NarrirjE
SEP
-
9 2009
I am writing asking you to deny Peoria Disposal Companft
szAagg
ILLINOIS
delist electric arc furnace dust (AS 2008-010). The delisting
irgYileff
°
at"
Board
door expansion of the landfill, an expansion both Peoria County and
the IPCB have already denied. The safety of what PDC is proposing
cannot be assured—PDC conducted no assessment of the impact on
its existing landfill, the process details are not available for review, the
I (
testing was very limited, no independent labs verified the results, and no
pc,ut
on-site testing was conducted at the landfills where the material will be
\
disposed. PDC's proposal simply shifts the risks to safe drinking water to
communities over the Mahomet aquifer instead of the San Katy. Please
work with the citizens of Central Illinois to begin the process of truly
closing this unwanted legacy and eliminating further risks to the health
and safety of our community.
?
•?
I?
2 .4.7:42-1.•A"
J
P?•
?
•
Cr)(
--e
L
.,
LZv r
?
n„
z?
4
y
/1
,
I
J
y
(Address)
SI 4)
?
2)12
?
Z
Dear Illinois Pollution Control Board,
(Name
4--
a i; / zit
To the Members of the Illinois Pollution Control Board,
?
2008
Public Comment RE: Case AS 08-10
?
31..Eptkg
'Vet
'?
EP
9
OPpice
As a member of Heart of Illinois Group Sierra Club, I am greatlyifrol
ILLIA100i_ts
p.,-
concerned about the precedent being set if Peoria Disposal
Company is granted delisting of Electric Arc Furnace Dust waste.
There has been no independent testing of the new treatment
process
Decemb
PDC
r 2007
claims
and February
is safe. Their
2008,
own
yet
testing
this waste
occurred
could be
only
in
in
e
9
dijt
our local landfills, including ones over the Mahomet Aquifer, forever.
I am concerned about dioxins, furans, mercury, and other heavy
metals leaching from this waste. If delisting is granted, PDC will
be able to send their treated EAF to any municipal waste landfill
in Illinois. I believe this violates factors of the IL Environmental
Protection Act, which require considerations of existing physical
conditions, receiving body of water and other issues. I am strongly
opposed to this delisting request and urge that it be denied.
Signed
Stsaft—.
Address
7
90 6
lAf
Prei-ftee._ RA
jag pie-/-6f.)
t
W..
Dear Illinois Pollution Control Board,
RECEIVED
CLERK'S OFFICE
SEP - 9 2008
I am writing asking you to deny Peoria Disposal CortpwrE
eguitogois
delist electric arc furnace dust (AS 2008-010).
Th02011400
CobtrOt
Board
door expansion of the landfill, an expansion both Peoria County and
the IPCB have already denied. The safety of what PDC is proposing
cannot be assured—PDC conducted no assessment of the impact on
p
its existing landfill, the process details are not available for review, the \
testing was very limited, no independent labs verified the results, and no
on-site testing was conducted at the landfills where the material will be
disposed. PDC's proposal simply shifts the risks to safe drinking water to
communities over the Mahomet aquifer instead of the San Koty. Please
work with the citizens of Central Illinois to begin the process of truly
closing this unwanted legacy and eliminating further risks to the health
and safety of our pommuni
(Name)
(Address)
/003/
iher
A ee_.5 J EctaArY
s
L 67--C2
g
Address
36? k. fr
(o,
;11
-
PAP.
atnet,,z( eat
Signed
Public Comment RE: Case AS 08-10
oraFiregu-F7:-
ES P - 9
20E
To the Members of the Illinois Pollution Control Board
, 91se
StATE
r
tio
OF
rot
ILLINL
As a member of Heart of Illinois Group Sierra Club
Boast
concerned about the precedent being set if Peoria Disposal
Company is granted delisting of Electric Arc Furnace Dust waste.
There has been no independent testing of the new treatment
process
December
PDC
2007
claims
and
is
February
safe. Their
2008,
own
yet
testing
this waste
occurred
could
only
be in
in
?
