Public Comment RE: Case AS 08-10
To the Members of the Illinois Pollution Control Board,
As a member of Heart of Illinois Group Sierra Club, I am greatly
concerned about the precedent being set if Peoria Disposal
Company is granted delisting of Electric Arc Furnace Dust waste.
There has been no independent testing of the new treatment?
, uo
process PDC claims is safe. Their own testing occurred only in ?
/
December 2007 and February 2008, yet this waste could be in
our local landfills, including ones over the Mahomet Aquifer, forever.
I am concerned about dioxins, furans, mercury, and other heavy
metals leaching from this waste. If delisting is granted, PDC will
be able to send their treated EAF to any municipal waste landfill
in Illinois. I believe this violates factors of the IL Environmental
Protection Act, which require considerations of existing physical
conditions, receiving body of water and other issues. I am strongly
opposed to this delisting request and urge that it be denied.
Signed/---*-7
Address //5
sh4?
[ad- AA-14?
(0/
'91crEe
RKE
sOYFEED
SEP
1 1 2008
I am writing asking you to deny Peoria Disposal C
95
&fig*
delist electric arc furnace dust (AS 2008-010). The delis.ing is
?
rel'roa
Rk
lSrd
door expansion of the landfill, an expansion both Peoria County and
the IPCB have already denied. The safety of what PDC is proposing
?
0y.
cannot
its existing
be assured—PDC
landfill, the process
conducted
details are
no assessment
not available
of
for
the
review,
impact
the
on
C
Au
v
testing was very limited, no independent labs verified the results, and no
on-site testing was conducted at the landfills where the material will be
disposed. PDC's proposal simply shifts the risks to safe drinking water to
communities over the Mahomet aquifer instead of the San Koty. Please
work with the citizens of Central Illinois to begin the process of truly
closing this unwanted legacy and eliminating further risks to the health
and, afety of our community.
Dear Illinois Pollution Control Board,
(Name)
M
71°
gy?
7(74144/tAd
el..ct 4(44; ■-gae
&a,/
(Address)
Dear Illinois Pollution Control Board,
I am writing asking you to deny Peoria Disposal Company's request to
delist electric arc furnace dust (AS 2008-010). The delisting is a back
door expansion of the landfill, an expansion both Peoria County and
cannot be assured—PDC conducted no assessment of the impact on ?
tokee
L3
the IPCB have already denied. The safety of what PDC is proposing
its existing landfill, the process details are not available for review, the
testing was very limited, no independent labs verified the results, and no
on-site testing was conducted at the landfills where the material will be
disposed. PDC's proposal simply shifts the risks to safe drinking water to
communities over the Mahomet aquifer instead of the San Koty. Please
work with the citizens of Central Illinois to begin the process of truly
and
closing
safety
this unwanted
of our co munity.
legacy and
W-Airy
eliminating f rther risks
?
o
a
new?
02,43 Fliotie-rni
ddress,
-
?
P
/6?
(116-zi i) fire rd.
614 CA-4 tiice
4,„
istio/‘/y
Public Comment RE: Case AS 08-10
"Cr ERK'S
OFFICE
OFFICE
To the Members of the Illinois Pollution Control BoaGEP
1
I 2008
As
concerned
a member
about
of Heart
the precedent
of Illinois
being
Group
set
Sierraif
Peoria
?
"e
t
I
t110
0
13
(f)
Company is granted delisting of Electric Arc Furnace Dust waste.
and
There has been no independent testing of the new treatment
?
process PDC claims is safe. Their own testing occurred only in ?c,‘
%tk
December 2007 and February 2008, yet this waste could be in
our local landfills, including ones over the Mahomet Aquifer, forever.
I am concerned about dioxins, furans, mercury, and other heavy
metals leaching from this waste. If delisting is granted, PDC will
be able to send their treated EAF to any municipal waste landfill
in Illinois. I believe this violates factors of the IL Environmental
Protection Act, which require considerations of existing physical
conditions, receiving body of water and other issues. I am strongly
opposed to
a
this delisting request a d urge that it be denied.
