1. 0803_A
      1. Web Site: http://www.ipcb.state.il.us
    2. 0803_B
      1. Federal Update
      2. United States Environmental Protection Agency Proposes Disapproval of an Illinois NOx SIP Revision Under the Clean Air Act
      3. The Board’s Decision: IEPA v. NISC
        1. March 6, 2008
        2. Chicago, Illinois
        3. March 20, 2008
        4. Chicago, Illinois
        5. Illinois Pollution Control Board Meeting
        6. R07-19
        7. In the Matter of: Section 27 Proposed Rules for Nitrogen Oxide (NOx) Emissions From Stationary Reciprocating Internal Combustion Engines and Turbines: Amendments to 35 Ill. Adm. Code Parts 211 and 217
        8. R07-19
        9. In the Matter of: Section 27 Proposed Rules for Nitrogen Oxide (NOx) Emissions From Stationary Reciprocating Internal Combustion Engines and Turbines: Amendments to 35 Ill. Adm. Code Parts 211 and 217
        10. PCB 08-42
        11. Tom Edwards/River Rescue v. IEPA and Peoria Disposal Company
        12. Illinois Pollution Control Board Meeting
        13. R08-09
        14. In the Matter of: Water Quality Standards for Effluent Limitations for the Chicago Area Waterway System and the Lower Des Plaines River: Proposed Amendments to 35 Ill. Adm. Code 301, 302, 303, and 304
        15. R08-09
        16. In the Matter of: Water Quality Standards for Effluent Limitations for the Chicago Area Waterway System and the Lower Des Plaines River: Proposed Amendments to 35 Ill. Adm. Code 301, 302, 303, and 304
        17. R08-17
        18. In the Matter of: Standards and Limitations for Organic Material Emissions for Area Sources Proposed New 35 Ill. Adm. Code Part 223
        19. R08-17
        20. In the Matter of: Standards and Limitations for Organic Material Emissions for Area Sources Proposed New 35 Ill. Adm. Code Part 223
        21. Illinois Pollution Control Board Meeting
        22. R07-19
        23. In the Matter of: Section 27 Proposed Rules for Nitrogen Oxide (NOx) Emissions From Stationary Reciprocating Internal Combustion Engines and Turbines: Amendments to 35 Ill. Adm. Code Parts 211 and 217
        24. R07-19
        25. In the Matter of: Section 27 Proposed Rules for Nitrogen Oxide (NOx) Emissions From Stationary Reciprocating Internal Combustion Engines and Turbines: Amendments to 35 Ill. Adm. Code Parts 211 and 217
        26. AS 08-05
        27. In the Matter of: Petition of BFI Waste Systems of North America, Inc. for Waste Delisting
        28. Illinois Pollution Control Board Meeting
    3. 0803_C

 
G. Tanner Girard, Acting Chairman
Board Members:
Thomas E. Johnson, Nicholas J. Melas, Andrea S. Moore
Illinois Pollution Control Board
James R. Thompson Center
100 W. Randolph, Suite 11-500
Chicago, Illinois 60601
(312) 814-3620
(312) 814-6032 TDD
Illinois Pollution Control Board
1021 North Grand Avenue East
P.O. Box 19274
Springfield, Illinois 62794-9274
(217) 524-8500
Web Site: http://www.ipcb.state.il.us

L
etter from the Chairman
he
g this letter you can consult the
l
rovides that the term "pollution control facility" includes plasma arc
so
cling” includes
t Residences Act, including
the Environmental Protection Act and the State Finance Act regarding the processing and disposal of
on Act, the Illinois Diesel Emissions Reduction Funding
eemed to be
IEPA to develop a
rs, collectors, and recyclers to perform certain duties related to recycling or reusing certain
ection Act by re-enacting language concerning fast-track rulemaking for
nvironmental Protection Act with regard to IEPA and Board procedures in the Clean Air Act
ermitting Program.
As I prepare this letter on April 8th, the General Assembly is considering thirteen
bills with particular interest for the Illinois Pollution Control Board, the parties
regulated by the Board, and the citizens of Illinois. If enacted into law, the bills
summarized below will impact Board rulemaking over the next few years. For t
current status of these bills when you are readin
General Assembly’s website at www.ilga.gov.
