BEFORE THE ILLINOIS POLLUTION CONTROL BOARD
    IN THE MATTER OF:
    SECTION
    27 PROPOSED RULES FOR
    NITROGEN OXIDE (NOx) EMISSIONS
    FROM STATIONARY RECIPROCATING
    INTERNAL COMBUSTION ENGINES
    AND
    TURBINES: AMENDMENTS
    TO 35 ILL.
    ADM.
    CODE
    PARTS 211 AND 217
    R07-19
    (Rulemaking - Air)
    NOTICE OF FILING
    TO: Mr. John
    Therriault
    Assistant Clerk of the Board
    Illinois Pollution Control Board
    100 West Randolph Street
    Suite 11-500
    Chicago,
    Illinois 60601
    (VIA ELECTRONIC
    MAIL)
    Mr. Tim Fox
    Hearing Officer
    Illinois Pollution Control Board
    100 West Randolph Street
    Suite 11-500
    Chicago, Illinois 60601
    (VIA ELECTRONIC
    MAIL)
    (SEE PERSONS ON ATTACHED SERVICE LIST)
    PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that I have today
    filed
    with the Office of the Clerk of the
    Illinois Pollution Control Board the PRE-FILED TESTIMONY OF KEVIN L.
    WAGNER, copies of which are herewith served upon you.
    Respectfully submitted,
    ILLINOIS MUNICIPAL ELECTRIC AGENCY,
    By:
    /s/
    N. LaDonna Driver
    N. LaDonna Driver
    Dated: March 26, 2008
    N. LaDonna Driver
    HODGE DWYER ZEMAN
    3150 Roland Avenue
    Post Office Box 5776
    Springfield, Illinois 62705-5776
    (217)
    523-4900
    T HIS FILING SUBMITTED ON RECYCLED PAPER
    Electronic Filing - Received, Clerk's Office, March 26, 2008

    CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
    I, N. LaDonna Driver, the undersigned, hereby certify
    that I have served the attached
    PRE-FILED TESTIMONY
    OF KEVIN L. WAGNER upon:
    Mr. John Therriault
    Assistant Clerk of the Board
    Illinois Pollution Control Board
    100 West Randolph Street
    Suite
    11-500
    Chicago, Illinois 60601
    via electronic filing and by depositing
    said documents in the United States Mail, postage
    prepaid, in Springfield,
    Illinois, on March 26, 2008; and upon:
    Mr. Tim Fox
    Hearing Officer
    Illinois Pollution Control
    Board
    100 West Randolph Street
    Suite 11-500
    Chicago, Illinois 60601
    Rachel
    L. Doctors, Esq.
    Illinois Environmental Protection Agency
    1021 North Grand Avenue East
    Post Office Box 19276
    Springfield, Illinois 62794-9276
    Renee Cipriano, Esq.
    Kathleen C. Bassi, Esq.
    Joshua R. More, Esq.
    Stephen J. Bonebrake, Esq.
    Schiff Hardin, LLP
    6600 Sears Tower
    233 South Wacker Drive
    Chicago,
    Illinois
    60606-6473
    via electronic
    mail on March 26, 2008.
    /s/
    N. LaDonna Driver
    N. LaDonna Driver
    IMEA/Fil/NOF-COS- Wagner
    Testimony

