ILLINOIS POLLUTION CONTROL BOARD
March 21, 1996
IN THE MATTER OF:
)
)
TRIENNIAL WATER QUALITY REVIEW:
)
R94-1(A)
AMENDMENTS TO 35 ILL. ADM. CODE
)
(Rulemaking
-
Water)
302.208 and 302.407 (Lead and Mercury)
1
Proposed Rule
Second Notice
PROPOSED OPINION AND ORDER OF THE BOARD
(by
E. Dunham, C.A. Manning, and
R.C. Flemal):
This matter comes before the Board on a regulatory proposal filed on February 24,
1994 by the Illinois Environmental Protection Agency (Agency). The Agency filed the
proposal as part ofits mandatory review of the applicable water quality standards of the State
of Illinois pursuant to 33 U.S.C. §~1251-1387 (1987)2. On January 4, 1996, the Board
severed the docket into subdockets A & B.3 By today’s order the Board sends the proposed
amendments to the lead and mercury standards to second notice.
The Board’s responsibility in this matter arises from the Environmental Protection Act.
The Board is charged therein to “determine, define, and implement the environmental control
standards applicable in the state of Illinois.” (415 ILCS
5/5(b)
(1994).) More generally, the
Board’s rulemaking charge is based on the system ofchecks and balances integral to the
illinois environmental governance: the Board bears responsibility for the rulemaking and
principal adjudicatory functions; the Agency has primary responsibility for administration of
the Act and the Board’s regulations. The latter includes administering today’s proposed
amendments.
PROCEDURAL HISTORY
The proposed amendments were filed by the Agency pursuant to Section 27 of the
Environmental Protection Act (Act) (415 ILCS 5/27 (1994)) and the Board’s procedural rules
1
The Federal Water Pollution Control Act, commonly known as the CleanWater Act
(CWA),
§~
101-607 requires the Agency to periodically, but at leastevery three years, review
the water quality standards applicable in the State. This review is commonly referredto as the
“triennial review”. The Board today adds this designation to the caption in this matter for
purposes of more fully characterizingthe instant proceeding.
2
Subdocket (A) is comprised of the amendments proposed by the Agency for lead and
mercury (Sections 302.208 and 302.407). Subdocket (B) contains the amendments proposed
by the Agency for ammonia nitrogen (Sections 392.202, 302.212, 302.213, 304.122 and
304.301).
2
at 35 Ill. Adm. Code
§~
102.120 and 102.121. By order of May 5, 1994 accepted the Agency
proposal as a federally-required mie pursuant to Section 2&2 of the Act
By order of September 15, 1994 the Board adopted the Agency’s proposal for purposes
of first notice, pursuant to Section 5.01 of the Illinois Administrative Procedure Act. (415
ILCS 100/1005-40). The Board adopted the proposal without making substantive comment on
the merits of the proposal. First notice publication occurred in the Illinois Register on
September 30, 1994 at 18 Ill. Reg. 14555 (Part 302) and 18 IlJ. Reg. 14549 (Part 304). The
Illinois Administrative Procedure Act requires that adoption of the rule occur within one year
ofthe first notice publication.
(5
ILCS
5140(e)
(1994).) As the one-year time period had
already elapsed, the Board sent part ofthe rulemaking back to first notice. The proposed
amendments to the lead and mercury standards were published in the Illinois Register on
January 26, 1996 at 20 Ill. Reg. 1445.
Publication ofthe proposed amendments in the Illinois Register began a 45 day
comment period. The Board received no comments during the comment period. The Board
received editorial changes from the Joint Committee on Administrative Rules. These changes
are incorporated in the amendments as proposed for second notice.
Three public hearings in this matter were held before hearing officer Diane O’Neill: on
November 10, 1994 in Chicago, Illinois; on November 22, 1994 in Springfield, Illinois; and
on January 26, 1995 in Chicago, Illinois. At hearing the Board received testimony in support
of the proposal from the Agency, as well as testimony on various aspects of the proposal from
interested persons. The hearing record pertaining to lead, mercury and non-anunonia matters
is summarized below.
SUMMARY OF THE RECORD BEFORE THE BOARD IN DOCKET A
The principal provisions of the instant proposed amendments are revision of the
Board’s General Use Water Quality Standards for lead, mercury, and ammonia nitrogen, as
found at 35 Ill. Adm. Code 302.208 and 302.2 12, and modification of the ammonia effluent
exception procedures at 35 Ill. Adm. Code 304.122 and 304.301. The proposal also contains
several conforming and housekeeping amendments.
The Board summarizes the proposal submitted by the Agency along with the record
developed to date in this matter as they pertain to lead and mercury standards.