House Bill 4172 amends the Environmental Protection Act by providing criteria for
the use of coal combustion by-product (CCB) as structural fill (also see Senate Bil
2567). HB 4426 amends the Environmental Protection Act by adding legislative
findings related to plasma arc incineration and defining “plasma arc incinerator.”
The bill also p
incinerators.
HB 4622 amends the Environmental Protection Act by specifying that the term
“recyclable general construction debris” includes wood salvaged from general
construction or demolition debris and processed for use as fuel under specified circumstances. HB 4622 al
amends the Illinois Solid Waste Management Act by providing that the definition of “recy
combustion of wood or biomass fuel for energy recovery under specified circumstances.
HB 4710 amends the Asbestos Abatement Act, the Response Action Contractor Indemnification Act, and the
Alternate Fuels Act and repeals both the Hazardous Waste Crane and Hoisting Equipment Operators Licensing Act
and the Hazardous Waste Laborers Licensing Act. HB 4789 creates the Radon-Resistan
a Radon-Resistant Building Codes Task Force to recommend rules for building codes.
HB 5348 creates the Mercury Thermostat Collection Act and, among its provisions, requires thermostat
manufacturers to establish and maintain a program for the collection and recycling of mercury thermostats. HB
5773 amends
white goods.
SB 2083 creates the Illinois Diesel Emissions Reducti
Program, and the Diesel Emissions Reduction Fund.
SB 2157 amends the Environmental Protection Act to specify that a municipal or county facility is not d
a waste management facility because it is used for the cremation of deceased non-companion animals.
SB 2166 amends the Environmental Protection Act by providing that “clean construction or demolition debris”
includes debris with contaminants that do not exceed certain levels. SB 2166 also requires
special authorization for specified clean construction or demolition debris fill operations.
SB 2313 creates the Electronic Products Recycling and Reuse Act and, among other provisions, requires
manufacturers, retaile
electronic products.
SB 2639 amends the Environmental Prot
the Board under the Clean Air Act.
SB 2640 amends the E
P
Sincerely,
Dr. G. Tanner Girard

 
Environmental Register – March 2008
1
Inside This Issue:
FEDERAL UPDATE
P. 1
R
ULE UPDATE
P. 2
A
PPELLATE UPDATE
P. 6
B
OARD ACTIONS
P. 8
N
EW CASES
P. 12
B
OARD CALENDAR
P. 13
Federal Update
United States Environmental Protection Agency Publishes Finding of States’ Failure to Submit State
Implementation Plans Required for the 1997 8-Hour Ozone NAAQS Under the Clean Air Act
On March 24, 2008 (73 Fed. Reg. 15416) the United States Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA) published
its final action finding that several states, including Illinois, failed to submit State Implementation Plans (SIPs) to
satisfy certain requirements of the Clean Air Act (CAA) for the 1997 8-hour ozone National Ambient Air Quality
Standards (NAAQS).
Under the CAA and USEPA's implementing regulations, states with nonattainment areas classified as moderate,
serious, severe or extreme were required to submit by June 15, 2007, SIPs to demonstrate how each nonattainment
area would attain the 1997 8-hour ozone standard as expeditiously as practicable but no later than the applicable
dates established in the implementing regulations. The states were also required to demonstrate reasonable further
progress (RFP). Additionally, states were required by September 15, 2006, to submit for these same areas SIPs
demonstrating that sources specified under the CAA were subject to reasonably available control technology
requirements (RACT). States that are part of the Ozone Transport Region (OTR) were required to submit SIPs to
meet the 1997 8-hour ozone RACT requirement for the entire state by September 15, 2006. The RACT requirement
applies to all areas within the Ozone Transport Region, regardless of the area's designation for the 1997 8-hour
ozone standard.
