ILLINOIS POLLUTION CONTROL BOARD
November 29, 1973
)
)
CARLINVILLE COMMUNITY
)
UNIT SCHOOL DISTRICT #1
)
)
)
v.
)
PCB 73-392
)
)
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
)
)
MR. EDWARD R. PHELPS, appeared for the School District
MR. FREDERICK C. HOPPER, Assistant Attorney General, appeared
for the Environmental Protection Agency
OPINION AND ORDER OF THE BOARD (by Mr. Dumelle):
Petition for variance from a sewer ban imposed by the
Environmental Protection Agency (“Agency”) on June 1, 1973 was
filed with the Board on September 17, 1973. No public hearing
was held. The school district is in Macoupin County.
The verified petition states that a $1,585,000 bond issue
was adopted by school district voters with a 1356 to 679 vote on
March 10, 1973 to alter and enlarge the Junior-Senior High School,
the North Elementary School and the South Elementary School; all
in Carlinville. After the referendum and issuance of letters of
intent to contract for construction of the additions, the Agency
on June 1, 1973 in a letter to Carlinville Mayor Pete Balotti
placed a sewer ban on the City.
A 4-inch and a fr-inch sewer connection are needed for the
North and South schools respectively. The Junior-Senior High
is not the subject of the petition.
The first day enrollment figures for the two elementary schools
show 558 pupils in the current year as compared to 628 a year
previous, for a decrease of 70.
The Agency recommendation was filed October 24, 1973. It
points out that the City of Carlinville sewage treatment plant is
designed for 5500 P.E. and 550,000 gpd. Present water usage is
630,000 gpd. but the period is not given. Monthly reports from the
City for the year ended February 1, 1973 show an average of 964,000 gpd
during that period. No effluent data are given.
10—173
-2-
The Agency recommends relief from Rule 912(b) of the Water
Pollution Regulations since the City cannot certify that its sewage
plant can adequately treat the wastewater to be added by the school
building additions, The Agency also states that the school dis-
trict’s petition for variance is premature in that.it has not
applied for construction permits and should thus be dismissed.
We
grant the variance as to Rules 921(a) and 912(b) to the
Carlinville Community Unit School District #1.
The
record in
the case is not as good
as we
would like in the following areas:
the Agency gives annual flow data for the year ending February 1,
1973 in a recommendation prepared October 19, 1973
--
surely more
recent annual flow data could have been supplied to the Board;
no effluent data from the plant are given and we do not know if
the present flow does in fact put the effluent above required
standards; and finally no mention is made of the condition of the
receiving stream
--
we do not know if itis
dead, dying or
possessed of vast assimilative capacity.
The Agency’s argument that the school district’s
petition
is premature seems ill-founded.
If we accept it and the district
then applies for permits and is then denied, nothing is gained
and valuable time is lost.
IVe feel that applicants ought not be
“run around the bush~’ but ought to be granted their variance (if
a grant is deserved) the first time up. All of us have too much
to do to re-examine the same petitions a second time.
ORDER
1.
Variance is granted from Rules 912(b) and 921(a) to the
Carlinvilie
Community Unit School District #1 to permit
it to connect its North and South Elementary schools to the
sanitary sewer system and to permit it to construct sewer
extensions to serve these buildings, if necessary.
2.
The School District shall make proper application for all
permits reqtired by the Agency.
IT S SO ORDERED.
I, Christan L. Moffett, Clerk of the Illinois Pollution Control
Board, hereby certify the above Opinion and Order were adopted on
the
*
day of November, 1973 by a vote of
~
/
‘
~
/*c/
Christan L. Moffe~t*, Clerk
Illinois Pollution Control Board
10—174