0'4
our local landfills, including ones over the Mahomet Aquifer, forever.
I am concerned about dioxins, furans, mercury, and other heavy
metals leaching from this waste. If delisting is granted, PDC will
be able to send their treated EAF to any municipal waste landfill
in Illinois. I believe this violates factors of the IL Environmental
Protection Act, which require considerations of existing physical
conditions, receiving body of water and other issues. I am strongly
opposed to this delistin re
?
- .d urge that it be denied.
Public Comment RE: Case AS 08-10
ar
c
en
‘..
^K-
F
S
I
V
F
FIE
CE
D
1
OF
-
9
I
20
LLI
198
NOIS
To the Members of the Illinois Pollution Control Board,,
ja
As a member of Heart of Illinois Group Sierra CliAtiSitatte
oard
concerned about the precedent being set if Peoria Disposal
Company is granted delisting of Electric Arc Furnace Dust waste.
There has been no independent testing of the new treatment
? c/(7‘
process PDC claims is safe. Their own testing occurred only in
December 2007 and February 2008, yet this waste could be in
our local landfills, including ones over the Mahomet Aquifer, forever.
I am concerned about dioxins, furans, mercury, and other heavy
metals leaching from this waste. If delisting is granted, PDC will
be able to send their treated EAF to any municipal waste landfill
in Illinois. I believe this violates factors of the IL Environmental
Protection Act, which require considerations of existing physical
conditions, receiving body of water and other issues. I am strongly
opposed to this delisting request and urge that it be denied.
Signed
?
Address
CI 2?
41Q
ID 6E,
" r
1-1AivieA c?
I L 6 (
Public Comment RE: Case AS 08-10
?
-4-ERK'S OFFICE
E
To the Members of the Illinois Pollution Control
gg-er, 9 2008
As
concerned
a member
about
of Heart
the precedent
of Illinois
being
Group
set
Sierra
if Peoria
Club;
TE
Disposal
OF
eftnitibrebarci
ILLIISt..
Company
has
is
been
granted
no independent
delisting of Electric
testing of
Arc
the
Furnace
new treatment
Dust waste. ejf4,
There
process PDC claims is safe. Their own testing occurred only
December 2007 and February 2008, yet this waste could be in
our local landfills, including ones over the Mahomet Aquifer, forever.
I am concerned about dioxins, furans, mercury, and other heavy
metals eventually from this waste. If delisting is granted, PDC will
be able to send their treated EAF to any municipal waste landfill
in Illinois. I believe this violates factors of the IL Environmental
Protection Act, which require considerations of existing physical
conditions, receiving body of water and other issues. I am strongly
opposed to this delisting request and urge that it be denied.
Signed
?
Address
i
Agq
;Qat-, &7
-;LER
FCS
OFFICE
`EP - 9 2008
To the Members of the Illinois Pollution Control Board,
r)F ILLINOIS
As a member of Heart of Illinois Group Sierra Club, I am great's/-
Intro'. Board
concerned about the precedent being set if Peoria Disposal
Company is granted delisting of Electric Arc Furnace Dust waste.
There has been no independent testing of the new treatment
process PDC claims is safe. Their own testing occurred only in
n 0,1
December 2007 and February 2008, yet this waste could be in C
our local landfills, including ones over the Mahomet Aquifer, forever.
I am concerned about dioxins, furans, mercury, and other heavy
metals leaching from this waste. If delisting is granted, PDC will
be able to send their treated EAF to any municipal waste landfill
in Illinois. I believe this violates factors of the IL Environmental
Protection Act, which require considerations of existing physical
conditions, receiving body of water and other issues. I am strongly
opposed to this delisting request and urge that it be denied.
Signed
Address
&
H
i
C
0
1
"14
1-71
Ch47
155"
Public Comment RE: Case AS 08-10
Dear Illinois Pollution Control Board,
delist
I am writing
electric
asking
arc
you
furnace
to deny
dust
Peoria
(AS
Disposal
2008-010).
