ILLINOIS POLLUTION CONTROL BOARD
    August 22, 1972
    ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY,
    )
    Complainant,
    —vs—
    )
    PCB 72—99
    QUINCY PARK DISTRICT, a Municipal
    )
    Corporation,
    Respondent.
    Frederick C. Hopper, Assistant Attorney General for the EPA
    Charles B. Binkert for Respondent
    OPINION AND ORDER OF THE BOARD (by Mr. Henss)
    The Environmental Protection Agency has charged Respondent
    Quincy Park District with numerous violations of the Environmental
    Protection Act and the Rules and Regulations for Refuse Disposal
    Sites and Facilities. It is alleged that Respondent operated a
    refuse disposal site without registration or a permit to do so;
    permitted open dumping and open burning of refuse; failed to
    confine dumping to the smallest practical area; failed to have
    sufficient equipment at the site; failed to spread and compact
    refuse as rapidly as received; failed to apply daily cover and
    final cover; and discharged refuse into the waters of the Mississippi
    River and deposited refuse on its banks to create a water pollution
    hazard. It is further charged that Respondent threatens to con-
    tinue these violations.
    The evidence shows that the Quincy Park District did operate
    a landfill at its All American City Park. The park is located near
    the Mississippi River and the objective of the park district was to
    raise the grade of a low-lying area which was subject to flooding
    so that the land could be put to a recreational use. The closest
    residential area is about two blocks from the site. Since 1966
    the par: district has deposited material consisting of concrete,
    rock, wood, trees, brick, lumber, wood chips and building demolition.
    Other material observed at the site included a small amount of paper,
    cans and bottles, a refrigerator, a stove and rubber tires. EPA
    iffi7estigators estimated that 90~of the material was stable and, non-
    combustible. The landfill’ covered an area approximately 200 yards
    by 100 yards. Numerous inspections by the EPA, especially in 1970
    and 1971, revealed that there was a failure to cover on a daily
    basis or apply a final cover.
    5
    213

    —2--
    Seepage of a dark red rusty color and septic odor was observed
    to enter the waters of the Mississippi from the fill area. The
    record is not clear as to its source. High water in the spring
    of the year would reach debris piled on the banks. Burning of
    diseased trees was terminated in 1970 or 1971.
    Photographs of the site reveal the nature of the violations
    and also indicate that the land reclamation project was at least
    partially successful. The park facilities include a merry-go-round,
    ferris wheel, log cabin general store, railroad tracks, round house,
    antique auto museum and maintenance building. Some of the facilities
    are built upon old fill.
    The park authorities apparently considered the landfill a
    private operation for the public good, not available for dumping by
    the public, and did not obtain a permit or make any attempt at
    registration. In October 1970 Kenneth Kramer, the Director Executive
    of the Quincy Park District, told an EPA investigator that ~‘hewas
    aware they didn’t have a permit to operate the site and was aware
    they werentt operating in conformance with the requirements but did
    indicate he thought they were engaged in a worthwhile project.and he
    plans to continue until their completion” (R. 44).
    We agree that the improving of land for recreational use is a
    worthwhile project, howover, the laudable goal does not excuse the
    operation of a landfill in violation of law. We are especially
    critical of the park director’s conscious disregard for the law
    after violations had been called to his attention. It is not our
    custom to impose heavy fines upon units of government, but such
    deliberate flouting of the law must not go entirely unpunished.
    We believe that a penalty of $200.00 would be appropriate in addition
    to an order that Respondent cease and desist from its violations.
    ORDER
    It is ordered that:
    (1) Respondent Quincy Park District cease and desist from
    depositing refuse at the All American City Park landfill in violation
    of law.
    (2) Respondent Quincy Park District pay to the State of Illinois
    (Environmental Protection Agency Fiscal Services Division) a penalty
    of $200.00.
    I, Christan L. Moffett, Clerk of the Illinois Pollution Control
    Board, hereby certify that the above Opinion and Order was adopted
    on the
    ~
    day of August, 1972 by a vote of ~
    ‘.~/7’)
    ~/~ ~
    Christan L. Moffet~ç Clerk
    Illinois Pollution Control Board
    5
    214

    Back to top