By this action USEPA made a finding of failure to submit for those nonattainment areas and OTR areas that have
not made the required SIP submissions. If USEPA has not affirmatively found that the state has submitted the
required plan or plans within 18 months, the offset sanction applies in the area. If within 6 additional months
USEPA has still not affirmatively determined that the state has submitted the required plan, the highway funding
sanction applies in an area if it is designated nonattainment. No later than two years after USEPA makes the
finding, USEPA must promulgate a Federal Implementation Plan if the state has not submitted and USEPA has not
approved the required SIP.
This action is effective on March 24, 2008.
General questions concerning this notice should be addressed to Mr. Butch Stackhouse, Office of Air Quality
Planning and Standards, Air Quality Policy Division, Mail Code: C504-2, 109 TW Alexander Drive, Research
Triangle Park, NC 27709; telephone (919) 541-5208.
United States Environmental Protection Agency Proposes Disapproval of an Illinois NOx SIP Revision Under
the Clean Air Act
On March 4, 2008 (73 Fed. Reg. 11565) the United States Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA) proposed
disapproval of an Illinois SIP revision for nitrogen oxide (NOX). The Illinois rule involved is Subpart X of 35 Ill.
Adm. Code 217, which establishes a program for voluntary NOx reductions by facilities not otherwise subject to
NOx emission limits. The Board adopted the rule in consolidated docket R01-16/R01-17 in April 2001. The
Illinois Environmental Protection Agency (IEPA) submitted the rule to USEPA for SIP approval on May 1, 2001.
Under the voluntary NOx reductions program, a facility that is not otherwise subject to NOx emission controls can
demonstrate a reduction in NOx emissions, obtain a credit for that reduction, and trade that credit to another facility
that is subject to NOx emissions limitations.

Environmental Register – March 2008
2
In the notice, USEPA stated it had three main concerns with the Illinois rule. First, that the rule did not guarantee
that NO
x
emission allowances would only be awarded for emission reductions that are real and that are additional
NO
x
emission reductions beyond those that would have occurred anyway, i.e., even in the absence of Subpart X.
Second, USEPA was concerned that the Subpart X rule would not require the same level of monitoring required of
sources participating in the NO
x
Budget Trading Program. And finally, even though Illinois argued that Subpart X
constitutes an Economic Incentive Program (EIP) and EIPs may be used to provide NO
x
SIP call emission credits,
USEPA noted that the EIP guidance also states that NO
x
SIP call requirements supersede EIP requirements.
USEPA stated that any requested NO
X
SIP revision failing to meet the requirements of the NO
x
SIP call would also
fail to comply with the requirements of the EIP policy. In this case, USEPA found that the more critical policy
requirements of concern are those of the NO
x
SIP call itself rather than other aspects of the EIP policy.
Comments must be received on or before April 3, 2008. Submit your comments, identified by Docket ID No. EPA-
R05-OAR-2007-1096, by one of the following methods:
1) http://www.regulations.gov
: Follow the online instructions for submitting comments.
2) E-mail: mooney.john@epa.gov
.
3) Fax: (312) 886-5824.
4) Mail: John M. Mooney, Chief, Criteria Pollutant Section, (AR-18J), U.S. Environmental Protection
Agency, 77 West Jackson Boulevard, Chicago, Illinois 60604.
5) Hand Delivery: John M. Mooney, Chief, Criteria Pollutant Section, (AR-18J), U.S. Environmental
Protection Agency, 77 West Jackson Boulevard, Chicago, Illinois. Such deliveries are only accepted
during the Regional Office's normal hours of operation, and special arrangements should be made for
deliveries of boxed information. The Regional Office's official hours of operation are Monday through
Friday, 8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., excluding Federal holidays.
For further information contact Edward Doty, Environmental Scientist, Criteria Pollutant Section, Air Programs
Branch (AR-18), Environmental Protection Agency, Region 5, 77 West Jackson Boulevard, Chicago, Illinois
60604, (312) 886-6057, doty.edward@epa.gov
.