C mpany's
T at
rgqDMto
rNbis
door expansion of the landfill, an expansion both
19
WiRit?
011oard
the IPCB have already denied. The safety of what PDC is proposing
cannot be assured—PDC conducted no assessment of the impact on
testing was very limited, no independent labs verified the results, and no
its existing landfill, the process details are not available for review, the
on-site testing was conducted at the landfills where the material will be
disposed. PDC's proposal simply shifts the risks to safe drinking water to
work with the citizens of Central Illinois to begin the process of truly
communities over the Mahomet aquifer instead of the San Koty. Please
closing this unwanted legacy and eliminating further risks to the health
RECEIVED
SEP -
g
2finp
LERK'S
OFF/CE
and safety of our community.
WIAAve^—
?
30514 KiP■ Ve9
(Na
m
e)
t6,4 tAh
temisk
p
)„,
vk
evo
on_?
pick,
I L.
to
;*2
(Address)
?
AM-AP
,ela soma
Public Comment RE: Case AS 08-10
?
es
cLEA
K
?
S OFFICE
ED
To the Members of the Illinois Pollution Control Board,
SEP - g 2008
As a member of Heart of Illinois Group Sierra Club, FineNI-LINOIS
concerned about the precedent being set if Peoria Disposal ntroi Beam
Company is granted delisting of Electric Arc Furnace Dust waste.
There
process
has
PDC
been
claims
no independent
is safe. Their
testing
own testing
of the new
occurred
treatment
only in ()
•
December 2007 and February 2008, yet this waste could be in \
our local landfills, including ones over the Mahomet Aquifer, forever.
I am concerned about dioxins, furans, mercury, and other heavy
metals leaching from this waste. If delisting is granted, PDC will
be able to send their treated EAF to any municipal waste landfill
in Illinois. I believe this violates factors of the IL Environmental
Protection Act, which require considerations of existing physical
conditions, rec•ody of water and other issues. I am strongly
opposed to, delis g requ st an d ur9 at it be denied.
Signed
Address/7;32 N
.
of/ isnify
?
PA-m/41 it__ /Pe;
—
`-irrICE
L
OIS
Public Comment RE: Case AS 08-10
nn Control
Board
SEP .. 91 200
1N8
To the Members of the Illinois Pollution Control
?
OF L
As a member of Heart of Illinois Group Sierra Club, I am greatly
concerned about the precedent being set if Peoria Disposal
Company is granted delisting of Electric Arc Furnace Dust waste.
There has been no independent testing of the new treatment
?
p
n
0
process PDC claims is safe. Their own testing occurred only in
December 2007 and February 2008, yet this waste could be in
our local landfills, including ones over the Mahomet Aquifer, forever.
I am concerned about dioxins, furans, mercury, and other heavy
metals leaching from this waste. If delisting is granted, PDC will
be able to send their treated EAF to any municipal waste landfill
in Illinois. I believe this violates factors of the IL Environmental
Protection Act, which require considerations of existing physical
conditions, receiving body of water and other issues. I am strongly
opposed to th . delistin
t
request and urge that it be denied.
if
.4
sdia
a .0
Address
76)
?
it) n ,
?
ed/CCQ `(.trio_
17
-€0 it a
1
1-
Signed
Public Comment RE: Case AS 08-10
?
eelineb
CLERK'S OFFICE
To the Members of the Illinois Pollution Control Boagp
°Cr -
9 2008
As a member of Heart of Illinois Group Sierra
CISIPMftrapetelliNOIS
concerned about the precedent being set if Peciritgiergoceatitrol Board
Company is granted delisting of Electric Arc Furnace Dust waste.
There has been no independent testing of the new treatment
process PDC claims is safe. Their own testing occurred only in 0 e,,i(
December 2007 and February 2008, yet this waste could be in 1
our local landfills, including ones over the Mahomet Aquifer, forever.
