceed 1.0 ppm. For this reason, the
Agency agrees with petitioner that Masonite’s discharge
presents a minimal environmental impact.
Masonite was granted a six month variance in the prior
variance proceeding to enable Masonite to examine additional
methods of achieving compliance with Rule 408(a) with respect
to fluoride (Masonite
v.
EPA, PCB 74-211, 13 PCB
229
(July
25, 1974)). Since the granting of the previous variance,
Masonite has spent approximately $12,000 examining methods
of achieving compliance with the existing fluoride effluent
limitations. This has consisted of literature research
reviews and both bench and pilot scale testing of various
treatment systems. Masonite alleges that their research has
indicated that the use of activated alumina is currently the
most promising method to reduce their fluoride discharges.
Masonite alleges that there does not exist technology at
present which would achieve compliance with the 2.5 mg/i
effluent limitation. For this reason Masonite requests an
extension of the previously granted variance while it continues
testing of the activated alumina program and additional
~Literature research. The Agency agrees with Masonite and
tecommends the grant of the requested relief.
Both Masonite and the Agency refer to the pending
regulatory proceeding before the Board which proposes a
modification of both the water quality and effluent standard
for fluoride, R 73-15. On January 16, 1975 the Board authorized
for publication and final comment an amendment to Rule
408(a) which would set a new maximum effluent limitation of
15 mg/l for fluoride. However, the existing effluent standard
for fluoride is 2.5 mg/i. Because of the minimal impact of
Masonite’s discharge and the pendency of the proposed amendment
to Rule 408(a) the Board has decided to grant an extension
of the previously granted variance.
This Opinion constitutes the Board’s findings of fact
and conclusions of law.
ORDER
The Pollution Control Board hereby grants Masonite
Corporation a variance from Rule 408(a) of the Water Pollution
Regulations until January 23, 1976 or until the Board’s pending
amendment of Rule 408(a) is enacted, whichever occur earlier,
subject to the following conditions:
15—312
1. Masonite’s discharge shall not exceed a maximum of
12 mg/i of fluoride~unlessa greater number is adopted by the
Board in R73-l5.
2. Masonite shall submit monthly progress reports to
the Environmental Protection Agency stating its efforts and
results in limiting fluoride discharges.
IT IS SO ORDERED,
I, Christan L, Moffett, Clerk of the Illinois Pollution
Control Board, hereby certify the above Opinion and Order
were adopted on the
~
day of January, 1975 by a vote of
Christan L. Moffett, erk
Illinois Pollution trol Board