ILLINOIS POLLUTION CONTROL
    BOARD
    October 31, 1972
    NORTH SHORE SANITARY DISTRICT
    v.
    )
    #71—343
    ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
    Opinion
    &
    Order of the Board (by Mr. Currie):
    The Capital Development Board of the State of Illinois
    petitions us for clarification of our order in this case en-
    tered March 2, 1972, 3 PCB 697, with respect to the ability
    to connect a new state facility for the mentally retarded to
    sewers in the North Shore Sanitary District without payment
    of a connection fee, which it is alleged would unreasonably in-
    terfere with the exercise of vital governmental functions.
    The motion must be denied.
    The Capital Development Board was not a party to the case,
    and neither was anyone in whose shoes it stands in making
    this request. The Development Board therefore has no standing
    to ask for further proceedings in that case, which in any
    event is closed. Cf. Lake County Contractors Ass~nv. Pollution
    Control Board, N.E.2d (Ill. App. 2d Dist., ##71-1l4,
    71-115, July 31, 1972) as to persons entitled to seek judicial
    review of Board decisions. Nor has proper service been made,
    as was conceded by the Development Board in presenting its
    motion at our October 31 meeting, on other parties to the
    proceeding. Moreover, “clarification” hardly seems the
    appropriate remedy, since our order of March 31, 1971, in
    League of Women Voters v. North Shore Sanitary District,
    #70—7, 1 PCB 369, 395 flatly requires the District to take
    all measures within its power to raise funds for needed treat-
    ment plant improvements by imposing, among other things,
    connection charges, because of serious money shortages
    alleged by the District. The proper remedy when a Board
    order imposes unreasonable hardship, as here alleged, is to
    petition for a variance. We cannot treat the present motion
    as a variance petition, for there is only the most con-
    clusory allegation respecting hardship and other requirements
    of the procedural rules for the contents of variance petitions
    are not met. We are not prepared to say without proper
    allegations and proof that the State of Illinois is entitled
    to exemption from rules applicable to everybody else with
    respect to bearing one~sfair share of the costs of in-
    dispensable municipal services.
    6
    77

    —2—
    The motion is hereby denied without prejudice to the
    filing of an appropriate variance petition.
    I, Christan Moffett, Clerk of the Pollution Control Board,
    certify that the Board adopted the above Opinion
    &
    Order
    this 31st day of October, 1972, by a vote of
    •.$~ ~
    ~
    •~
    ~/
    ~
    ~/
    6
    78

    Back to top