I am concerned about dioxins, furans, mercury, and other heavy
metals leaching from this waste. If delisting is granted, PDC will
be able to send their treated EAF toi
l municipal waste landfill
in Illinois. I believe this violates factors of the IL Environmental
Protection Act, which require considerations of existing physical
conditions, receiving body of water and other issues. I am strongly
opposed to this delisting request and urge that it be denied.
Signed ?
Address
'
O3 )14-
1
-"w
o
i
cei
it
:e-4
1-
aL, LP, /C--2&°
IIC
E
LE
C
RK
E
'S
1
0
FVFIW
Dear Illinois Pollution Control Board,
?
SEP
delist electric arc furnace dust (AS 2
?
-
?
.?
o
I am writing asking you to deny Peoria Disposal Comp
,t5
-
9 2"
Nois
tol Board
door expansion of the landfill, an expansion both Peoria ounty
the IPCB have already denied. The safety of what PDC is proposing
pir
cannot be assured—PDC conducted no assessment of the impact on Ou,
its existing landfill, the process details are not available for review, the
testing was very limited, no independent labs verified the results, and no
on-site testing was conducted at the landfills where the material will be
disposed. PDC's proposal simply shifts the risks to safe drinking water to
communities over the Mahomet aquifer instead of the San Koty. Please
work with the citizens of Central Illinois to begin the process of truly
closing this unwanted legacy and eliminating further risks to the health
and safety of our communi% .
3E
C
LERK'S
WHIP
SEP - 9 2008
I am writing
electric
asking
arc furnace
you to
dust
deny
(AS
Peoria
2008
Disposal
-010). The
Comp an ' it vest to
delist
door expansion of the landfill, an expansion both Peoria ouniy
1
pn,s,,tui
a
ro,NBOoa
lSrd
the IPCB have already denied. The safety of what PDC is proposing
cannot
its existing
be assured—PDC
landfill, the process
conducted
details
no
are
assessment
not available
of the
for
impact
review,
on
theOC.
?
2,
1 5
„..---
testing was very limited, no independent labs verified the results, and no
k
on-site testing was conducted at the landfills where the material will be
disposed. PDC's proposal simply shifts the risks to safe drinking water to
communities over the Mahomet aquifer instead of the San Koty. Please
work with the citizens of Central Illinois to begin the process of truly
closing this unwanted legacy and eliminating further risks to the health
and safety of our community.
Clr,,,
k-/ cs - 3-
etunic 131-ikew
ski
(Name)
65-27
A/ Fa 4/1eu, ,e,- non EA 1
4-
6/gir
(Address)
Dear Illinois Pollution Control Board,
OFFICED
T
rPr
ikt-INOIS
Dear Illinois Pollution Control Board,
?
I am writing asking you to deny Peoria Disposal Co
?
SE
delist electric arc furnace dust (AS 2008-010). The delisting isVetrei
- 9
2°
Board
door expansion of the landfill, an expansion both Peoria County and
cannot be assured—PDC conducted no assessment of the impact on
p C,7,
14
the IPCB have already denied. The safety of what PDC is proposing
its existing landfill, the process details are not available for review, the
testing was very limited, no independent labs verified the results, and no
on-site testing was conducted at the landfills where the material will be
disposed. PDC's proposal simply shifts the risks to safe drinking water to
communities over the Mahomet aquifer instead of the San Koty. Please
work with the citizens of Central Illinois to begin the process of truly
closing this unwanted legacy and eliminating further risks to the health
and safety of our community.
IZcL2_,(7
(Name)
g.1?
imonAltwictei 1
-
)r, Peonc&
?
1
(4)/L1
7
a
r ire
CLERK'S OFFICE
SEP - g 2008
Dear Illinois Pollution Control Board,
STATE OF ILLINOIS
delist
I am writing
electric
asking
arc furnace
you to
dust
deny
(AS
Peoria
2008-010).
