ILLINOIS POLLUTION CONTROL BOARD
May 21, 1998
IN THE MATTER OF:
ENHANCED VEHICLE INSPECTION
AND MAINTENANCE (I/M)
REGULATIONS: AMENDMENTS
TO 35 ILL. ADM. CODE 240
)
)
)
)
)
)
R98-24
(Rulemaking - Air)
Proposed Rule. Second Notice.
OPINION AND ORDER OF THE BOARD (by M. McFawn):
The Board today adopts for second notice amendments to 35 Ill. Adm. Code
240, Enhanced Vehicle Inspection and Maintenance (I/M) Regulations, also known as IM240.
On January 21, 1998, the Illinois Environmental Protection Agency (Agency) filed a proposal
to amend the enhanced I/M program. On January 22, 1998, the Board adopted the
amendments for first notice publication in the
Illinois Register
. See Enhanced Vehicle
Inspection and Maintenance (I/M) Regulations: Amendments to 35 Ill. Adm. Code 240
January 22, 1998, R98-24; see also 22 Ill. Reg. 2720 (February 6, 1998).
Sections 182(b) and 182(c) of the federal Clean Air Act, as amended in 1990 (42
U.S.C. § 7582(b), § 7582(c) (1990)), require the use of I/M programs in areas that do not
meet the National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS) for ozone or carbon monoxide.
The Clean Air Act specifies the use of “basic” or “enhanced” I/M programs. “Basic”
programs are required in moderate and marginal ozone nonattainment areas with existing I/M
programs. “Enhanced” programs are mandated for serious, severe, and extreme ozone
nonattainment areas with urbanized populations of 200,000 or more. States are required to
submit for approval to the United States Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA) revisions
to their State Implementation Plans (SIPs) which fully describe and assure implementation of a
satisfactory I/M program. In Illinois, the Chicago and Metro-East St. Louis (Metro-East)
areas are classified as “severe” and “moderate” nonattainment areas for ozone. Pursuant to
Section 5/13B-5 of Illinois’ Vehicle Emissions Inspection Law (625 ILCS 5/13B-5 (1996)),
Chicago and Metro-East St. Louis are subject to these I/M regulations.
USEPA has promulgated both final regulations and interim guidelines containing
testing standards and procedures for use in a state’s enhanced I/M emissions testing program
(40 C.F.R. § 51). Illinois’ Vehicle Emissions Inspection Law provides the authority for the
Board to adopt the regulations necessary for Illinois to meet USEPA’s enhanced I/M testing
and performance requirements. The Board has previously adopted the bulk of the standards
necessary for implementation of the enhanced I/M program (R94-19, 18 Ill. Reg. 18228
(December 14, 1994) and R94-20, 18 Ill. Reg. 18013 (December 12, 1994)). The
amendments adopted today for second notice represent the remainder of the mobile source
emissions standards necessary for the implementation of the enhanced I/M program and
2
constitute an integral part of Illinois’ enhanced I/M package. Once adopted by the Board, they
must be submitted by the Agency as part of the Illinois SIP for final approval by the USEPA.
In sum, these proposed rules contain clarifications and modifications to existing
standards, and new standards for the remaining portions of the enhanced I/M testing program.
More specifically, these proposed amendments:
(1)
replace the current evaporative system testing program (which uses a pressure
test and a purge test to test the entire system’s integrity) with a fuel cap only
inspection;
(2)
add “fast-pass” standards to allow vehicles undergoing I/M 240 exhaust
emissions tests to be tested more quickly, saving time and money;
(3)
add standards for the required on-road sensing test; and
(4)
add a program for on-board diagnostic testing that will become mandatory on
January 1, 2001.
The adoption by the Board of these proposed amendments to Part 240: Mobile Sources
is authorized under Section 28.5 of the Environmental Protection Act (Act) (415 ILCS 5/28.5
(1996)) and mandated by Section 13B-20 of the Vehicle Emissions Inspection Law (625 ILCS
5/13B-20 (1996)). Today, the Board adopts these rules for second notice under the Illinois
Administrative Procedure Act (5 ILCS 100/5 (1996)). We have considered the merits of the
Agency’s proposal and its testimony and find that these regulations are required pursuant to the
Vehicle Emissions Inspection Law and adopted in accordance with Section 28.5(d) of the
Environmental Protection Act for the reasons discussed below.
PROCEDURAL MATTERS
Section 13B-20 of the Vehicle Emissions Inspection Law (625 ILCS 5/13B-20 (1996))
mandates adoption of enhanced I/M rules by the identical-in-substance rulemaking procedure
under Section 7.2 of the Act (415 ILCS 5/7.2 (1996)). It further provides that these proposed
amendments are not subject to the requirements of Section 27(b) of the Act (415 ILCS 5/27(b)
(1996)). However, most of the federal enhanced I/M scheme is not codified in federal
regulations, but exists only as federal guidance. Section 7.2 of the Act, which defines
“identical-in-substance” rulemaking and establishes conditions for its use, allows the Board
only to adopt federal rules using this mechanism, not federal guidelines. Since, many of the
federal requisites underlying these proposed rules are based upon federal guidance, we cannot
proceed under Sections 7.2 and 28.4 of the Act with this rulemaking.
The Board previously addressed this issue in R94-19 (18 Ill. Reg. 18228 (December
14, 1994) which also amended the enhanced I/M program. In that rulemaking, major portions
of the federal enhanced I/M scheme were also not codified in federal regulations, but existed
only as federal guidance. At that time, the Agency suggested and the Board agreed to use the
3
next-fastest procedural mechanism, rulemaking under Section 28.5 of the Act (415 ILCS
5/28.5 (1996)), known as “ fast-track” rulemaking. Section 28.5 fast-track rulemaking is to
be applied to “promulgate a rule that the Clean Air Act requires to be adopted.” “Requires to
be adopted” is defined as referring “only to those regulations or part of regulations for which
the United States Environmental Protection Agency is empowered to impose sanctions against
the State for failure to adopt such rules.” 415 ILCS 5/28.5 (1996). Such was the case for
that rulemaking, and is the case in this rulemaking. Here again, most of the federal requisites
underlying these enhanced I/M amendments exist only as federal guidance, yet this program is
required by the Clean Air Act. Therefore, the Board once again finds that this rulemaking
implements the Clean Air Act and is acting to adopt it in accordance with the fast-track
requirements in Section 28.5 of the Act.
Section 28.5 contains numerous procedural requirements including specific timeframes
that the Board must follow in a fast-track rulemaking. The Board has no discretion to adjust
the timeframes under any circumstances. The Board is required to hold one to three hearings
within a fixed number of days, and the number of hearings held fixes the number of days the
Board has to finally adopt the subject rulemaking. Since only one hearing was held in this
rulemaking, the Board has only 130 days after it receives the Agency’s proposal to adopt
regulations for second notice.
On March 17, 1998, the one hearing on the merits of the proposal was held in
Chicago.
1
The second and third hearings originally scheduled for April 14, 1998, and April
28, 1998, respectively, were canceled pursuant to Section 28.5(g) because the Board received
no requests that those hearings be held. At hearing, Elizabeth Tracy, manager of the Division
of Vehicle Inspection and Maintenance, Michael Hills, engineer in technical services with the
Vehicle Inspection Test Program, and James Matheny, engineer manager of technical services
with the Vehicle Inspection Test Program, testified on behalf of the Agency.
The Board received three filings in this proceeding.
2
The Agency’s prehearing
comments were filed by Michael Hills on March 4, 1998. At hearing, the Agency presented
the Board with an errata sheet containing additional amendments to Part 240. On April 3,
1998, the Agency filed its post hearing public comment. No additional filings or public
comments were filed with the Board during the first notice period.
1
The transcript of the March 17, 1998, hearing will be referred to as Tr. at __.
2
The Agency’s prehearing comments will be referred to as Pre. Comm. at __; the Agency’s
errata sheet will be referred to as Errata at __; the Agency’s post hearing comments will be
referred to as Post Comm. at __.
4
ANALYSIS
Subpart A: Definitions and General Provisions
Section 240.102: Definitions
Section 240.102 contains the definitions applicable in the I/M program. The Agency
proposed amendments necessary to conform the definitions with the program changes it
proposed in the remainder of Part 240. First, the Agency proposed that a fuel cap test replace
the two tests currently required under the evaporative system testing program. Accordingly,
the definitions of “pressure test” and “purge test” are deleted. and the following new terms
were proposed: “evaporative system integrity test;” “fuel cap;” “fuel cap leak flow test;”
“fuel cap leak flow tester;” “fuel cap pressure decay test;” “fuel cap pressure decay tester;”
and “fuel cap visual function test.”
3
Stat. of Reas. at 11. All of these terms are applicable to
the different fuel cap tests added at Subpart F: Evaporative Test Standards. See discussion at
pages 10-12.
The Agency also proposed amending one existing definition and eliminating three other
definitions. First, the definition for “high idle” is amended so that it is no longer applicable to
the preconditioning mode of a steady-state idle test. See State of Reas. at 11. Next, the
following three definitions are entirely deleted. The reasons for their deletions are discussed
under the appropriate sections referenced below.
(1)
“Tier I” because the exhaust emission standards defined therein are no longer
required, and all references to the Tier 1 standards are deleted from Part 240.
Those references were removed from Sections 240.162, 204.163, and Section
240.Tables A and B.
(2)
“Test procedure” to eliminate any confusion in interpretation. Section 240.141
(currently not being considered by the Board) contains references to “test
procedure” in both the heading and within the section itself. The section also
contains references to “standards.” The current definition of “test procedure”
creates confusion as to whether test procedures are different from standards.
(3)
“Two speed idle test” because that test is no longer utilized by the Agency. The
Agency’s procedures at Section 276.204 currently require only a single-speed
idle test. While Section 240.125 of the Board’s regulations should also have
been amended to remove the reference to two-speed idle test, cannot be
amended at this time as the Illinois Administrative Procedures Act (5 ILCS
100/5-30(b), (c) (1994)) requires that any amended sections be published in the
Illinois Register
at first notice.
3
The Agency’s Statement of Reasons will be referred to as State. of Reas. at __.
5
The Board agrees that the changes proposed by the Agency are necessary to understand
all the revisions to the I/M program. Accordingly, these amendments are included in the
attached order.
Section 240.104: Inspection
Section 240.104 contains the compliance requirements for motor vehicles which must
be inspected under the Vehicle Emissions Inspection Law. Currently this section is a single
paragraph which contains the compliance requirements for two sets of vehicles. The first set of
vehicles, those subject to inspection under Section 13A of the Vehicle Emissions Inspection
law (625 ILCS 5/13A-104 (1996)), must comply with the exhaust emission standards found at
Section 240.141. (Section 240.141 is not amended in this rulemaking.) This requirement
(unchanged) will now be found in the new subsection (a).
Subsection (b) will contain the compliance requirements for the second set of vehicles,
those subject to inspection under Section 13B of the Vehicle Emissions Inspection Law (625
ILCS 5/13B (1996)). Those vehicles will be required to comply with the emission standards
found at Sections 240.152, 240.162, 240.163, and 240.172. The Agency also proposed
amending the new subsection (b) to require compliance with the new vehicle emission
standards for remote sensing diagnostic (RSD) standards and on-board diagnostic (OBD)
testing, which are newly proposed at Sections 240.182 and 240.192, respectively. Stat. of
Reas. at 12. Finally, the Agency also proposed eliminating the cross-reference to Section
240.173, which contains the purge test.
The Board agrees with the suggested reorganization of Section 240.104 and deletion of
the purge test reference. Also, we find that amendments proposed at 240.104(b) are necessary
to require inspection and compliance with the new vehicle emission standards for RSD and
OBD testing set forth in the cross-referenced Sections 240.182 and 240.192. The cross-
reference to the purge test at Section 240.173 is deleted. For the reasons set forth above, the
purge test is eliminated under today’s proposed rules. These amendments are included in the
attached order.
Section 240.105: Penalties
Section 240.105 sets forth penalties for violations of Part 240. The Agency proposes
changes to Section 240.105 to reflect the addition of penalties for exceedences of the RSD and
OBD standards found at new Section 240.182 and 240.192, respectively, and to eliminate
penalties for not meeting the purge test standards formerly contained in Section 240.173 which
is being deleted. Stat. of Reas. at 12. Also, at first notice the proposed rules contained
several typographical errors which are corrected by today’s order. Errata at 1.
The Board finds that these amendments serve to conform the existing rules to the
proposed amendments, and they are included in the attached order.
6
Section 240.106: Determination of Violation
Section 240.106 specifies how violations of the various standards of Part 240 are to be
determined. For example, violation of the smoke emission standard at Section 240.103 must
be determined using visual observation or a qualified opacity measuring system. As with the
changes proposed at Sections 240.104 and 240.105, the Agency proposed adding to this
Section the cross-references to the newly proposed RSD and OBD standards, and that the
cross-reference to the purge test be eliminated. Stat. of Reas. at 13 and Exhibit 1 at 1. Also,
at first notice the proposed rules contained several typographical errors which are corrected by
today’s order. Errata at 1.
The Board finds that these amendments to the existing rule are necessary to clarify how
violations of the RSD or OBD standards will be determined and that the purge test will no
longer be considered an element of the I/M program. Accordingly, these amendments are
included under Section 240.106 in the attached order.
Section 240.107: Incorporation by Reference
Section 240.107 contains a list of documents incorporated by reference into Part 240.
The Agency proposed that the Board amend Section 240.107(c), which contains a reference to
a USEPA formal guidance document entitled “Report EPA AA EPSD IM 1, High Tech I/M
Test Procedures, Emission Standards, Quality Control Requirements, and Equipment
Specifications”. Stat. of Reas. at 13. The Agency proposes that this reference be deleted and
replaced with USEPA’s most recent formal guidance that was updated in June 1996. Stat. of
Reas. at 13. The title of the more recent reference document is: “High-Tech I/M Test
Procedures, Emission Standards, Quality Control Requirements, and Equipment
Specifications: IM240 and Functional Evaporative System Tests, Revised Technical
Guidance” (High-Tech Guidance). State of Reas. at 13.
