R CLERK'S
E
OFFICE
FC
,
BEFORE THE ILLINOIS POLLUTION CONTROL BOARD
JAN 2 9 2 u7
LONE STAR INDUSTRIES, INC .,
V
.
Petitioner,
ILLINOIS ENVIRONMENTAL
PROTECTION AGENCY,
Respondent.
TO
: Dorothy M. Gunn, Clerk
Illinois Pollution Control Board
100 West Randolph Street
Suite 11-500
Chicago, Illinois 60601
(VIA FIRST CLASS MAIL)
NOTICE OF FILING
(PERSONS ON ATTACHED SERVICE LIST)
PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that I have today filed with the Office of the Clerk of
the Illinois Pollution Control Board an original and nine copies of the ENTRY OF
APPEARANCE OF KATHERINE D . HODGE, ENTRY OF APPEARANCE OF
THOMAS G.
SAFLEY, MOTION TO STAY THE EFFECTIVENESS OF
CONTESTED PERMIT CONDITIONS and PETITION FOR REVIEW copies of
which are herewith served upon you.
Respectfully submitted,
LONE STAR INDUSTRIES, INC.,
Petitioner,
Dated: January 26, 2007
By:
Katherine D
. Hodge
Thomas G . Safley
HODGE DWYER ZEMAN
3150 Roland Avenue
Post Office Box 5776
Springfield, Illinois 62705-5776
(217) 523-4900
Division of Legal Counsel
Illinois Environmental Protection Agency
1021 North Grand Avenue East
Post Office Box 19276
Springfield, Illinois 62794-9276
(VIA FIRST CLASS MAIL)
THIS FILING SUBMITTED ON RECYCLED PAPER
PollutionSTATEOControl
rBo4
r
PCB
01
-#71
(Construction Permit Appeal)
Its mqft
J
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
I, Thomas G. Safley, the undersigned, hereby certify that I have served the
attached ENTRY OF APPEARANCE OF KATHERINE D
. HODGE, ENTRY OF
APPEARANCE OF THOMAS G . SAFLEY, MOTION TO STAY THE
EFFECTIVENESS OF CONTESTED PERMIT CONDITIONS, and PETITION FOR
REVIEW upon :
Ms . Dorothy M
. Gunn
Clerk of the Board
Illinois Pollution Control Board
100 West Randolph Street
Suite 11-500
Chicago, Illinois 60601
Division of Legal Counsel
Illinois Environmental Protection Agency
1021 North Grand Avenue East
Post Office Box 19276
Springfield, Illinois 62794-9276
by depositing said documents in the United States Mail, postage prepaid, in Springfield,
Illinois on January 26, 2007 .
LONE :001/FiINOF-COS-EOAs, Petition for Review
BEFORE THE ILLINOIS POLLUTION CONTROL BOARD
RECEIVED
CLERKS OFFICE
LONE STAR INDUSTRIES, INC .,
JAN 2 9 2Q01
)
STATE OF ILLINOIS
Petitioner
,
Pollution Control Board
v.
) PCB(Construction
4AI
Permit Appeal)
ILLINOIS ENVIRONMENTAL
)
PROTECTION AGENCY,
)
Respondent .
)
ENTRY OF APPEARANCE OF KATHERINE D
. HODGE
NOW COMES Katherine D Hodge, of the law firm of HODGE DWYER
ZEMAN, and hereby enters her appearance on behalf of Petitioner, LONE STAR
INDUSTRIES, INC .
Respectfully submitted,
LONE STAR INDUSTRIES, INC
.,
Petitioner,
1
q
By
: Katherine
Y
D
.
2Hodge
J
~l~l' /
Dated : January 26, 2007
Katherine D
. Hodge
HODGE DWYER ZEMAN
3150 Roland Avenue
Post Office Box 5776
Springfield, Illinois 62705-5776
(217) 523-4900
LONE : 00 1 /Fil/EOA-KDH2
BEFORE THE ILLINOIS POLLUTION CONTROL BOARD
LONE STAR INDUSTRIES, INC .,
RECEIVEDCLERK'S
OFFICE
Petitioner,
JAN 2 9 2007
)
STATE OF ILLINOIS
V .
)
PCB
P~ollu 'on Control Board
(Construction P
it Appeal)
ILLINOIS ENVIRONMENTAL
)
PROTECTION AGENCY,
)
Respondent .
)
ENTRY OF APPEARANCE OF THOMAS G.SAFLEY
NOW COMES Thomas G . Safley, of the law firm of HODGE DWYER ZEMAN,
and hereby enters his appearance on behalf of Petitioner, LONE STAR INDUSTRIES,
INC .
Respectfully submitted,
LONE STAR INDUSTRIES, INC .,
Petitioner,
By:
Dated: January 26, 2007
Thomas G. Safley
HODGE DWYER ZEMAN
3150 Roland Avenue
Post Office Box 5776
Springfield, Illinois 62705-5776
(217) 523-4900
LONE: 00 1
/Fi1/EOA-TGS
RECEIVEDCLERK'S
OFFICE
BEFORE THE ILLINOIS POLLUTION CONTROL BOAIRN
2 9 2007
LONE STAR INDUSTRIES, INC .,
STATE OF ILLINOIS
)
Pollution Control Board
Petitioner,
)
II
vs.
)
PCB
-bj
(Construction Permit Appeal)
ILLINOIS ENVIRONMENTAL
)
PROTECTION AGENCY,
)
Respondent.
)
MOTION TO STAY THE EFFECTIVENESS
OF CONTESTED PERMIT CONDITIONS
NOW COMES Petitioner, LONE STAR INDUSTRIES, INC ., d/b/a Buzzi
Unicem USA (hereinafter "Lone Star" or "Petitioner"), by and through its attorneys,
HODGE DWYER ZEMAN, pursuant to Section 10-65(b) of the Illinois Administrative
Procedure Act (5 ILCS 100/10-65) and pursuant to the Illinois Pollution Control Board's
("Board") authority to grant discretionary stays of permit conditions
(see Community
Landfill Co
. and City of Morris v . Illinois EPA, PCB Nos. 01-48 and 01-49
(I11 .Pol .Control .Bd . Oct. 19, 2000)), and hereby moves the Board to stay the effectiveness
of the contested conditions of Lone Star's construction permit at issue in this matter
.
In support thereof, Lone Star states as follows :
1 .
On December 22, 2006, the Illinois Environmental Protection Agency
("Illinois EPA") issued Lone Star a revised air construction permit (Application No
.
06030057), which included conditions that are not required by the Illinois Environmental
Protection Act ("Act")
or regulations promulgated thereunder, and are not necessary to
correct, detect, or prevent noncompliance with, or accomplish the purposes of, the Act or
regulations promulgated thereunder .
2.
Today, Lone Star filed simultaneously with this Motion a timely Petition
for Review of such permit conditions
.
3 .
The Board may grant a stay of contested permit conditions where a
petitioner has requested such a stay.