Signed /
/1
(-
-
Address Z-LitZ_
Public Comment RE: Case AS 08-1,0 ?
erett
li
OFF
I
ViE
cE
To the Members of the Illinois Pollution Control Bod,
SEP 1 1
2008
g
tio
TE
act
IOF Liiivois
As a member of Heart of Illinois Group Sierra Club
p
concerned about the precedent being set if Peoria Disposal
?
16?
trot
Board
Boar
Company is granted delisting of Electric Arc Furnace Dust waste.
There has been no independent testing of the new treatment
process
December
PDC
2007
claims
and February
is safe. Their
2008,
own
yet this
testing
waste
occurred
could be
only
in
in
te‘13,
our local landfills, including ones over the Mahomet Aquifer, forever.
I am concerned about dioxins, furans, mercury, and other heavy
metals leaching from this waste. If delisting is granted, PDC will
be able to send their treated EAF to any municipal waste landfill
in Illinois. I believe this violates factors of the IL Environmental
Protection Act, which require considerations of existing physical
conditions, receiving body of water and other issues. I am strongly
opposed to this delisting request and urge that it be denied.
Signed 4alzrty
Address 7/.7(-- //) Ott 2C 4eA
r:?
221//1, 7t
760y
Public Comment RE: Case AS 08-10
?
-1"Fii"- O,
Freec
To the Members of the Illinois Pollution Control Boatr)niruit
tSinEE,POIF
As a member of Heart of Illinois Group Sierra Club, I am grekr
1(0.
IP
, 2098
_oar(
LLINOIS
concerned about the precedent being set if Peoria Disposal
Company is granted delisting of Electric Arc Furnace Dust waste.
?
There has been no independent testing of the new treatment
sti
process PDC claims is safe. Their own testing occurred only in ?&V
December 2007 and February 2008, yet this waste could be in
our local landfills, including ones over the Mahomet Aquifer, forever.
I am concerned about dioxins, furans, mercury, and other heavy
metals eventually from this waste. If delisting is granted, PDC will
be able to send their treated EAF to any municipal waste landfill
in Illinois. I believe this violates factors of the IL Environmental
Protection Act, which require considerations of existing physical
conditions, receiving body of water and other issues. I am strongly
opposed to this delisting request and urge that it be denied.
Signe
AddresS
?
R
(
l"?
Or\
rnae
Public Comment RE: Case AS 08-10
?
SEp
2008
To the Members of the Illinois Pollution Control
BoarOlution
,srAre
or
Co
ontrol
ntrol
I
Boar,
As a member of Heart of Illinois Group Sierra Club, I am greatly
concerned about the precedent being set if Peoria Disposal
Company is granted delisting of Electric Arc Furnace Dust waste.
There
process
December
has
PDC
been
2007
claims
no
and
independent
February
is safe. Their
2008,
testing
own
yet
of
this
testing
the
waste
new
occurred
treatment
could be
only
in
?
in
e
&
ttt
/
our local landfills, including ones over the Mahomet Aquifer, forever.
I am concerned about dioxins, furans, mercury, and other heavy
metals leaching from this waste. If delisting is granted, PDC will
be able to send their treated EAF to any municipal waste landfill
in Illinois. I believe this violates factors of the IL Environmental
Protection Act, which require considerations of existing physical
conditions, receiving body of water and other issues. I am strongly
opposed to this delisting request and urge that it be denied.-R
?
)1
Address 1-K1
-1\/
1
4.06--
Wv.si-V\Z-ZSc,,,C7S.,L,\C's'c:
Public Comment RE: Case AS 08-10
Pollution
To the Members of the Illinois Pollution Control BoashAre
SEP 1 1
2008
SP ILLINOIS
As a member of Heart of Illinois Group Sierra Club, I am grea99–oara
trol
P
concerned about the precedent being set if Peoria Disposal
Company is granted delisting of Electric Arc Furnace Dust waste.
process
There
our
December
local
has
PDC
landfills,
been
2007
claims
no
and
including
independent
is
February
safe.
ones
Their
2008,
testing
over
own
yet
the
testing
of
this
Mahomet
the
waste
new
occurred
treatment
Aquifer,
could
only
be
forever.
in
in
p
r
L
O
I am concerned about dioxins, furans, mercury, and other heavy
metals leaching from this waste. If delisting is granted, PDC will
be able to send their treated EAF to any municipal waste landfill
in Illinois. I believe this violates factors of the IL Environmental
Protection Act, which require considerations of existing physical
conditions, receiving body of water and other issues. I am strongly
opposed to this delis g reque and urge that it be denied.
