ILLINOIS POLLUTION CONTROL BOARD
June 7, 1973
)
CITY OF BELLEVILLE
)
)
)
v.
)
PCB 73-91
)
)
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
)
)
OPINION AND ORDER OF THE BOARD (by Mr. Dumelle)
This is a petition for variance requesting relief from
Rules 404(f), 921(d) and 1002 of the Water Regulations. Hearing
was held on May 10, 1973.
The City owns and operates two activated sludge secondary treat-
ment plants. The design average daily flow of Plant #1 is 8.4 mgd
and that of Plant #2 is 0.4 mgd. Both plants discharge to inter-
mittent streams having a dilution ratio of less than one to one.
Rule 404(f) requires that by December 31, 1973 no effluent
shall exceed 4 mg/l BOD and 5 mg/l suspended solids where the dilu-
tion ratio is less than one to one. In October, 1971 the City was
issued Agency permits for the construction of improvements designed
to bring the plants into compliance with Rule 404(f).
The Agency informed Petitioner that a certified basin plan
was a necessary prerequisite of the Federal Water Quality Office
prior to the acceptance of grant applications. The Southwestern
Illinois Metropolitan Planning Commission (SIMAPC) has prepared
an Interim Metro Plan which includes the City of Belleville.
Petitioner received SIMAPC’s certification on October 2, 1972,
thereby fulfilling the requirement for State and Federal grant
applications.
Petitioner’s Construction Permits have now expired and must
receive Agency renewal because construction was not undertaken
within a year from the date the permits were issued. These permits
cannot be renewed or reissued since the project does not have an
approved Project Completion Schedule as required by Rule 921(d).
On August 28, 1972, Petitioner submitted a Project Completion Schedule
to the Agency. The schedule could not be approved because compliance
with Rule 404(f) was scheduled for December 31, 1974, one year after
the required compliance date.
8
—
227
-2-
The Agency has recommended to the U.S. Environmental Protection
Agency that a grant offer be extended to Petitioner. Petitioner’s
project has a certification number of 1-73 for FY73. In light of
the high State and Federal priority number, it is reasonably certain
that Petitioner will receive the necessary funding to assure the
required upgrading.
Petitioner’s present inability to file an approvable project
completion schedule is due primarily to uncertainties of regionali-
zation and compliance with Federal requirements for funding. The
Agency believes that there is significant benefit in requiring
Petitioner to file a Project Completion Schedule containing dates
which Petitioner can follow even though the dates submitted do not
reflect the requirements of the Water REgulations and are not approvable
by the Agency.
The Agency believes that compliance with Rules 921(d) and 1002
imposes a sufficiently arbitrary and unreasonable hardship in that
the requirement of a Project Completion Schedule would impose further
delay in beginn:ing construction of improved sewage treatment facilities,
The Agency reports that neither intermittent stream receiving
effluent from Petitioner’s plants show any adverse effects from the
effluents. The apparent absence of adverse effect of Petitioner’s
discharges combined with justifiable reasons for delay, a high
probability of State and Federal grants and an apparent willingness
of Petitioner to proceed with construction; causes the Agency to
believe that the petition for variance should be granted.
Based upon the evidence and the Agency’s recommendation we
will grant the variance for one year so that the permits may be
issued and construction may begin.
This opinion constitutes the Board’s findings of fact and
conclusions of law.
ORDER
The variance is granted from Rules 404(f), 921(d) and 1002
of the Water Regulations for one year from the date of this order,
I, Christan L. Moffett, Clerk of the Illinois Pollution Control
Board, hereby certify the above Opinion and Order were adopted on the
7
~ day of June, 1973 by a vote of
£4
/Y\ ~dJsE
Christan L. Mof’fet’t,/~1erk
Illinois Pollution ~~/itrolBoard
8
—
228