See Midwest Generation, LLC Will County
Generating Station v
. Illinois EPA, PCB No . 06-156 (Il1 .Pol.Control
.Bd. July 20, 2006)
(granting a request for a partial stay of construction permit conditions),
North Shore
Sanitary District v . Illinois EPA,
PCB No . 03-146 (I11 .Pol
.Control .Bd. Mar. 20, 2003)
(granting Petitioner's Motion to Stay Condition 1 pending the outcome of the appeal),
Hartford Working Group v
. Illinois EPA, PCB No
. 05-74 (I11 .Pol.Control
.Bd. Nov. 18,
2004) (granting Petitioner's Motion to Stay Effectiveness of Special Condition 2
.0 until
the Board takes final action in the appeal) .
4.
A stay of effectiveness of Special Conditions 1 .1 .9(d),
1 .1 .10(d), and
1 .1
.7-2 of the construction permit issued to Lone Star on December 22, 2006, is needed
to prevent irreparable harm to Petitioner
. Each of these Special Conditions would require
Lone Star to incur costs to comply with these Special Conditions, where the activities that
the Special Conditions require either are unneeded or will not provide Illinois EPA with
the information necessary to review Lone Star's compliance status
. See Petition for
Review
. Further, a stay is necessary to protect Petitioner's right to appeal permit
conditions
. That is, Lone Star's appeal would be rendered meaningless if it must comply
with these provisions while its appeal is pending
. Finally, no adequate remedy exists at
law, and Lone Star has a probability of success on the merits
. See Petition for Review
.
5 .
The Illinois EPA, the public, and the environment will not be harmed if a
stay is granted .
2
WHEREFORE, Petitioner, LONE STAR INDUSTRIES, INC ., d/b/a
Buzzi Unicem USA, moves the Illinois Pollution Control Board to grant a Stay of
Effectiveness of Special Conditions 1 .1
.9(d),
1 .1 .10(d), and 1 .1 .7-2 of Petitioner's
December 22, 2006, construction permit until the Board's final action in this
matter.
Respectfully submitted,
Dated: January 26, 2007
Katherine D . Hodge
Thomas G . Safley
HODGE DWYER ZEMAN
3150 Roland Avenue
Post Office Box 5776
Springfield, Illinois 62705-5776
(217) 523-4900
LONE : 001/Fit/Motion to Stay Effectiveness of Contested Permit Conditions
LONE STAR INDUSTRIES, INC
.,
Petitioner,
By:
Thomas
qG
3
BEFORE THE ILLINOIS POLLUTION CONTROL BOA~Vg~
LONE STAR INDUSTRIES, INC .,
RE
CKE
IV IC
)
Petitioner,
JAN 2 9 2007
)
VS .
)
PCIs p"(t
1
ontrol Board
(Construction Permit Appeal)
ILLINOIS ENVIRONMENTAL
)
PROTECTION AGENCY,
)
Respondent .
)
PETITION FOR REVIEW
NOW COMES, Petitioner, LONE STAR INDUSTRIES, INC.,
d/b/a Buzzi
Unicem USA (hereinafter "Lone Star" or "Petitioner"), by and through its attorneys,
HODGE DWYER ZEMAN, pursuant to Section 40 of the Illinois Environmental
Protection Act ("Act") (415 ILCS 5/40) and 35 Ill . Admin. Code Part 105, Subpart B, and
petitions the Illinois Pollution Control Board ("Board") for review of the Revised
Construction Permit granted to Lone Star by the Illinois Environmental Protection
Agency ("Illinois EPA") pursuant to Section 39(a) of the Act on December 22, 2006 .
In support thereof, Lone Star states as follows :
Lone Star owns and operates a Portland cement manufacturing facility in
Oglesby, Illinois ("Kiln") .
2.
On June 3, 2002, the Illinois EPA issued an air construction permit
(Application No . 02050070) to Lone Star authorizing the construction of a Carbon-
Limekiln Dust ("CLKD") Storage and Feed System at the Kiln .
3 .
This system was intended to enable Lone Star to utilize CLKD as a
substitute for certain raw material utilized in the operation of the Kiln .
4
. Thereafter, Lone Star completed construction of the CLKD Storage and
Feed System, but prior to startup of the system, the supplier ceased operations, and the
source of the material became unavailable.
5.
In October 2005, Illinois EPA issued a revised air construction permit
(Application No. 02050070) authorizing Lone Star to use Copier Toner Fuel Material
("CTFM") as an alternative fuel in the Kiln and to utilize the former CLKD System, now
referred to as the Kiln's "Supplemental Material Storage and Feed System," to introduce
CTFM into the Kiln.
6.
On May 15, 2006, Illinois EPA issued a construction permit (Application
No. 06030057) authorizing Lone Star to conduct a test bum of seed corn in the Kiln
("May 15, 2006 Test Burn Permit")
. A copy of the May 15, 2006 Test Burn Permit is
attached hereto as Exhibit A .
7.
Lone Star conducted that test burn in June 2006, and forwarded the results
of that test burn to Illinois EPA for review on September 7, 2006 .
8 .
On November 14, 2007, Lone Star applied for a revision to the October
2005 revised construction permit to allow Lone Star to utilize Agriculture Seed Fuel
Material ("ASFM") as an alternative fuel in the Kiln, subject to certain conditions, and to
use the Supplemental Material Storage and Feed System (former CLKD system) to
introduce ASFM into the Kiln .
9 .
On December 22, 2006, in response to Lone Star's November 14, 2007,
application for permit revision, Illinois EPA issued Lone Star a revised construction
permit ("December 22, 2006 Construction Permit")
. This December 22, 2006
Construction Permit is a revision to the May 15, 2006 Test Bum Permit (Application No
.
2
06030057) rather than, as Lone Star requested, a revision to the October 2005 revised air
construction permit (Application No
. 02050070). A copy of the December 22, 2006
Construction Permit is attached hereto as
Exhibit B .
10.
As set forth below, Illinois EPA included conditions in the December 22,
2006 Construction Permit that are not required by the Act or regulations promulgated
thereunder, and are not necessary to correct, detect, or prevent noncompliance with, or
accomplish the purposes of, the Act or regulations promulgated thereunder
.
11 .
Lone Star timely files this Petition for Review of the December 22, 2006
Construction Permit, on the grounds set forth below .
12.
First, Special Condition 1
.1 .9(d) of the December 22, 2006 Construction
Permit appears to have been inadvertently incorporated from the May 15, 2006 Test Burn
Permit into the December 22, 2006 Construction Permit
. This provision was included as
Special Condition 1 .1
.9(d) of the May 15, 2006 Test Bum Permit
; relates to information
that Lone Star was required to maintain in connection with the test bum authorized by
that Permit
; and expressly incorporates a "10
.0 percent ASFM" level of usage which was
in place in the May 15, 2006 Test Bum Permit, but which is not in place in the December
22, 2006 Construction Permit
. Now that Lone Star has completed the test bum
authorized by the May 15, 2006 Test Bum Permit, and submitted the information
generated from that test bum to Illinois EPA, this provision is not required
. Further, this
provision is not otherwise required by the Act or regulations promulgated thereunder, and
is not otherwise necessary to correct, detect, or prevent noncompliance with, or
accomplish the purposes of, the Act or regulations promulgated thereunder
.