At hearing, the Board questioned the Agency regarding the appropriate address to
obtain a copy of the USEPA High-Tech Guidance and whether that address should be included
in Section 240.107. Tr. at 21. In its post hearing comments, the Agency confirmed that the
following address for the USEPA High-Tech Guidance should be included at Section 240.107:
2525 Plymouth Road, Ann Arbor, Michigan, 48105. PC at 3.
The Board finds that this amendment is necessary to update the reference to the USEPA
formal guidance document; it is included in the attached order.
Subpart E: Transient Loaded Mode Test Emission Standards
Section 240.162: Vehicle Exhaust Emission Start-Up Standards and Section 240.163: Vehicle
Exhaust Emission Final Standards
Both existing Sections 240.162 and 240.163 make the vehicle exhaust emission
standards applicable to vehicles which are subject to inspection under Section 13B-15 of the
7
Vehicle Emissions Inspection Law. See Section 240.104. Pursuant to Section 240.162, the
vehicle exhaust emission start-up standards are applicable to all such vehicles by cross-
referencing the standards found in Table A of Part 240. Pursuant to Section 240.163 the
vehicle exhaust emission final standards are applicable to all vehicles by cross-referencing the
standards found at Table B of Part 240.
The Agency proposed two types of amendments to these sections and tables. First, the
Agency proposed that the applicability timeframes now contained in the rules be changed from
a fixed date to a “variable” date. Second, the Agency proposed that references to “Tier 1”
standards be deleted from both sections and both tables.
Applicability Time Frames
Currently, the applicability timeframes for the vehicle exhaust emission standards is
phased. Under the existing rules, the start-up standards were applicable until December 31,
1997, and the final standards became applicable on January 1, 1998. The Agency proposed
changing the applicability date for the start-up and final standards from a fixed date (both of
which have passed) to a date (unspecified) dependent upon when enhanced I/M testing actually
begins. Stat. of Reas. at 13-14. Negotiated changes with the contractor who will be
implementing the enhanced I/M program have resulted in revisions to the start-up and final
standards dates. Stat. of Reas. at 13. The Agency’s test contractor may begin enhanced I/M
testing on the first day of any month between December 1998, and June 1999, depending upon
certain conditions being met. Stat. of Reas. at 14. Therefore, the Agency proposes that the
start-up standards still be phased-in over a two year period before the final standards become
applicable. Since the ending date for the start-up standards cannot be fixed until enhanced I/M
testing begins, the initial date that the final standards replace the start-up standards cannot yet
be specified. State of Reas. at 14.
The current ending date for the start-up vehicle emission standards in Section 240.162
is December 31, 1997. That date is past. Because its contractor for enhanced I/M testing will
be allowed to start testing on the first day of any month between December 1998 and June
1999, the Agency proposed that the start-up standards become applicable sometime after
December 1, 1998 and be applicable for two years. The Board accepts that the beginning date
for enhanced I/M testing must be a floating date rather than a fixed date so the Agency’s test
contractor may have a six month period within which to initiate the enhanced I/M testing. The
Board agrees with the Agency’s proposed two years to make the transition from these
standards to the final standards. Therefore, the previous ending date for start-up standards in
Section 240.162 is deleted and replaced with a description that these standards will be
applicable for two years after the enhanced I/M testing is begun. This means that the start-up
standards will become applicable on the first day of the month between December 1998 and
June 1999 and expire no later than June 2001. Tr. at 44.
Given that the ending date for the start-up standards is not yet established, the actual
date for the final standards can no longer be a fixed date. Again, Section 240.163 currently
provides that the final standards became applicable on January 1, 1998. Therefore, the Board
8
will amend Section 240.163 to provide that the final standards will become applicable at the
conclusion of the testing for the start-up standards; no fixed date will be included in the rule at
this time. As discussed above, that date will be two years after the enhanced I/M testing is
begun,
i.e.
, sometime between December 2000 and June 2001. The Board urges the Agency
to inform it when this date can be established,
i.e.
, notify the Board as to the date its test
contractor begins enhanced I/M testing, so that Section 240.163 can be amended to include a
fixed date. Such an amendment will simplify the rule for the regulated community and those
enforcing the regulations.
Elimination of Tier 1 Vehicle Emission Standards
Sections 240.162 and 240.163 reference the Tier 1 emission standards found in Tables
A and B. Tables A and B contain vehicle emission standards for three pollutants:
hydrocarbons, carbon monoxide, and oxides of nitrogen. The emission levels vary depending
upon the vehicle model years,
e.g.
, 1991-1995, 1983-1990. One model year is designated
“Tier 1(1994+).” Tier 1 is currently defined at Section 240.102 to mean:
the exhaust emission standards required by the Clean Air Act as amended in
1990 that require auto makers to reduce tailpipe emissions of hydrocarbons and
oxides of nitrogen by 35% and 60%, respectively, from existing standards,
beginning with 40% of the vehicles sold in 194, 80% in 1995, and 100%
thereafter.
As mentioned in the discussion of Section 240.102, the Agency proposed that this
definition be deleted. The Agency proposed that the Tier 1 standards be eliminated because the
USEPA’s High Tech Guidance now recommends that the vehicle emission standards apply
only to all 1996 and newer “light duty vehicles,” “light duty trucks 1,” and “light duty trucks
2”. Stat. of Reas. at 14; see High Tech Guidance, Exh. 15.b at 2-3. Formerly, the guidance
recommended Tier 1 standards apply to all model year 1996 and newer vehicles and model
year 1994 and new vehicles certified to Tier 1 standards. Furthermore, the Agency maintains
that the elimination of “Tier 1” requirements for these model year vehicles will simplify
testing operations. Stat. of Reas. at 14. Tier 1 vehicles can only be identified by
inspecting/evaluating the vehicle emission labels located in the engine compartment. Stat. of
Reas. at 14. Therefore, the hood of the vehicle must be opened which the Agency contends
increases both test time and the potential for vehicle damage.
The Board finds that removing the Tier 1 standards from Tables A and B, and the
cross-references to Tier 1 in Sections 240.162 and 240.163 are appropriate. The Board will
delete these requirements and references since the USEPA recommends in its High-Tech
Guidance that the these vehicle emission standards be applicable only to 1996 and newer “light
duty vehicles,” light duty trucks 1,” and “light duty trucks 2.”
9
Section 240.164: Vehicle Exhaust Emission Fast-Pass Standards
The Agency proposed adding new “fast-pass” standards for the IM240 exhaust
emission test. Stat. of Reas. at 15; Pre. Comm. at 2. Table C of Part 240 contains the new
vehicle exhaust emission fast-pass standards, and according to a new Section 240.164, these
are the standards to be applied to vehicles that must be inspected pursuant to Section 240.161
utilizing the IM240 transient loaded mode exhaust emission test specified in the Agency’s rules
at 35 Ill.Adm.Code 276. The IM240 transient loaded mode exhaust test procedure, developed
by USEPA, will be used to measure exhaust emissions of hydrocarbons and carbon monoxide
while the vehicle is operated on a chassis dynamometer. Pre. Comm. at 2. The IM240
driving cycle consists of a series of accelerations, decelerations, and high-speed cruise modes
over a 240-second period which, due to the load or resistance provided by the dynamometer,
allows for measurement of emissions under simulated on-road driving conditions. Pre.
Comm. at 2.
The Agency asserts that the IM240 standards (currently at old Section 240.164) require
a full 240-second driving cycle for all tests, regardless of how clean the vehicle’s emissions
appear early on in the driving cycle. Pre. Comm. at 2. The proposed fast-pass standard will
allow vehicles to pass the IM240 test much more quickly by enabling vehicles which exhibit
clearly clean emission to pass the IM240 exhaust emission test before the entire 240-second
period has elapsed. Stat. of Reas. at 15; Pre. Comm. at 2. Essentially, the fast-pass standard
allows for more vehicle testing in less time, thereby reducing motorists’ testing time and
resulting in a less expensive test network for the State. Stat. of Reas. at 15; Pre. Comm. at 2.
The Board finds that the Agency’s proposed fast-pass standards will reduce testing
time, and thereby allow for testing volume to be increased, and result in a less expensive test
network. Accordingly, the Board deletes old Section 240.164 and adopts new Section 240.164
and Table C for second notice.
Section 240.165: Compliance Determination
The Agency proposes moving the current Section 240.164 to new Section 240.165(a),
the only changes in the existing language is to update the title of the referenced document. See
discussion at page 6 regarding Section 240.107.
The Agency also proposed a new subsection (b), which contains compliance
determination procedures for fast-pass standards, and is based upon USEPA’s High-Tech
Guidance. Stat. of Reas. at 16. Compliance with fast-pass IM240 standards is determined by
measuring the vehicle’s cumulative emissions of each pollutant in each second, and comparing
them to separate cumulative fast-pass standards for each pollutant for each second of the test.
Pre. Comm. at 2.
The Agency noted that like the full-cycle IM240 standards, the proposed fast-pass
standards establish two methods in which a vehicle can pass: composite and Phase 2. Pre.
Comm. at 3. In the case of fast-pass standards, compliance determination with composite fast-
10
pass standards begins at second 30 and is based upon emissions accumulated from the start of
the IM240 test. Pre. Comm. at 3. Compliance determination with Phase 2 fast-pass standards
begins at second 109 and is based upon emissions accumulated from second 94 of the IM240
test. Pre. Comm. at 3. If the vehicle does not meet all of the fast-pass standards within 240
seconds, then the pass/fail determination for each exhaust component will be based upon
compliance with the composite or Phase 2 emission standards for the full driving cycle located
in 35 Ill. Adm. Code 240.162 and 240.163. Those are the start-up and final vehicle exhaust
emission standards discussed above.
The Board agrees that the amendments proposed by the Agency are necessary. Section
240.165(a) now contains the method for determining compliance with the IM240 standards
when the full driving cycle test is used,
i.e.,
Tables A and B. This regulation is simply
relocated from Section 240.164 which is necessary to accommodate the addition of fast-pass
standards at Section 240.164. The Board modifies subsection (a) slightly by adding a title,
“Vehicle Exhaust Emissions Start-Up and Final Standards.” Section 240.165(b) is new. It
contains the method for determining compliance with the new fast-pass standards located in
Table C of Part 240. Obviously, this section is necessary to provide a means for determining
whether vehicles pass the “fast-pass” standards in Table C. The Board amends subsection (b)
by removing the reference in the title to “Compliance Determination” to avoid redundancy
with the Section 240.165 heading, which already includes this phrase. 240.165 is adopted for
second notice with these amendments.
Subpart F: Evaporative Test Standards
Section 240.171: Applicability
Subpart F contains the standards and regulations concerning evaporative testing.
Currently, Section 240.171 contains two rules about the applicability of the evaporative system
integrity test standards found in Subpart F. The Agency proposed removing subsection (b)
which concerns the purge standards currently located in Section 240.173. The Agency
proposed deleting Section 240.171(b) because recent amendments to the Vehicle Emission
Inspection Law made purge testing optional rather than mandatory. Stat. of Reas. at 16; see
Section 10 of P.A. 90-475 (eff. August 17, 1997). Purge testing has been eliminated as a
mandatory requirement of the enhanced I/M program because the test cannot currently be
performed reliably or economically in the high through-put, centralized test system to be built
in Illinois. Stat. of Reas. at 16; Pre. Comm. at 6. As Section 240.171(b) will be deleted, the
Agency also proposed removing the paragraph lettering for Section 240.171(a), leaving the
text in place. Stat. of Reas. at 16.
The Board agrees that since purge testing is no longer mandatory and the Agency
claims that it cannot be reliably or economically performed in the I/M testing system it is
overseeing in Illinois, the requirement to perform purge testing should be deleted. See
infra
concerning Section 240.173. Therefore Section 240.171(b), the rule about its applicability is
deleted.
11
Section 240.172: Evaporative Integrity Test Standards
Section 240.172 establishes standards for vehicles subject to the evaporative system
integrity test. The proposed changes are premised on the Agency’s determination that it is
infeasible to perform a full pressure test of a vehicle’s entire evaporative system. Pre. Comm.
at 3. The Agency, therefore, proposed that it inspect the vehicle’s fuel cap, which is a major
component of the evaporative system. Stat. of Reas. at 17.
The Agency has identified that, in addition to visual inspection, there are two different
instruments used for testing a fuel cap for leakage: a “leak flow” tester or a “pressure decay”
tester. Stat. of Reas. at 17; Pre. Comm. at 3. The Agency explains that the fuel cap leak
flow test determines fuel cap integrity by using a leak flow tester that measures actual leakage
flow rate through the fuel cap and compares it to the flow through a designated master orifice.
Pre. Comm. at 3-4. The fuel cap pressure decay test determines fuel cap integrity by
measuring the actual pressure decay over a period of ten seconds while the fuel cap is
pressurized. Pre. Comm. at 4. Fuel caps that are proper for the vehicle being tested, but do
not fit either the leak flow or pressure decay fuel cap tester (due to the lack of a proper
adapter), will be tested using a visual functional test. Pre. Comm. at 4. This test will involve
a visual inspection of the fuel cap for damage or missing parts. Pre. Comm. at 4.