Disposal
The
coraiitulinrecatinfrai
delisting is a back
Board
door expansion of the landfill, an expansion both Peoria County and
the IPCB have already denied. The safety of what PDC is proposing
cannot be assured—PDC conducted no assessment of the impact on
0e.,17.---
its existing landfill, the process details are not available for review, the
r
testing was very limited, no independent labs verified the results, and no
on-site testing was conducted at the landfills where the material will be
disposed. PDC's proposal simply shifts the risks to safe drinking water to
communities over the Mahomet aquifer instead of the San Koty. Please
work with the citizens of Central Illinois to begin the process of truly
closing this unwanted legacy and eliminating further risks to the health
and safety of our community.
(Name)
(Address)
;Jai/
AA° (.4 rai
get?
-
6)6 c5/
Signed
7
Address.-?
0
/0 /-1
4,n)
7. /2
Oa(
To?
-
the Members of the Illinois Pollution Control Board,
p
s AS:rEEP
CLERK
'S
EZFE
I°
co-F ILL
INOIS
Public Comment RE: Case AS 0810
As a member of Heart of Illinois Group Sierra Club,
rlikftgreatyltrol Boan
concerned about the precedent being set if Peoria Disposal
Company is granted delisting of Electric Arc Furnace Dust waste
There has been no independent testing of the new treatment
December
process PDC
2007
claims
and February
is safe. Their
2008,
own
yet
testing
this waste
occurred
could
only
be in
in
CL/
our local landfills, including ones over the Mahomet Aquifer, forever.
I am concerned about dioxins, furans, mercury, and other heavy
metals eventually from this waste. If delisting is granted, PDC will
be able to send their treated EAF to any municipal waste landfill
in Illinois. I believe this violates factors of the IL Environmental
Protection Act, which require considerations of existing physical
conditions, receivipg body of water and other issues. I am strongly
opposed to thiclelisting req est and urge that it be denied.
Public Comment RE: Case AS 08-10
?
RECEIVED
CLERK'S OFFICE
To the Members of the Illinois Pollution Control Board,
stp - 9 2008
As
concerned
a member
about
of
Heart
Hea
the
of
precedent
Illinois Group
being
Sierra
set if
C
P ,
i
t;
edolttINOIS
fP9antrol Board
There
Company
has
is
been
granted
no independent
delisting of
testing
Electric
of
Arc
the
F
new
nace
treatment
Dust waste.
?
?
r ' 1,
,,
process PDC claims is safe. Their own testing occurred only in Ca/t
December 2007 and Februar
2008, yet this waste could be in
y
our local landfills, including ones over the Mahomet Aquifer, forever.
I am concerned about dioxins, furans, mercury, and other heavy
metals leaching from this waste. If delisting is granted, PDC will
be able to send their treated EAF to any municipal waste landfill
in Illinois. I believe this violates factors of the IL Environmental
Protection Act, which require considerations of existing physical
conditions, receiving body of water and other issues. I am strongly
opposed to this delisting request and urge that it be denied.
Signed ?
Ykt–a/ti,
?
/a 7/k/ i o-a-z-e
Address .57/
Ai.a.„eg,
ehe.4.1-iiik
•
re...0_44:4_.
6 / 1, PI
Dear Illinois Pollution Control Board,
RECEIVED
CLERK'S OFFICE
SEP - 9 2008
I am writing asking you to deny Peoria Disposal
CoThr
tAv
it
ois
delist electric arc furnace dust (AS 2008-010). The Oglithitrepothit
Board
door expansion of the landfill, an expansion both Peoria County and
the IPCB have already denied. The safety of what PDC is proposing
cannot
its existing
be assured—PDC
landfill, the process
conducted
details
no
are
assessment
not available
of
for
the
review,
impact
theon
?
ell
testing was very limited, no independent labs verified the results, and no
on-site testing was conducted at the landfills where the material will be
disposed. PDC's proposal simply shifts the risks to safe drinking water to
communities over the Mahomet aquifer instead of the San Koty. Please
work with the citizens of Central Illinois to begin the process of truly
closing this unwanted legacy and eliminating further risks to the health
and safety of our community.
_)-)
a_ce_ 7 /
A )
?
5 5
pew.?
4,
/& Cil
Li
(Address)