3
13 .
Second, Special Condition 1
.1 .10(d) of the December 22, 2006
Construction Permit also appears to have been inadvertently incorporated from the May
15, 2006 Test Burn Permit into the December 22, 2006 Construction Permit
. This
provision was included as Special Condition 1 .1
.10(d) of the May 15, 2006 Test Burn
Permit to require Lone Star to submit information to Illinois EPA following the test burn
authorized by that Permit, in order to enable Illinois EPA to evaluate the results of the
test bum on emissions from the Kiln
. Now that Lone Star has completed the test burn
authorized by the May 15, 2006 Test Bum Permit, and submitted the information
generated from that test bum to Illinois EPA, this provision is not required
. Further, this
provision is not otherwise required by the Act or regulations promulgated thereunder, and
is not otherwise necessary to correct, detect, or prevent noncompliance with, or
accomplish the purposes of, the Act or regulations promulgated thereunder
.
14 .
Third, Special Condition 1
.1
.7-2 of the December 22, 2006 Construction
Permit requires that Lone Star conduct emission testing at the Kiln "while ASFM is being
used in the kiln
." December 22, 2006 Construction Permit, Special Condition 1
.1 .7-
2(a)(i)
. However, the testing methods and methodology specified by Special Condition
1 .1
.7-2 are not appropriate to determine the effect of the use of seed corn pursuant to the
Permit on emissions from the Kiln
. Lone Star does not object to a requirement in the
Permit that it conduct some testing as necessary to demonstrate compliance with
applicable statutory and regulatory requirements, where the testing required will yield
information that would enable Illinois EPA to evaluate such compliance
. However, the
testing specified by Special Condition 1
.1 .7-2 will not produce such information
.
4
Therefore, Lone Star objects to Special Condition 1
.1
.7-2 of the December 22, 2006
Revised Construction Permit .
15 .
Lone Star has no objection to, and does not appeal, any other conditions
included by Illinois EPA in the December 22, 2006 Construction Permit
.
WHEREFORE, Petitioner, LONE STAR INDUSTRIES, INC
., d/b/a
Buzzi Unicem USA, petitions the Illinois Pollution Control Board for a hearing
on the Illinois Environmental Protection Agency's action issuing the December
22, 2006 Revised Construction Permit in this fashion
.
Respectfully submitted,
LONE STAR INDUSTRIES, INC .,
Petitioner
Dated : January 26, 2007
By:
`~Ll~e_y
Katherine D
. Hodge
Thomas G. Safley
HODGE DWYER ZEMAN
3150 Roland Avenue
Post Office Box 5776
Springfield, Illinois 62705-5776
(217) 523-4900
LONE :001/Fil/Petition for Review
- ASFM Pernvt Revision
5
217/762-2113
PERMITTEE
ILLINOIS ENVIRONMENTAL, PROTECTION AGENCY
1021 NoKTH GRANo AV.NuE
EAST, P .O
. BOX 15506
. SPRINCMELD, ILLINOIS 627949506-(217) 782-2113
Roo K . PJACOIEVICH, GOvU:NOR
DOUCtis
P
. Sco' r, DIRECTOR
Lone Star Industries, Inc .
(d/b/a Duzzi Unicem USA)
Attn : Judy King
,
490 Portland Avenue
Oglesby, Illinois 61348
Application No_ : D60S0057
I .D . No . : 099816AAF
Applicant's Designationt
Date Received, : March 20, 2006
Subject
: Evaluation of Agricultural Seed Fuel Material (ASFM)
Date Issued : May 15, 2006
Location : 490 Portland Avenue, Oglesby
Permit is hereby granted to the above-designated Permittee to CONSTRUCT
emission units) and/or air pollution control equipment consisting of an
evaluation of use of Agricultural Seed Fuel Material (ASFM) in the existing
kiln, utilizing the new bulk material storage bin with baghouse and pneumatic
kiln feed system, as described in the above-referenced application . This
Permit is subject to standard conditions attached hereto and the following
I
special conditions :
1 .0
Unit Specific Conditions
CONSTRUCTION PERMIT -- NES14AP SOURCE
1 .1 Supplemental Material Storage and Feed System (Former CLKD
System)
1
.1'_1 Description
Lone Star is proposing to evaluate use of `expired" seed
corn as a supplemental fuel material in the kiln, in place
of some of the coal
. This would entail using the existing
Carbon Lime Kiln Dust ICLIO) systems to handle up to 500
tons of seed corn
Lone Star installed the CilD systems to enable it to use
CKLD in place of some of the limestone fed to its existing
kiln, CLAD is a byproduct of the production of lime whose
composition makes it suitable as
a feedstock for the
production of Portland cement
. CL1CD would hav<x bean first
handled in the 'affected storage system," which would
receive bulk shipments of CLKD from enclosed hopper trucks'
and hold the material in a
. storage bin pending use . The
-affected feed system" would then feed the stored CLKb
into the kiln at an appropriate rate for the production of
.
cement
. The new systems were never operated on CKLD,
because the lime plant that was to be the sourcc of CLKD
ceased operation before the systems could be started up
.
EXHIBIT A
PRINTED oN RtCYCLEO Pnrfa
)
Page 2
Lone Star hass applied for a permit
to allow use of these
CLRU systems to handle seed corn
. After a number of
growing seasons, stored seed corn and other agricultural
seed is no loihger
.suitable for use as seed because of the
potential reduction in ch& germination rate
. However, the
seed still has value for usee as fuel
.
The affected storage system will be source of particulate
matter (PM) emissions, which would be controlled by a
fabric filter or bagiouse located on top . of the storage
bin
. The affected feed system will also generate PM
emissions, which will be addressed as part of the kiln's
emissions and controlled by the existing control devices
on the kiln, i .e.,
en electrostatic precipitator' (ESP) and
a baghouse, which operate in series with the baghouse
serving as a further control device for the portion of
exhaust that passes through the raw mill
.
1 .1
.2 List of Emission Units and Emission Control Equipment
1
.1-3 Applicable Emission Standards
i .
The affected systems are subject to the
National
Emission
Standards for Hazardous Air
Manufacturing
Pollutants (NESKAP)
Industry,
from
40
the
CPR
Portland
63 Subpart
CementLLL
and related provisions in 40 CFR 63 Subpart A,
General Provisions
.
ii
.
The opacity of the exhaust from the affected
storage system shall not exceed 10 percent,
pursuant to 40 CFR 63
.1340, as the affected
storage system constitutes a
raw material
storage bin .
Note
: This Permit does not list the
applicable emission standards and control
requirement for the affected feed system, as
emissions attributable to
.this system are
addressed by rules that apply to the existing
kiln, which are not altered by this permit,
iii .
For the affected systems, the Permittee shall
also comply with other applicable requirements
of the NESHAP, including planning and
.'