Signed
Address
/tej/
4.4,,ipethw idattDir
Den /z,
A;
As a member of Heart of Illinois Group Sierra Club, I am great
To the Members of the Illinois Pollution Control Board, .
-ccilifS O
FFICE
i
1
2008
9ontrol
P
/LIAO;
Boa
Public Comment RE: Case AS 08-10
Pollution
STATE
0
concerned about the precedent being set if Peoria Disposal
Company is granted delisting of Electric Arc Furnace Dust waste.
There has been no independent testing of the new treatment
process PDC claims is safe. Their own testing occurred only in
De
o,
Ittl
December 2007 and February 2008, yet this waste could be in
k
our local landfills, including ones over the Mahomet Aquifer, forever.
I am concerned about dioxins, furans, mercury, and other heavy
metals eventually from this waste. If delisting is granted, PDC will
be able to send their treated EAF to any municipal waste landfill
in Illinois. I believe this violates factors of the IL Environmental
Protection Act, which require considerations of existing physical
conditions, receiving body of water and other issues. I am strongly
opposed to this elisting request and urge that it be denied.
4
Signed ?
2-vhe•
(A)
Address
?
pc-
4
, &gm,
‘14,/
.r`-.
Public Comment RE: Case AS 08-10
?
cliCL
E. (
F
ia
r
:SIE
CED
To the Members of the Illinois Pollution Control Boars,
_OR
STATE OF ILLINOIS
As a member of Heart of Illinois Group Sierra
EROtintrantatibiSoard
concerned about the precedent being set if Peoria Disposal
Company is granted delisting of Electric Arc Furnace Dust waste.
There
process
December
has
PDC
been
2007
claims
no
and
independent
is
February
safe. Their
2008,
testing
own
yet
testing
of
this
the
waste
new
occurred
treatment
could
only
be
in
in
p
r
140
our local landfills, including ones over the Mahomet Aquifer, forever.
I am concerned about dioxins, furans, mercury, and other heavy
metals leaching from this waste. If delisting is granted, PDC will
be able to send their treated EAF to any municipal waste landfill
in Illinois. I believe this violates factors of the IL Environmental
Protection Act, which require considerations of existing physical
conditions, receiving body of water and other issues. I am strongly
opposed to this delisting request and urge that it be denied.
Signed ?
Address
goo “ Sti44.1
?
Cid-1Y
-
?
,LERK'S OFFICE
FFICE
Board
l'EC7112:10::
Public Comment RE: Case AS 08-10
o
To the Members of the Illinois Pollution Control BosaT
rd:0
As a member of Heart of Illinois Group Sierra Clulmi/kAi
concerned about the precedent being set if Peoria Disposal
Company is granted delisting of Electric Arc Furnace Dust waste.
There has been no independent testing of the new treatment
process PDC claims is safe. Their own testing occurred only in n& 1;1
December 2007 and February 2008, yet this waste could be in
ie
our local landfills, including ones over the Mahomet Aquifer, forever.
I am concerned about dioxins, furans, mercury, and other heavy
metals leaching from this waste. If delisting is granted, PDC will
be able to send their treated EAF to any municipal waste landfill
in Illinois. I believe this violates factors of the IL Environmental
Protection Act, which require considerations of existing physical
conditions, receiving body of water and other issues. I am strongly
opposed to this delisting request and urge that it be denied.
Signed
Address A
0 2 c---11)11
,1‘ c1 eve.
F'
4,1 001
Public Comment RE: Case AS 08-10
?
