ILLINOIS POLLUTION CONTROL BOARD
May 3, 2007
COUNTY OF JACKSON,
Complainant,
v.
ALVIN VALDEZ and RUBEN J. VALDEZ,
Respondents.
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
AC 07-34
(Administrative Citation)
ORDER OF THE BOARD (by G.T. Girard):
On January 31, 2007, the County of Jackson (County) filed an administrative citation
against Alvin Valdez and Ruben J. Valdez (respondents).
See
415 ILCS 5/31.1(c) (2004); 35 Ill.
Adm. Code 108.202(c). The administrative citation concerns a site commonly known as
“DeSoto/Alvin Valdez,” designated with Site Code No. 0778035022, and located in Jackson
County. For the reasons below, the Board accepts the respondents’ petition to contest the
administrative citation.
Under the Environmental Protection Act (Act) (415 ILCS 5 (2004)), an administrative
citation is an expedited enforcement action brought before the Board seeking civil penalties that
are fixed by statute. Administrative citations may be filed only by the Agency or, if the Agency
has delegated the authority, by a unit of local government, and only for limited types of alleged
violations at sanitary landfills or unpermitted open dumps.
See
415 ILCS 5/3.305, 3.445, 21(o),
(p), 31.1(c), 42(b)(4), (4-5) (2004); 35 Ill. Adm. Code 108.
In this case, the County alleges that respondents violated Sections 21(p)(1) and (p)(3) of
the Act (415 ILCS 5/21(p)(1), (3) (2004)) by causing or allowing the open dumping of waste in a
manner resulting in litter and open burning. The County asks the Board to impose a $3,000 civil
penalty on respondents.
To contest an administrative citation, a respondent must file a petition with the Board no
later than 35 days after being served with the administrative citation. If a respondent fails to do
so, the Board must find that the respondent committed the violation alleged and impose the
corresponding civil penalty.
See
415 ILCS 31.1(d)(1) (2004); 35 Ill. Adm. Code 108.204(b),
108.406. Here, respondents were served with the administrative citation on January 22, 2007.
The Board received respondents’ petition on March 1, 2007. When the Board receives a petition
after the 35-day deadline, the postmark date of that petition is considered its filing date under the
Board’s procedural rules.
See
35 Ill. Adm. Code 101.300(b)(2). The petition was timely filed
within the 35-day appeal period because the petition was postmarked on the filing deadline of
February 26, 2007.
2
On March 15, 2007, the Board accepted respondents’ petition as timely filed, but found
that the petition did not satisfy the Board’s procedural rules because it failed to state any reason
why respondents believe the administrative citation was improperly issued.
See
35 Ill. Adm.
Code 108.206. The Board therefore directed respondents to file an amended petition within 30
days stating the grounds on which they contest the administrative citation.
See
County of
Jackson v. Dan Kimmel, AC 06-21 (Feb. 16, 2006).
On April 19, 2007, the Board received an amended petition stating the reasons for which
respondents contest the administrative citation. The petition was timely filed within the 30-day
period because the petition was postmarked on April 12, 2007.
The Board accepts the amended petition and directs the hearing officer to proceed
expeditiously to hearing. The hearing officer will give the parties at least 21 days written notice
of the hearing.
See
35 Ill. Adm. Code 108.300; 415 ILCS 5/31.1(d)(2) (2004). By contesting the
administrative citation, respondents may have to pay the hearing costs of the Board and the
County.
See
415 ILCS 5/42(b)(4-5) (2004); 35 Ill. Adm. Code 108.500. A schedule of the
Board’s hearing costs is available from the Clerk of the Board and on the Board’s Web site at
www.ipcb.state.il.us.
See
35 Ill. Adm. Code 504.
Respondents may withdraw their petition to contest the administrative citations at any
time before the Board enters its final decision. If respondents choose to withdraw their petition,
they must do so in writing, unless they do so orally at hearing.
See
35 Ill. Adm. Code 108.208.
If respondents withdraw their petition after the hearing starts, the Board will require respondents
to pay the hearing costs of the Board and the County.
See id.
at 108.500(c).
As indicated above, the County has the burden of proof at hearing.
See
415 ILCS
5/31.1(d)(2) (2004); 35 Ill. Adm. Code 108.400. If the Board finds that respondents have
violated Section 21(p)(1) or (p)(3), the Board will impose civil penalties on respondents. The
civil penalty for violating any provision of subsection (p) of Section 21 is $1,500 for each
violation, except that the penalty amount is $3,000 for each violation that is the person’s second
or subsequent adjudicated violation of that provision.
See
415 ILCS 5/42(b)(4-5) (2004); 35 Ill.
Adm. Code 108.500(a). However, if the Board finds that respondents have “shown that the
violation resulted from uncontrollable circumstances, the Board shall adopt a final order which
makes no finding of violation and which imposes no penalty.” 415 ILCS 5/31.1(d)(2) (2004);
see also
35 Ill. Adm. Code 108.500(b).
IT IS SO ORDERED.
I, John T. Therriault, Assistant Clerk of the Illinois Pollution Control Board, certify that
the Board adopted the above order on May 3, 2007, by a vote of ______________.
___________________________________
John T. Therriault, Assistant Clerk
Illinois Pollution Control Board