ILLINOIS POLLTION CONTROL BOARD
    January 16, 1973
    JOHNS-MANVILLE PRODICTS COR~RATION )
    (WAUKEGAN
    PLANT)
    v.
    )
    PCB 72-444
    VTRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
    OPINION & ORDER OF THE BOARD (by Mr.
    Dumelle):
    The Johns-Manvifle Products Corporation (“J-M”), on November 10, 1972,
    asked the Board to amend Condition 3 of its Opinion and Order entered
    September 26, 1972 (PCB 72-2 72). The Board, by a 3-2 vote, docketed the
    request as the instant variance which without hearing we grant today to run
    with that which it changes, namely PCB 72-272.
    Johns-Manville asks that the requirement of Condition 3 that testing
    be done ‘by an independent testing organization” be changed to permit the
    testing by “thoroughly qualified personnel”
    of
    the J-M Industrial Hygiene
    Laboratory at Waukegan. Johns
    -
    Manville further state that they have
    perfected an alternate test method; that they offer asbestos testing services
    to others in the industry on a national scale; and that they prefer to count
    fibers near the sampling site to avoid the risk of errors induced by transport.
    The Agency recommendation, dated and filed December 14, 1972 terms
    the J-M test method as identical with that specified by Board Regulations;
    differs with J-M on the necessity to count fibers at the site; and agrees that-
    J-M personnel have expertise in asbestos testing. The Agency thus specifi-
    cally recommends the grant of the variance to permit testing by J-M personnel.
    The Board agrees and grants the variance.
    The Agency in its current recommendation asks for a 20-day advance
    notice before testing in order to have Agency personnel present if desired.
    However,
    in its
    recommendation filed in PCB 72-272 the Agency asked for
    only
    7 days notice to witness the tests. Because no reason is given for the
    change in time period from 7 to 20 days and because stack testing is so
    6
    559

    -2-
    dependent upon weather conditions (especially wind) we think it better to
    retain the 7 day period and thus achieve more precise weather forecasts.
    ORDER
    1)
    Condition 3 of PCB 72-272 is changed to read as follows:
    Where compliance is to be achieved by the installation of air
    pollution control equipment, within 30 days of the completed
    installation of such equipment, Petitioner shall submit to the
    Agency for its approval results of stack tests performed on
    such equipment. Testing shall be done in accordance with
    Rule 651 by thoroughly qualified personnel of the Johns-
    Manville Industrial Hygiene Laboratory at Waukegan. All
    aspects of the
    testing work shall be totally open to field
    observation and check by the Agency. The Agency shall
    be notified
    7 days in advance of testing so that Agency per-
    sonnel may be present, if desired, to observe all aspects
    of testing and analysis.
    2) The instant variance shall expire in accordance with the dates
    listed by source of emissions in the Order of PCB 72-272.
    The foregoing constitutes the Board~s findings of fact and conclusions
    of law.
    I, Christan L. Moffett, Clerk of the Illinois Pollution Control Board,
    hereby certify the above Opinion and Order were adopted on the /~“k1ay
    of January, 1973 byavote of
    ..3—ô
    hristan L. Moffett,
    Q~4J~k
    Illinois Pollution Control Board
    6
    560

    Back to top