    BEFORE THE ILLINOIS POLLUTION CONTROL
    BOARD
    IN THE MATTER OF:
    SECTION 27 PROPOSED RULES FOR
    NITROGEN OXIDE (NOx) EMISSIONS
    FROM STATIONARY RECIPROCATING
    INTERNAL COMBUSTION ENGINES AND
    TURBINES: AMENDMENTS TO 35 ILL.
    ADM. CODE PARTS 211 AND 217
    R07-19
    (Rulemaking - Air)
    PRE-FILED
    TESTIMONY OF KEVIN L. WAGNER
    NOW COMES the Illinois Municipal Electric Agency ("IMEA"), by one of its
    attorneys, N. LaDonna Driver of
    HODGE DWYER ZEMAN, and submits the following pre-
    filed testimony of Kevin L. Wagner for presentation at the April 9, 2008, hearing scheduled
    in the above-referenced matter:
    Testimony of
    Kevin L. Wagner
    My name is Kevin L. Wagner. I am employed by IMEA as the Director of
    Engineering. I am
    here today to provide information on how the Proposed Rule will affect
    IMEA and its members.
    Educational Background and Professional Experience
    I graduated from Brigham Young University in 1977 with a Bachelor of Science
    Degree in Electrical Engineering. Immediately following graduation, I started working for
    Bechtel Power Corporation ("Bechtel")
    in Houston, Texas. At Bechtel, I was an Assistant
    Engineer, involved in coal-fired power plant design. In 1979, I joined the Missouri Utilities
    Company ("Missouri Utilities"),
    located in Cape Girardeau, Missouri. While at Missouri
    Utilities, I was an Assistant Engineer, supporting various electric utility distribution system
    projects. I worked at Missouri Utilities until
    1983, at which time I accepted employment
    with Central
    Illinois Public Service Company ("CIPS") in Springfield, Illinois. I worked at

    CIPS for 9 %2 years
    in various engineering positions,
    including transmission and generation
    planning, protective
    relaying and system operations. I was then
    hired as a Staff Engineer
    with IMEA, in January of 1993. Shortly thereafter,
    I became IMEA's Manager of
    Engineering. In that capacity,
    I was responsible for the planning, property acquisition
    and
    construction oversight
    of transmission line and diesel generating
    plant projects for IMEA.
    My title was changed to Director of Engineering
    in 2004. 1 have been a Licensed
    Professional Engineer
    in the State of Illinois since 1990.
    Duties and
    Responsibilities in Present Position
    As Director of Engineering,
    I oversee the work of the IMEA's engineering staff,
    which
    provides technical support for the planning, implementing
    and maintaining of IMEA's
    power supply resources, transmission agreements
    and member delivery point facilities.
    These responsibilities
    include the capacity testing and permitting of IMEA
    and IMEA
    member-owned peaking generators (that consist primarily
    of small diesel units) dedicated to
    the IMEA's use.
    IMEA Background
    The Illinois Municipal Electric Agency
    was created in 1984 and its primary purpose
    is to provide
    for the wholesale electric power supply needs of its
    members, all of which are
    municipally-operated electric distribution systems
    within the State of Illinois. These systems
    are units of local
    government that own, operate and maintain the electric distribution
    system
    that serves their citizens. IMEA is governed by
    a board of directors, with one director
    representing each member community.
    It operates on a not-for-profit basis and employs a
    full-time professional
    staff.

    Prior to
    the creation of the Agency, the municipally-operated electric
    systems
    provided for their wholesale power needs primarily
    in one of two ways. They either
    purchased wholesale
    power for resale to their citizens from the investor-owned electric utility
    in the area in which they were located, or they generated their own electricity
    from power
    plants located within the
    community. The generation in the local power plants was, most
    generally, driven by large diesel, or dual-fueled natural gas and diesel,
    reciprocating internal
    combustion engines.
    Economics related to fuel costs in the late 1970s and early 1980s prompted most of
    the communities operating these local plants to
    migrate to purchasing power from wholesale
    providers.
    The municipal power plants were then reserved generally for backup use in case
    of an interruption of wholesale power deliveries over the electric transmission system.
    As noted earlier, IMEA was created
    to pool the wholesale power needs of municipal
    electric systems and to acquire, through ownership or contract, the power these systems need
    to serve their citizens. IMEA currently
    has long-term power supply contracts with 30 of the
    state's municipally-operated electric systems. These systems vary greatly
    in
    size.
    IMEA's
    members include St. Charles (population 31,000)
    in suburban DuPage and Kane Counties
    and Winnetka (population
    12,000) in Cook County. However, the majority of the members
    are of 10,000 population or fewer and are located throughout the state.
    To serve its communities, IMEA has assembled a power supply
    that includes
    ownership
    of base load and peaking generation, long-term power supply contracts for
    capacity and energy and other such arrangements as are
    needed to fulfill the Agency's
    responsibilities. The members currently require over 700 MW of generating capacity to
    serve their combined population of approximately
    180,000 citizens.