Overview of the Proposal-Subdocket A
Lead: General Use Water Quality Standard Among its General Use Water Quality
Standards, the Board currently has an acute standard (AS) for lead found at 35 Ill. Adni. Code
3
302,208. The General Use Water Quality Standards currently do
j~
specify a chronic
standard (CS) for lead.
Pursuant to today’s proposal, the AS for lead would be modified to reflect updated
aquatic toxicity data regarding lead, and a CS for lead would be added. In both cases, the lead
standards would be expressed as functions of hardness.
Mercury: General Use AS and CS Water Ouality Standards The Board currently has a
mercury AS among its General Use Water Quality Standards. Today’s proposal would change
that AS from
0.5
ug/L to 2.6
ugiL,
based upon the most recent aquatic life toxicity
information regarding mercury. Today’s action would also add, for the first time, a CS for
mercury at a value of 1.3 ug/L.
Human Health Water Quality Standards Today’s action proposes, for the first time in
the Board’s General Use Water Quality standards, a human health standard (HHS)4. Only one
such standard is today proposed, that being for mercury at new subsection (I) of 35 Ill. Adm.
Code 302.208. The value proposed for the mercury HHS is 0.Ol2ug/L, which is lower than
the currently existing AS for mercury at Section 302.208. New text is also proposed at new
302.208(c) and 302.208(e)(3) to support the human health standard.
Conforming and Housekeeping Amendments There are several places in the sections
which are today opened for other purposes where housekeeping corrections are in order.
Among these are updating citations to the Illinois Compiled Statues to the current (1994)
edition and replacement of the preferred abbreviation ofthe word “liter” from “1” to “L”.
The Agency’s proposal amends the STORET number for un-ionized ammonia (as N)
found at 35 Ill. Adm. Code 302.407. As the Agency observes, the STORET number currently
found at Section 302.407 for un-ionized ammonia (as N) is actually the number for un-ionized
ammonia (as NH3). The Board corrects the STORET number in Section 302.407 in today’s
order.
At hearing on November 22, 1994 the Agency submitted an errata sheet correcting
typographical errors that appeared in the proposed amendments as first noticed. These, along
with similar changes suggested by the Administrative Code Division in Public Comment #25,
have been incorporated into today’s proposal.
~ The Board observes that human health criteria, pursuant to
35.
ill. Adm. Code 302.Subpart
F, have been a feature ofthe Board’s water quality regulations since 1990. (See also
Amendments to Title 35 Subtitle C (Toxics Control), R88-21, fmal opinion and order of the
Board, January
25,
1990.)
4
HEARING RECORD
Agency Witnesses
-
Mosher The testimony of Mr. Mosher focused on the technical
justification for the proposed new water quality standards, and on the anticipated economic
impact ofthe new water quality standards.
As regards the lead standards, Mr. Mosher testified that the Agency’s proposed
numbers have been tailored to illinois conditions but remain consistent with the national
criteria for lead. (Tn. at 22.) Mr. Mosher observed that there is some controversy over the
existing NCD for lead5 associated with the nature of the species that control the chronic lead
standard, inability of analytic techniques to accurately measure low lead values, and the
absence of approved test methodology for the most toxic forms of lead. (Mosher at 24.) In
view ofthese and other problems, the Agency believes that Illinois-specific lead standards are
justified and achievable. Mr. Mosher testified:
The Agency concludes that the proposed chronic criterion for lead is
most suitable foruse in Illinois in that it is driven by native aquatic organisms
and the degree of safety factoring is held to an appropriate level because of
the improved methodology. This criterion is more in line with observations in
Illinois streams in that violations of the chronic standard will not routinely occur
in streams supporting high quality biota.
. .
With the establishment of a èhronic
standard, the acute standard cap is no longer necessary. The proposed acute
standard is very similar to the existing standard without the cap. (Mosher at 28.)
As regards the proposed new mercury standards, Mr. Mosher observed that the
existing mercury water quality standard (0.5 ug/L) is based on human health considerations,
even though it is identified in the regulations as a standard forthe protection of aquatic life (an
AS). (Mosher at 19.) At this juncture in time, sufficient information is available to
promulgate aquatic protection standards that are truly based on aquatic life conditions.
Accordingly, the Agency recommends that this step now be taken (Tn. at 22),. and
additionally that the current
0.5
ug/L standard be properly recognized in the regulations as a
HHS.