ERKS OFFICP
RE
Cree/VE
As a member of Heart of Illinois Group SierrshlgekICRIWIWths
concerned about the precedent being set if Peon'iDgfilatradl
To the Members of the Illinois Pollution Control Etteft1,1
I
20
Company is granted delisting of Electric Arc Furnace Dust waste.
Board
process PDC claims is safe. Their own testing occurred only in p (
There has been no independent testing of the new treatment
December 2007 and February 2008, yet this waste could be in
our local landfills, including ones over the Mahomet Aquifer, forever.
I am concerned about dioxins, furans, mercury, and other heavy
metals leaching from this waste. If delisting is granted, PDC will
be able to send their treated EAF to any municipal waste landfill
in Illinois. I believe this violates factors of the IL Environmental
Protection Act, which require considerations of existing physical
conditions, receiving bod of water and other issues. I am strongly
opposed to this delisting quest and urge that it be denied.
Signed
Address
°lig?
euttic) A
VI
/
PQ
3
i4c 4 /5/
?
627(e/6
Fr
e
RK'S O
Public Comment RE: Case AS 08-10
?
CL
Cell/
FFICE
ED
4
To the Members of the Illinois Pollution Control BoargEp
1
,
1
2008
As
concerned
a member
about
of Heart
the precedent
of Illinois Group
being set
Sierra
if Peon
Cht
Tt
,WatIntrol
iel
__
Ofe
kOI
ON
84
Company is granted delisting of Electric Arc Furnace Dust waste.
There has been no independent testing of the new treatment
process PDC claims is safe. Their own testing occurred only in
ncl
ice
our
December
local landfills,
2007 and
including
February
ones
2008,
over the
yet
Mahomet
this waste
Aquifer,
could be
forever.
in
r e„,
I am concerned about dioxins, furans, mercury, and other heavy
metals eventually from this waste. If delisting is granted, PDC will
be able to send their treated EAF to any municipal waste landfill
in Illinois. I believe this violates factors of the IL Environmental
Protection Act, which require considerations of existing physical
conditions, receiving body of water and other issues. I am strongly
opposed to this delisting request and y
j
rge that it be denied.
k) 4--L
"....
Address
sei-S719
?
/
Signed
Public Comment RE: Case AS 08-10
?
4c3te,
To the Members of the Illinois Pollution Control Board,
?
CLEFric I
OFFICE
ve
r,
SEP 1 1
As a member of Heart of Illinois Group Sierra Club, t
?
•
tly
, 2008
concerned about the precedent being set if
PeoriaiN
C
F
ILLINOIS
Company is granted delisting of Electric Arc Furnace Dust
waig)DI Board
There has been no independent testing of the new treatment
process PDC claims is safe. Their own testing occurred only in
A
(Cid(
December 2007 and February 2008, yet this waste could be in V
our local landfills, including ones over the Mahomet Aquifer, for ver. 7.°
I am concerned about dioxins, furans, mercury, and other heavy
metals eventually from this waste. If delisting is granted, PDC will
be able to send their treated EAF to any municipal waste landfill
in Illinois. I believe this violates factors of the IL Environmental
Protection Act, which require considerations of existing physical
conditions, receiving body of water and other issues. I am strongly
opposed to this delisting request and urge that it be denied.
Signed
?
Address ?
/3
it W. floss Chic Peorm it.
C,
Public Comment RE: Case AS 08-10
To the Members of the Illinois Pollution Control Board,
As a member of Heart of Illinois Group Sierra Club, I am greatly
concerned about the precedent being set if Peoria Disposal
Company is granted delisting of Electric Arc Furnace Dust waste.
‘e
A‘
There has been no independent testing of the new treatment
npri,
December
process PDC
2007
claims
and
is
February
safe. Their
2008,
own
yet
testing
this waste
occurred
could
only
be inin
\i
our local landfills, including ones over the Mahomet Aquifer, forever.
I am concerned about dioxins, furans, mercury, and other heavy
metals eventually from this waste. If delisting is granted, PDC will
be able to send their treated EAF to any municipal waste landfill
in Illinois. I believe this violates factors of the IL Environmental
Protection Act, which require considerations of existing physical
conditions, receiving body of water and other issues. I am strongly
opposed to this delisting request and urge that it be denied.