    Specifically, IMEA owns a portion
    (12.12%) of Trimble County Unit 1, a base loaded
    500
    MW coal-fired steam power plant facility located northeast of
    Louisville, Kentucky. It is
    operated by the majority owner of
    the facility, Louisville Gas and Electric Company. IMEA
    also holds long-term contracts for wholesale electricity with
    Ameren Energy Marketing, the
    power marketing arm of Ameren Corporation.
    IMEA also enters into shorter-term
    arrangements to
    meet seasonal requirements and makes purchases on a time to time basis
    from the power markets that operate in Illinois. In addition
    to these resources, IMEA owns
    and operates 10 high speed, remotely-controlled
    diesel engine generators. Each of these
    peaking
    units has a nameplate rating of 1825 kilowatts. These units are located
    in
    the
    IMEA
    member communities of Highland, Waterloo and
    Flora and are currently permitted with the
    respective
    member's local generation.
    To assure the economic and reliable
    delivery of power supply to its members, IMEA
    operates a 24-hour
    a day, seven-day a week operations center within its Springfield
    headquarters. The operations center monitors each member's power
    requirements on a real-
    time basis, forecasts member load and schedules
    the delivery of the needed power.
    Power is normally delivered to the members through the high voltage electric
    transmission grid and, in most cases, through the lower
    voltage sub-transmission system of
    power lines and substations
    owned and operated by a variety of corporate entities, such as
    Exelon and Ameren Corporation. The high voltage grid
    is administered by two Regional
    Transmission Organizations
    ("RTOs") known as the Midwest Independent System Operator
    ("MISO") and the PJM regional transmission organization ("PJM"). Their job
    is to
    oversee
    use of the transmission grid and
    assure its availability to all who wish to use it on a non-
    discriminatory
    basis. Along with their responsibilities for transmission services, MISO and

    PJM both operate power markets in which wholesale power
    is bought and sold. In Illinois,
    MISO has a
    footprint that takes in most of the state south of Interstate 80. PJM's footprint is
    primarily north of Interstate 80.
    How the IMEA and IMEA Member-Owned Peaking Generation Units Fit into IMEA's
    Power Supply
    As I noted earlier, a number of IMEA's members continue to maintain and operate
    locally-sited stationary reciprocating internal combustion generating units. Two of the
    members have added small combustion turbine generating units to this mix. As a part of its
    power supply arrangements, IMEA has entered into contractual agreements with
    these
    members for the use of
    their
    units
    as
    a part of
    the
    overall
    Agency power portfolio. These
    units can be called on to operate by IMEA's operations staff and they are considered an
    integral part of the
    Agency's
    power supply.
    The vast majority
    of these units are permitted
    under Title V permits.
    The member-owned units, along with the IMEA-owned diesels, are used in two ways.
    First, they are operated for economic reasons. That is, when power purchases through either
    MISO or PJM are more expensive than the cost to operate the member units, IMEA's
    operations center will ask for the operation of enough member units to fill the need. This
    typically occurs during periods of peak summer demand. Such operation provides an
    important cap during periods of peak demand on power costs for IMEA's members by
    allowing the group to avoid market power purchases during high cost periods. Since peak
    usage typically occurs less than 10% of the year, NOx emissions are minimal from operation
    of these units during periods of peak demand. Even when the member-owned units are not
    running, having them simply available to operate helps reduce the power supply cost for the