Rule Update
Board Adopts Second Notice Opinion and Order in Procedures Required by P. A. 94-849 for Reporting
Releases of Radionuclides at Nuclear Power Plants: New 35 Ill. Adm. Code 1010 (R07-20)
On March 6, 2008, the Board adopted a second notice opinion and order in Procedures Required by P. A. 94-849
for Reporting Releases of Radionuclides at Nuclear Power Plants: New 35 Ill. Adm. Code 1010 (R07-20). During
the first notice period the Board did not receive any comments on the proposed rule. The only changes made to the
rule at second notice were to correct the text as it was published in the
Illinois Register
so that the rule matched the
text that the Board proposed for first notice. The rule was filed with the Joint Committee on Administrative Rules
(JCAR) and is scheduled to be considered at the April 15, 2008 JCAR meeting.
This rulemaking is based on a proposal filed with the Board by the Illinois Environmental Protection Agency
(IEPA) on May 25, 2007. The IEPA’s proposal is driven by amendments to the Environmental Protection Act (Act)
in Public Act 94-849 which, in adding Section 13.6 to the Act (415 ILCS 5/13.6 (2006)), required the IEPA to
propose rules to the Board to establish standards for detecting and reporting unpermitted releases of radionuclides
from nuclear power plants.
The proposed new Part 1010 procedures will allow licensees of power plants to fulfill their obligation under Section
13.6 of the Act to report unpermitted releases of radionuclides to the IEPA and the Illinois Emergency Management
Agency (IEMA). Among other things, these procedures establish a requirement that within 24 hours of any
unpermitted release of radionuclides into the groundwater, surface water, or soil, the licensee must evaluate the
release to determine whether it needs to be reported and, if reporting is necessary, make the a report to the IEPA and
IEMA within that same 24 hours. The proposal gives the proper procedure for reporting the releases, including the
appropriate reporting phone numbers for the Agency and IEMA as well as instructions on electronic reporting. The
proposal also r requires a follow-up written report sent to the IEPA and IEMA within five days after reporting the
release. This follow-up report must contain the information required for the initial report as well as supplemental
information on the release utilizing the best data available.

Environmental Register – March 2008
3
Copies of the Board’s opinion and order in R07-20 may be obtained by calling the Clerk’s office at 312-814-3620,
or by downloading copies from the Board’s Web site at www.ipcb.state.il.us.
For additional information contact Marie Tipsord at 312-814-4925; e-mail address tipsordm@ipcb.state.il.us
Board Adopts Order Consolidating Dockets and Extending the Adoption Deadline in the Identical In
Substance Rulemaking Wastewater Pretreatment Update, USEPA Amendments (January 1, 2007 though
June 30, 2007)(R08-5); SDWA Update, USEPA Amendments (January 1, 2007 though June 30, 2007)(R08-
7); SDWA Update, USEPA Amendments (July 1, 2007 though December 31, 2007)(R08-13) (consolidated).
On March 6, 2008, the Board adopted an order to consolidate the identical in substance rulemakings in identical in
substance rulemaking: Wastewater Pretreatment Update, USEPA Amendments (January 1, 2007 though June 30,
2007)(R08-5); SDWA Update, USEPA Amendments (January 1, 2007 though June 30, 2007)(R08-7); SDWA
Update, USEPA Amendments (July 1, 2007 though December 31, 2007)(R08-13). In that order the Board also
found it necessary to extend the one-year period for completion of these amendments. The adoption deadline, based
on the first federal action in docket R08-5, originally was March 12, 2008. The Board found that the statutory one-
year period in this consolidated docket was insufficient for completion of the amendments.
The Board has not yet adopted a proposal for public comment in this rulemaking, so there has been no
Illinois
Register
publication. The Board anticipates that it will adopt a proposal for public comment at its April 17, 2008
meeting, and that the proposal will be filed by April 28, 2008 with the Secretary of State’s Index Department for
publication in the May 9, 2008
Illinois Register
. If these events timely occur and no additional delay is required to
adequately respond to public comments, the Board anticipates adoption of final rules at its July 24, 2008 meeting.
The Board anticipates filing the adopted amendments with the Secretary of State’s Index Department by August 4,
2008.
