ILLINOIS POLLUTION CONTROL BOARD
    August 13, 1971
    ARTHUR H. ZAMOST
    v
    )
    #
    PCB71—136
    ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
    Mr. Arthur H. Zamost, pro se.
    Mr. Lee Zelle,for the Environmental Protection Agency
    Opinion and Order of the Board
    (by Mr. Currie):
    Mr. and Mrs. Zamost seek a variance to permit connection
    of a proposed new home to sewers tributary to an overloaded
    treatment plant in
    the
    North Shore Sanitary District (see
    #
    70-7, March 31, 1971). We deny the petition.
    The sad state of the air and water as a result of inadequate
    sewage treatment within the District was fully documented
    in
    our March
    31
    opinion. We have insisted on proof
    of
    consider-
    able hardship--unreasonable hardship, as required by the statute--
    in order to justify any new connections that will make a bad
    situation worse, In the present case the petitioners have pur-
    chased a lot and paid for plans for their new home (R. 5), but
    construction has not begun CR, 13)
    .
    We have held the inconvenience
    due to postponement of construction under similar circumstances
    insufficient, E.g., Wagnon
    V.
    EPA, # 71-85 (July 26, 1971).
    The evidence also is that the petitioners must vacate their
    present~home, which has been rented to others in reliance
    on their anticipated move CR. 6)
    .
    But the record suggests
    the strong possibility that they must make temporary arrange-
    ments to live elsewhere even if the variance is granted, because
    the new house can no longer be completed by the agreed moving
    date of September
    1
    CR. 12), In any case, there isno showing
    that the petitioners are unable to find or to afford adequate
    housing for the interim until the plants are built and the
    sewer ban lifted. We regret the inconvenience, but we do not
    think
    it
    rises to the level of hardship required to justify
    additional pollution.
    The petition for variance is
    denied.
    This opinion constitutes the Board~s findings of fact and
    conclusions of law.
    I, Regina E. Ryan, certify that the Board adopted th-e~boveOpi
    and Order this~ day of~,,
    1971.
    2 — 301

    Back to top