Signed
?
p
?
ye_ge
8PEek,
iasi
e.
Oa
N-Ye-
Address
?fro
g
, ye ;21 kic
?
e-
40/6 /Co
Public Comment RE: Case AS 08-10
?
PICE
LERFOI FVFIE
CED
To the Members of the Illinois Pollution Control Boars; 1 1 200
t
0
0
1
10
As
concerned
a member
about
of Heart
the precedent
of Illinois
being
Group
set
Sierra
if Peoria
CWIr
eC
naa
rN
8
8
11
1S
rd
Company is granted delisting of Electric Arc Furnace Dust waste.
There has been no independent testing of the new treatment?
A
process
December
PDC
2007
claims
and February
is safe. Their
2008,
own
yet
testing
this waste
occurred
could
only
be in
in
9L,
\
our local landfills, including ones over the Mahomet Aquifer, forever.
I am concerned about dioxins, furans, mercury, and other heavy
metals leaching from this waste. If delisting is granted, PDC will
be able to send their treated EAF to any municipal waste landfill
in Illinois. I believe this violates factors of the IL Environmental
Protection Act, which require considerations of existing physical
conditions, receiving body Otwatc and other issues. I am strongly
opposed to this delisting r?
s Mis1 urge that it be denied.
Signed
?
Address ?
ELM /AI< le
:q
1
?
k--)0/1
–..critc'S OFFICE—
To the Members of the Illinois Pollution Control Boar:
tru
A
SU
T
oE
E
nP
trol
Boarc
0
I
F
/
11.2
.1.0
.N
B
ois
As a member of Heart of Illinois Group Sierra Club, I am gre
concerned about the precedent being set if Peoria Disposal
Company is granted delisting of Electric Arc Furnace Dust waste.
There has been no independent testing of the new treatment
?
tv04\
process PDC claims is safe. Their own testing occurred only in p %/y
e/
December 2007 and February 2008, yet this waste could be in
our local landfills, including ones over the Mahomet Aquifer, forever.
I am concerned about dioxins, furans, mercury, and other heavy
metals eventually from this waste. If delisting is granted, PDC will
be able to send their treated EAF to any municipal waste landfill
in Illinois. I believe this violates factors of the IL Environmental
Protection Act, which require considerations of existing physical
conditions, receiving body of water and other issues. I am strongly
opposed to this delisting request and urge that it be denied.
Signed
,
416-1-
c
-z-- /7.
,t211
Address-
5C
:51
61
1,11
?
(2/44}- 6
6/-5
"
1/
443
Public Comment RE: Case AS 08-10
Public Comment RE: Case AS 08-10
14 it-
?
To the Members of the Illinois Pollution Control Board,,
?
6"
o
Fr
'Vet
/ce
OEP
2nn
As a member of Heart of Illinois Group Sierra Club
14zegth/
concerned about the precedent being set if Peoria
?
vue
Company is granted delisting of Electric Arc Furnace Dust
• Cnn,
wasteroi
kONO/s
—
There has been no independent testing of the new treatment
8°cgrc
process PDC claims is safe. Their own testing occurred only in
December 2007 and February 2008, yet this waste could be in
our local landfills, including ones over the Mahomet Aquifer, forever.
I am concerned about dioxins, furans, mercury, and other heavy
metals eventually from this waste. If delisting is granted, PDC will
a
t
be able to send their treated EAF to any municipal waste landfill
in Illinois. I believe this violates factors of the IL Environmental
Protection Act, which require considerations of existing physical
conditions, receiving body of water and other issues. I am strongly
opposed to this delisting request and urge that it be denied.
Signed
P14:2
7====--
Address?
Or-?
14e,
" Crpe
e
n Wen
Dear Illinois Pollution Control Board,?