The Board was unable to initiate this rulemaking earlier due to the unusually high demands on staff resources over
the last several months as a result of a greatly increased volume of complex federal rulemaking. In addition, the
Board expects this rulemaking to take a considerable amount of effort, since it involves updating the analytical
methods used to demonstrate compliance with the SDWA and wastewater pretreatment requirements.
Copies of the Board’s opinion and order in R08-5/7/13 may be obtained by calling the Clerk’s office at 312-814-
3620, or by downloading copies from the Board’s Web site at www.ipcb.state.il.us.
For additional information contact Michael J. McCambridge at 312-814-6924; e-mail address
mccambm@ipcb.state.il.us
Board Dismisses Five Identical in Substance Rulemaking Dockets As Unnecessary: UST Update, USEPA
Regulations (July 1, 2007 through December 31, 2007), R08-10; Wastewater Pretreatment, USEPA
Regulations (July 1, 2007 through December 31, 2007), R08-11 Definition of VOM, USEPA Regulations (July
1, 2007 through December 31, 2007), R08-12; UIC Update, USEPA Regulations (July 1, 2007 through
December 31, 2007), R08-14; and RCRA Subtitle D Update, USEPA Regulations (July 1, 2007 through
December 31, 2007), R08-15
Every six months the Board reserves a series of dockets for adoption of Board rules to accommodate any rules
adopted by the United States Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA) to implement various programs. On
March 6, 2008, the Board dismissed as unnecessary five dockets reserved to consider rules adopted by USEPA
during the period July 1, 2007 through December 31, 2007. In each of the five program areas described below,
USEPA adopted no rules during the update period.
UST (R08-10)
. Section 22.4(d) of the Environmental Protection Act (415 ILCS 5/22.4(d) (2006)) requires the
Board to adopt regulations which are “identical in substance,” as defined at Section 7.2 of the Act (415 ILCS 5/7.2
(2006)), to underground storage tank (UST) regulations promulgated by the USEPA pursuant to Section 9003 of the
federal Resource Conservation and Recovery Act of 1976 (RCRA) as amended, 42 U.S.C. § 6993 (2000), to
implement Subtitle I of RCRA (42 U.S.C. §§ 6991
et seq
. (2000)), with certain limitations. USEPA has codified its
UST regulations at 40 C.F.R. 281 through 283.
Wastewater Pretreatment (R08-11)
. Sections 7.2 and 13.3 of the Environmental Protection Act (Act) (415 ILCS
5/7.2 and 13.3 (2006)), require the Board to adopt regulations that are “identical in substance” to regulations of the
United States Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA). 415 ILCS 5/7.2 (2006). Specifically, Section 13.3

Environmental Register – March 2008
4
relates to wastewater pretreatment regulations that the USEPA adopted to implement Sections 307(b), (c), and (d)
and 402(b)(8) and (b)(9) of the federal Water Pollution Control Act (FWPCA) (33 U.S.C. §§ 1317(b), (c), and (d)
and 1342(b)(8) and (b)(9) (2003)). USEPA has codified the federal wastewater pretreatment rules as 40 C.F.R. 400
through 499.
Definition of VOM (R08-12)
. Sections 7.2 and 9.1(e) of the Environmental Protection Act (Act) (415 ILCS
5/9.1(e) (2006)) requires the Board to adopt regulations that are “identical in substance” to regulations of the United
States Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA). 415 ILCS 5/7.2 (2006). Specifically, Section 9.1(e) of the Act
(415 ILCS 5/9.1(e) (2006)) relates to the definition of “volatile organic material” (VOM) and those compounds that
USEPA has found to be exempted from regulation under state implementation plans for ozone due to negligible
photochemical reactivity. USEPA has codified these exemptions as part of its definitions at 40 C.F.R. 51.100(s).
UIC Program (R08-14)
. Section 13(c) of the Environmental Protection Act (415 ILCS 5/13(c) (2006)) requires
the Board to adopt regulations that are “identical in substance” to regulations of the United States Environmental
Protection Agency (USEPA). 415 ILCS 5/7.2 (2006). Specifically, Section 13(c) relates to underground injection
control (UIC) regulations that USEPA adopted to implement provisions of the Safe Drinking Water Act (42 U.S.C.
