ILLINOIS POLLUTION CONTROL BOARD
    August 23, 1973
    )
    CITY OF HIGHLAND
    )
    )
    )
    v.
    )
    PCB 73-221
    )
    ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
    )
    )
    OPINION AND ORDER OF THE BOARD (by Mr. Dumelle)
    Petition for variance was filed on
    May
    25, 1973 to relax an
    existing sewer connection ban to permit hooking up a projected
    rest area to be built along Interstate Route 70 in Highland, Madi-
    son County, by the Illinois Department of Transportation.
    The Agency filed its recommendation on June 29, 1973 and
    recommended denial. Public hearing was held on July 16, 1973 in
    Hi ghland.
    The site for the rest area was selected in 1963 for maximum
    scenic value and adequate spacing (about one hour travel) from other
    rest areas. It overlooks Silver Lake which is the water supply for
    Highland.
    The
    City’s interest
    in the variance is obvious. Since the
    State would construct 14,000 lineal feet of 12” diameter sewer to the
    rest area and through an area presently containing overloaded septic
    tanks, the City would be spared this expense, said to be about
    $130,000 (R.42), and when its sewage plant is again at proper capa-
    city, could connect on those homes.
    The State Transportation Department’s
    interest in the variance
    (though not
    a party) is that the alternative to a sewer is much more
    costly and has other disadvantages.
    A lagoon for sewage treatment
    would require 6.7 acres at a
    cost
    of $16,000 to $20,000 for the
    land
    plus $160,000 for outfall lines
    and
    pumping stations plus $54,000 for
    maintenance for a total of $234,000 (R.36). Later
    on the figure of
    $280,000 is given without a detailed breakdown (R.49).
    We do not agree wi.th either the $234,000 or $280,000 figures.
    The latter is unsubstantiated and the former incorrectly lumps in
    annual maintenance. Later testimony revealed that the incremental
    cost attached to lagooning treatment alone was not known (R. 55)
    Thus the correct figure is more nearly the land cost ($20,000) plus
    the outfall lines ($160,000) plus some capitalized equivalent of the

    -
    unknown maintenance costs.
    The other disadvantages to lagooning are (1) placement
    of a sewage lagoon within 1,000 feet of the City’s water supply
    which we feel is not desirable (2) aesthetic impairment of what
    apparently is a beautiful site (3) some organic loading to a stream
    which flows through a dairy farm.
    The rest area, to be completed in late summer of 1975 (two
    years from now) would add to the plant about 47.1 lbs. of BOD per
    day or a population equivalent of 282. The flow would be 20,732
    gpd for a P.E. of 207 (R.46). The sewage plant has a 7,000 P.E,
    design but is limited to 5,000 P.E. by the final clarifier (R.83,
    87)
    The City’s consulting engineer testified that the new sewage
    plant might be on line about the summer of 1975 (R.90) but admitted
    that he was perhaps “optimistic” (R.91).
    Agency witnesses told of the degradation of the branch of Sugar
    Creek which flows to the Kaskaskia River and noted sludge deposits
    and undiversified stream fauna (R.l03). Low dissolved oxygen
    (0.2 mg/l) was reported which was far below the State 5.0 mg/i
    standard for a 16 hour period (State Ex. 1)
    .
    About five miles
    below the sewage plant, the stream began to recover (R.l04).
    Other testimony told of nozzles missing or clogged and the
    wrong size aggregate in the fixed trickling filter (R.l35). Also
    ponding was noted as well as “black, anaerobic growth” at the
    filter (R.l34, 140).
    On balance, we grant the variance. While the sewage plant may
    be expanded just in time we know full well there is many a slip
    ‘twixt the plan and the Federal grant. And the Illinois Department
    of Transportation should know now that it will have a sewer connec-
    tion for its rest area so that it can proceed with orderly planning
    and construction contracts.
    But there are many things Highland can and must do to improve
    its sewage treatment and its resulting effects upon the stream. It
    should remove the many ~‘drifts” (blockages) along the stream (eight
    major and 12 partial were noted)(R. 167). The trickling filter’s
    missing nozzles should be replaced and others made to function and
    the correct size aggregate should be installed. The use of
    chemicals to decrease overloading should be explored. Chlorination,
    due by July 31, 1972 (Rule 405), shall be installed with a temporary faci~
    lity within 120 days. And the June 26, 1972 sewer control ordinance
    shall be enforced to protect the biological sewage treatment process
    from deleterious industrial wastes.
    This opinion constitutes
    the Board’s findings cf fact and
    conclusions of law,
    06

    -3-
    ORDER
    1.
    Variance is granted from the Sanitary Water Board ban
    of
    February 20, 1969 to connect the rest area on Interstate
    Route
    70 to the Highland Sewage Treatment Plant.
    2. The City shall remove, within 60 days, and keep free the
    receiving stream from drifts (blockages) in order to promote
    maximum reaeration.
    3. The feasibility of using chemicals to improve sewage treatment
    shall be studied and reported to the Agency within 90 days.
    If feasible, the Agency may ask the Board to issue an addi-
    tional order in this proceeding to require their use.
    4. A temporary chlorination facility sufficient to meet the stan-
    dard shall be installed and operated within 120 days from
    this date.
    5. The trickling filter shall be made completely operable
    within 60 days including nozzles and correct size aggregate.
    6. Studies of industrial wastes and pretreatment programs shall
    be pursued to completion by June 30, 1974. If not satisfactory
    to the Agency, request may be made to the Board to enter
    further orders as are appropriate.
    7. This proceeding shall remain open for further orders of the
    Board as listed in
    No. 3 and No. 6 above.
    IT IS SO ORDERED.
    I, Christan L. Moffett, Clerk of the Illinois Pollution
    Control Board, hereby certify the above Opinion and Order were adopted
    on
    the
    ~
    day of August, 1973 by a vote of
    ___________________
    Illinois Pollution
    I Board

    Back to top