SEP
—
"
1
0
12008
OFFir
I am writing asking you to deny Peoria Disposal Comore vest to
delist electric arc furnace dust (AS 2008-010). The
clikittiwatti
s TAILINois
door expansion of the landfill, an expansion both Peoria Coun y9a e0drd
the IPCB have already denied. The safety of what PDC is proposing
cannot be assured—PDC conducted no assessment of the impact on
its existing landfill, the process details are not available for review, the
testing was very limited, no independent labs verified the results, and no
on-site testing was conducted at the landfills where the material will be
disposed. PDC's proposal simply shifts the risks to safe drinking water to
work with the citizens of Central Illinois to begin the process of truly
?
149)
communities over the. Mahomet aquifer instead of the San Koty. Please
closing this unwanted legacy and eliminating further risks to the health 0
and safety of our community.
IL
C-5
?
\it toP
elm Or c
vv-A
?
n
to oil'
obi:o‘A
9
(mcketio
cjd
Dear Illinois Pollution Control Board,
Ft e
cLen
e
ig
oFFice
I
Ve
SEP 11
2008
I am writing asking you to deny Peoria Disposal Co
?
E OF
X
RI
delist electric arc furnace dust (AS 2008-010). The d
?
KIPOD
?
019
door
?
expansion of the landfill, an expansion both Peoria County an
BoBo
a
r
the IPCB have already denied. The safety of what PDC is proposing
cannot be assured—PDC conducted no assessment of the impact on
its existing landfill, the process details are not available for review, the
testing was very limited, no independent labs verified the results, and no
on-site testing was conducted at the landfills where the material will be
disposed. PDC's proposal simply shifts the risks to safe drinking water to
?
11;
communities over the Mahomet aquifer instead of the San Koty. Please?e,
work with the citizens of Central Illinois to begin the process of truly
closing this unwanted legacy and eliminating further risks to the health
and safety of our community.
(Na1)
ge???
j'A
?
C /to_
e_ L
Add(
?
c?
/
)„
s
o el
--TT
?
r,
(Address)
czof
)1/ Mr
d
i
i
/(tvcr et-
-etc-Ens
LtRicis,reo
Dear Illinois Pollution Control Board,
aSTATig
SEPfr
2008
I am writing asking you to deny Peoria Disposal
Compgglititl
delist electric arc furnace dust (AS 2008-010). The delisting is a bac '
w
Board
door expansion of the landfill, an expansion both Peoria County and
the IPCB have already denied. The safety of what PDC is proposing
cannot be assured—PDC conducted no assessment of the impact on
its existing landfill, the process details 'we not available for review, the
testing was very limited, no independent labs verified the results, and no
on-site testing was conducted at the landfills where the material will be
disposed. PDC's proposal simply shifts the risks to safe drinking water to
?
60
communities over the Mahomet aquifer instead of the San Koty. Please
work with the citizens of Central Illinois to begin the process of truly
closing this unwanted legacy and eliminating further risks to the health
and safety of our community.
(Name)
t‘a 4
7
,16-Ite
Dear Illinois Pollution Control Board,
brajcia
s
OFFICE
V
SEP 1 12008
STATE OF/
I am writing asking you to deny Peoria Disposal
CoM9ilfarreds?
OIS
delist electric arc furnace dust (AS 2008-010). The delisting is a bac B
oard
door expansion of the landfill, an expansion both Peoria County and
the IPCB have already denied. The safety of what PDC is proposing
cannot be assured—PDC conducted no assessment of the impact on
its existing landfill, the process details are not available for review, the
testing was very limited, no independent labs verified the results, and no
on-site testing was conducted at the landfills where the material will be
disposed. PDC's proposal simply shifts the risks to safe drinking water to
communities over the Mahomet aquifer instead of the San Koty. Please
?/
work with the citizens of Central Illinois to begin the process of truly
y toy
closing this unwanted legacy and eliminating further risks to the health
and safety of our com junity.
(Name)
17
(
i&
/ ath KU
Sa
l!