§ 300h
et seq
. (2000)). USEPA has codified its UIC regulations at 40 C.F.R. 144 through 148.
RCRA Subtitle D (R08-15)
. Section 22.40(a) of the Environmental Protection Act (415 ILCS 5/22.40(a) (2006))
requires the Board to adopt regulations that are “identical in substance” to regulations of the USEPA. 415 ILCS
5/7.2 (2006). Specifically, Section 22.40(a) relates to municipal solid waste landfill (MSWLF) regulations that
USEPA adopted to implement Subtitle D of the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act of 1976 (42 U.S.C §§
6941-6949 (1998); RCRA Subtitle D). USEPA has codified the federal MSWLF rules as 40 C.F.R. 258.
Copies of the Board’s separate dismissal orders may be obtained by calling the Clerk’s office at 312-814-3620, or
by downloading copies from the Board’s Web site at www.ipcb.state.il.us.
For additional information contact Mike McCambridge at 312/814-6924; e-mail address:
mccambm@ipcb.state.il.us.
Board Requests Public Comment on Federal Amendments in RCRA Subtitle C Update, USEPA Regulations
(July 1, 2007 through December 31, 2007) (R08-16)
On March 6, 2008, the Board adopted an order in RCRA Subtitle C Update, USEPA Regulations (July 1, 2007
through December 31, 2007) (R08-16) requesting public comment on federal adopted by the United States
Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA). These USEPA rules implement Subtitle C of the federal Resource
Conservation and Recovery Act of 1976 (RCRA Subtitle C) (42 U.S.C. §§ 6921
et seq
. (2005)). The Board
reserved this docket for USEPA amendments during the period of July 1, 2007 through December 31, 2007. During
that time period, USEPA amended its hazardous waste regulations one time, on July 18, 2007. The nature of the
USEPA action was unusual, so that the Board is requesting comment before a determination is made that no action
is necessary, and the Board dismisses this docket. The Board requested that comments be filed before April 7,
2008.
On July 18, 2007, USEPA amended a single provision of the hazardous waste rules and adopted new rules that
pertain to the use of “chat” in federally funded highway projects. Chat is a granular material generated from the
extraction and beneficiation of lead and zinc minerals. It is produced in the Tri-State Mining District of southwest
Missouri, southeast Kansas, and northeast Oklahoma. It is primarily composed of a hard rock called “chert,” and it
is useful in making asphalt-based road materials, Portland cement, and epoxy traction coatings.
The federal action of July 18, 2007 establishes standards for the environmentally sound use of this material. They
add a new part 278 to the federal solid waste rules that establishes standards and conditions for use of chat in
federally funded highway projects.
In it March 6, 2006 order, the Board stated that, for several reasons, the Board does not believe it necessary to
include corresponding rules to the Illinois hazardous waste regulations. Initially, USEPA asserted the authority of
section 6006 of RCRA (42 U.S.C. § 6966b, as added by § 6018 of Pub. L. 109-59 (Aug 10, 2005)).
See
40 C.F.R.
278.2, as added at 72 Fed. Reg. 39331, 39343-44 (July 18, 2007). The Board’s identical-in-substance mandate is
limited to rules adopted by USEPA pursuant to sections 3001 through 3005 of RCRA (42U.S.C. §§ 6921-25
(2005)).
See
415 ILCS 5/22.4(a) (2006). Second, the chat standards do not affect implementation of the hazardous
waste regulations in any way. Third, the chat material originates outside Illinois, and it is unclear that it will be used

Environmental Register – March 2008
5
in Illinois.
See
415 ILCS 5/7.2(a)(1) (2006). Finally, these rules appear to be requirements that USEPA has
developed to implement federal procurement requirements, and they do not apply outside that context.
The Board invited public comment on whether the provisions of new 40 C.F.R. 278, as adopted by USEPA at 72
Fed. Reg. 39331 (July 18, 2007), should be included in the Illinois hazardous waste regulations. Any comments
received must conspicuously indicate the docket number, R08-16, and be received by the Board by April 7, 2008 to
receive consideration.