The Agency is currently using a leak flow test device for advisory testing, but
explained that it desires the flexibility to use either the leak flow or the pressure decay method,
since in the enhanced I/M program, the pressure decay method will be used in the testing
lanes, and the leak flow method will be used for gas cap-only retests. Stat. of Reas. at 17. By
testing the fuel cap instead of the full evaporative system, the Agency testifies that it will
eliminate any problems created by intrusive, underhood inspections and will still receive 40%
of the emission reduction credit that would be received if a test of the entire system were
performed. Stat. of Reas. at 17; Pre. Comm. at 4. In addition, problems detected with the
fuel cap test can be corrected with a simple replacement of the fuel cap. Pre. Comm. at 4.
Therefore, time and cost to the motorist created by the fuel cap test will be quite minimal
when compared to the full evaporative system test. Pre. Comm. at 4.
At hearing, the Board asked the Agency to confirm the correct heading for this section
and all other references to this test. Tr. at 22. The Agency replied that this section and all
references to this test should be referred to as the “Evaporative System Integrity Test
Standard.” Tr. at 22.
The Board finds that the Agency’s proposed amendments are warranted to perform an
evaporative system integrity test. Using either the leak flow, pressure decay, or the visual
function test will allow for flexibility to efficiently conduct the evaporative system integrity
test.
Section 240.173 Evaporative System Purge Test Standards
12
Section 240.173 contains the standards for the evaporative system purge test. The
purge test was included as part of the enhanced I/M testing program in 1994 because,
according to the Agency, the USEPA insisted it be in the program. Stat. of Reas. at 18; see
Enhanced Vehicle Inspection and Maintenance (I/M) Regulations Amendments to 35 Ill. Adm.
Code 240 (December 1, 1994), R94-20, slip op. at 4. The Agency explained that USEPA has
subsequently determined that the problems involved with trying to implement this test in a high
through-put, centralized testing program cannot presently be overcome. Stat. of Reas. at 18.
Furthermore, the Vehicle Emission Inspection Law has been amended to eliminate the
mandatory requirement for the purge test. See P.A.90-475, effective August 17, 1997.
Consequently, the Agency proposed eliminating the purge test as a mandatory part of the
required enhanced I/M test. Stat. of Reas. at 18.
The Board finds that the purge test standards of the evaporative system should be
eliminated from the state’s enhanced I/M program because of the subsequent determination by
USEPA and the Agency that the purge test could not be quickly, reliably, or economically
performed. Section 240.173 is deleted from Part 240 in the attached order for second notice.
Subpart G: On-Road Remote Sensing Testing
The Agency proposed a new subpart to fulfill new requirements of the Vehicle
Emission Inspection Law that the enhanced I/M program include on-road remote sensing
testing. Stat. of Reas. at 18; see 625 ILCS 5/13B-20 (1996). On-road remote sensing testing
is also required by USEPA as a part of the enhanced I/M program. State of Reas. at 19; see
57 Fed. Reg. 52950, 52967 (November 5, 1992); 40 § C.F.R. 51.371.
Specifically, in a new Section 240.182, the Agency proposed emission standards for
on-road remote sensing for hydrocarbons and carbon monoxide. In a new Section 240.181, it
proposed that these standards be applicable to all vehicles that will receive on-road tests
pursuant to 35 Ill. Adm. Code 276,
i.e.,
all 1968 and new “light duty vehicles,” “light duty
trucks 1,” and “light duty trucks 2.” Finally, in a new Section 240.183, it proposed that
compliance be measured using test procedures adopted by the Agency. Tr. at 41. In that
section, the Agency also provided the procedures for notifying the vehicle owner that the
vehicle failed the on-road test. Stat. of Reas. at 18-19. Pursuant to Section 13B-20 of the
Vehicle Emission Inspection Law, the vehicle owner is not obligated to do anything until the
vehicle has failed the on-road emission sensing testing for a second time. This limitation is
legislatively mandated to avoid a determination of non-compliance based upon false failures of
the on-road test.
The Agency proposed the emission standards for on-road remote sensing testing based
upon a study by the Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources. State of Reas at 19. The
Agency explained that its proposal is based upon this study because the USEPA did not
provide any guidance for such standards. State of Reas. at 19. At hearing, Mr. Hills testified
that the Agency had selected the Wisconsin study because it was the most comprehensive in
13
that it tested 71,000 vehicles. Tr. at 26. The false failure rate in the Wisconsin study was
three percent. Tr. at 28.
The Agency advocates this program because it can be used on in-use vehicles and is
non-invasive, and according to the Agency, it is an available technology. Pre. Comm. at 4.
The test procedures involve using an open-path infrared sensor to measure the concentrations
of hydrocarbons, carbon monoxide, and carbon dioxide emitted from the tested in-use vehicle.
Pre. Comm. at 4; Tr. at 28, 39. The testing apparatus is not manned, but rather temporarily
installed at testing points, such as entrance ramps to expressways. Tr. at 28. The apparatus
would likely be placed at on-ramps to expressways rather than off-ramps, to read emissions
from a vehicle that is accelerating. Tr. at 28-29. Mr. Hills testified that measuring vehicle
emissions from a decelerating vehicle may cause false failures. Tr. at 28.
Mr. Hills further explained that an infrared beam from the testing apparatus takes a
snapshot of emissions coming out of the tail pipe of a vehicle that crosses the beam. Tr. at 28.
The infrared beam measures the concentration of hydrocarbons, carbon monoxide, and carbon
dioxide emitted from a vehicle. Tr. at 28. To identify the tested vehicle, a camera
automatically photographs the vehicle’s license plate. Pre. Comm. at 4-5; Tr. at 28.
Section 240.183 provides that compliance is determined based upon procedures adopted
by the Agency. Compliance is determined by comparing the measured emission concentration
of each pollutant to the on-road remote sensing emission standard contained in Section
240.182. Pre. Comm. at 5. In response to a Board question at hearing regarding the adoption
of on-road diagnostic procedures, the Agency stated that it has not yet drafted those
procedures. Tr. at 39. The Agency explained that it intends to adopt procedures at Part 276
within three to six months after hearing that will ensure the following: locating the remote
sensing diagnostic devices to minimize false passes; a representative cross-section of vehicles
in the area; and safety of the operator’s equipment. Tr. at 40.
The Board requests that the Agency notify the Board when its procedures are adopted
under the Administrative Procedures Act. The Board will then determine the best way to
communicate this information to the regulated public either by amending this rule to include a
specific citation or through other means.
Section 240.183 also includes the procedures the Agency must use to notify the
vehicle’s owner that the vehicle failed the on-road remote sensing emission testing. In no case
may such a notice be sent to vehicles registered outside the affected counties. The affected
counties are listed at Section 13B-5 of the Vehicle Emissions Inspection Law.
There is a two step notice procedure when a vehicle fails the on-road emission sensing
test. The first time the vehicle fails the test, the notice must notify the vehicle owner of the
time and location where the on-road remote sensing emission test was taken, and the emission
readings and emission standards exceeded. Although the vehicle’s emissions exceeded the
standards set out in Section 240.182, there is no violation until the vehicle fails the test for a
14
second time. Again, this is to help prevent non-compliance based upon a false failure of the
vehicles.
The second time the vehicle fails the on-road remote sensing emission test, and that
second exeedence occurs prior to the next scheduled in-cycle emissions test, the Agency must
notify the vehicle owner of the second failure. Pre-Comm. at 5. In so doing, the Agency
must include the same information required in the first notice. However, in this second
instance, the Agency must also notify the vehicle owner of the obligation to take the vehicle
for inspection at a local inspection station. This inspection is referred to as an “out-of-cycle
follow up inspection.” Again, at hearing, Mr. Hills explained that the two failure rule is
necessary because it will prevent false failures and it is required by the Vehicle Emission
Inspection Law (625 ILCS 13B-15 (1996)).
The Board finds that the Agency’s proposed rules for the on-road remote sensing
emission testing meet the requirements of the Vehicle Emission Inspection Law. Therefore,
the Board’s order contains the language modified slightly from that proposed by the Agency.
In addition to fulfilling statutory requirements, the Board hopes the on-road remote sensing
emission testing will be an effective tool for evaluating the effectiveness of enhanced I/M on
the in-use performance of vehicles as well as an effective means for identifying vehicles that,
between in-cycle I/M inspections, have an increase in exhaust emissions.
Subpart H: On-Board Diagnostic Test Standards
The Agency proposed a new subpart to contain the necessary rules for the on-board
diagnostic (OBD) program. The OBD system is used on vehicles, in part, as an emission
control diagnostic system that is capable of identifying deterioration or malfunction in certain
vehicle components which could cause increase in emissions that exceed the emission
standards. Pre. Comm. at 5. If the OBD system detects any deterioration or malfunction, a
fault code is recorded in the system for later retrieval and the malfunction indicator light
(MIL) is illuminated on the dashboard. Pre. Comm. at 5. The OBD test is conducted by
connecting the in-lane computer test system to the vehicle’s OBD system. Pre. Comm. at 6.
The test system will then send a request to determine the readiness of the vehicle’s OBD
system. Pre. Comm. at 6. The test system will then download the MIL status and trouble
code information to the vehicle test record. Pre. Comm. at 6. Pass/fail determination will be
made by comparing the MIL status and trouble code information to the OBD test standards
proposed at Section 240.192. Pre. Comm. at 6.
The regulations proposed by the Agency parallel in part those required under the
enhanced I/M program under federal law pursuant to the Clean Air Act, as amended (42
U.S.C. § 7582(b), § 7582(c) (1990)) and state law pursuant to Vehicle Emission Inspection
Law (625 ILCS 5/13B-20(1996)). When the Agency filed its proposal, federal law required
that states adopt a two step OBD program. First, USEPA required OBD testing in all I/M
programs beginning January 1, 1998. 61 Fed. Reg. 40939, 40946 (August 6, 1996); see 40
C.F.R. § 51.373; Tr. at 34. Second, USEPA required that the enhanced I/M program begin
to “pass” or “fail” vehicles based upon compliance with the OBD standards by January 1,
15
2000. 61 Fed. Reg. 409939, 40946 (August 6, 1996); see 40 C.F.R. 51.357(b)(4), 85.222;
Tr. at 35. However at the time it filed its proposal, the Agency also informed the Board that
USEPA intended to propose that this date be delayed until January 1, 2001 (Letter from Gay
MacGregor, Director of Regional and State Programs Division, Office of Air and Radiation,
USEPA, to Air Division Directors, received by the Agency on November 4, 1997). State of
Reas. 21; 62 Fed. Reg. 66841 (December 22, 1997). On December 22, 1997, USEPA did
just that; it proposed a rule delaying the initial date until January 1, 2001. Since hearing,
USEPA adopted a final rule delaying the implementation of the OBD testing standards until
January 1, 200l. 63 Fed. Reg. 24429 (May 4, 1998). The Board takes official notice of this
federal action.
Based upon the December 22, 1997 proposed USEPA rule and the federal guidance
(letter), the Agency asked the Board to adopt OBD testing; however, the Agency requested
that only OBD testing be implemented, and that the Board not make mandatory pass/fail
testing. See State of Reas. at 21; Tr. at 34-35. The Agency sought to have the testing portion
of the OBD program adopted and implemented to allow it to gain more experience about OBD
testing before the OBD program becomes mandatory. Tr. at 31; State of Reas. at 21. The
Agency’s request for testing only stems from USEPA’s original adoption of OBD testing
standards. Tr. at 34-35; see 61 Fed. Reg. 40940 (August 6, 1996). In that original rule,
USEPA required OBD testing in all I/M programs beginning January 1, 1998, but it did not
require that mandatory pass/fail commence until January 1, 2000. See 40 C.F.R. § 51.373, §
85.2207. USEPA noted that, “[d]uring this two year test-only period, EPA in cooperation
with states and motor vehicle manufacturers hopes to gather data on the effectiveness of
OBD.” 61 Fed. Reg. at 40940.
In the final rule delaying the mandatory pass/fail date for OBD testing to January 1,
2001, USEPA amended 40 C.F.R. § 51.373, which now provides that on-board diagnostic
checks shall be implemented by January 1, 2001. 63 Fed. Reg. 24429, 24433 (May 4, 1998).
In response to comments regarding whether a state could implement the OBD testing before
the January 1, 2001, deadline, USEPA indicated there are benefits to implementing the OBD
testing before the mandatory pass/fail date: increased consumer knowledge and acceptance of
OBD testing and the opportunity to work through start-up problems such as complications with
equipment and network compatibility. 63 Fed. Reg. at 24431. The final rule, however, does
not mandate that the states include OBD testing prior to January 1, 2001.
When it finalized the one year extension of the OBD program, USEPA noted the states
are required to amend their I/M SIP submittals to include the OBD program within two years
of the federal promulgation of the OBD program,
i.e.
, these SIP packages are due no later
than August 6, 1998, because the initial OBD program was federally promulgated on August
6, 1996. Some commentators questioned whether this date should be extended since USEPA
has not finalized all of its OBD rules. USEPA acknowledged that the time for developing such
a SIP amendment is short, but pointed out that it does not require states to fully develop their
OBD program as part of this SIP submission. Rather USEPA will only require that in their
OBD SIP submittals, the states commit to implementing the OBD program no later than
January 1, 2001. 63 Fed. Reg. at 24429.
16
Three rules are proposed. First, Section 240.191: Applicability sets forth that the on-
board diagnostic test is advisory only and therefore a vehicle which fails the test does not fail
the vehicle emission test. It also provides that the advisory OBD test is to be performed on all
1996 and new “light duty vehicles,” “light duty trucks 1,” and “light duty trucks 2,” required
to meet the standards for OBD equipment contained in relevant federal rules (see 40 C.F.R. §
86.094-17). Finally, this section provides that such vehicle must be inspected using OBD
testing procedures found at 35 Ill. Adm. Code 276. As of the date of hearing, the Agency had
not yet adopted such rules. Stat. of Reas. at 20-21. However, the Board notes that there is
sufficient time after final adoption of this rule and its applicability for the Agency to develop
such procedures.