/
Mtia
n
t
\ &11/),1)/2/.
i
lk
/L O-7,6()7
(Address)
RECEIVED
CLERK'S OFFICE
SEP
TA,TkuertILLINOIS
1 1
2008
c
iPtracintrol Board
door expansion of the landfill, an expansion both Peoria County and
the IPCB have already denied. The safety of what PDC is proposing
cannot be assured—PDC conducted no assessment of the impact on
its existing landfill, the process details are not available for review, the
testing was very limited, no independent labs verified the results, and no
on-site testing was conducted at the landfills where the material will be
disposed. PDC's proposal simply shifts the risks to safe drinking water to
communities over the Mahomet aquifer instead of the San Koty. Please
?
1/.
work with the citizens of Central Illinois to begin the process of truly
closing this unwanted legacy and eliminating further risks to the health
?
and safety of our community.
(
9..„
7
(3
N
B)41914/ 51?
1/401(-1a--
Dear Illinois Pollution Control Board,
I am writing asking you to deny Peoria Disposal Comp
delist electric arc furnace dust (AS 2008-010). The del
A
el% A
Di
n7-
245
bre
f
lire
1 V E
ID
s OFFICE
Dear Illinois Pollution Control Board,
?
SEP
1 1
2008
. STATE OF
I41.6INOIS
I am writing asking you to deny Peoria Disposal CompdflYttliegegh I
Board
delist electric arc furnace dust (AS 2008-010). The delisting is a back
door expansion of the landfill, an expansion both Peoria County and
the IPCB have already denied. The safety of what PDC is proposing
cannot be assured—PDC conducted no assessment of the impact on
its existing landfill, the process details are not available for review, the
testing was very limited, no independent labs verified the results, and no
on-site testing was conducted at the landfills where the material will be
disposed. PDC's proposal simply shifts the risks to safe drinking water to
communities over the Mahomet aquifer instead of the San Koty. Please
/work
with the citizens of Central Illinois to begin the process of truly
closing this unwanted legacy and eliminating further risks to the he ther
and s ety of our community.
(Namo
7
t
n0+,
1A-Q
ehit-P\i(
(Add
ress)
CLER4'S
OFFICES
SEP 1 1 2008
Dear Illinois Pollution Control Board,
STATE OF ILLINOIS
I am writing asking you to deny Peoria Disposal Com
e'
soliftmaahtibl
Board
delist electric arc furnace dust (AS 2008-010). The desisting is a back
door expansion of the landfill, an expansion both Peoria County and
the IPCB have already denied. The safety of what PDC is proposing
cannot be assured—PDC conducted no assessment of the impact on
its existing landfill, the process details are not available for review, the
testing was very limited, no independent labs verified the results, and no
on-site testing was conducted at the landfills where the material will be
disposed. PDC's proposal simply shifts the risks to safe drinking water to
communities over the Mahomet aquifer instead of the San Koty. Please
work with the citizens of Central Illinois to begin the process of truly
and
safety of our community.?
Fi
closing this unwanted legacy and eliminating further risks to the health
?
ssr
74a9mi
'Th
(Name)
V 3
6 /
?
t11
(Address)
Dear Illinois Pollution Control Board,
cLefikrg
OFFicE
vs to
SEP 1 1 2008
delist electric arc furnace dust (AS 2008-010). The delis
bninstesh
I am writing asking you to deny Peoria Disposal Comp
I14111164Ib
LINOIS
troi Board
iL
door expansion of the landfill, an expansion both Peoria County and
the IPCB have already denied. The safety of what PDC is proposing
cannot be assured—PDC conducted no assessment of the impact on
its existing landfill, the process details are not available for review, the
testing was very limited, no independent labs verified the results, and no
on-site testing was conducted at the landfills where the material will be
disposed. PDC's proposal simply shifts the risks to safe drinking water to
communities over the Mahomet aquifer instead of the San Koty. Please
work with the citizens of Central Illinois to begin the process of truly
closing this unwanted legacy and eliminating further risks to the health
and safety of our community.
?
r
rt
1/4"
Ms. Lynn LiPtir
2008
705E. McClure Ave.