Copies of the Board’s order may be obtained by calling the Clerk’s office at 312-814-3620, or by downloading
copies from the Board’s Web site at www.ipcb.state.il.us.
For additional information contact Mike McCambridge at 312/814-6924; e-mail address:
mccambm@ipcb.state.il.us.
Board Adopts Proposal for Public Comment Opinion and Order and Extends the Adoption Deadline in the
Identical In Substance Rulemaking RCRA Subtitle C Update, USEPA Amendments (January 1, 2006 though
June 30, 2006) R07-5; RCRA Subtitle C Update, USEPA Amendments (July 1, 2006 though December 31,
2006) R07-14 (consolidated)
On March 20, 2008, the Board entered an opinion and order in RCRA Subtitle C Update, USEPA Amendments
(January 1, 2006 though June 30, 2006) R07-5; RCRA Subtitle C Update, USEPA Amendments (July 1, 2006
though December 31, 2006) R07-14 (consolidated) to adopt a proposal for public comment and to extend the
adoption deadline in this identical-in-substance rulemaking. The proposal for public comment was published at 32
Illinois Register
4915-5935 (April 11, 2008). Accordingly, the 45-day public comment period ends May 26, 2008;
all public comments must be filed or postmarked by that date.
As is explained in the order, the Board has extended the adoption deadline for this rulemaking to allow for the 45-
day public comment period following publication, and to allow the United States Environmental Protection Agency
(USEPA) 30 days to review the final amendments before the Board files them for adoption. The March 20, 2008
order stated that the Board anticipates adoption of final rules at its June 5, 2008 meeting; because the Board holds
adopted RCRA Subtitle C rulemakings for 30 days for USEPA review, the Board anticipates filing the adopted
amendments with the Secretary of State’s Index Department by July 14, 2008. This proceeding updates the Illinois
Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) Subtitle C hazardous waste rules to correspond with
amendments adopted by the United States Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA) that appeared in the
Federal
Register
during two update periods.
The consolidated R07-5/R07-14 docket amends rules in Parts 703, 720, 721, 722, 723, 724, 725, 726, 727, 728, and
739. The amendments to the various Parts are inter-related. The amendments include federal actions from: April 4,
2006, (71 Fed. Reg. 16862), July 14, 2006 (71 Fed. Reg. 40254), July 28, 2006 (71 Fed. Reg. 42928), and March 5,
2005 (70 Fed. Reg. 10776).
The April 4, 2006 action contained paperwork reduction amendments, primarily directed towards Environmental
Performance Track Program facilities. The amendments from July 14, 2006 addressed corrections to various rules.
The July 28, 2006 amendments covered conditional exclusion of CRTs that are reused or recycled from regulation
as solid waste.
In addition to the federal actions that fall within the timeframe of this docket, the Board included the one additional
federal action from March 5, 2005 that occurred in earlier consolidated docket R06-5/R06-6/R06-7, which the
Board adopted on January 5, 2006. For the reasons described in the opinion in that earlier docket, the nature of one
set of federal amendments involved in that docket was such that the Board could not conclude them until after
September 5, 2006. This set of amendments addressed changes to the hazardous waste manifest system.
Copies of the Board’s opinion and order may be obtained by calling the Clerk’s office at 312-814-3620, or by
downloading copies from the Board’s Web site at www.ipcb.state.il.us.
For additional information contact Mike McCambridge at 312/814-6924; e-mail address:
mccambm@ipcb.state.il.us.

 
Environmental Register – March 2008
6
Board Accepts Proposal for Hearing in Proposed Amendments to Groundwater Quality Standards, 35 Il.
Adm. Code 620 (R08-18)
On March 20, 2008, the Board adopted an order in Proposed Amendments to Groundwater Quality Standards, 35 Il.
Adm. Code 620 (R08-18) accepting the proposal filed by the Illinois Environmental Protection Agency (IEPA) for
hearing. The proposal, filed by the IEPA on February 19, 2008, seeks to amend the Board’s groundwater quality
regulations.
