ILLINOIS POLLUTION CONTROL BOARD
    October 17, 1972
    DANVILLE SANITARY DISTRICT
    )
    )
    #72—400
    v
    ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
    OPINION
    AND
    ORDER OF THE BOARD (BY SAMUEL T. LAWTON, JR.)
    By petition filed in Danville Sanitary District v. Environ-
    mental Protection Agency, #72-347, the District sought a variance
    from the requirements of PCB Regs., Chapter 3, Rule 404(f), re-
    quiring advanced sewage treatment facilities to be completed by
    December 31, 1973. The petition requested until June 30, 1976 to
    complete the facilities.
    We stated that the allegations were insufficient to support a
    variance petition, noting particularly that no facts were alleged
    with respect to the present plant effluent, the condition of the
    stream or the reasons why petitioner had fallen so far behind in
    the preparation and implementation of plans for construction of
    advanced sewage treatment facilities. We observed that the Decem-
    ber 31, 1973 completion date from which variance was sought was it-
    self an la-month extension of the deadline contained in former
    Regulations. Because of the foregoing inadequacies, the petition
    was dismissed without prejudice to the filing of a more detailed
    petition, (#72—347, 5 PCB August 29, 1972)
    On October 10, 1972, a new petition was filed requesting the
    same relief sought by the earlier petition. While some of the
    inadequacies noted above have been corrected, we again dismiss the
    petition for failing to satisfy our procedural Rule 401, spelling
    out the types of facts which must be alleged in a variance petition.
    See Decatur Sanitary District v. Environmental Protection A~ency,
    #71-37, 1 PCB 359 (March 22, 1971). As in the former petition,
    no allegations are made justifying petitioner’s failure to comply
    with the Regulations, and specifically, why petitioner has fallen
    so far behind in the submission of plans and initiation of construc-
    tion for advanced treatment faci1ities, consistent with former and
    existing Regulations. Little is stated what effect on the stream
    would result from the granting of the variance proposed, nor has
    petitioner gone into any detail adequately delineating the
    5
    721

    point of sag in oxygen levels in the Vermilion River. We again
    dismiss the petition without prejudice to the filing of a more
    detailed petition consistent with our procedural rules and former
    decision above cited.
    IT IS SO ORDERED.
    I, Christan Moffett, clerk of
    the
    Illinois Pollution Control
    Board,
    certify thai- the above Opinion and Order was adopted
    on
    the
    ,7~
    ayo-f October, 1972, by a vote of ~ to ~
    -~-~
    I
    7~
    ~
    I
    - j
    /
    /
    —2—
    5
    722

    Back to top