    members who would otherwise be at the mercy of a capacity market that is expected to
    experience a 6-fold price increase over the next five years.
    Secondly, the member units can be used for system reliability and support in the
    event of a critical transmission or sub-transmission system outage. An example of system
    support is when one of the transmission system owners or RTOs asks for our member units to
    operate to help reduce the loading of transmission grid facilities or to keep system voltage at
    acceptable levels. Unacceptably
    low
    voltage can damage customer equipment and lead to a
    collapse of the power delivery system.
    These units are also particularly vital to members who are served radially by a single
    transmission line or transformer. Such members are subject to a total power outage in their
    communities as a result of weather-related or other types of damage to the radial facilities. In
    some circumstances, a weather-related transmission outage can stretch for
    days or weeks. If
    a transmission equipment failure involves a single substation transformer that supplies the
    member,
    the outage can sometimes extend several months. These lines and transformers
    must also be taken out of service periodically for routine maintenance. Under such
    circumstances, the local generation is the only means of providing power to the municipal
    system's customers. Similarly, members
    with limited capacity backup transmission lines
    may be required to run local generation for extended periods to prevent equipment overloads
    or low voltage during outages that affect their primary
    transmission feed.
    As an example of the vital nature of these units in emergency circumstances, you
    need look no farther than the experiences of one of our member communities in the last year.
    This municipality is located on a radial transmission line fed from the Ameren bulk

    transmission system and is one of the IMEA communities that maintains a power generation
    facility comprised of stationary reciprocating internal combustion generating
    units.
    In calendar year 2007 alone, this member suffered six transmission related
    outages
    that required the operation of their power generating units. The most serious occurred on
    December 11, when an ice event took down a portion of the transmission
    system serving the
    city. The municipal system brought on their generation and was forced to operate the units
    for 48 hours, until ice damage to the transmission lines could be repaired and the lines
    put
    back into service.
    As recently as March 5, 2008, the
    same community experienced an outage caused by
    an industrial accident on the Ameren system. In this case the city was forced to generate
    from
    10:30 AM until 7:00 PM when transmission service was restored.
    IMEA's Involvement in the Rulemaking
    Process
    Both economics and reliability are of critical importance to our members.
    With those
    issues in mind, IMEA has held a number
    of meetings with representatives of the Illinois
    Environmental Protection Agency to discuss the Proposed Rule. As originally proposed,
    the
    Rule impacted peaking generation
    owned by IMEA and IMEA members located throughout
    the entire state. The scope of the Rule, as currently proposed, has subsequently
    been
    modified
    to affect only those plants located in the nonattainment areas. However, IMEA's
    general concerns continue to relate to the Proposed
    Rule's impact on available operation of
    the affected members' generating units, both because of their peaking use and most
    particularly because
    of the members' concerns over their ability to operate for system support
    or during transmission outages.

    IMEA found the meetings to be productive
    in that IEPA staff agreed to modifications
    and clarifications
    that went a long way toward addressing IMEA's concerns.
    I will outline
    our understanding of the Proposed Rule's key provisions
    for IMEA and its members. The
    first such
    provision is Section 217.388(c). This section allows units
    that would otherwise be
    subject to the Proposed Rule's emission
    requirements to be in compliance with the Proposed
    Rule if they are operated
    as low usage units.
    Low usage units are defined in one of two ways. First,
    low usage units may take a
    collective federally enforceable emission
    limit
    of
    100 tons per year of NOx. Units that
    qualify
    for an exemption from the Proposed Rule's requirements and units that are
    complying with the Proposed Rule's emission
    requirements are not counted under this
    emission limit. Second,
    reciprocating engines may take a federally enforceable limit of 8
    million brake horsepower-hours annually in the aggregate
    and turbines may take a federally
    enforceable limit of 20,000
    Megawatt-hours annually in the aggregate. IMEA understands
    that this second low usage option allows a site with both reciprocating
    engines and turbines
    to operate the reciprocating
    engines up to the 8 million brake horsepower-hours limit and the
    turbines
    up to the 20,000 Megawatt-hours annual limit and still be considered low usage
    units. This approach provides important flexibility for
    IMEA's members, which IMEA
    strongly supports.
    IMEA must note that while the low usage provision
    is an important compliance
    option,
    it will, in some cases, impose severe restrictions upon the members' units as currently
    permitted. Many of the IMEA members' units, particularly the older
    units, will be forced to
    operate as low usage units because
    it is economically not feasible to modify these units to