Emission Unit
Mmission Control
Equipment
Supplemental
.Material Storage
(Receiving and Storage)
System
Storage System Filter
(Baghouse)
Supplemental Material Seed System
kiln Control System
(Pneumatic Transport into the Kiln) (ESP and Baghouge)
page
3
operational requirements and
requirements for
testing,
monitoring,
recordkeeping and
r eporting . i n particular, at . all times, the
Permittee shall maintain and operate the
affected
systems, including associated air'
pollution control equipment, in a manner
consistent with good air pollution control
practice for minimizing emissions, pursuant to
40 CFR 63,6(e)(1)(i) and Section 39(a) of the
Environmental Protection Act
.
b . Other than emissions that occur from the kiln, there
shall be no visible emissionss from the affected
systems, pursuant to 35 TAC 212 .423(c) .
1 .1
.4 Non-Applicability of Regulations of concern
a . Pursuant to 40 CFR 63 .1356 ; the affected systems are
act subj'ect'to the New Source Performance Standards
(NSPS) for Portland Cement Plants, 40 CPR 60 Subpart
F because they axe subject to the NESI •I
AP, 40 CPR 63
Subpart LLL .
This permit is issued based upon the use of the
affected systems for ASFM, as now being permitted,
not constituting a major modification subject to the
federal rules for Prevention of Significant
Deterioration (PSD), 40 CSR 52 .21, because it is not
accompanied by a significant i
:tcrease in emissions of
PSD pollutants from the source
.
c . This permit is issued based upon the use of the
affected systems for ASFM not being subject to local
siting approval pursuant to Section 39 .2 of the
Environmental Protection Act, because the operations
engaged in by the Permittee with respect to ASFM will
not entail' the transfer, storage or treatment' of
waste by the Permittee, so
as to constitute operation
of a pollution control facility, as defined by
Section 3 .330 of the Favironmental Protection Act,
1
.1
.5 Operational Restrictions and Work Practices
a .
This permit authorizes the Permittee to handle up to
500 tons of ASPM in the affected systems for an
evaluation of the feasibility of using ASFM as a
supplementary fuel for the kiln
.
b .
i .
This Permit does not authorize acceptance of
ASFM that would qualify as acceptance of waste
by the Pcrmittee under the provisions of the
Lnvironmental Protection Act,
Page 4
ii .
This
Permit
does not authorize acceptance of
ASFM by the
. affected storage system that would
quality as hazardous waste under the
provisions of the Federal Resource
Conservation, the Recovery Act, Environmental
Protection hot, or 35 IAC Part 721, including
ASFM that would qualify as hazardous waste
based on its composition due to materials
applied to the seed
.
iii .
'This Permit does not authorize the Permittee
to process ASFM at the plant to prepare the
ASFM for use as fuel,
iv
.
This permit does not authorize modification of
the kiln to increase its capacity, measured in
terms of both clinker production and fuel heat
input to the kiln .
c . i .
The Permittee shall only accept ASFMI from
suppliers that are addressed in the records
required by Condition 1 :1 .9(b)(i)
.
ii .
The Permittee shall only accept shipments
of
ASFM in which :,
A
. The ASFM is ready for use as fuel as
delivered to the plant, without the need
for further processing by the Permittee
.
S
. The'ASFM is clean, that is, the ASF)( as
unloaded into the affected storage system
is free of foreign matter
and any
contaminants
that would adversely impact
the environment
when the Permittee uses
the ASFM as fuel .
iii .
The Permittee shall operate the affected
systems, including associated control
equipment, and generally handle ASPM in
accordance with good air pollution control to
minimize PM emissions
.
iv .
The Permittee shall implement practices to
store and otherwise manage'ASFM so that
accepted ASFM is mot degraded or otherwise
damaged such that the ASFM can no longer be
used as fuel . "
The Permittee shall carry out the acceptance and
handling of ASFM in a manner that ensures that ASFM
Page 6
1 .1
.7-2 Emission Testing Requirements
Within 6D days of a w
equesc from the
Illinois EPA or Such 1
date agreed'to by
the Illinois EPA, the Permittee shall have the
emission of PM, CO and selected HA-Is (i .e .,
IMPS that are , subject to standards under the
NESHAP, 40 CPR 63 Subpart LLL) measured while
ASFM is being used in the
kiln, as set forth
below, unless the use of ASFM in the kiln has
been discontinued-
ii
. The Permittee need not comply with the
requirements below for discretionazy emission
testing that it conducts or has conducted as
part of the evaluation of the use of ASFM
authorized by this permit if the Permittee does
not intend to rely on such tests to demonstrate
compliance with applicable emission standards . .
For such testing, the Permittee shall at a
minimum : 1) Provide notification to the
Illinois EPA prior to the expected date of
testing, as provided by Condition 1
.1 .7-21d),
except that the initial notice must only be
provided 10 days prior to the expected date of
testing
; 2) Measure condensable PM emissions
using Method 202 or other method approved by
the Illinois ERA if measurements of filterable
$M emissions are made ; and 3) Report the
results of such testinng in accordance with
condition
b
. Testing of emissions, as required by Condition
2, shall be conducted while the kiln is using at
least 120 percent of Ehe greatest percentage of ASFM
that the Permittee would intend to use during normal
operation of the kiln, provided,
. however, that the
usage of ASFM during
testing shall not exceed
.the
ma.-cimum
design capacity of the affected feed system
.
In other respects, the operating conditions of the
kiln and associated control devices during testing
shall be representative of normal operation
.
c . i .
Testing of PM emissions shall be conducted
using appropriate USEPA Methods, including
Method Sand 202 .
ii
. Testing of
CO
emissions shall be cc aducted
using appropriate USEPA Methods
.
iii
. Testing of emissions of HAPs shall be conducted
using methods specified by the NrSHAP .'
Page 7
d .
The Permit-tee
shall submit a
test plan to the
Illinois EPA at least 60 days prior to' testing, which
plan shall include the information specified by
Condition 9
.6 .2 of the source's CAAPP Permit
;
e
. The Permittee shall notify the Illinois EPA prior to
these tests to enable the Illinois EPA to observe
these tests
. Notification of the expected date of
testing shall be submitted s minimum of 30 days prior
to -the expected date
. Notification of the actual date
and expected time of testing shall be submitted a
minimum of 5 working days prior to the actual date oft
the test
. The Illinois EPA may, at its-discretion,
accept notification with shorter advance notice
provided that the Illinois
EPA will not accept such
notification it it interferes with the Illinois EPA's
ability to observe the testing .
f
. The Permittee shall' expeditiously submit complete
Final Reports) for required emission testing to the
Illinois EPA, no lacer than 90 days after the date of
testing
. These reports shall include the information
specified in Condition 8 .9
.3 of the source's CAAPP
permit and the following information :
i .
A summary of results .
ii .
Detailed description of test
. method (s)
including description of sampling points,
sampling train, 'analysis equipment, and test
schedule .
iii
. Detailed description of the operating
conditions of the kiln and associated control
equipment during testing, including kiln feed
rate '(tons/hr), the operating parameters of
ESP, and the pressure drop across the baghouse
.
iv
. Detailed data and calculations, including
copies of all raw data sheets and records& of
laboratory analyses, sample calculations, and
data on equipment calibration
.
v .
opacity data (6-minute average) during the
period of testing for the kiln stack(s) as
determined by the opacity monitoring systems
.