The existing acute standard was set lower than levels ofmercury which actually cause
effects to aquatic life. (Mosher at 21.) This was done in part to limit the total amount of
mercury that could be discharged because of the lack of a chronic or HHS standard. (Mosher
at 21.) The Agency now proposes to update this standard and others for chronic toxicity
protection of aquatic life and protection of human health through the prevention of fish flesh
contamination. (Mosher at 21.) The Agency recommends that adoption of the NCD acute and
This document is Exhibit J to the Agency’s proposal of February 24, 1994.
5
chronic criteria and proposes the NCD chronic criterion protective of bioaccumulation in fish
flesh as a HHS. (Mosher at 21.)
The Agency believes that the economic impact resulting from the proposed lead and
mercury standards will be minimal. (Mosher at 37.) No additional treatment for lead is
believed to be required as a result of this rulemaking. (Mosher at 37.) The few dischargers in
Illinois with lead limits in their permits are utilizing the best degree oftreatment and are not
expected to have trouble meeting the new standard. (Mosher at 37.) Mercury dischargers are
rare and the new standards will have the most potential impact by encouraging pollution
prevention. (Mosher at 37.) Dischargers with mercury limits will be required to utilize the
best analytical methods to detect mercury at levels as low as possible. (Mosher at 38.) This
may result in some minor additional expense. (Mosher at 38.)
Public Comments
The Board received 25 public comments on the Agency’s proposal. The origin and
content ofthose public comments pertaining to the mercury and lead standards are summarized
in this section.
PC #1:
By Linda Brand, Manager of Regulatory Flexibility Unit, Illinois Department
ofCommerce and Community Affairs: a review of the proposed amendments
found no impact on small businessesL. Filed
10/5/94.
PC #11:
The Sierra Club, illinois Chapter ofTrout Unlimited, Citizens for a Better
Environment, Lake Michigan Federation, and Friends of the Chicago River,
by Albert F. Ettinger; supports adoption ofproposed standards for mercury
and lead. Filed
3/10/95.
PC #12:
By Jeffrey Flocken, Lake Michigan Federation; supports the proposed
standards. Mr. Flocken sites the health effects of mercury. Filed 3/10/95.
PC #25:
By the Index Department of the Administrative Code Division of the Office of
the Secretary of State; notes corrections that must be made to the text ofthe
rule before the rule can be adopted. The Board today makes the suggested
corrections to the text. Filed 11/7/94.
DISCUSSION
The Board believes that the Agency has adequately demonstrated that the water quality
standards it recommends for lead and mercury are justifiable and necessary for the protection
of aquatic life in Illinois. The Board accordingly today proposes adoption ofthese standards
as recommended by the Agency for second notice.
6
ORDER
The Board hereby directs that second notice ofthe following proposed amendments be
submitted to the Joint Committee on Administrative Rules:
SUBTITLE C: WATER POLLUTION
CHAPTER I: POLLUTION CONTROL BOARD
PART 302
WATER QUALITY STANDARDS
SUBPART A: GENERAL WATER QUALITY PROVISIONS
Definitions
Scope and Applicability
Allowed Mixing, Mixing Zones and ZIDs
Stream Flows
Main Riven Temperatures
Nondegradation
SUBPART B: GENERAL USE WATER
QUALITY STANDARDS
Scope and Applicability
Purpose
Offensive Conditions
pH
Phosphorus
Dissolved Oxygen
Radioactivity
Numeric Standards for
Fecal Choliform
Other Toxic Substances
Temperature
TITLE
35:
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
Section
302.100
302.101
302. 102
302.103
302.104
302. 105
Section
302.201
302.202
302.203
302.204
302.205
302.206
302.207
302.208
302.209
302.210
302.211
302 .212
Chemical Constituents
Ammonia Nitrogen and Un-ionizedAmmonia
7
SUBPART C: PUBLIC AND FOOD
PROCESSING WATERSUPPLY STANDARDS
Section
302.301
Scope and Applicability
302.302
Algicide Permits
302.303
Finished Water Standards
302.304
Chemical Constituents
302.305
Other Contaminants
302.306
Fecal Coliform
SUBPART D: SECONDARY CONTACT AND
INDIGENOUS AQUATIC LIFE STANDARDS
Section
302.401
Scope and Applicability
302.402
Purpose
302.403
Unnatural Sludge
302.404
pH
302.405
Dissolved Oxygen
302.406
Fecal Coliform (Repealed)
302.407
Chemical Constituents
302.408
Temperature
302.409
Cyanide
302.410
Substances Toxic to Aquatic Life
SUBPART E:
LAKE MICHIGAN WATER
QUALITY STANDARDS
Section
302.501
Scope and Applicability
302.502
Dissolved Oxygen
302.503
pH
302.504
Chemical Constituents
302.505
Fecal Coliform
302.506
Temperature
302.507
Existing Sourceson January 1, 1971
302.508
Sources under Construction But Not in Operation on January 1, 1971
302.509
Other Sources
8
SUBPART F: PROCEDURES FOR
DETERMINING WATER QUALITY CRITERIA
Scope and Applicability
Definitions
Mathematical Abbreviations
Data Requirements
Determining the Acute Aquatic Toxicity
General Procedures
Determining the Acute Aquatic Toxicity
Water Chemistry
Determining the Acute Aquatic Toxicity
Water Chemistry
Determining the Acute Aquatic Toxicity
Combinations ofSubstances
Determining the Chronic Aquatic Toxicity Criterion for an Individual Substance
-
General Procedures
Determining the Chronic Aquatic Toxicity Criterion
-
Procedure for
Combination of Substances
The Wild and Domestic Animal Protection Criterion
The Human Threshold Criterion
Determining the Acceptable Daily Intake
Determining the Human Threshold Criterion
The Human Nonthreshold Cnitenion
Determining the Risk Associated Intake
Determining the Human Nonthreshold Criterion
Stream Flow for Application of Human Nonthreshold Criterion
Bioconcentration Factor
Determination of Bioconcentration Factor
Utilizing the Bioconcentration Factor
Listing of Derived Criteria
Appendix A References to Previous Rules
Appendix B Sources of Codified Sections
AUTHORITY: hnplementing Section 13 and authorized by Section 27 ofthe Environmental
Protection Act 415 ILCS 5/13 and 27).
SOURCE: Filed with the Secretary of State January 1, 1978; amended at 2 Ill. Reg. 44, p.
151, effective November 2, 1978; amended at 3 ill. Reg. 20, p.
95,
effective May 17, 1979:
amended at 3 ill. Reg.
25,
p. 190, effective June 21, 1979; codified at 6 ill. Reg. 7818;
amended at 6 ill. Reg. 11161, effective September 7, 1982; amended at 6 ill. Reg. 13750,
Section
302.601
302.603
302.604
302.606
302.612
302.615
302.618
302.621
302.627
302.630
302.633
302.642
302.645
302.648
302.651
302.654
302.657
302.658
302.660
302.663
302.666
302.669
Criterion for an Individual Substance
-
Criterion
-
Toxicity Independent of
Criterion
-
Toxicity Dependent on
Criterion
-
Procedures for
9
effective October 26, 1982; amended at 8 Ill. Reg. 1629, effective January 18, 1984;
peremptory amendments at 10 Ill. Reg. 461, effective December 23, 1985; amended in R87-27
at 12 ill. Reg. 9911, effective May 27, 1988; amended at in R85-29 at 12 ill. Reg. 12082,
effective July 11, 1988; amended in R88-1 at 13 Ill. Reg. 5998, effective April 18, 1989;
amended in R88-21(A) at 14 Ill. Reg. 2899, effective February 13, 1990; amended in R88-
21(B) at 14 Ill. Reg. 11974, effective July
9, 1990; amended in R94-1(A) at 20 Ill.
Reg.
,
effective
________________________________________
BOARD NOTE: This Part implements the Illinois Environmental Protection Act as of July 1.
1994.
SUBPART B: GENERAL USE WATER QUALITY STANDARDS
Section 302.208 Numeric Standards for Chemical Constituents
a)
The acute standard (AS) for the chemical constituents listed in subsection (de)
shall not be exceeded at any time except as provided in subsection (e4).
b)
The chronic standard (CS) for IlK cheniical constituents listed in subsection ~d~)
shall not be exceeded by the arithmetic average of at least four consecutive
samples collected over any period of at least four days, except as provided in
subsection (e4). The samples used to demonstrate compliance or lack of
compliance with a CS must be collected in a manner which assures an average
representative ofthe sampling period.
c)
The human health standard (HHS) for the chemical constituents listed in
subsection (IT) shall not be exceeded when the stream flow is at or above the
harmonic mean flow pursuant to Section 302.658 nor shall an annual average.
based on at least eight samples. collected in a manner representative of the
sampling period, exceed the HHS except as provided in subsection (d).
~e)
Inwaters where mixing is allowed pursuant to Section 302.102, the following
apply:
1.
The AS shall not be exceeded in any waters except for those waters for
which the Agency has approved a ZID pursuant to Section 302.102.
2.
The CS shall not be exceeded outside of waters in which mixing is
allowed pursuant to Section 302. lO2.~
3.
The HHS shall not be exceeded outside of waters in which mixing is
allowed pursuant to Section 302.102.