Section 240.192 contains the on-board diagnostic test standards. The standards are
those required by federal regulations for OBD test standards. They are taken from the
“Inspection/Maintenance Program Requirement – On-Board Diagnostic Checks,” Final Rule,
63 Fed Reg. 24429 (May 4, 1998). See also Stat. of Reas. at 21. The pass/fail determination
will be made by comparing the MIL status and trouble code information to the proposed OBD
test standards set forth in Section 240.192.
Also in Section 240.192, the Board proposes deletion of phrase “as defined by SAE
J2012” as the reference is both confusing and redundant. On August 6, 1996, USEPA
adopted final rules implementing on-board diagnostic test standards. 61 Fed. Reg. 40940,
40946 (August 6, 1996). In doing so, USEPA identified under what circumstances a vehicle
shall fail the on-board diagnostics test. USEPA adopted its procedures from a list contained
within the Society of Automotive Engineers’, SAE J2012 Diagnostic Trouble Code
Definitions. As Section 240.192 explicitly sets forth the 43 OBD codes under which OBD
failure shall be determined, the specific reference to SAE J2012 is unnecessary.
Finally, new Section 240.193 sets forth compliance determination for OBD testing
standards. The Agency proposed that compliance be determined through inspection of the on-
board diagnostic connector, the malfunction indicator light and comparing the fault codes
down loaded from the on-board diagnostic system with the standards contained in Section
240.192. This inspection must be conducted using the procedures to be adopted by the
Agency at 35 Ill. Adm. Code 276.208. Stat. of Reas. at 22. According to the Agency, these
will be the same regulations promulgated by the USEPA. Stat. of Reas. At 22.
The Board finds that these regulations providing for an on-board diagnostic testing
program is warranted. Although the State is not currently required to have in place an on-
board diagnostic program as part of its enhanced I/M program, such a program is federally
mandated by January 1, 2001, and the State is required to submit by August 6, 1998, a SIP
amendment which commits the State to this program.
Because USEPA has now adopted a final rule delaying implementation of the
mandatory pass/fail OBD testing until January 1, 2001, the Board will include January 1,
17
2001, as the day OBD programs adopted in Subpart H become mandatory. The OBD program
adopted at Subpart H will satisfy USEPA’s SIP requirement.
The Board will not adopt the “advisory” testing program proposed by the Agency.
This testing program is no longer required under the Clean Air Act. Therefore, the Board
does not have the authority to adopt such a program in this rulemaking. As discussed
infra
at
page 3, the Board can only promulgate a rule under Section 28.5 fast-track rulemaking if the
Clean Air Act requires such a rule. See 415 ILCS 28.5(c) (1996). All “non-required” rules
may be considered in a second docket which proceeds under the Board’s routine rulemaking
authority. See 415 ILCS 5/28.5(j) (1996). Should the Agency still desire such an interim
program, it must file such a rulemaking proposal under Title VII of the Act.
Section 240.Tables A and B
Section 240.Table A, Vehicle Exhaust Emission Start-Up Standards, and Table B,
Vehicle Exhaust Emission Final Standards, sets forth emissions standards for light duty
vehicles, light duty trucks 1, and light duty trucks 2. The Agency proposes eliminating the
reference to “Tier 1” in this table as “Tier 1” vehicles requires evaluation of vehicle emission
labels located in the engine compartment. Stat. of Reas. at 22. Access to this information
requires opening the hood, which increases both test time and the potential for vehicle damage.
Stat. of Reas. at 14, 22. Therefore, eliminating the “Tier 1” requirements for these model
year vehicles will simplify testing procedures. Stat. of Reas. at 14, 22.
The Board finds the foregoing proposed changes are warranted and accordingly adopts
the changes as offered by the Agency.
Section 240.Table C
The Agency proposes new Section 240.Table C, entitled Vehicle Exhaust Emission
Fast-Pass Standards, based upon USEPA guidance and to allow vehicles to more quickly pass
the IM240 test. Stat. of Reas. at 23, 15. The fast-pass standards allow higher throughputs to
be achieved, reducing time for the motorists and resulting in a less expensive test network for
the State.
At hearing, the Board inquired about apparent errors in calculation in Table C. Tr. at
22. The Board identified two of these errors. Tr. at 22-24. In its post hearing comments, the
Agency noted that it had inadvertently used incorrect information in preparing the three tables
found in Table C; consequently, the Agency identified several additional errors in calculation.
PC at 2. The Agency explained that in preparing the original proposal for rulemaking, it
erroneously used outdated fast-pass standards. PC at 2. The Agency clarified that the USEPA
High-Tech Guidance standards should be used as a basis for determining the values in the three
tables in Table C. PC at 2. The Agency provided an attachment to its post hearing
comments, highlighting the additional corrections that should be made to Table C.
18
The Board finds that new Section 240.Table C is necessary to provide vehicle exhaust
emission standards for the fast-pass testing procedure. The Board agrees that the additional
changes suggested by the Agency in its post hearing comment should be made to provide
uniformity in understanding the fast-pass standards. The Board adopts the table as proposed
and subsequently amended by the Agency.
CONCLUSION
The Board today adopts for second notice amendments to 35 Ill. Adm. Code 240.
ORDER
The Board directs the Clerk of the Board to cause the submission of the following
proposal to the Joint Committee on Administrative Rules:
TITLE 35: ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
SUBTITLE B: AIR POLLUTION
CHAPTER I: POLLUTION CONTROL BOARD
SUBCHAPTER k: EMISSION STANDARDS AND LIMITATIONS FOR MOBILE
SOURCES
PART 240
MOBILE SOURCES
SUBPART A: DEFINITIONS AND GENERAL PROVISIONS
Section
240.101
Preamble
240.102
Definitions
240.103
Prohibitions
240.104
Inspection
240.105
Penalties
240.106
Determination of Violation
240.107
Incorporations by Reference
SUBPART B: EMISSIONS
Section
240.121
Smoke Emissions
240.122
Diesel Engine Emissions Standards for Locomotives
240.123
Liquid Petroleum Gas Fuel Systems
240.124
Vehicle Exhaust Emission Standards
240.125
Compliance Determination
19
SUBPART C: HEAVY-DUTY DIESEL SMOKE OPACITY STANDARDS AND TEST
PROCEDURES
Section
240.140
Applicability
240.141
Heavy-Duty Diesel Vehicle Smoke Opacity Standards and Test
Procedures
SUBPART D: STEADY-STATE IDLE MODE TEST EMISSION STANDARDS
Section
240.151
Applicability
240.152
Steady-State Idle Mode Vehicle Exhaust Emission Standards
240.153
Compliance Determination
SUBPART E: TRANSIENT LOADED MODE TEST EMISSION STANDARDS
Section
240.161
Applicability
240.162
Vehicle Exhaust Emission Start-Up Standards
240.163
Vehicle Exhaust Emission Final Standards
240.164
240.1645
Vehicle Exhaust Emission Fast-Pass Standards
Compliance Determination
SUBPART F: EVAPORATIVE TEST STANDARDS
Section
240.171
Applicability
240.172
Evaporative System Pressure Integrity Test Standards
240.173
Evaporative System Purge Test Standards
SUBPART G: ON-ROAD REMOTE SENSING TEST EMISSION STANDARDS
240.181
Applicability
240.182
On-Road Remote Sensing Emission Standards
240.183
Compliance Determination
SUBPART H: ON-BOARD DIAGNOSTIC TEST STANDARDS
240.191
Applicability
20
240.192
On-Board Diagnostic Test Standards
240.193
Compliance Determination
240.Appendix A
Rule into Section Table
240.Appendix B
Section into Rule Table
240.Table A
Vehicle Exhaust Emission Start-Up Standards
240.Table B
Vehicle Exhaust Emission Final Standards
240 Table C
Vehicle Exhaust Emission Fast-Pass Standards
AUTHORITYAUTHORITY: Implementing Sections 9, 10 and 13 and authorized by Sections 27 and 28.5
of the Environmental Protection Act [415 ILCS 5/9, 10, 13, 27, and 28.5] and Section 13B-20
of the Vehicle Emissions Inspection Law of 1995 [625 ILCS 5/13B-20] (see Section 10 of
P.A. 90-475, effective August 16, 1997).
SOURCESOURCE: Adopted as Chapter 2: Air Pollution, Part VII: Mobile Sources, filed and effective
April 14, 1972; codified at 7 Ill. Reg. 13628; amended in R85-25, at 10 Ill. Reg. 11277,
effective June 16, 1986; amended in R90-20 at 16 Ill. Reg. 6184, effective April 7, 1992;
amended in R94-20 at 18 Ill. Reg. 18013, effective December 12, 1994; amended in R94-19
at 18 Ill. Reg. 18228, effective December 20, 1994; amended in R98-24 at
_______________ Ill. Reg._____________, effective
______________________________________.
BOARD NOTE: This part implements the Environmental Protection Act as of July 1, 1994.
NOTE: Capitalization denotes statutory language.
SUBPART A: DEFINTIONS AND GENERAL PROVISIONS
Section 240.102 Definitions
All terms which appear in this Part have the definitions specified in this Part and 35 Ill. Adm.
Code 201 and 211. Where conflicting definitions occur, the definitions of this Section apply
in this Part.
"Diesel engine" means all types of internal-combustion engines in which
air is compressed to a temperature sufficiently high to ignite fuel injected
directly into the cylinder area.
"Diesel locomotive" means a diesel engine vehicle designed to move cars
on a railway.
“Evaporative system integrity test” means a test of a vehicle’s
evaporative system. The test shall either consist of a leak check of a
vehicle’s fuel cap with a fuel cap pressure decay tester (fuel cap pressure
21
decay test), a fuel cap leak flow tester (fuel cap leak flow test), or a
visual functional check, as applicable.
“Fuel cap” means a device used to seal a vehicle’s fuel inlet.
“Fuel cap leak flow test” means a test which may be performed in
accordance with this Part on a vehicle’s fuel cap using a fuel cap leak
flow tester to determine whether the vehicle complies with the
evaporative system emission standards of this Part.
“Fuel cap leak flow tester” means a device used to determine the leak
flow integrity of a vehicle’s fuel cap by comparing the measured leak
flow of the fuel cap with an established fuel cap leak flow standard.
“Fuel cap pressure decay test” means the test performed in accordance
with this Part on a vehicle’s fuel cap using a fuel cap pressure decay
tester to determine whether the vehicle complies with the evaporative
system emission standards of this Part.
“Fuel cap pressure decay tester” means a device used to determine the
pressure decay integrity of a vehicle’s fuel cap by monitoring the
pressure behind the fuel cap for a ten second period and comparing the
measured pressure decay of the fuel cap to an established fuel cap
pressure decay standard.
“Fuel cap visual functional test” means the test performed in accordance
with this Part on a vehicle’s fuel cap using visual analysis to determine
whether the vehicle complies with the evaporative system emission
standards of this Part.
"Full power position" means the throttle position at which the engine
fuel delivery is at maximum flow.
"Gross vehicle weight rating (GVWR)" means the value specified by the
manufacturer as the maximum design loaded weight of a single vehicle.
"Heavy duty vehicle" means any motor vehicle rated at more than 8500
pounds GVWR or that has a vehicle curb weight of more than 6000
pounds or that has a basic vehicle frontal area in excess of 45 square
feet.
"High idle" means a vehicle operating condition with engine
disconnected from an external load (placed in either neutral or park) and
operating at speed of 2500 (+) 300 RPM.that portion of a steady-state
idle test conducted with the engine operating at a speed of approximately
22
2500 RPM.
"Idle mode" means that portion of a vehicle emission test procedure
conducted with the engine disconnected from an external load and
operating at minimum throttle.
"Initial idle mode" means the first of up to two idle mode sampling
periods during a steady-state idle mode test, during which exhaust
emission measurements are made with the vehicle in "as-received"
condition.
"Light duty truck 1" means a motor vehicle rated at 6000 pounds
maximum GVWR or less and which has a vehicle frontal area of 45
square feet or less, and which is designed primarily for purposes of
transportation of property or is a derivation of such a vehicle, or is
designed primarily for transportation of persons and has a capacity of
more than 12 persons, or is available with special features enabling off-
street or off-highway operation and use.
"Light duty truck 2" means a motor vehicle rated between 6001 and
8500 pounds maximum GVWR and which has a vehicle frontal area of
45 square feet or less, and which is designed primarily for purposes of
transportation of property or is a derivation of such a vehicle, or is
designed primarily for transportation of persons and has a capacity of
more than 12 persons, or is available with special features enabling off-
street or off-highway operation and use.
"Light duty vehicle" means a passenger car or passenger car derivative
capable of seating 12 passengers or fewer. "Loaded mode" means that
portion of a vehicle emission test procedure conducted with the vehicle
positioned and operating under load on a chassis dynamometer.
"Loaded vehicle weight (LVW)" means the vehicle curb weight plus 300
pounds.
"Measured values" means five second running averages of exhaust
emission concentrations sampled at a minimum rate of twice per second.
"Model year" means the year of manufacture of a motor vehicle based
upon the annual production period as designated by the manufacturer and
indicated on the title and registration of the vehicle. If the manufacturer
does not designate a production period for the vehicle, then "model year"
means the calendar year of manufacture.
"Motor vehicle" as used in this Part, shall have the same meaning as in
23
Section 1-146 of the Illinois Vehicle Code [625 ILCS 5/1-146].
"Preconditioning mode" means a period of steady-state loaded mode or
high-idle operation conducted to ensure that the engine and emissions
control system components are operating at normal operating
temperatures, thus minimizing false failures caused by improper or
insufficient warm-up.
"Pressure test" means a test of a vehicle's evaporative emission control
system to verify the system's integrity by identifying the presence of
system leaks by injecting an inert gas into the system and confirming the
system's ability to hold pressure over a specified period of time.