The Permittee shall also comply with applicable
requirements of the
NESFIAP
for tlanning, notification
and reporting related' to testing of emissions
.
g .
Page 8
1 .1 .5
Monitoring
Requirements
This Permit does
not revise monitoring requirements for
the kiln, as identified in the plant's CBP.PP Permit
.
1_1
.5 Recordkaaping Requirements
a
. For the affected systems, the Permittce shall
maintain all applicable records required by the
NESHAP, 40,CFR 63 .1355 .
b
. The Permittee shall maintain a file containing the
identity and address of each supplier of ASPM to the
plant, accompanied bye (1) the type(s) of ASFH
supplied
; (2) the origin of material, if other than
the supplier
; (3) copies' of relevant portions of the
contracts, agreements or other material developed by
the supplier and
the Permittee identifying the
technical specifications and regulatory criteria for
the type(s) of ASFM that are provided to the plant
; .
(4) copies of documentation for the ASFM showing
applicable technical specifications are met
; and (5)
information and documentation as the Permittee deems
appropriate to show that applicable legal criteria
for acceptance
of the AsFM should
be met .
c
. The Permittee shall maintain records for the amount
of ASFM accepted (tons, by type) .
d
. The 2ermittee shall maintain logs (or other similar
records) for the operation and maintenance of the
affected 'systems with ASFM chat address compliance
with the requirements for acceptance end use of
ASFM,
including records for
: each shipment of
ASFM accepted
at the plant
; the periods When A5FM
is fired, with
firing rate (i.e.,
the amounts of"ASFM and other
fuels fired
in
the kiln, in tons,
. and the percentage
of ASFM fired, by weight)
; and periods when the kiln
operates with greater than 10
.0 percent ASFM, on a
daily average, with explanation
.
e
. The Permittee shall maintain the following records-
related to the PM emissions of the affected storage
system :
i .
A file containing the emission factor(s) used
by the Permittee to determine emissions, with
supporting documentation
.
ii
. A file containing engineering calculations for
the maximum emission rate, pound/ hour . at
the
maximum operating rate and other representative
1
Page 9
operating conditions of the system and
'associated control measures .
iii
. Records of the actual emissions (pounds) ,
based
on material handled, operating records, and
appropriate emission factors, as addressed
above, 'with supporting calculations .
The Permittee shall maintain the records-required by
this
can
permit
permit
in
chat
accordance
ad4zess retention
with the provisions
and'availebilityof
its
Of
records .
1 .1
.10 Reporting Requirements
a . For the affected systems, the permittee shall fulfill
all applicable notification and reporting
requirements of the NESRAP, 40 CPR 63 Subpart LLL
.
b . The Permittee shall notify the Illinois EPA within 5
days of initially accepting ASFM .
c . Except as specif~ed below, the Permittee shall notify
the' Illinois EPA of d
.eviationc from the re qui rements
.of this permit in accordance with the general
provisions of its CAAPP permit that address reporting
of deviations for raw material storage bins .
if ASPM, once accepted, is found . to
be either
unacceptable or unsuitable for use as fuel, so as to
require en alternative disposition of the material,
the Illinois EPA shall be notified within 15 days .
d
. Within 180 days of concluding the use of ASFM in the
kiln, an authorized by this Permit, the Permittee,
shall submit a summary report for this project to. the
Illinois. EPA
. This report shall include a diocussion
of the effects of the use of ASFM on the operation of
the
. kiln and the emission data gathered during the
project, including emissions (micrograms per cubic
meter, pounds per hour, and pounds per million Btu of
fuel, and pounds per ton of stone feed or clinker),
with identification and description of the various
moat of operations of the kiln,
e
. Unless otherwise instilcted in writing
by the
Illinois EPA, two copies of notifications and reports
required by this permit shall be sent to the Illinois
EPA,
Air
Compliance Section in Springfield and one
copy shall be sent to the Illinois EPA, Air Regional
office in Peoria
.
Page 10
2 .
Upon successful completion of testithg in accordance with Condition
L .1
.7-1, the Permittet may continue to operate the aflaetcd systems
under this permit until December 31, 2006
.
This permit does not excuse the Pennittee from the obligation to obtain
a permit as a wastee treatment facility from the Illinois EPA, Bureau of
Land, if needed for burning of wastes generated by a party other than
the Permittee
.
If you have any questions on this permit, please call Chris
.ropher romaine at
217/782-2113 .
Donald B- Sutton . P .E .
Manager, Permit Section
Division of Air Pollution Control
nss~cnr :8 ~j
cc
: Illinois EPA, region 2
D1702/07 TUE 09
:31 FAX 815 883 8721
LONE STAR OG IL
14 002
ILLINOIS ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
1021
NORTH GRAND
AVENUE EAST, P .O .
Oar 19506, Srvwcrino, huwas 62794-9506-(217) 782-2113
ROD R . &EAGOJEvICH,
GOVERNOR
DOUGLAS P . 5con, DREcrot
217/70Z-2113
CONSTRUCTION PERMIT - -
NESHAP SOURCE
--
REVISED
PERMITTEE
Lone,
(dfbfaa"BUZri"OniCStar,
IndustriesII
A)"Inc,
_
Attn490-Portland
:
Judy Klng_
Avenue-
, _
Oglesby, Illinois 61348
Application No
., 06030057
I .D . No . :
099916AAP
Applicant's Designation
:
Date Received :
November 17, 2006
subject :
Use of Agricultural Seed Fuel Material (ASPM)
Date Issued :
December 22,
2006
Location :
490 Portland Avenue, Oglesby
Permit is hereby granted to the above-designated Permittes to
CONSTRUCT
emission unit(s) and/or air pollution control equipment consisting of use of
Agricultural Seed Fuel Material (ASFM) in the existing kiln, utilizing the
new bulk material storage bin with bagbouse and pneumatic kiln feed system,
as described in the above-referenced application
. This Permit is subject to
standard conditions attached hereto and the following special conditional
1 .0 unit specific conditions
1
.1 supplemental Material Storage and Peed System (Former CLKD
System)
1 .1
.1 Description
Lone star is capable of using -expired" need corn as a
supplemental fuel material in its existing cement kiln, in
place of some of the commercial fuels, using its existing
Carbon Lime Kiln Dust (CL1W) systems .
Lone Star installed the CLKD systems to enable it to use
CKLO in place of some of the limestone fed to its existing
kiln
. CLKD is a byproduct of the production of lime whose
composition makes it suitable as a feedstock for the
production or Portland cement
. CLKO would have been first
handled in the "affected storage system,' which would
receive bulk shipments of CUM from enclosed hopper trucks
and hold the material in a storage bin pending use
. The
"affected feed system ,
would then feed the stored CLKD
into the kiln at an appropriate rats for the production of
cement
. The new systems were never operated on CKLD,
because, the lime plant that was . to
be, the source of CLIO
ceased operation before the systems could be started up
.
