ILLINOIS POLLUTION CONTROL BOARD
    December 13, 1973
    SOUTHERN ILLINOIS POWER
    COMPANY
    PETITIONER
    v.
    )
    PCB 73—436
    ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
    RESPONDENT
    CIIARLES
    0. WINTERS, ~TTORNEY, in behalf of SOUTHERN ILLINOIS POWER
    COMP ANY
    LARRY EATON, ASSISTANT ATTORNEY GENERAL, in behalf of the ENVIRON-
    MENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
    OPINION AND ORDER OF THE BOARD (by Mr. Marder)
    This action involves a request for a variance extension by
    Southern Illinois Power
    Company. Relief is
    sought from Rule 2-2.53
    of the Rules and Regulations Governing the Control of Air Pollution
    and Rule 203 of the Air Pollution Control Regulations, to allow im-
    plementation of a compliance program J~y April 1975.
    Southern Illinois Power Company owns and operates a power gen-
    erating station in Williamson County, Illinois. As was stated in
    our previous opinion, Southern Illinois Power Company generates ap-
    proximately 100 megawatts of power by the burning of coal to generate
    steam for its steam turbines. The plant consists of three 33-NW un-
    its, each fired by double seven-foot radial cyclone burners equipped
    with multiple-cyclone dust collectors. Two boilers exhaust into one
    stack and a third exhausts into a separate stack. Previous testing
    (1971) has shown emissions to be in the order of 0.67#/MBTU.
    On February 6, 1973, Petitioner was granted a one—year variance
    to the abovementioned rules (PCB 72-238)
    .
    The Board fully expected
    an extension to be necessary, as the compliance program presented
    essentially ran into 1975. The plan of action calls for the install-
    ation of three electrostatic precipitators of a 96 efficiency rating.
    This would bring emissions down to 0.04#/MBTU at a cost of some
    $2,000,000. This plan will meet the requirements of Rule 203 (9).
    The following compliance project completion schedule was submitted
    in PCB 72—238.
    10—
    363

    —2—
    Start design
    May 1972
    Start erection of first May 1973
    Precipitator
    Startup of first Pre-
    April 1974
    cipitator
    Startup of second Pre- October 1974
    cipitator
    Startup of third Pre-
    April 1975
    cipitator
    Upon investigation by the Environmental Protection Agency, it was
    found that even though some delays were encountered with regard to
    steel delivery, the plan is still on schedule.
    The Order of the Board in PCB 72-238 read as follows:
    1. That SIPC be granted a variance from the provisions of Rule
    2—2.53 of the Rules and Regulations Governing the Control
    of Air Pollution and Rule 203 of the Air Pollution Control
    Regulations until January 30, 1974, in order to install
    three electrostatic precipitators on its coal-fired boil-
    ers, subject to a construction program which will bring
    all facilities into compliance by April of 1975. Any
    extension of this variance shall be by further petition and
    hearing and a demonstration on the part of SIPC that it is
    pursuing the program of installation as outlined herein.
    2. Bond in the amount of $500,000, in form satisfactory to
    the Agency, shall be posted to assure compliance as to
    the installation of the three electrostatic precipitators
    as proposed by SIPC. Payment provision shall be made for
    forfeiture in the amount of $10,000 in the event SIPC is
    not in compliance with the relevant regulations by April
    30, 1975. Bond shall be filed with the Environmental Pro-
    tection Agency, Fiscal Services Division, 2200 Churchill
    Drive, Springfield, Illinois 62706, within thirty days
    from the date thereof.
    3. SIPC shall pursue the ash and dust control program as de-
    tailed in letter of December 7, 1972, addressed to the
    Board and subject to the following terms and conditions:
    (a) With respect to the coal yard, SIPC shall continue
    its present policy of fugitive dust abatement and speci-
    fically:
    (i) In times of high wind velocity (greater than
    20 MPH) in a direction to cause fugitive emissions,
    coal handling shall be stopped except for the fill-
    ing of coal bunkers.
    (ii)
    All roadways and paths of travel of coal
    handling equipment shall be regularly
    sprinkled
    with a water tank truck to prevent dusting.
    (b) SIPC
    shall undertake whatever other measures are nec—
    10
    ~64

    —3—
    essary to insure that its coal handling facilities
    are operated in compliance with Rule 203 (f).
    (c) With respect to the ash control program, all fly ash
    shall be sluiced to Pond #1. Fly ash shall be con-
    strued as all particulate matter, generated as the
    result of fuel combustion, that is separated from a
    combustion gas stream by an air pollution control
    device.
    (d) Water content of Pond #1 shall be maintained at a
    sufficient level to keep all collected fly ash from
    becoming airborne.
    Ce) No material collected in Pond #1 shall be removed to
    any other area except with written permission from
    the Agency, and subject to conditions the Agency may
    impose to insure compliance with the Act and Board
    regulations.
    (f) All materials now deposited in ash storage Pond #1
    before implementation of (c) above, shall be removed,
    leveled, and covered with vegetation in such a manner
    so as to prevent blowing of particulate matter.
    (g) That SIPC undertake whatever other measures are nec-
    essary to insure that its ash storage area is oper-
    ated in compliance with Rule 203 (f).
    The Agency has found, through investigation, on October 9, 1973,
    that Petitioner has been carrying out the Board order diligently
    and in good faith. Paragraph (g) of the above Order required Petit-
    ioner to take whatever other steps it could to bring its ash storage
    pile into compliance with Rule 203 (f). Plans now call for Petition-
    er to seal its ash pile. The Board’s Order will require this step.
    Residents of the area were interviewed by the Agency in an attempt
    to judge the impact this variance has on them. Although these people
    reported that at times fugitive dust was a problem, no one objected
    to the continuance of the variance.
    This Opinion constitutes the findings of fact and conclusions of
    law of the Board.
    ORDER
    IT IS THE ORDER of the Pollution Control Board:
    1. That Southern Illinois Power Company be granted a variance ex-
    tension of one year, beginning on January 31, 1974, and ending
    on January 30, 1975. Said variance shall be from Rule 2-2.53 and
    Rule 203 (g)
    10
    365

    —4
    2. Any request for re—extension of this variance shall be by
    petition filed no later than 90 days before termination of this var-
    iance grant.
    3. All applicable conditions imposed by Board Order PCB 72—238
    shall remain in full force and effect.
    4. Petitioner shall by 30 days from the date of this order seal
    its ash pile so as to reduce the possibility of fugitive particulate
    emissions.
    IT IS SO ORDERED.
    I, Christan L. Moffett, Clerk of the Illinois Pollution Control
    Board, certify
    th~ the above 0 inion and Order was adopted by th
    Board on the
    /~.3
    ~
    day of
    ____________,
    1973, by a vote of
    ____
    to
    ~
    .
    10
    *
    366

    Back to top