"Purge test" means a test of the vehicle's evaporative emission control
system to determine the ability of the system to properly recycle gasoline
vapors captured and adsorbed on the charcoal in the system's canister.
The purge test consists of determining the volume of vapor flow between
the canister and the engine as measured during the course of the transient
loaded (IM240) exhaust emissions test.
"Second-chance idle mode" means the second of two idle mode sampling
periods during a steady-state idle mode test, preceded by a
preconditioning mode and utilized as a second chance to pass idle
exhaust emission standards immediately following an initial idle mode
failure.
"Smokemeter or opacimeter" means an optical instrument designed to
measure the opacity of smoke or diesel exhaust gases using the light
extinction method.
"Snap-idle cycle" means rapidly depressing the accelerator pedal from
normal idle to the full power position while the vehicle is in neutral,
holding the pedal in the position for no longer than ten seconds or until
the engine reaches maximum RPM, and fully releasing the pedal so that
the engine decelerates to normal idle.
"Steady-state idle test" means a vehicle emission test procedure
consisting of an initial idle mode measurement of exhaust emissions
followed, if necessary, by a loaded or high idle preconditioning mode
and a second-chance idle mode.
"Tier 1" means the exhaust emission standards required by the Clean Air
Act as amended in 1990 that require auto makers to reduce tailpipe
emissions of hydrocarbons and oxides of nitrogen by 35% and 60%,
respectively, from pre-existing standards, beginning with 40% of the
24
vehicles sold in 1994, 80% in 1995, and 100% thereafter.
"Transient loaded mode test" means a vehicle emissions test run on an
inertial and power absorbing dynamometer using USEPA's IM240
driving cycle consisting of accelerations and decelerations simulating on-
road driving conditions.
"Test Procedure" means the preparation, preconditioning sequence and
smoke opacity measurement processes using the snap idle cycle for
determining compliance with Section 240.141.
"Two-speed idle test" means a vehicle emission test procedure consisting
of the measurements of exhaust emission in high idle and idle modes.
(Source: Amended at 18 Ill. Reg. 18228, effective December 20, 1994; amended at ____
Ill. Reg. ________, effective _______________________________)
Section 240.104 Inspection
All motor vehicles subject to inspection pursuant to Section 13A-104 of the Illinois Vehicle
Emissions Inspection Law [625 ILCS 5/13A-104] shall comply with the exhaust emission
standards for carbon monoxide and hydrocarbons set forth at Section 240.124 of this Part. All
motor vehicles subject to inspection pursuant to Section 13B-15 of the Illinois Vehicle
Emissions Inspection Law of 1995 (Vehicle Emissions Inspection Law of 1995) [625 ILCS
5/13B-15] (see P.A. 88-533, effective January 18, 1994) shall comply with applicable vehicle
emission standards contained in Sections 240.152, 240.162, 240.163, 240.172, and 240.173 of
this Part.
a)
All motor vehicles subject to inspection pursuant to Section 13A-104 of the
Vehicle Emissions Inspection Law [625 ILCS 5/13A-104] shall comply with the
exhaust emission standards for carbon monoxide and hydrocarbons set forth at
Section 240.124 of this Part.
b)
All motor vehicles subject to inspection pursuant to Section 13B-15 of the
Vehicle Emissions Inspection Law [625 ILCS 5/13B-15] shall comply with
applicable vehicle emission standards contained in Sections 240.152, 240.162,
240.163, 240.172, 240.182 and 240.192 of this Part.
(Source: Amended at 18 Ill. Reg. 18228, effective December 20, 1994; amended at ______I
Ill. Reg. ____________, effective ___________________________)
Section 240.105 Penalties
25
a)
Any violations of Sections 240.103, 240.121, 240.122, and 240.123 of this Part
shall be subject to the penalties as set forth in Section 42 of the Act [415 ILCS
5/42].
b)
Any violations of Sections 240.104(a)240.104 and 240.124 of this Part shall be
subject to the penalties as set forth in Sections 13A-112 and 13A-113 of the
Vehicle Emissions Inspection Law [625 ILCS 5/13A-112 and 13A-113].
c)
Any violations of Sections 240.104(b), 240.152, 240.162, 240.163, 240.172,
and 240.182, and 240.192 240.173 of this Part shall be subject to the penalties
as set forth in Sections 13B-55 and 13B-60 of the Vehicle Emissions Inspection
Law
of 1995.
(Source: Amended at 18 Ill. Reg. 18228, effective December 20, 1994; amended at ______
Ill. Reg. ______________, effective ______________________________)
Section 240.106 Determination of Violation
a)
Any violations of Sections 240.103, 240.121, 240.122, and 240.123 of this Part
shall be determined by visual observation; or by a test procedure employing an
opacity measurement system as qualified by 35 Ill. Adm. Code 201, Subpart J.
b)
Any violations of Sections 240.124, 240.152, 240.162, 240.163, 240.172,
or240.182, or 240.192 240.173 of this Part shall be determined in accordance
with test procedures adopted by the Agency in 35 Ill. Adm. Code 276.
(Source: Amended at 18 Ill. Reg. 18228, effective December 20, 1994; amended at ______
Ill. Reg. ___________, effective ________________________________)
Section 240.107 Incorporations by Reference
The following materials are incorporated by reference and include no later editions or
amendments:
a)
Society of Automotive Engineers (SAE), 400 Commonwealth Drive,
Warrendale, PA 15096: Report J255a Diesel Engine Smoke Measurement
(August 1978).
b)
International Standards Organization (ISO), Case Postale 56, 1211 Geneve 20,
Switzerland: ISO 393 (Working Draft, January 1991). Also available from
American National Standards Institute (ANSI), 11 West 42nd Street, New
York, NY 10036.
c)
United States Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA), “High-Tech I/M
Test Procedures, Emission Standards, Quality Control Requirements, and
26
Equipment Specifications: IM240 and Functional Evaporative System Tests,
Revised Technical Guidance,” Report EPA-AA-RSPD-IM-96-1 (June 1996),
2565 Plymouth Road, Ann Arbor, MI 48105. Report EPA-AA-EPSD-IM-93-1,
High Tech I/M Test Procedures, Emission Standards, Quality Control
Requirements, and Equipment Specifications (April 1994).
(Source: Amended at 18 Ill. Reg. 18228, effective December 20, 1994 amended at _________
Ill. Reg. ___________, effective ___________________________)
SUBPART E: TRANSIENT LOADED MODE TEST EMISSION STANDARDS
Section 240.162 Vehicle Exhaust Emission Start-Up Standards
Vehicle exhaust emission start-up standards contained in Section 240.Table A of this Part shall
apply for all vehicles subject to inspection until two years after the beginning of IM240
testing.December 31, 1997. Tier 1 standards shall apply to all model year 1996 and newer
vehicles and model year 1994 and newer vehicles certified to Tier 1 standards. All standards
are expressed in grams per mile (gpm).
(Source: Amended ___________ Ill. Reg. _______________, effective
___________________________)
Section 240.163 Vehicle Exhaust Emission Final Standards
Vehicle exhaust emission final standards contained in Section 240.Table B of this Part shall
apply for all vehicles subject to inspection beginning at the conclusion of testing using the
start-up vehicle exhaust emissions standards required in Section 240.162. on January 1, 1998.
Tier 1 standards shall apply to all model year 1996 and newer vehicles and model year 1994
and newer vehicles certified to Tier 1 standards. All standards are expressed in grams per mile
(gpm).
(Source: Amended at_________ Ill. Reg. ___________, effective
______________________________)
Section 240.164 Compliance Determination
Compliance shall be determined based upon the measurement of exhaust emissions while
operating the vehicle on a dynamometer and following the driving cycle as specified for the
transient IM240 test procedures adopted by the Agency. If the corrected, composite emission
rates exceed standards for any pollutant, additional analysis of test results shall review the
second phase ("Phase 2") of the driving cycle separately. Phase 2 shall include second 94
through second 239 of the driving cycle. Second-by-second emission rates in grams and
composite emission rates in grams per mile for Phase 2 and for the entire composite test shall
be recorded for each pollutant. For any given pollutant, if the composite emission level is at
or below the composite standard or if the Phase 2 grams per mile emission level is at or below
27
the applicable Phase 2 standard, then the vehicle shall pass the test for that pollutant.
Composite and Phase 2 emission rates shall be calculated in accordance with procedures
specified in "High-Tech I/M Procedures, Emissions Standards, Quality Control Requirements,
and Equipment Specifications Final Technical Guidance" incorporated by reference at Section
240.107 of this Part.
(Source: Added at 18 Ill. Reg. 18228, effective December 20, 1994)
Section 240.164 Vehicle Exhaust Emission Fast-Pass StandardsCompliance Determination
Vehicle exhaust emissions fast-pass standards contained in Section 240.Table C of this Part
will apply for all vehicles subject to inspection under Section 240.161 of this Part utilizing the
IM240 transient loaded mode exhaust emission test procedures specified in 35 Ill. Adm. Code
276. All standards are expressed as the cumulative grams for each second of the composite
and Phase 2 tests.
(Source: Old Section 240.164 renumbered to Section 240.165 and new Section 240.164 added
at _____________ Ill. Reg. _____________________, effective
_____________________________)
Section 240. 164165 Compliance Determination
a)
Vehicle Exhaust Emission Start-Up and Final Standards - Compliance shall be
determined based upon the measurement of exhaust emissions while operating
the vehicle on a dynamometer and following the driving cycle as specified for
the transient IM240 test procedures adopted by the Agency. If the corrected,
composite emission rates exceed standards for any pollutant, additional analysis
of test results shall review the second phase ("Phase 2") of the driving cycle
separately. Phase 2 shall include second 94 through second 239 of the driving
cycle. Second-by-second emission rates in grams and composite emission rates
in grams per mile for Phase 2 and for the entire composite test shall be recorded
for each pollutant. For any given pollutant, if the composite emission level is at
or below the composite standard or if the Phase 2 grams per mile emission level
is at or below the applicable Phase 2 standard, then the vehicle shall pass the
test for that pollutant. Composite and Phase 2 emission rates shall be calculated
in accordance with procedures specified in "High-Tech I/M Procedures,
Emissions Standards, Quality Control Requirements, and Equipment
Specifications: IM240 and Functional Evaporative System Tests, Revised
Technical Guidance," incorporated by reference at Section 240.107 of this Part.
b)
Vehicle Exhaust Emission Fast-Pass Standards - Compliance will be determined
based upon the measurement of exhaust emissions while operating the vehicle
on a dynamometer and following the driving cycle as specified for the transient
IM240 test procedures adopted by the Agency. Vehicles will be fast-passed
using the following algorithm:
28
1)
Beginning at second 30 of the driving cycle, cumulative second-by-
second emission levels for each second, calculated from the start of the
cycle in grams, will be compared to the cumulative fast-pass emission
standards for the second under consideration. Beginning at second 109,
fast-pass decisions are based upon analysis of cumulative emissions in
Phase 2, the portion of the test beginning at second 94, as well as
emission levels accumulated from the beginning of the composite test.
2)
A vehicle will pass the transient IM240 test for a given pollutant if either
of the following conditions occurs:
A)
cumulative emissions of the pollutant are below the full cycle
fast-pass standard for the second under consideration; or
B)
at second 109 and later, cumulative Phase 2 emissions are below
the Phase 2 fast-pass standards for the second under
consideration.
3)
Testing may be terminated when fast-pass criteria are met for all subject
pollutants in the same second.
4)
If a fast-pass determination cannot be made for all subject pollutants
before the driving cycle ends, the pass/fail determination for each
component will be based on composite or Phase 2 emissions over the full
driving cycle according to the procedures in subsection (a) of this
Section. In cases where fast-pass standards are not used, composite
emission rates in grams per mile for Phase 2 and for the entire composite
test will be recorded for each pollutant.
5)
Composite and Phase 2 emission rates will be calculated in accordance
with procedures specified in “High-Tech I/M Procedures, Emissions
Standards, Quality Control Requirements, and Equipment Specifications:
IM240 and Functional Evaporative System Tests, Revised Technical
Guidance,” incorporated by reference at Section 240.107 of this Part.
(Source: Renumbered from Section 240.164 and amended at ________________ Ill. Reg.
_________________________, effective __________________________________)
SUBPART F: EVAPORATIVE TEST STANDARDS
Section 240.171 Applicability
a)
The standards of Section 240.172 of this Subpart shall apply to all model year
1968 and newer vehicles required at the time of manufacture to be equipped
29
with evaporative emission control systems.
b)
The standards of Section 240.173 of this Subpart shall apply to model year 1981
and newer light duty vehicles, light duty trucks 1, and light duty trucks 2 that
are inspected utilizing the transient loaded mode exhaust emission test
procedures adopted by the Agency.
(Source: Added at 18 Ill. Reg. 18228, effective December 20, 1994; amended at _________
Ill. Reg. _______________, effective _____________________________-)
SUBPART F: EVAPORATIVE TEST STANDARDS
Section 240.172 Evaporative System Pressure Integrity Test Standards
Vehicles subject to evaporative system integrity testing shall fail the evaporative system
integrity test if one of the following occurs:
a)
Fuel Cap Pressure Decay Standards - While tested using the fuel cap pressure
decay tester, the pressure decays by 6 inches of water or more during a 10
second period after being pressurized to 28+1 inches of water column; The
vehicles shall be inspected utilizing an evaporative system pressure test adopted
by the Agency.
b)
Fuel Cap Leak Flow Test Standards - While tested using the fuel cap leak flow
tester, the fuel cap leak flow rate exceeds 60 cc/min at a pressure of 30+1
inches of water column. Determination will be made by comparing the fuel
cap’s measured leak flow rate with the flow rate obtained from a calibrated
master orifice with a National Institute of Standards and Technology traceable
flow rate which will result in a pass/fail flow rate threshold of 60 cc/min of air
at 30+1 inches of water column; orThe vehicle shall fail the evaporative system
pressure test if one of the following occurs:
1)
The system cannot maintain a system pressure above eight inches of
water for up to two minutes after being pressurized to 14 plus or minus
0.5 inches of water;
2)
No pressure drop is detected when the gas cap is loosened;
3)
The fuel vapor storage canister is missing or obviously damaged;
4)
System vapor lines or hoses are missing or obviously disconnected; or
5)
The gas cap is missing.