Peoria, IL 61603
Dear Illinois Pollution Control Board,
Gaits
•
v D
OFFICE
SEP
1 1
P008
I am writing asking you to deny Peoria Disposal CompaRta
STATE
l
fgqi.jest toi-InfOIS
delist electric arc furnace dust (AS 2008-010). The delisting is a oaaPtrol Board
door expansion of the landfill, an expansion both Peoria County and
the IPCB have already denied. The safety of what PDC is proposing
cannot be assured—PDC conducted no assessment of the impact on
its existing landfill, the process details are not available for review, the
testing was very limited, no independent labs verified the results, and no
on-site testing was conducted at the landfills where the material will be
disposed. PDC's proposal simply shifts the risks to safe drinking water to
communities over the Mahomet aquifer instead of the San Koty. Please
work
closing
with
this
the
unwanted
citizens of
legacy
Central
and
Illinois
eliminating
to begin
further
the process
risks to the
of trulyhealth
?
6
6
and?
ty of our community.?
I? —
c
(E:524-1,0EA044
?0 4
,Ad)
l
_LtL
b4909
(Name)
CLERK'S OFFICE
OF
F
S
Dear Illinois Pollution Control Board,
?
SEP 1 1 2008
I am writing asking you to deny Peoria Disposal
CompanallbtfitentezntrO1
STATE OF ILLINOIS
Board
delist electric arc furnace dust (AS 2008-010). The delisting is a back
door expansion of the landfill, an expansion both Peoria County and
the IPCB have already denied. The safety of what PDC is proposing
cannot be assured—PDC conducted no assessment of the impact on
its existing landfill, the process details are not available for review, the
testing was very limited, no independent labs verified the results, and no
on-site testing was conducted at the landfills where the material will be
disposed. PDC's proposal simply shifts the risks to safe drinking water to
communities over the Mahomet aquifer instead of the San Koty. Please
e to*
work with the citizens of Central Illinois to begin th proce s of tru
closing this unwanted legacy and
inating
f
r
?
alth
and safety of our community.
rt
(Address)
/- J
)27,-/
(Address)
ZSC
CrEATP;17
OFFice
Vet)
Dear Illinois Pollution Control Board,
?
SEP?
1
2008
I am writing asking you to deny Peoria Disposal
CompmiltiOresTANOIS
ai
S
T
AT
E OF
delist electric arc furnace dust (AS 2008-010). The delisting is a back Board
door expansion of the landfill, an expansion both Peoria County and
the IPCB have already denied. The safety of what PDC is proposing
cannot be assured—PDC conducted no assessment of the impact on
its existing landfill, the process details are not available for review, the
testing was very limited, no independent labs verified the results, and no
on-site testing was conducted at the landfills where the material will be
disposed. PDC's proposal simply shifts the risks to safe drinking water to
work
communities
with the
over
citizens
the
of
Mahomet
Central Illinois
aquifer
to
instead
begin the
of the
process
San Koty.
of truly
Please
?
11
and
closing
safe
this
of
unwanted
our community.
legacy and eliminating further risks to the health
?Li
4.4d
,_=k)
‘74,45
t'iCEIVED
CLERK'S
OFFICE
SF_P 1 1 2008
delist
I am writing
electric
asking
arc furnace
you to
dust
deny
(AS
Peoria
2008-010).
Disposal
The
Comp
delisting
STATE
is a back
OF ILLINOIS
?
Board
door expansion of the landfill, an expansion both Peoria County and
the IPCB have already denied. The safety of what PDC is proposing
cannot be assured—PDC conducted no assessment of the impact on
its existing landfill, the process details are not available for review, the
testing was very limited, no independent labs verified the results, and no
on-site testing was conducted at the landfills where the material will be
disposed.
communities
PDC's
over
proposal
the Mahomet
simply
aquifer
shifts the
instead
risks
of
to
the
safe
San
drinking
Koty. Pleasewater
to
V
work with the citizens of Central Illinois to begin the process of truly ?t,
closing this unwanted legacy and eliminati further risks to the health
and safety of our community.
(Name)
Dear Illinois Pollution Control Board,
7 TY)
8 /L ek /6c
(Address)
go zizt--;
N acne tioe
PON--
Pe-e>r/a- lit
ct-ri ,
17- 616.