EXHIBIT B
P&NIID ow Recraeo PA,cx
01/02/07 TUE 00 :31 FAX 615 883 8721
LONE STAR OG IL
e
Page 2
Lone star has applied for a permit to allow use of these
CLKO systems to handle Geed corn . After a number of
growing seasons, stored deed corn and other agricultural
seed is no longer suitable for use as seed because or the
potential reduction in the germination rate
. No-ever, the
.---s . .A 2HII hadvalueforuse as fuel
Tha_affente&st4rage .
svet em_will be source of particulate
matter (PM) emissions,
whicwould-be
controlled 5y
a -
fabric filter, or baghouse located on top of the storage
bin . The affected feed system will also generate PM
emissions, which will be addressed as part of the kiln's
emissions and controlled by'the existing control devices
on the kiln, i .e ., an electrostatic precipitator (ESP) and
a baghouse, which operate in saries with the baghouse
serving as a further control device for the portion of
exhaust that passes through the raw mill .
1
.1
.2 List of Emission Units and Emission Control Equipment
1 .1 .3 Applicable Emission Standards
a, 1 .
The affected systems are subject to the
National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air
Pollutants (NESEAP) from the Portland Cement
Manufacturing Industry, 40 CPR 63 Subpart LLL
and related provisions in 40 CFR 63 Subpart A,
Oanaral Provisions .
ii .
The opacity of the exhaust from the affected
storage system shall not exceed 10 percent,
pursuant to 40 CrR 63 .1346, ad
the affected
storage system constitutes a raw material
storage bin
.
Note, This Permit 'does not list the
applicable emission standards and control
requirement for the affected feed system, as
emissions attributable to this system are
addressed by rules that apply to the existing
kiln, which are not altered by this permit,
iii . For the affected Systems, the Permittee shall
also comply with other applicable requirements
of the NESEAP, including planning and
Emission unit
Supplemental Material Storage Syste .
(Receivinq and storage)
storage System Filter
(Baghouse)
Supplemental Material Peed system
(Pneumatic Transport into the Kiln)
Kiln Control Sycten
(ESP and Baghause)
ul/Ue/U7 TUE 09 :32 FAX 815 883 8721
LONE STAR OC IL
Page 3
operational requirements and requirements for
testing, monitoring, recordkeeping and
reporting . In particular, at all times, the
Permittee shall maintain and operate the
affected systems, including associated air
consistent" itTh good air pollution control
-EO-
40 CPR 63 .6(e)(a)
U)
and Section 39 (a) of the
Environmental Protection Act
.
b
. Ocher than emissions that occur from the kiln, there
aba•1
l be no visible emissions from the affected
systems, pursuant to 35 SAC 212 .423(c) .
1 .1
.4 Non-Applicability of Regulations of Concern
a . Pursuant to 40 CPR
63 .13561 the affected systems are
not subject to the New Source Performance Standards
(NSPS) for Portland Cement Plants, 40 CPR 60 Subpart
F because they are subject to the NESEAP,
40 CPR 63
Subpart LLL .
b . This permit is issued based upon the use of the
affected systems for ASPM, as now being permitted,
not constituting a major modification subject to the
federal rules for Prevention of significant
Deterioration (PSD), 40 CPR
52 .21, because it is not
accompanied by a significant increase in emissions of
P5D pollutants from the source
. (see also Condition
1 .1 .9(c) .)
C . This permit is issued based upon the use of the
affected systems for ASPM not being subject to local
siting approvsl pursuant to Section
39 .2 of the
Environmental Protection Act, because the operations
engaged in by the Permittee with respect to ASFM will
not entail the transfer, storage or treatment of
waste by the Permitter
. so as to constitute operation
of a pollution control facility, as defined by
Section 3
.330 of the Environmental Protection Act .
1 .1
.5 Operational Restrictions and Work Practices
a . 1 .
The ASFM fed to the kiln shall not constitute
more that 20 .0 percent by weight of the total
fuel input into the kiln, on a daily basis .
ii .
Notwithstanding the above, the kiln may be
operated with more than 20
.0 percent ASFM for
the purpose of evaluating the use of ASFM on
kiln operation and tooting emissions of the
10
004
uiiuv Ur IUE UY :JZ
FAI
815 885 8721
LONE STAR OG IL
I
Page 4
kiln while firing AsFM as addressed by
Condition 1 .1 .7-2, provided, however, that the
extent of . such operation shall not exceed the
amount reasonably needed to evaluate the
effects of higher ASFM usage rates on kiln
overatin
to nnAnrtamtenin„ra
t-In•,
r-the
'""""'kYla,and:-Eopiepire ~orsuchemiesion
b . i .
This Permit does not authorize acceptance of
ASFM that would qualify as acceptance of waste
by the Permittee under the provisions of the
Environmental Protection Act .
11 .
This Permit dome not authorize acceptance of
ASFM by the affected storage system that would
quality an hazardous waste under the
provisions of the Federal Resource
Conservation, the Recovery Act, Environmental
Protection Act, or 35 IAC Part 721, including
ASFM that would qualify as hazardous waste
based on its composition due to materials
applied to the teed .
iii . This Permit does not authorize the Parmittee
to process ASFM at the plant to prepare the
ASFM for use as fuel .
iv .
This permit does not authorize modification of
the kiln to increase its capacity, measured in
terms of both clinker production and fuel beat
input to the kiln .
C . i .
The Pexmittee shall only accept ASYK from
suppliers that are addressed in the records
required by condition 1 .1 .9(b)(i) .
ii .
The Permittee shall only accept shipments of
ASFM in which :
A . The ASFM is ready for use as fuel as
delivered to the plant, without the need
for further processing by the Permitcee
.
B . The Aa7M is clean, that is, the ASFM am
unloaded into the affected storage system
is tree of foreign matter and any
contaminant* that would adversely impact
the environment when the Permittec uses
the ASFM as fuel .
®005
Vliux/u'I '1U4' U9 :32 FAX 815 883 8721
LONE
STAR 0G IL
M008
Page 5
iii .
The Permittee shall operate the affected
systems, including associated control
equipment, and generally handle ASFM in
accordance with good air pollution control to
minimize . PH emissions .
. .y;- 'Theierm'ttee-shall
- W
Y
'C¢T'CO
_-
-- -_
store
and otherwise manage ASFM so that .
accepted ASPM is not degraded or otherwise
damaged such that the ASFM can no longer be
used as fuel .
d
. The Permittes shall carry out the acceptance and
handling of ASFM in a manner that ensures that ASFM
accepted at the plant satisfies applicable legal
criteria for the Permittee to accept such material,
including the applicable requirements of this permit,
and is handled in accordance-with applicable legal
requirements .
1 .1 .6 Emission Limitations
a . PM emission from the affected storage system shall
not exceed 0 .26 lb/hr and 0 .75 tons . these limits
are based on the information provided in the original
application for the CKLD equipment .
1 .1 .7-1 Opacity Testing Requirements
a . d .
The Permittee shall conduct measurements of
opacity from the affected feed system as
required by the SESEAP, including use of the
teat method and procedures described in 40 CFR
63 .1349(b) .