30
c)
Visual Functional Test Standards - While tested using the visual functional test,
an inspection of the fuel cap reveals one or more of the following:
1)
a missing fuel cap;
2)
a missing or damaged o-ring, gasket, or seal;
3)
missing or damaged threads, flanges, prongs, or other parts used to
secure the fuel cap to the fuel tank filler neck; and/or
4)
cracks, holes, or other visible forms of tampering or damage.
BOARD NOTE: Derived from 40 CFR 51.357(b)(3)(i) (1993).
(Source: Added at 18 Ill. Reg. 18013, effective December 12, 1994; amended at _________
Ill. Reg. ______________________, effective _____________________________-)
Section 240.173 Evaporative System Purge Test Standards
a)
The vehicle shall be inspected utilizing the evaporative system purge test
adopted by the Agency.
b)
The vehicle shall fail the evaporative system purge test if the canister purge
system flow as measured during the course of the transient exhaust emission test
is less than one liter.
BOARD NOTE: Derived from 40 CFR 51.357(b)(3)(ii) (1993).
(Source: Added at 18 Ill. Reg. 18013, effective December 12, 1994)
SUBPART G: ON-ROAD REMOTE SENSING TEST EMISSION STANDARDS
Section 240.181 Applicability
The standards of this Subpart apply to all vehicles which are inspected utilizing the on-road
remote sensing exhaust emission test procedures adopted by the Agency in 35 Ill. Adm. Code
276.
(Source: Added at
Ill. Reg.
, effective
)
Section 240.182 On-Road Remote Sensing Emission Standards
Exhaust emissions from all subject vehicles and trucks shall not exceed the following
limitations:
31
Model Year
Hydrocarbons
Carbon Monoxide
(ppm)
(%)
1992+
400
2.0
1988-1991
450
3.0
1981-1987
650
5.0
1975-1980
1300
7.0
1968-1974
1700
8.0
(Source: Added at
Ill. Reg.
, effective
)
Section 240.183 Compliance Determination
Compliance shall be determined based upon the measurement of exhaust emissions using the
on-road remote sensing test procedures adopted by the Agency. If, during the course of on-
road inspections, a vehicle is found to exceed the on-road remote sensing emission standards
specified in Section 240.182 for the model year and type of vehicle, the Agency shall send a
notice to the vehicle owner of the violation, which notice will include the time and location of
the reading. The notice of a second on-road remote sensing exceedance shall, in addition to
the information contained in the first notice, indicate that the vehicle has been reassigned and
is subject to an out-of-cycle follow-up inspection at an official inspection station. In no case
shall the Agency send a notice of an on-road exceedance to the owner of a vehicle that was
found to exceed the on-road remote sensing emission standards if the vehicle is registered
outside the affected counties.
(Source: Added at
Ill. Reg.
, effective
)
SUBPART H: ON-BOARD DIAGNOSTIC TEST STANDARDS
Section 240.191 Applicability
The standards of this Subpart apply to all 1996 and newer model year light duty vehicles, light
duty trucks 1, and light duty trucks 2 that are required to meet the standards contained in 40
C.F.R. § 86.094-17 and which are inspected utilizing the on-board diagnostic test procedures
adopted by the Agency in 35 Ill. Adm. Code 276. Vehicles which receive a result of fail do
not thereby fail their emissions test until January 1, 2001.
(Source: Added at
Ill. Reg.
, effective
)
Section 240.192 On-Board Diagnostic Test Standards
32
Vehicles subject to on-board diagnostic testing shall fail the on-board diagnostic test if one of
the following occurs:
a)
the vehicle connector is missing, has been tampered with, or is otherwise
inoperable;
b)
the malfunction indicator light is commanded to be illuminated and it is not
visually illuminated according to visual inspection; or
c)
the malfunction indicator light is commanded to be illuminated and any of the
following on-board diagnostic codes are present (where X refers to any digit):
1)
Any PX1XX Fuel and Air Metering codes
2)
Any PX2XX Fuel and Air Metering codes
3)
Any PX3XX Ignition System or Misfire codes
4)
Any PX4XX Auxiliary Emission Controls codes
5)
P0500 Vehicle Speed Sensor Malfunction
6)
P0501 Vehicle Speed Sensor Range/Malfunction
7)
P0502 Vehicle Speed Sensor Circuit Low Input
8)
P0503 Vehicle Speed Sensor Intermittent/Erratic/High
9)
P0505 Idle Control System Malfunction
10)
P0506 Idle Control System RPM Lower Than Expected
11)
P0507 Idle Control System RPM Higher Than Expected
12)
P0510 Closed Throttle Position Switch Malfunction
13)
P0550 Power Steering Pressure Sensor Circuit Malfunction
14)
P0551 Power Steering Pressure Sensor Circuit Malfunction
15)
P0552 Power Steering Pressure Sensor Circuit Low Input
16)
P0553 Power Steering Pressure Sensor Circuit Intermittent
17)
P0554 Power Steering Pressure Sensor Circuit Intermittent
33
18)
P0560 System Voltage Malfunction
19)
P0561 System Voltage Unstable
20)
P0562 System Voltage Low
21)
P0563 System Voltage High
22)
Any PX6XX Computer and Output Circuits codes
23)
P0703 Brake Switch Input
24)
P0705 Transmission Range Sensor Circuit Malfunction (PRNDL Input)
25)
P0706 Transmission Range Sensor Circuit Range/Performance
26)
P0707 Transmission Range Sensor Circuit Low Input
27)
P0708 Transmission Range Sensor Circuit High Input
28)
P0709 Transmission Range Sensor Circuit Intermittent
29)
P0719 Torque Converter/Brake Switch "B" Circuit Low
30)
P0720 Output Speed Sensor Circuit Malfunction
31)
P0721 Output Speed Sensor Circuit Range/Performance
32)
P0722 Output Speed Sensor Circuit No Signal
33)
P0723 Output Speed Sensor Circuit Intermittent
34)
P0724 Torque Converter/Brake Switch "B" Circuit High
35)
P0725 Engine Speed Input Circuit Malfunction
36)
P0726 Engine Speed Input Circuit Range/Performance
37)
P0727 Engine Speed Input Circuit No Signal
38)
P0728 Engine Speed Input Circuit Intermittent
39)
P0740 Torque Converter Clutch System Malfunction
34
40)
P0741 Torque Converter System Performance or Stuck Off
41)
P0742 Torque Converter System Stuck On
42)
P0743 Torque Converter System Electrical
43)
P0744 Torque Converter System Intermittent
(Source: Added at
Ill. Reg.
, effective
)
Section 240.193 Compliance Determination
Compliance shall be determined based upon the inspection of the on-board diagnostic vehicle
connector, malfunction indicator light, and fault codes using the on-board diagnostic test
procedures adopted by the Agency and specified in 35 Ill. Adm. Code 276.
(Source: Added at
Ill. Reg.
, effective
)
Section 240.Table A Vehicle Exhaust Emission Start-Up Standards
Light Duty Vehicles:
Model Years
Hydrocarbons
Carbon Monoxide
Oxides of Nitrogen
Composite
Phase 2
Composite
Phase 2
Composite
Phase 2
(gpm)
(gpm)
(gpm)
(gpm)
(gpm)
(gpm)
Tier 1
(1994+)
1996+
0.80
0.50
15.0
12.0
2.0
Reserved
1991-1995 1.20
0.75
20.0
16.0
2.5
Reserved
1983-1990 2.00
1.25
30.0
24.0
3.0
Reserved
1981-1982 2.00
1.25
60.0
48.0
3.0
Reserved
Light Duty Trucks 1:
Model Years
Hydrocarbons
Carbon Monoxide
Oxides of Nitrogen
Composite
Phase 2
Composite
Phase 2
Composite
Phase 2
(gpm)
(gpm)
(gpm)
(gpm)
(gpm)
(gpm)
Tier 1
(1994+)
1996+
(< 3750
LVW)
0.80
0.50
15.0
12.0
2.0
Reserved
35
(> 3750
LVW)
1.00
0.63
20.0
16.0
2.5
Reserved
1991-1995 2.40
1.50
60.0
48.0
3.0
Reserved
1988-1990 3.20
2.00
80.0
64.0
3.5
Reserved
1984-1987 3.20
2.00
80.0
64.0
7.0
Reserved
1981-1983 7.50
5.00
100.0
80.0
7.0
Reserved
Light Duty Trucks 2:
Model Years
Hydrocarbons
Carbon Monoxide
Oxides of Nitrogen
Composite
Phase 2
Composite
Phase 2
Composite
Phase 2
(gpm)
(gpm)
(gpm)
(gpm)
(gpm)
(gpm)
Tier 1
(1994+)
1996+
(< 5750
LVW)
1.00
0.63
20.0
16.0
2.5
Reserved
(> 5750
LVW)
2.40
1.50
60.0
48.0
4.0
Reserved
1991-1995 2.40
1.50
60.0
48.0
4.5
Reserved
1988-1990 3.20
2.00
80.0
64.0
5.0
Reserved
1984-1987 3.20
2.00
80.0
64.0
7.0
Reserved
1981-1983 7.50
5.00
100.0
80.0
7.0
Reserved
(Source: Added at 18 Ill. Reg. 18228, effective December 20, 1994Amended at ________
Ill. Reg. ____________, effective _______________________________)
Section 240.TABLE B Vehicle Exhaust Emission Final Standards
Light Duty Vehicles:
Model Years
Hydrocarbons
Carbon Monoxide
Oxides of Nitrogen
Composite
Phase 2
Composite
Phase 2
Composite
Phase 2
(gpm)
(gpm)
(gpm)
(gpm)
(gpm)
(gpm)
Tier 1
(1994+)
1996+
0.60
0.40
10.0
8.0
1.5
Reserved
1983-1995 0.80
0.50
15.0
12.0
2.0
Reserved
1981-1982 0.80
0.50
30.0
24.0
2.0
Reserved
Light Duty Trucks 1:
36
Model Years
Hydrocarbons
Carbon Monoxide
Oxides of Nitrogen
Composite
Phase 2
Composite
Phase 2
Composite
Phase 2
(gpm)
(gpm)
(gpm)
(gpm)
(gpm)
(gpm)
Tier 1
(1994+)
1996+
(< 3750
LVW)
0.60
0.40
10.0
8.0
1.5
Reserved
(> 3750
LVW)
0.80
0.50
13.0
10.0
1.8
Reserved
1988-1995 1.60
1.00
40.0
32.0
2.5
Reserved
1984-1987 1.60
1.00
40.0
32.0
4.5
Reserved
1981-1983 3.40
2.00
70.0
56.0
4.5
Reserved
Light Duty Trucks 2:
Model Years
Hydrocarbons
Carbon Monoxide
Oxides of Nitrogen
Composite
Phase 2
Composite
Phase 2
Composite
Phase 2
(gpm)
(gpm)
(gpm)
(gpm)
(gpm)
(gpm)
Tier 1
(1994+)
1996+
(< 5750
LVW)
0.80
0.50
13.0
10.0
1.8
Reserved
(> 5750
LVW)
0.80
0.50
15.0
12.0
2.0
Reserved
1988-1995 1.60
1.00
40.0
32.0
3.5
Reserved
1984-1987 1.60
1.00
40.0
32.0
4.5
Reserved
1981-1983 3.40
2.00
70.0
56.0
4.5
Reserved
(Source: Added at 18 Ill. Reg. 18228, effective December 20, 1994Amended at _______ Ill.
