ILLINOIS POLLUTION CONTROL
    BOARD
    June 14, 1973
    LOCKE
    STOVE COMPANY
    )
    #73—159
    v.
    ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
    )
    OPINION
    AND
    ORDER OF THE BOARD
    (BY
    SAMUEL T. LAWTON, JR.):
    Petitioner has filed a petition for variance
    in
    which it
    appears to
    seek
    to
    be permitted
    to exceed the particulate and
    hydrocarbon emission limitations contained in our Pollution
    Control
    Board Air Regulations, Rules 203(b) and 205(f), until May 30, 1975,
    when it contemplates that its
    paint
    supplier, the Glidden Paint
    Company, will have
    re—formulated
    its product so as to meet Illinois
    Air
    Pollution Regulations.
    Petitioner operates
    a space heater fabrication plant in
    East St. Louis. Included in the facility is a
    three-man enamel
    paint spraying
    booth. Emissions from this operation result from
    spraying, dipping and baking of the product. While the variance
    pethtion
    does not
    cite
    what express provisions of
    the
    Regulations
    petitioner seeks to be relieved from, the Agency has assumed
    that it
    is requesting relief from Rule 103 and 104, and 203(b)
    and 205(f)
    above cited.
    On
    March 2, 1973, etitioner~s operating permit application
    was denied by
    the Agency, which led to the instant petition. At
    the
    time
    of
    the application,
    the
    Agency had calculated petitioner’s
    particulate emissions from the spray booths to be 0,356 lbs/hr at
    a process weight rate of
    14.255 lbs/hr.
    Upon
    re—examination, the Agency determined that petitioner~s
    particulate emissions are
    0.12 lbs/hr against
    an
    allowable particulate
    emission rate of 0.13 lbs/hr.
    At the present time,
    the Agency
    is of the opinion that no
    variance
    is required in order to obtain
    an operating permit for
    particulate emissions from
    the
    paint spray
    booths and that the
    operating permit application likewise contains
    an adequate compliance program
    for organic emissions and that
    no
    variance is required in this respect.
    n thaw ci
    the foregoincr representations contained in the
    Agency s .recommendation • we do not. discern any basis upon which a

    variance is needed and accordingly, the petition
    for
    variance
    is dismissed as moot.
    IT IS SO ORDERED.
    I, Christan
    Moffett, Clerk of the Pollution Control Board, certify
    that
    the
    above Opinion and Order was adopted on the /~‘~dayof
    June, 1973, by a vote of 4
    to ~
    /
    iv
    8
    290

    Back to top