    comply with
    the emission requirements of the Proposed Rule, particularly
    given that these
    units operate sporadically.
    Some of
    the newer member-owned diesel units are of a high speed design
    and,
    according to our understanding of the manufacturer's
    literature, may be capable of operating
    within the 660 ppmv NOx
    (corrected to 15% dry 02) standard of the Proposed Rule. IMEA
    assumes
    the compliance strategy under the Proposed Rule will differ for each member with
    generation. Those members with
    newer high speed units that may be capable of complying
    with the proposed
    emission limits may operate those units under the provisions in Section
    217.388(a), along with the accompanying
    testing and monitoring requirements. The balance
    of the affected
    member units that are unlikely to be emission compliant or are not feasible to
    modify to bring into compliance with the emission limits of Section 217.388(a),
    will most
    likely operate under the Proposed
    Rule's low usage provisions at Section 217.388(c).
    Members with municipal plants that consist of a combination of emission-compliant and low
    usage-compliant units may operate the units respectively
    under Section 217.388(a) and
    Section
    217.388(c).
    To understand the full impact of the Proposed
    Rule, it is important to understand that
    the average
    annual plant capacity factor of the nonattainment area IMEA member power
    plants, as currently permitted, is slightly less than 13%. That is, the units, on average, are
    permitted to operate at full capacity
    for about 13% of the total hours in a year or
    approximately 1130 hours. Permitting at this level was chosen as the best compromise
    between permitting costs and maintaining available hours of operation. This
    number
    of
    operational hours provides
    the ability to meet both the peak dispatch requirements and the
    unanticipated system support or power emergency situations.

    Operating under the most favorable mix of provisions
    in
    the Proposed Rule as
    noted
    above, the average annual plant capacity factor of the nonattainment area IMEA member
    power plants would decrease to approximately 11.5%, which equates to the units, on average,
    being able to run about 1000 hours in a year. If the newer high speed units in our members'
    fleets prove unable to feasibly meet the emission requirements under the
    Proposed Rule as
    noted above, meaning all of the affected units would have to operate as low usage units
    under Section 217.388(c), then the average annual plant capacity factor for this group would
    decrease to slightly less than 9%, meaning the units, on average, would be able to run about
    780 hours in a year. However, for one particular member in this group, the available annual
    operating hours for its units could drop to as little as 273 if its newer high speed units could
    not meet the emission requirements under the Proposed Rule. This
    would equate to an
    annual capacity factor of only 3%. Without the option of the low usage exemption, another
    member
    in
    the
    group,
    which has
    only older slow speed diesels
    and likely faces
    prohibitive
    costs to replace them or apply control technologies, would bear a particular hardship. It
    should
    be
    noted that
    both of these
    members
    also
    have
    very
    limited
    backup transmission
    capacity and must rely heavily on their local generation to maintain service if they lose their
    primary feed.
    An emissions averaging plan offers little compliance relief due to the uniformity in
    design and operation among most municipal units. Thus, the low usage designation is critical
    for
    our
    members to
    be
    able to comply with this Proposed Rule. A low
    usage designation
    avoids costly and possibly unfeasible retrofit controls, while assuring proper unit function
    due to the
    inspection
    and
    maintenance requirements at Section 217.388(d). Further, low
    usage units must document compliance pursuant to the recordkeeping requirements at