In conjunction with these tests, the Permittee
shall also conduct observations for the
presence of visible emissions from the affected
storage and feed systems using the methods and
procedures specified by 35 LAO 212 .107 .
b
. The Permittee shall notify the Illinois EPA of the
planned date for testing as required by the NISHAP .
c . The Permittee shall submit a report for this test to
the Illinois EPA in accordance with Condition 8 .6 .3
of its CAAPP permit .
1 .1 .7-2 Emission Testing Requirements
a, i
.
By December 31, 2007, the Permittee shall have
the amiseion of PM, CO and selected HAPs
01/02/07
TUE 09:33
FAX 815 683 8721
LONE
STAR OG IL
(a007
Page 6
(i .e ., EAPs that are subject to standards under
the NESAAP, 40 CYR 63 Subpart LLL) measured
while ASFM is being used in the kiln, as set
forth below, unless the use of ASFM in the kiln
has been discontinued .
- iY. -
rcq
Tl:a
u0,r,Peimf~tee.,nenrs
aea
hl,.
-not
fn
r
comply with the
n.__._ . ._ ._
. .____ .
tasting that it conducts or haw conducted ac
part of the further evaluation of the use of
ASFH if the Permittee does not intend to rely
on such tests to demonstrate compliance with
applicable emission standazds . For such
testing, the Permittee shall at a minimum : i)
Provide notification to the Illinois EPA prior
to the expected date of testing, as provided by
Condition 1 .1 .7-3(d), except that the initial
notice must only be provided 10 days prior to
the expected date of testing ; 2) Measure
condensable PM emissions using Method 202 or
other method approved by the Illinois EPA if
measurements of filterable PM emissions are
made ; and 3) Report the results of such tasting
in accordance with Condition 1 .1 .10(d) .
b . Testing of emissions, as required by Condition
1 .1.7-2, shall be conducted while the kiln is using
at least 120 percent of the greatest percentage of
ASFM that the Permittae would intend to use during
normal operation of the kiln, provided, however, that
the usage of ASFM during testing shall not exceed the
maximum design capacity of the affected feed system
.
In other respects, the operating conditions of the
kiln and associated control devices during testing
shall be representative of normal operation .
c . i . Testing of PM emissions shall be conducted
using appropriate US$PA Methods, including
Method 5 and 202 .
ii . Tenting of CO emissions shall be conducted
using appropriate USSPA Methods .
iii . Testing of emissions of RAPS shall be conducted
using methods specified by the NESRAP
.
d . The Permittee shall aubmit a teat plan to the
Illinois EPA at least 60 days prior to tasting, which
plan shall include the information specified by
Condition 8 .6 .2 of the sources CAAPP Permit .
01/U2/07 'fUE 00 :77 FAX 815
883 3721
LONE STAR OG IL
LM 008
Page 7
e . The Permittee shall notify the Illinois EPA prior to
these tests to enable the Illinois EPA to observe
these tests . Notification of the expected date of
testing shall be submitted a minimum of 30 days prior
to the expected date . Notification of the actual date
and expected time of
testing shall be submitted a
the test
. The Illinois EPA may, at its discretion,
'" --"
accepE'uoElfication with shorter advance notice
provided that the Illinois EPA will not accept such
notification if it interferes with the Illinois EPA's
ability to observe the testing .
f
. The Permittea shall expeditiously submit complete
Pinal Reports) for required emission testing to the
Illinois EPA, no later than 90 days after the date of
testing
. These reports shall include the information
specified in condition 8
.6 .3 of the source's CAAPP
permit and the following information
;
i .
A summary of results .
ii .
Detailed description of test method(s),
including description of sampling points,
sampling train, analysis equipment, and test
schedule .
iii . Detailed description of the operating
conditions of the kiln and associated control
equipment during testing, including kiln feed
rate (tons/hr), the operating parameters of
'ESP, and the pressure drop across the baghouse
.
Detailed data and calculations, including
copies of all raw data sheets and records of
laboratory analyses, sample calculations . and
data on equipment Calibration .
V . NO, and SO, emission data (ppm, hourly average)
measured by monitoring systems for the period
of testing .
vi
. Opacity data (6-minutq average) for the period
of testing* for the kiln stacks) as determined
by the opacity monitoring systems .
g- The Permittee shall also comply with applicable
requirements of the NESBAP for planning, notification
and reporting related to testing of emissions .
01/02/07
TUB 09 :33
AS 815 883 8721
LONE 5TAR
. OG IL
Jf.)gyy
I
Page 8
1 .1
.9 Monitoring Requirement!
This Permit does not revise monitoring requirements for
the kiln, as identified in the plant's CAAPP Permit,
1
.1 .9
Recordkeeping Requirements
a
. For the affected systems, the Parmittee shall
'matarr am
nppl cable recor3a requ red by the
NESEAP, 40 CPR 13
.1355 .
b . The Parmittee shall maintain a file containing the
identity and . address of
. each supplier of ASPM to the
plant,
suppliedaccompanied
; (2) the origin
by
: (1)
of
the
material,
type(w)
if
ofother
AM
than
the supplier
; (3) copies of relevant portions of the
contracts, agreements or other material developed by
the supplier and the Permittee Identifying the
technical specifications and regulatory criteria for
the type(s) of AsFM that are provided to the plant
;
(4) copies of documentation for the ASFM showing
applicable technical specifications are met
; and (5)
information and documentation as the Permittee deems
appropriate to show that applicable legal criteria
for acceptance of the ASPM should be met
.
c
. The Parmittee shall maintain records for the amount
of ASPM accepted (tons, by type) .
d
. The Parmittee shall maintain logs (or other similar
records) for the operation and maintenance of the
affected systems with ASYM that address compliance
with the requirements for acceptance and use of ASFM,
including records
fort
each shipment of ASPH accepted
at the plant
; the periods when ASPM is fired, with
firing rate (i .e
., the amounts of ASFM and other
fuels fired in the kiln, in tons, and the percentage
.of ASPM fired, by weight)
; end periods when the kiln
operates with greater than 10
.0 percent ASFM, an a
daily average, with explanation
.
e
. The Parmittee shall maintain the following records
related to the PH emissions of the affected storage
system :
i
. A file containing the emission factor(s) used
by the Parmittee to determine emissions, with
supporting documentation .
ii
. A rile containing engineering calculations for
the maximum emission rate, pound/hour, at the
maximum operating rate and other representative
)
01,02/07 TUE 09__34_FAX_815
683 8721„
. ..
_LOU.
.SnR .
.04 .IL . . .
-®0lo
Page 9
operating conditions of the system and
associated control measures
.
iii . Records of
the actual emissions
(pounds), based
on material handled, operating records, and
----
aDDroor4ate
ahoVW ; -Wi
emtseinnfactors
. a s
aAArmxAeA.
f
. The Permittee shall also
pp
fulfill
ug calculationsthe
applicable
.
recordkaeping and reporting requirements of the PSD
rules, 40 CPA 52
.21(c)(5), as related to the
emissions of the kiln and use of AEPM .
g . The Permittea shall maintain the records required by
this permit in accordance with the provisions of its
CAAPP permit that address retention and availability
of records .