Reg. ________________, effective ________________________)
Section 240.Table C: Vehicle Exhaust Emission Fast-Pass Standards
a)
Vehicles having composite hydrocarbon emission limitations of less than 1.25 grams
per mile, and composite carbon monoxide emission limitations of less than 20.0 grams
per mile, in Section 240.Table A or Section 240.Table B:
Hydrocarbons
Carbon Monoxide
Second
Composite
Phase 2
Composite
Phase 2
37
30
0.124
N/A
0.693
N/A
31
0.126
N/A
0.773
N/A
32
0.129
N/A
0.837
N/A
33
0.135
N/A
0.851
N/A
34
0.140
N/A
0.853
N/A
35
0.146
N/A
0.857
N/A
36
0.150
N/A
0.900
N/A
37
0.153
N/A
0.960
N/A
38
0.156
N/A
1.034
N/A
39
0.160
N/A
1.070
N/A
40
0.165
N/A
1.076
N/A
41
0.169
N/A
1.083
N/A
42
0.172
N/A
1.102
N/A
43
0.173
N/A
1.111
N/A
44
0.177
N/A
1.114
N/A
45
0.197
N/A
1.157
N/A
46
0.200
N/A
1.344
N/A
47
0.208
N/A
1.482
N/A
48
0.221
N/A
1.530
N/A
49
0.232
N/A
1.542
N/A
50
0.235
N/A
1.553
N/A
51
0.238
N/A
1.571
N/A
52
0.240
N/A
1.595
N/A
53
0.242
N/A
1.633
N/A
54
0.246
N/A
1.685
N/A
55
0.249
N/A
1.689
N/A
56
0.252
N/A
1.693
N/A
57
0.261
N/A
1.700
N/A
58
0.271
N/A
1.723
N/A
59
0.276
N/A
1.852
N/A
60
0.278
N/A
1.872
N/A
61
0.280
N/A
1.872
N/A
62
0.282
N/A
1.872
N/A
63
0.283
N/A
1.900
N/A
64
0.284
N/A
1.917
N/A
65
0.285
N/A
1.944
N/A
66
0.286
N/A
2.000
N/A
67
0.288
N/A
2.060
N/A
68
0.291
N/A
2.064
N/A
69
0.294
N/A
2.076
N/A
70
0.296
N/A
2.104
N/A
71
0.298
N/A
2.117
N/A
72
0.300
N/A
2.125
N/A
73
0.302
N/A
2.130
N/A
74
0.304
N/A
2.138
N/A
38
75
0.307
N/A
2.152
N/A
76
0.308
N/A
2.170
N/A
77
0.308
N/A
2.188
N/A
78
0.308
N/A
2.200
N/A
79
0.314
N/A
2.212
N/A
80
0.320
N/A
2.212
N/A
81
0.324
N/A
2.221
N/A
82
0.327
N/A
2.222
N/A
83
0.329
N/A
2.227
N/A
84
0.333
N/A
2.236
N/A
85
0.336
N/A
2.243
N/A
86
0.339
N/A
2.262
N/A
87
0.343
N/A
2.271
N/A
88
0.347
N/A
2.284
N/A
89
0.350
N/A
2.299
N/A
90
0.356
N/A
2.308
N/A
91
0.358
N/A
2.326
N/A
92
0.360
N/A
2.330
N/A
93
0.363
N/A
2.331
N/A
94
0.367
N/A
2.344
N/A
95
0.370
N/A
2.347
N/A
96
0.372
N/A
2.355
N/A
97
0.376
N/A
2.395
N/A
98
0.388
N/A
2.451
N/A
99
0.396
N/A
2.508
N/A
100
0.405
N/A
2.590
N/A
101
0.410
N/A
2.660
N/A
102
0.411
N/A
2.749
N/A
103
0.412
N/A
2.913
N/A
104
0.413
N/A
3.162
N/A
105
0.421
N/A
3.170
N/A
106
0.428
N/A
3.197
N/A
107
0.430
N/A
3.288
N/A
108
0.455
N/A
3.419
N/A
109
0.459
0.015
3.587
0.168
110
0.462
0.017
3.595
0.173
111
0.464
0.021
3.640
0.237
112
0.466
0.024
3.740
0.266
113
0.468
0.024
3.868
0.280
114
0.471
0.025
3.877
0.291
115
0.488
0.026
3.934
0.314
116
0.513
0.029
4.015
0.331
117
0.538
0.032
4.061
0.345
118
0.561
0.035
4.063
0.350
119
0.577
0.035
4.079
0.356
39
120
0.580
0.036
4.140
0.367
121
0.586
0.038
4.185
0.388
122
0.594
0.040
4.199
0.407
123
0.603
0.041
4.205
0.463
124
0.610
0.042
4.212
0.480
125
0.615
0.042
4.232
0.506
126
0.624
0.042
4.298
0.518
127
0.628
0.045
4.344
0.522
128
0.632
0.046
4.361
0.525
129
0.637
0.046
4.366
0.528
130
0.641
0.049
4.369
0.530
131
0.643
0.050
4.372
0.530
132
0.644
0.052
4.435
0.534
133
0.645
0.054
4.523
0.550
134
0.647
0.054
4.524
0.554
135
0.651
0.054
4.525
0.590
136
0.658
0.055
4.531
0.616
137
0.663
0.055
4.534
0.639
138
0.666
0.056
4.542
0.653
139
0.668
0.059
4.553
0.662
140
0.670
0.061
4.554
0.683
141
0.672
0.061
4.554
0.696
142
0.675
0.061
4.554
0.708
143
0.678
0.063
4.554
0.721
144
0.681
0.064
4.554
0.739
145
0.684
0.065
4.554
0.742
146
0.686
0.066
4.554
0.743
147
0.688
0.067
4.554
0.745
148
0.690
0.068
4.554
0.748
149
0.692
0.069
4.554
0.751
150
0.694
0.070
4.554
0.762
151
0.696
0.071
4.556
0.789
152
0.698
0.072
4.556
0.790
153
0.700
0.073
4.565
0.794
154
0.702
0.073
4.612
0.799
155
0.704
0.074
4.834
0.805
156
0.706
0.077
5.702
0.842
157
0.708
0.079
5.841
0.990
158
0.710
0.082
6.170
1.038
159
0.712
0.082
6.670
1.357
160
0.716
0.086
7.425
1.455
161
0.750
0.095
8.379
1.546
162
0.784
0.107
9.648
1.824
163
0.805
0.115
10.918
2.746
164
0.840
0.122
12.157
3.073
40
165
0.853
0.127
12.731
3.633
166
0.874
0.159
12.831
4.505
167
0.903
0.186
12.892
4.952
168
0.910
0.189
12.932
5.254
169
0.914
0.200
13.702
5.730
170
0.916
0.220
14.139
6.051
171
0.919
0.236
14.964
6.333
172
0.931
0.247
15.704
6.490
173
0.948
0.257
16.253
6.796
174
0.983
0.267
16.907
7.205
175
1.018
0.283
17.655
8.151
176
1.027
0.295
18.020
8.230
177
1.035
0.312
18.349
8.584
178
1.051
0.318
18.671
8.800
179
1.074
0.323
18.972
8.847
180
1.084
0.337
19.228
8.913
181
1.099
0.345
20.123
9.122
182
1.121
0.350
20.405
9.532
183
1.132
0.359
20.754
10.256
184
1.152
0.387
21.684
10.862
185
1.161
0.398
21.955
10.996
186
1.168
0.400
22.650
11.206
187
1.175
0.402
22.989
11.514
188
1.181
0.405
23.535
11.894
189
1.188
0.418
23.876
12.019
190
1.203
0.429
24.018
12.170
191
1.219
0.442
24.464
12.517
192
1.233
0.457
24.685
12.598
193
1.251
0.473
24.931
12.625
194
1.255
0.487
25.188
12.653
195
1.258
0.501
25.468
12.777
196
1.265
0.510
25.627
12.906
197
1.280
0.512
25.746
12.989
198
1.293
0.514
25.850
13.060
199
1.301
0.516
25.974
13.165
200
1.313
0.518
26.141
13.242
201
1.324
0.527
26.225
13.412
202
1.332
0.540
26.338
13.662
203
1.341
0.547
26.547
13.773
204
1.357
0.553
26.818
13.942
205
1.375
0.559
27.052
14.090
206
1.392
0.563
27.393
14.224
207
1.408
0.567
27.501
14.426
208
1.422
0.571
27.632
14.498
209
1.433
0.575
27.803
14.776
41
210
1.443
0.579
27.953
14.907
211
1.453
0.595
28.205
14.916
212
1.463
0.605
28.543
15.014
213
1.468
0.614
28.997
15.221
214
1.470
0.622
29.000
15.472
215
1.474
0.627
29.005
15.555
216
1.478
0.638
29.081
15.652
217
1.481
0.643
29.281
15.969
218
1.484
0.643
29.483
16.028
219
1.487
0.645
29.734
16.375
220
1.490
0.651
29.803
16.487
221
1.493
0.655
29.821
16.524
222
1.504
0.663
29.847
16.578
223
1.522
0.671
29.862
16.684
224
1.547
0.675
29.873
16.755
225
1.549
0.684
30.008
16.770
226
1.562
0.694
30.126
16.805
227
1.574
0.701
30.127
16.865
228
1.579
0.702
30.127
16.960
229
1.584
0.708
30.208
16.960
230
1.589
0.708
30.314
16.962
231
1.590
0.709
30.323
16.988
232
1.596
0.710
30.325
17.072
233
1.598
0.710
30.368
17.094
234
1.604
0.711
30.411
17.184
235
1.610
0.712
30.416
17.189
236
1.612
0.712
30.428
17.188
237
1.613
0.712
30.430
17.189
238
1.614
0.713
30.452
17.241
239
1.615
0.716
30.488
17.370
b)
Vehicles having composite hydrocarbon emission limitations of at least 1.25 grams per
mile but less than 2.00 grams per mile, and composite carbon monoxide emission
limitations of at least 20.0 grams per mile but less than 30.0 grams per mile, in Section
240.Table A or Section 240.Table B:
Hydrocarbons
Carbon Monoxide
Second
Composite
Phase 2
Composite
Phase 2
30
0.247
N/A
1.502
N/A
31
0.253
N/A
1.546
N/A
32
0.258
N/A
1.568
N/A
33
0.263
N/A
1.582
N/A
34
0.268
N/A
1.593
N/A
35
0.277
N/A
1.602
N/A
36
0.283
N/A
1.621
N/A
42
37
0.293
N/A
1.631
N/A
38
0.297
N/A
1.702
N/A
39
0.298
N/A
1.784
N/A
40
0.313
N/A
1.879
N/A
41
0.320
N/A
2.162
N/A
42
0.327
N/A
2.307
N/A
43
0.342
N/A
2.343
N/A
44
0.360
N/A
2.376
N/A
45
0.376
N/A
2.406
N/A
46
0.389
N/A
2.433
N/A
47
0.408
N/A
2.458
N/A
48
0.423
N/A
2.483
N/A
49
0.434
N/A
2.774
N/A
50
0.444
N/A
2.844
N/A
51
0.454
N/A
2.900
N/A
52
0.465
N/A
2.936
N/A
53
0.472
N/A
3.133
N/A
54
0.478
N/A
3.304
N/A
55
0.485
N/A
3.407
N/A
56
0.493
N/A
3.456
N/A
57
0.500
N/A
3.480
N/A
58
0.505
N/A
3.518
N/A
59
0.514
N/A
3.560
N/A
60
0.537
N/A
3.593
N/A
61
0.540
N/A
3.628
N/A
62
0.543
N/A
3.641
N/A
63
0.546
N/A
3.655
N/A
64
0.551
N/A
3.680
N/A
65
0.559
N/A
3.700
N/A
66
0.567
N/A
3.728
N/A
67
0.575
N/A
3.857
N/A
68
0.588
N/A
3.894
N/A
69
0.595
N/A
3.943
N/A
70
0.601
N/A
3.983
N/A
71
0.606
N/A
4.009
N/A
72
0.610
N/A
4.023
N/A
73
0.617
N/A
4.023
N/A
74
0.631
N/A
4.053
N/A
75
0.643
N/A
4.063
N/A
76
0.651
N/A
4.077
N/A
77
0.659
N/A
4.225
N/A
78
0.667
N/A
4.243
N/A
79
0.676
N/A
4.260
N/A
80
0.681
N/A
4.282
N/A
81
0.685
N/A
4.322
N/A
43
82
0.689
N/A
4.398
N/A
83
0.694
N/A
4.482
N/A
84
0.700
N/A
4.515
N/A
85
0.705
N/A
4.518
N/A
86
0.709
N/A
4.520
N/A
87
0.713
N/A
4.522
N/A
88
0.717
N/A
4.522
N/A
89
0.721
N/A
4.523
N/A
90
0.724
N/A
4.526
N/A
91
0.727
N/A
4.527
N/A
92
0.729
N/A
4.527
N/A
93
0.731
N/A
4.528
N/A
94
0.734
N/A
4.528
N/A
95
0.740
N/A
4.528
N/A
96
0.748
N/A
4.529
N/A
97
0.759
N/A
4.575
N/A
98
0.771
N/A
4.703
N/A
99
0.783
N/A
4.805
N/A
100
0.793
N/A
4.886
N/A
101
0.810
N/A
4.957
N/A
102
0.823
N/A
5.104
N/A
103
0.836
N/A
5.340
N/A
104
0.853
N/A
5.496
N/A
105
0.871
N/A
5.625
N/A
106
0.887
N/A
5.815
N/A
107
0.899
N/A
6.473
N/A
108
0.931
N/A
7.037
N/A
109
0.947
0.040
7.419
0.246
110
0.957
0.047
7.643
0.257
111
0.965
0.052
7.759
0.286
112
0.971
0.056
7.824
0.379
113
0.977
0.061
7.889
0.425
114
0.983
0.064
7.960
0.457
115
1.003
0.072
8.024
0.477
116
1.030
0.081
8.076
0.494
117
1.041
0.082
8.111
0.504
118
1.050
0.083
8.130
0.512
119
1.052
0.092
8.148
0.519
120
1.055
0.094
8.211
0.529
121
1.061
0.097
8.478
0.529
122
1.071
0.100
8.548
0.530
123
1.081
0.103
8.561
0.531
124
1.091
0.106
8.568
0.532
125
1.102
0.108
8.572
0.533
126
1.110
0.110
8.584
0.548
44
127
1.116
0.112
8.592
0.610
128
1.121
0.114
8.596
0.614
129
1.125
0.116
8.597
0.622
130
1.128
0.118
8.601
0.631
131
1.130
0.120
8.605
0.640
132
1.132
0.122
8.608
0.646
133
1.134
0.123
8.626
0.650
134
1.135
0.124
8.650
0.652
135
1.143
0.127
8.660
0.738
136
1.147
0.130
8.767
0.754
137
1.156
0.134
9.029
0.780
138
1.163
0.139
9.238
0.795
139
1.186
0.146
9.389
0.804
140
1.253
0.149
9.493
0.810
141
1.262
0.151
9.583
0.815
142
1.271
0.153
9.626
0.818