10
ed)
Numeric Water Ouality Standarsls for the Protection of Aquatic Organisms
360
exp~A+Bln(H), but
not to exceed 50
ugIL,
where
A=-2.918 and
B
=
1.128
16
exp~A+Bln(H)
where A=3.688
and B =0.8190
exp~A+Bln(H)
where Ar-i .464
and B =0.9422
22
exp~A+Bln(H)
but not to
exceed 100 ug/L
where Ar 1.460
-~301 and B=1.273
ug/L
=
microgram per liter,
exp~x
=
base neutral logarithms raised to the
x- power, and
Storet
AS
CS
Constituent
Number
(ug/L)
(ug/L)
Arsenic
(total)
Cadmium
(total)
Chromium (total
hexavalent)
Chromium (total
trivalent)
Copper
(total)
Cyanide
Lead
(total)
Mercury
TRC
where:
01002
01027
01032
01033
01042
00718
01051
71900
500600
190
exp A+Bln(H)
where A=-3.490
and B =0.7852
11
exp~A+Bln(HjJ
where Ar 1.561
and B=0.8190
exp~A+Bln(H)
where A=~1.465
and B=0.8545
5.2
Not Applied
explA +Bln(JDL
where A=-2.863
and B=i.273
~~JQ1Applied
1.3
19
ii
ln(H)
=
natural
logarithm of Hardness (STORET 00900):
11
fi
Numeric Water Ouality Standard for the Protection ofHuman Health
Constituent
STORET
Number
(ug/L)
Mercury
71900
0.0 12
where ug/L
=
micrograms per liter
Concentrations of the following chemical constituents shall not be exceeded
except in waters for which mixing is allowed pursuant to Section 302.102.
g~)
Constituent
STORET
Unit
Number
Standard
Barium (total)
mg/L
01007~
5.0
Boron (total)
mg/L
01022
1.0
Chloride (total)
mg/L
00940
500.
Fluoride
mg/L
00951
1.4
Iron (dissolved)
mg/L
01046
1.0
Manganese (total)
mg/L
01055
1.0
Nickel (total)
mg/L
01067
1.0
Phenols
mg/L
32730
0.1
Selenium (total)
mg/L
00147
1 M
Silver (total)
ug/L
01077
5.0
Sulfate
iiig/L
00945
500.
Total Dissolved
mg/L
70300
1000.
Solids
Zinc (total)
mg/L
01092
1.0
where: mg/L
=
milligram per liter and
ug/L
=
microgram per liter
(Source: Amended at 20 Ill. Reg.
__________,
effective
)
12
Section 302.407 Chemical Constituents
Concentrations ofother chemical constituents shall not exceed the following standards:
Ammonia Un-ionized (as N*)
Arsenic (total
Barium (total)
Cadmium (total)
Chromium (total hcxavalcnt)
Chromium (total trivalent)
Copper (total)
Cyanide (total)
Fluoride (total)
Iron (total)
Iron (dissolved)
Lead (total)
Manganese (total)
Mercury (total)
Nickel (total)
Oil, fats and grease
Phenols
Selenium (total)
Silver
Zinc (total)
Total Dissolved Solids
006192
01002
01007
01027
01032
01033
01042
00720
00951
01045
01046
01051
01055
71900
01067
00550, 00556
or 00560
32730
00~147
01077
01092
70300
0.1
1.0
5.0
0.15
0.3
1.0
1.0
0.10
15.0
2.0
0.5
0.1
1.0
0.0005
i.0
i5.0~~k
03
1.0
1.1
1.0
1500
STORET
CONCENTRATIO
CONSTITUENTS
NUMBER
N
(mg/1~)
13
*For purposes of this
section the concentration ofun-ionized ammonia shall be computed
according to the following equation:
U =
N
where:
0.94412(1 + lox) + 0.0559
X=0.09018+ 2729.92
-pH
(T + 273.16)
U
=
Concentration ofun-ionized ammonia as N in mg/It
N
=
Concentration of ammonia nitrogen as N in
mg/lb
T
=
Temperature in degrees Celsius
**Oil shall be analytically separated into polar and non-polar components if the total
concentration exceeds
15 mg/It. In no case shall either of the components exceed 15
mg/IL
(i.e., 15 mg/IL
polar materials and 15 mg/It non-polar materials).
(Source: Amended at 20 Ill. Reg.
_______________,
effective ___________________________
IT IS SO ORDERED.
I, Dorothy M. Gunn, Clerk of the Illinois Pollution Control Board, hereby certify that
the above opinion and order was adopted on thec2/
~ft:
day of
7kiSi~-ct~
,
1996, by
avoteof
_______
~Dorothy
M. 9~in,
~‘t
Clerk
Illinois PolliLtión Control Board