Reporting Requirements
a
. Tot the affected systems, the Permittes shall fulfill
all applicable notification and reporting
requirements of the
NESEAP, 40 CPR 63 Subpart LLL
.
b . The Permittee shall notify the Illinois
EPA within 5
days of initially accepting AwPc
.
Except as specified below, the Permittee shall notify
the Illinois EPA of deviations from the requirements
of this permit in accordance with the general
provisions of its CAAPP permit that address reporting
of deviations for raw material storage bins .
If ASPM, once accepted, is found to be either
unacceptable or unsuitable for use as fuel, so as to
require an
alternative disposition of the material,
the Illinois EPA
shall be notified within 15 days .
d
. Within 180 days of concluding the use of ASPM in the
kiln, as authorized by this Permit, the Permittes
shall submit a summary report for this project to the
Illinois
EPA . This report shall include a discussion
of the effects of the use of
ASPM on the operation of
the kiln and the emission data gathered during the
project, including emissions (micrograms per cubic
meter, pounds per hour, and pounds per million
Btu of
fuel, and pounds per ton of atone feed or clinker),
with identification and description of the various
mode of operations of the kiln
.
e . unless otherwise instructed in writing by the
Illinois EPA,
two copies of notifications and reports
01/02/07 TUE 09 :34 FAX 815 883 8721
LONE STAR 0C IL
Page 10
required by this Permit shall be sent to the Illinois
EPA, Air Compliance section in Springfield and one
copy shall be sent to the Illinois EPA, Air Regional
office in Peoria .
2 The Parmittee may operate the affected systems under this constiuction
addressing use
of these systems and operation
--S,iaeued-fortof
the kiln
with
AM,
_
provided that the emission testing required by Coadit oa 1
.1 .7-2 s
conducted in a timely manner .
3 .
This permit does not excuse the Permittee from the obligation to obtain
a permit as a ,waate treatment facility from the Illinois EPA, Bureau of
Land, if needed for burning of wastes generated by a party other than
the perrnittee .
Please note that this permit has been revised to allow regular use of ASPM,
following an evaluation in which the Parmittee found that use of ASPM did not
adversely affect the production of the kiln
. This revived Permit includes a
requirement that emissions testing be performed for particulate matter and
other pollutants while firing ASPM .
if you have any questions on this permit, please call Christopher Romaine at
217/782-2113 .
sea <//1, C, CSawnWS~n lam
.
Edwin C . Bakowski, P .E .
Acting Manger, Permit Section
Division of Air Pollution control
ECB :CRR,psj
CC,
Illinois EPA, Region 2
Q1/02J01__SII
PAT ..
.815
.1S3 . 12.L ._ ._---
LONE STAR Oli tT .
2012
I
STATE OF ILLINOIS
. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
DIVISION OF AIR POLLUTION CONTROL
SPRINGFIELD,
P. 0
.
ILLINOIS
BOX 19506'8Z794-950$
STANDARD CONDITIONS FOR CON8TR11CTIONIDEVELOPMENT PERMITS
ISSUED
BY TAE ILLINOIS ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
July 7 1035
-The-I)Iineis-Environmmtel Protection Act (Illinois Revised Statutes, Chapter 111-112, Section 1030) authorizes the
Environmental Protection Agency to impose conditions on permits which it issues
.
The Following conditions are applicable unless sueperseded by special condition(s) .
1
. Unless this permit-has been extehded or it lice
bees voided by a newly issued permit, this permit will expire one
year
from the date of issuance, unless a continuous program of construction or development
on this project has
started by such time
.
2
. The construction or development covered by this permit shall be done in compliance with
applicable previsions of
the Illinois Environmental Protection Act and Regulations adopted by the Blinois Pollution
Control Board
.
9
. There shall be no deviations from the approved plane and specifications unless a written request
for modification,
along with plans and specifications as required, shall have bean submitted to the Agency and a supplemental
written permit issued
.
The permittee shall allow any duly authorized agent of the Agency upon the
presentation of credentials, at
reasonable times :
a .
to enter the permittee's property where actual or potential effluent, emission or noise
sources are located or
where any activity is to be conducted pursuant to this permit,
b.
to have access to and to copy any records required to be kept under the terms and conditions
of this permit,
c .
to inspect, including during any hour
. of operation of equipment constructed or operated
under this permit,
such equipment and any equipment required to be kept, used, operated, calibrated and maintained
under this
permit,
d
. to obtain and remove samples of any discharge or emissions of pollutants, and
e .
to enter and utilize any photographic, recording, testing, monitoring or other equipment
for the purpose of
preserving, testing, monitoring, or recording any activity, discharge, or amlssioh
authorized by this permit
.
5 . The issuance of this permit
:
a
. shall not be considered as (n any
manner
affecting the title of the premises upon which the permitted
facilities are to be located,
b
. does not release the permittee from any liability for damage to person or property caused by
or resulting from
the construction, maintenance, or operation of the proposed facilities,
I c .
does not release the permittee from compliance with other applicable statutes and regulations
of the United
States, of the State of Illinois, or with applicable local laws, ordinances and regulations,
d does not take into consideration or attest to the structural stability of any
unite or parts of the project, and
Si
732-0226
pdmvdcne,cvdodPomr
OPo-oas
Ape
159
Rev . 5/99
UI/UZ/U'! TUli W35 F.a 815
883 8721
LONE STAR
OG IL
Far
assistance in preparing a permit
application contact the
Permit
Section .
i tnv
nmental Protection . Agency
Division of Air
. Pollution Control
Permit Section
1021 N.' Grand Ave 'E .
P,0,16i 195Q6
Springfield, Illinois 62794-9506
or a' regional office of the
Field Operations Section .
The regional offices and their
areas of responsibility are
shown on the map
. The
addresses and telephonee
numbers of the regional
faces are as follows :
Illinois EPA
Region 1
Bursau of air, FOS
9511 West Harrison
Des Plainee, Illinois
. 60016
847/294-4000
11I I 6ii EPA
Region 2
5415 North University
Peoria, Illinois 61614-
309/693-5 463'
Illinois EPA
.Region 3
2009 Hall Street
Collinsville, Illinois 62234
618/346-5120
DIRECTORY
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
.BUREAU OF AIR
I
Yv(nlu,>
.
I
I
r;i M
d.e I
(
1 ._
I •IM1,
I
I
7
YYL
Kr~X'V~
•>
--i
L'
X(UrPYYVU(NI
L
~ •~ rMfM¢L
,~
l
./r
~XNVI\U1•I
L-'-
iL.(M
.
.
.NY
NYO-~
r
u
I
~
1
- /YM[_J,f
~I4MCW Y
•'
/ I
K(
~NQU?CCMui
L/Ly(t~• I
Nw
I
I
J
u4U(
UYI((r,N
YN,UYY,
i
I
40.0
I
I
I % VUXI,Y„Y
oY(
i
VIISIYY
I
.
I
I
fin`+ n,Y1
-
Xou
•
I_
I
~rwu„
~MIYIWW-'I"W<
I l4
,
leu:i,)L
""iuiX=o-LY`, ~INiNYU :co~ Ioi(
t14YQ i" '(e(ii •Z
Fdo13