    Section 217.396(d) and submit reports, as necessary, pursuant
    to
    Section
    217.396(d)(3) and
    217.392(c)(3).
    Low usage units do not have to follow the Proposed Rule's
    testing and monitoring
    requirements. The benefit of this provision
    to our members is significantly balanced with the
    substantial
    reduction in permitted capacity that some members will likely face. IMEA has
    expressed concern that this cut in capacity may have dire consequences in the rare
    circumstance that a low usage
    limit would need to be exceeded in response to an emergency
    situation. Such an emergency would include interruptions of wholesale power deliveries
    from the transmission
    grid due to natural disasters, system maintenance or other events
    beyond the control of the member, such as noted earlier in the example.
    Our concern has been addressed by Section 217.392(c),
    which provides that
    any
    affected unit
    may, under certain circumstances specified in the Proposed Rule, use NOx
    allowances to meet the compliance requirements in Section 217.388. IMEA understands that
    this option is available to IMEA's members
    in
    the event
    such member is required to operate
    in exceedance of its emission limits or its annual low usage limits due to a system
    emergency, and the NOx allowance provision has not been utilized for
    more than two
    events
    in any rolling five-year period. The NOx allowance provision may be utilized for low usage
    units that are under the 100 ton/year NOx emission limit, as well as those units utilizing the
    low usage operating
    hours limits. For those units using the operating hours low usage limits,
    the hours exceedance would be converted to a corresponding amount of NOx emissions that
    may then be compensated for in NOx allowances.
    The NOx allowance component is crucial for our members to maintain system
    reliability. The low usage compliance option would simply not be workable
    without
    the

    NOx allowance provision. Our members would not be able to
    limit
    their
    units under the low
    usage designation without the flexibility
    to operate as needed in an emergency situation.
    Further, the NOx allowance option inherently assures that any impact caused by the limit
    exceedance is addressed by retiring the corresponding amount
    of emissions from the NOx
    allowance market.
    Note that NOx emissions from member
    municipalities covered by the Proposed Rule
    are already
    minor, due to the fact that generation operates on an as-needed basis. A summary
    of the average NOx emissions over the last five years, from member municipality units that
    would be subject to the Proposed Rule, is as follows:
    Municipality
    Average Annual NOx Emissions (ton/yr)
    2003-2007
    Freeburg
    6.32
    Highland
    17.27
    Mascoutah
    4.18
    Winnetka
    5.94
    Waterloo
    13.42
    This is based on actual unit run times and "not to exceed" NOx lb/hr permitted
    emission rates. Clearly, the IMEA and IMEA member peaking units
    affected
    by
    the
    Proposed Rule make a negligible contribution to the NOx emissions in the State of Illinois.
    The historically low average emissions experienced by our members translate into an
    unacceptably
    high cost per ton of NOx removed if currently available control technologies
    are applied in an attempt to bring the older units into compliance with
    the Proposed Rule's
    emission
    limits. Though IMEA's actual peaking generator usage may be very low, the
    critical reliability concerns that directly affect the health and safety of our member
    12

    communities make it essential
    that we nonetheless maintain the ability to operate, and
    subsequently emit NOx, for much greater periods of
    time than we typically demonstrate.
    Consequently, provisions
    for low usage and other operating considerations, such as those
    identified in Section 217.392(c) of the Proposed Rule, which allow the purchase of
    NOx
    allowances if unforeseen circumstances
    occasionally require emission exceedances, are
    considered by IMEA to be absolutely
    essential to any Rule under which we could operate.
    I appreciate the opportunity to share IMEA's comments on this Proposed
    Rule. I
    would be happy to answer
    questions regarding my testimony.
    IMEA reserves the
    right to supplement this pre-filed testimony.
    Respectfully submitted,
    By: /s/ N. LaDonna Driver
    N. LaDonna Driver
    Dated: March 26, 2008
    N. LaDonna Driver
    HODGE DWYER
    ZEMAN
    3150
    Roland Avenue
    Post Office Box 5776
    Springfield, Illinois 62705-5776
    (217) 523-4900
    IMEA:001/FiUNOx Rule IPCB Comments-
    Wagner Testimony 03

    Back to top