Public Comment RE: Case AS 08-10
?
R
CLERK'S
E C E
OFFICE
I
VE
ID
To the Members of the Illinois Pollution Control BoardSEp
1 8 2008
As a member of Heart of Illinois
Group Sierra CluIT?
Rgotntic
trLoliNgalbrii
concerned about
the precedent being set if Peoria"
IW
8 did
Company is granted delisting of Electric Arc Furnace Dust waste.
There has been no independent testing of the new treatment p).12
process PDC claims is safe. Their own testing occurred only in
December 2007 and February 2008, yet this waste could be in
our local landfills, including ones over the Mahomet Aquifer, forever.
I am concerned about dioxins, furans, mercury, and other heavy
metals leaching from this waste. If delisting is granted, PDC will
be able to send their treated EAF to any municipal waste landfill
in Illinois.
I believe this violates factors of the IL Environmental
Protection Act, which require considerations of existing physical
conditions, receiving body of water and other issues.
I am strongly
opposed to this delisting request and urge that it be denied.
Signed
Address?
Public Comment RE: Case AS 08-10
To the Members of the Illinois Pollution Control Board,
RECEIVE
CLERK'S OFFICE
SEP 1 8 2008
As a member of Heart of Illinois Group Sierra Club, I arlyeatl
concerned about the precedent being set if Peoria Di
?
a?
uF ILLINC
Company is granted delisting of Electric Arc Furnace
Disc
n
?
wase
ion Control
.t
Pk
There has been no independent testing of the new treatment
?
'1
process PDC claims is safe. Their own testing occurred only in Oar/
December 2007 and February 2008, yet this waste could be in V
our local landfills, including ones over the Mahomet Aquifer, forever.
I
am concerned about dioxins, furans, mercury, and other heavy
metals leaching from this waste. If delisting is granted, PDC will
be able to send their treated EAF to any municipal waste landfill
in Illinois. I believe this violates factors of the IL Environmental
Protection Act, which require considerations of existing physical
conditions, receiving body of water and other issues.
I
am strongly
op. • -d to
?
delistin•est an
?
t it be denied.
Signed
6326 W Salem School Rd
Address_ Dunlap, IL 61525
1111111.11.11111.111111110.010.
RK S OFFICE
I am writing asking you to deny Peoria Disposal Company's r
equ
P
es
t
t too
2008
delist electric arc furnace dust (AS 2008-010). The
delisti4TATesalk ILLINOis
door expansion of the landfill, an expansion both PeoriaRMINti941Qontrol Bon
the IPCB have already denied. The safety of what PDC is proposing
cannot be assured—PDC conducted no assessment of the impact on
ni
its existing landfill, the process details are not available for review, the
ki1-•
testing was very limited, no independent labs verified the results, and no
on-site testing was conducted at the landfills where the material will be
disposed. PDC's proposal simply shifts the risks to safe drinking water to
communities over the Mahomet aquifer instead of the San Koty. Please
work with the citizens of Central Illinois to begin the process of truly
closing this unwanted legacy and eliminating further risks to
the health
and safety of our community.
(Name)
(Address)
317/
?
/6/1-0-01eArth-d
.29-A
/°-e-e-tc;
Dear Illinois Pollution Contraf Board,
RECEIVED
CLERK'S OFFICE
Dear Illinois Pollution Control Board,
?
SEP 1 8 2008
the IPCB have already denied. The safety of what PDC is proposing
l
py
cannot be assured—PDC conducted no assessment of the impact on
its existing landfill, the process details are not available for review, the
testing was very limited, no independent labs verified the results, and no
on-site testing was conducted at the landfills where the material will be
disposed. PDC's proposal simply shifts the risks to safe drinking water to
communities over the Mahomet aquifer instead of the San Koty. Please
work with the citizens of Central Illinois to begin the process of truly
closing this unwanted legacy and eliminating further risks to the health
and safety of our community.
z*-
772.)
(Address)?
( 1717
I am writing asking you to deny Peoria Disposal Comp
delist electric arc furnace dust (AS 2008-010). The d
INOit
door expansion of the landfill, an expansion both Pe
?
nt
ol Boarr
(Name)
Public Comment RE: Case AS 08-10?
RECEIVED
CLERKS OFFICE
To the Members of the Illinois Pollution Control Board,
SEP
t
r 1 8 2008
As a member of Heart of Illinois Group Sierra
ClulISTAT@rellRILLINOIS
concerned about the precedent being set if Peorir914$19
g
aPontroi
Soap'
Company is granted delisting of Electric Arc Furnace Dust waste.
?
,W
There has been no independent testing of the new treatment
process PDC claims is safe. Their own testing occurred only in
December 2007 and February 2008, yet this waste could be in
our local landfills, including ones over the Mahomet Aquifer, forever.
I am concerned about dioxins, furans, mercury, and other heavy
metals leaching from this waste. If delisting is granted, PDC will
be able to send their treated EAF to any municipal waste landfill
in Illinois. I believe this violates factors of the IL Environmental
Protection Act, whith require considerations of existing physical
conditions, receiving body of water and other issues. I am strongly
opposed to this delisting request and urge that it be denied.
Signed ?
Pr?
Address
?
a1.,3To,,,r.
et?
.
se.
Dear Illinois Pollution Control Board,
RECEIVED
CLERK'S OFFICE
SET 1 8 2008
I am writing asking you to deny Peoria Disposal
delist electric arc furnace dust (AS 2008-010).
door expansion of the landfill, an expansion bothPeoria County and
the IPCB have already denied. The safety of what PDC is proposing
cannot be assured—PDC conducted no assessment of the impact on
its existing landfill, the process details are not available for review, the
testing was very limited, no independent labs verified the results, and no
on-site testing was conducted at the landfills where the material will be
disposed. PDC's proposal simply shifts the risks to safe drinking water to
communities over the Mahomet aquifer instead of the San Koty. Please
work with the citizens of Central Illinois to begin the process of truly
closing this unwanted legacy and eliminating further risks to the health
and safety of our community.
7
(Add res
I ?
ACt,
k 7-47'
Signed '--
r
Public Comment RE: Case AS 08-10?
FIECEDVE
LERK's
OFFICE
ID
To the Members of the Illinois Pollution Control BoarcSE
r
n
I
8 2008
As a member of Heart of Illinois Group Sierra CO§Liceli ?
c
e
grealltiNo,
concerned about the precedent being set if PeorianYeisiOntroi Soaro
Company is granted delisting of Electric Arc Furnace Dust waste. ?
al
There has been no independent testing of the new treatment
process PDC claims is safe. Their own testing occurred only in tAr,
December 2007 and February 2008, yet this waste could be in
our local landfills, including ones over the Mahomet Aquifer, forever.
I am concerned about dioxins, furans, mercury, and other heavy
metals eventually from this waste. If delisting is granted, PDC will
be able to send their treated EAF to any municipal waste landfill
in Illinois. I believe this violates factors of the IL Environmental
Protection Act, which require considerations of existing physical
conditions, receiving body of water and other issues. I am strongly
opposed to this delisting request and urge that it be denied.
Address
A)
.-Litet-
/WS /L._