143
1.277
0.155
9.669
0.821
144
1.283
0.157
9.716
0.825
145
1.291
0.162
9.763
0.840
146
1.294
0.164
9.809
0.847
147
1.296
0.166
9.852
0.855
148
1.298
0.168
9.885
0.865
149
1.303
0.169
9.932
0.874
150
1.316
0.170
9.986
0.891
151
1.330
0.171
10.039
0.914
152
1.342
0.172
10.072
0.929
153
1.348
0.173
10.090
0.937
154
1.353
0.175
10.105
0.942
155
1.362
0.178
10.146
0.949
156
1.365
0.180
10.245
1.375
157
1.366
0.189
10.397
1.576
158
1.373
0.198
10.923
1.943
159
1.397
0.203
11.970
2.820
160
1.422
0.207
13.421
3.281
161
1.440
0.214
15.289
3.483
162
1.452
0.221
15.912
3.620
163
1.465
0.229
16.530
4.168
164
1.509
0.247
17.622
4.338
165
1.533
0.274
18.366
4.682
166
1.555
0.309
19.869
5.633
167
1.576
0.318
20.711
6.137
168
1.598
0.322
22.319
6.853
169
1.618
0.333
23.751
7.136
170
1.636
0.343
24.842
7.320
171
1.666
0.356
25.410
7.685
45
172
1.685
0.385
25.798
8.052
173
1.726
0.409
26.122
8.344
174
1.742
0.433
26.353
8.602
175
1.756
0.453
26.638
8.898
176
1.769
0.463
27.219
9.251
177
1.784
0.507
27.279
10.253
178
1.802
0.523
27.320
10.828
179
1.822
0.528
27.352
10.933
180
1.843
0.541
27.822
11.060
181
1.864
0.549
28.763
11.188
182
1.884
0.559
29.402
11.345
183
1.896
0.571
29.971
11.733
184
1.915
0.584
30.276
12.598
185
1.940
0.598
30.988
12.953
186
1.958
0.613
31.095
13.213
187
1.972
0.624
31.314
14.131
188
1.985
0.629
31.833
14.839
189
1.991
0.629
32.239
15.137
190
1.993
0.638
32.547
15.138
191
1.995
0.648
32.855
15.141
192
2.001
0.659
33.153
15.595
193
2.015
0.663
33.444
15.658
194
2.031
0.671
33.482
15.704
195
2.047
0.681
33.516
15.729
196
2.063
0.693
33.549
16.058
197
2.079
0.709
33.653
16.987
198
2.094
0.725
33.973
17.064
199
2.109
0.740
34.159
17.073
200
2.122
0.754
34.191
17.153
201
2.130
0.767
34.250
17.332
202
2.137
0.775
34.469
17.406
203
2.157
0.787
34.716
17.641
204
2.172
0.795
34.969
17.922
205
2.194
0.803
35.144
18.484
206
2.222
0.854
35.418
18.553
207
2.245
0.859
35.766
18.658
208
2.268
0.872
35.949
18.953
209
2.279
0.892
36.010
19.266
210
2.288
0.896
36.548
19.309
211
2.301
0.903
37.179
19.731
212
2.316
0.924
37.651
19.902
213
2.332
0.938
38.041
20.012
214
2.345
0.941
38.591
20.260
215
2.354
0.951
38.852
20.739
216
2.362
0.966
38.861
21.346
46
217
2.368
0.979
38.926
21.810
218
2.376
0.980
39.194
22.001
219
2.384
0.981
39.474
22.290
220
2.391
1.005
39.668
22.324
221
2.395
1.016
39.781
22.343
222
2.400
1.022
39.890
22.522
223
2.405
1.028
39.954
22.661
224
2.409
1.035
39.984
22.666
225
2.413
1.041
39.989
22.667
226
2.415
1.045
39.990
22.668
227
2.417
1.051
39.990
22.669
228
2.419
1.055
39.990
22.670
229
2.420
1.059
39.991
22.671
230
2.421
1.062
40.012
22.671
231
2.423
1.063
40.061
22.672
232
2.425
1.063
40.116
22.673
233
2.427
1.063
40.249
22.673
234
2.429
1.064
40.253
22.673
235
2.430
1.064
40.290
23.674
236
2.431
1.066
40.385
23.675
237
2.432
1.069
40.488
23.675
238
2.433
1.072
40.720
23.675
239
2.434
1.075
40.763
23.677
c)
Vehicles having composite hydrocarbon emission limitations of 2.00 grams per mile or
greater, and composite carbon monoxide emission limitations of 30.0 grams per mile or
greater in Section 240.Table A or Section 240.Table B:
Hydrocarbons
Carbon Monoxide
Second
Composite
Phase 2
Composite
Phase 2
30
0.407
N/A
3.804
N/A
31
0.415
N/A
3.985
N/A
32
0.423
N/A
4.215
N/A
33
0.436
N/A
4.440
N/A
34
0.451
N/A
4.579
N/A
35
0.464
N/A
4.688
N/A
36
0.468
N/A
4.749
N/A
37
0.475
N/A
4.783
N/A
38
0.487
N/A
4.813
N/A
39
0.506
N/A
4.876
N/A
40
0.530
N/A
5.104
N/A
41
0.549
N/A
5.217
N/A
42
0.569
N/A
5.383
N/A
43
0.588
N/A
5.571
N/A
44
0.609
N/A
5.888
N/A
47
45
0.621
N/A
6.199
N/A
46
0.636
N/A
6.245
N/A
47
0.649
N/A
6.318
N/A
48
0.666
N/A
6.418
N/A
49
0.679
N/A
6.540
N/A
50
0.696
N/A
6.690
N/A
51
0.712
N/A
6.875
N/A
52
0.727
N/A
7.029
N/A
53
0.745
N/A
7.129
N/A
54
0.760
N/A
7.359
N/A
55
0.776
N/A
7.722
N/A
56
0.797
N/A
8.017
N/A
57
0.814
N/A
8.249
N/A
58
0.826
N/A
8.425
N/A
59
0.837
N/A
8.563
N/A
60
0.849
N/A
8.686
N/A
61
0.862
N/A
8.804
N/A
62
0.872
N/A
8.916
N/A
63
0.887
N/A
9.025
N/A
64
0.895
N/A
9.138
N/A
65
0.903
N/A
9.250
N/A
66
0.925
N/A
9.354
N/A
67
0.933
N/A
9.457
N/A
68
0.945
N/A
9.575
N/A
69
0.959
N/A
9.728
N/A
70
0.970
N/A
9.938
N/A
71
0.980
N/A
10.140
N/A
72
0.988
N/A
10.222
N/A
73
0.997
N/A
10.261
N/A
74
1.022
N/A
10.278
N/A
75
1.037
N/A
10.290
N/A
76
1.051
N/A
10.715
N/A
77
1.064
N/A
10.790
N/A
78
1.075
N/A
10.844
N/A
79
1.087
N/A
10.921
N/A
80
1.097
N/A
11.010
N/A
81
1.105
N/A
11.090
N/A
82
1.114
N/A
11.136
N/A
83
1.136
N/A
11.136
N/A
84
1.160
N/A
11.165
N/A
85
1.182
N/A
11.191
N/A
86
1.201
N/A
11.205
N/A
87
1.217
N/A
11.211
N/A
88
1.233
N/A
11.211
N/A
89
1.248
N/A
11.211
N/A
48
90
1.262
N/A
11.211
N/A
91
1.271
N/A
11.220
N/A
92
1.279
N/A
11.294
N/A
93
1.287
N/A
11.332
N/A
94
1.295
N/A
11.355
N/A
95
1.302
N/A
11.383
N/A
96
1.309
N/A
11.410
N/A
97
1.316
N/A
11.433
N/A
98
1.325
N/A
11.516
N/A
99
1.339
N/A
11.820
N/A
100
1.356
N/A
12.104
N/A
101
1.365
N/A
12.344
N/A
102
1.378
N/A
12.781
N/A
103
1.397
N/A
13.472
N/A
104
1.420
N/A
14.405
N/A
105
1.445
N/A
14.808
N/A
106
1.470
N/A
14.965
N/A
107
1.491
N/A
15.121
N/A
108
1.506
N/A
15.372
N/A
109
1.517
0.151
15.530
1.113
110
1.528
0.159
15.687
1.213
111
1.542
0.172
16.018
1.344
112
1.559
0.186
16.527
1.399
113
1.578
0.199
16.810
1.520
114
1.594
0.207
16.961
1.640
115
1.605
0.216
17.120
1.684
116
1.615
0.229
17.135
1.693
117
1.625
0.235
17.249
1.786
118
1.642
0.240
17.451
2.007
119
1.670
0.245
17.509
2.084
120
1.694
0.261
17.605
2.179
121
1.705
0.267
17.734
2.264
122
1.717
0.277
18.049
2.328
123
1.732
0.287
18.447
2.375
124
1.747
0.298
18.592
2.437
125
1.763
0.308
18.657
2.543
126
1.779
0.316
18.796
2.593
127
1.795
0.322
18.952
2.641
128
1.810
0.329
19.137
2.663
129
1.823
0.338
19.329
2.672
130
1.835
0.346
19.519
2.676
131
1.845
0.354
19.707
2.683
132
1.854
0.356
19.882
2.817
133
1.862
0.357
19.905
2.992
134
1.870
0.359
20.049
3.111
49
135
1.883
0.362
20.460
3.234
136
1.888
0.364
20.746
3.304
137
1.896
0.368
21.068
3.310
138
1.911
0.378
21.380
3.320
139
1.928
0.391
21.748
3.354
140
1.949
0.402
22.046
3.436
141
1.969
0.408
22.348
3.443
142
1.982
0.422
22.397
3.452
143
1.999
0.428
22.407
3.490
144
2.011
0.432
22.417
3.552
145
2.022
0.434
22.922
3.588
146
2.035
0.439
22.951
3.600
147
2.043
0.450
22.976
3.616
148
2.049
0.460
23.017
3.627
149
2.063
0.467
23.073
3.636
150
2.085
0.472
23.161
3.676
151
2.104
0.480
23.218
3.882
152
2.117
0.491
23.253
4.011
153
2.127
0.503
23.337
4.047
154
2.138
0.505
23.425
4.067
155
2.152
0.515
23.534
4.081
156
2.168
0.522
23.652
4.116
157
2.186
0.527
23.739
4.251
158
2.205
0.537
24.606
5.099
159
2.224
0.549
25.615
5.383
160
2.242
0.568
26.073
6.362
161
2.268
0.586
28.496
7.926
162
2.308
0.610
29.772
8.429
163
2.352
0.648
31.056
9.201
164
2.406
0.677
33.351
10.825
165
2.421
0.699
34.890
12.291
166
2.435
0.720
35.937
13.366
167
2.470
0.738
37.012
14.428
168
2.501
0.767
37.892
15.318
169
2.537
0.828
39.028
15.699
170
2.571
0.855
40.406
16.073
171
2.625
0.869
41.379
16.475
172
2.657
0.885
42.033
17.158
173
2.683
0.900
42.432
17.532
174
2.701
0.941
42.742
17.965
175
2.717
0.979
43.399
18.242
176
2.732
1.002
43.895
18.283
177
2.756
1.025
44.227
18.480
178
2.781
1.047
44.926
19.576
179
2.811
1.065
45.256
20.015
50
180
2.853
1.089
45.553
20.203
181
2.898
1.109
45.753
20.433
182
2.946
1.133
46.210
21.025
183
2.988
1.158
47.017
21.882
184
3.023
1.184
48.185
22.204
185
3.057
1.209
48.741
22.859
186
3.076
1.222
49.462
23.533
187
3.101
1.231
50.313
24.281
188
3.120
1.239
51.285
25.078
189
3.136
1.254
52.076
25.276
190
3.151
1.278
52.857
25.578
191
3.163
1.300
52.876
25.859
192
3.209
1.313
53.067
25.985
193
3.223
1.324
53.777
26.153
194
3.237
1.340
54.242
26.582
195
3.263
1.367
54.489
27.067
196
3.302
1.387
54.601
27.456
197
3.338
1.402
54.912
27.805
198
3.372
1.417
55.588
28.070
199
3.390
1.432
56.266
28.590
200
3.428
1.446
56.617
28.914
201
3.470
1.460
56.863
29.063
202
3.493
1.477
57.204
29.502
203
3.509
1.492
57.371
29.697
204
3.522
1.501
57.487
29.713
205
3.533
1.510
57.728
29.783
206
3.550
1.522
58.097
29.942
207
3.578
1.561
58.572
30.284
208
3.607
1.585
59.024
30.755
209
3.630
1.597
59.321
31.287
210
3.658
1.607
59.715
31.549
211
3.701
1.627
60.045
31.820
212
3.745
1.645
60.453
32.250
213
3.778
1.656
60.935
32.546
214
3.814
1.663
61.307
32.808
215
3.825
1.669
61.666
33.060
216
3.835
1.674
62.148
33.204
217
3.844
1.685
62.532
33.341
218
3.853
1.700
62.546
33.414
219
3.864
1.704
62.559
33.514
220
3.874
1.706
62.570
33.640
221
3.891
1.709
62.846
34.692
222
3.928
1.711
63.097
34.711
223
3.966
1.714
63.150
34.733
224
4.008
1.718
63.150
34.770
51
225
4.010
1.721
63.150
34.796
226
4.012
1.723
63.150
34.810
227
4.016
1.726
63.150
34.821
228
4.019
1.729
63.150
34.839
229
4.057
1.731
63.150
34.865
230
4.065
1.733
63.150
34.894
231
4.071
1.735
63.150
34.918
232
4.073
1.743
63.150
34.944
233
4.075
1.749
63.150
34.985
234
4.077
1.753
63.153
34.014
235
4.079
1.757
63.159
34.032
236
4.081
1.762
63.173
34.051
237
4.083
1.767
63.193
34.067
238
4.084
1.772
63.214
34.079
239
4.085
1.776
63.233
34.085
(Source: Added at
Ill. Reg.
, effective
)
IT IS SO ORDERED.
I, Dorothy M. Gunn, Clerk of the Illinois Pollution Control Board, hereby certify that
the above opinion and order was adopted on the 21st day of May 1998 by a vote of 7-0.
Dorothy M. Gunn, Clerk
Illinois Pollution Control Board