The IEPA stated that this rulemaking is intended to account for new scientific data, update the groundwater
standards that have been amended at the federal level, update technical references that are in the Incorporations by
Reference, and address any additional groundwater parameters that have been discovered.
The Board is currently scheduling hearings in this rulemaking.
Copies of the Board’s order may be obtained by calling the Clerk’s office at 312-814-3620, or by downloading
copies from the Board’s Web site at www.ipcb.state.il.us.
For additional information contact Richard McGill at 312/814-6983; e-mail address: mcgillr@ipcb.state.il.us.
Appellate Update
Second District Affirms Board Finding of Violation and Imposition of $3000 Penalty and Hearing Costs in
Northern Illinois Service Co. v. Environmental Protection Agency and Pollution Control Board, No. 2-07-
0213 (2d Dist. March 11, 2008) (affirming Board orders in AC 05-40 (affirming July 26, 2007 final order as
modified April 19, 2007)
On March 11, 2008, the Second District Appellate Court issued an opinion affirming the Board in Northern Illinois
Service Co. v. Environmental Protection Agency and Pollution Control Board, No. 2-07-0213 (2d Dist. March 11,
2008) (hereinafter NISC
(2d. Dist.)) In an administrative citation (AC) case, the Board had found that Northern
Illinois Service Co. (NISC) committed two violations of the Environmental Protection Act (Act), 415 ILCS 5/1 et
seq. (2006) at NISC’s "Roscoe Quarry." IEPA v. Northern Illinois Service Company
, AC05-40 (July 26, 2007 final
order as modified April 19, 2007)(hereinafter IEPA v. NISC).
The Board found that NISC violated the open
dumping of waste prohibitions of Sections 21(p)(1) (litter) and (p)(7) (general construction or demolition debris) of
the Act, 415 ILCS 5/21(p)(1) and (7) (2006), and imposed the corresponding statutory civil penalty of $3,000, along
with Board and Agency hearing costs.
NISC petitioned the Second District for review of the Board's decision, but only regarding the violation of Section
21(p)(1). The court’s opinion, which will be published, will provide helpful precedent in the decision of future AC
cases.
The Board’s Decision: IEPA v. NISC
The Board set out the facts of the case before it in a September 21, 2006 interim opinion and order, and citations
below are to that opinion. (Although the order was subsequently vacated, the findings of fact and conclusions of
law were incorporated into the Board’s July 26, 2007 final order as modified April 19, 2007). IEPA v. NISC
, AC
05-40 (Sept. 21, 2006 interim opinion)
NISC specializes in excavation and demolition contracting at its site known as the Roscoe Quarry, located at 4960
Rockton Road in Roscoe, Winnebago County. In the course of business, Northern uses sand from the Roscoe
Quarry to complete its projects. Workers also haul dirt and other material back from other excavations to the
Roscoe Quarry site.
Id
., slip op. at 2.
An Agency field inspector conducted two site investigations at the Roscoe Quarry, the first
inspection in July of 2004 and the second inspection on October 4, 2004. At the time of the
October 4, 2006 inspection, over 150 cubic yards of concrete debris with protruding rebar filled
low-lying areas of the quarry. A debris pile contained steel conduit. Approximately 9,700 cubic
yards of landscape debris were piled northwest of the concrete debris. The landscape debris
resembled “an island with a moat” and stood 10 to 13 feet high.
The landscape material consisted of uprooted trees and cut trees, some of which have been on the
property for more than ten years. An access road surrounded a large pile of trees, which was in
turn surrounded by more landscape debris. Trees at the site were not processed in any way. In

Environmental Register – March 2008
7
fact, trees at the base of the mounds of landscape debris showed signs of decay. Furthermore, the
position of the trees did not change between the July and October inspections.
Id
., slip op. at 2.
In its analysis, the Board related that NISC did not contest the alleged violation of Section 21(p)(7) of the Act,
which prohibits the open dumping of waste resulting in the deposition of general or clean construction or demolition
debris. Accordingly, the Board found that NISC had committed that violation.
Id
., slip op. at 7. NISC did contest
the alleged Section 21(p)(1) violation, arguing that the landscape debris could be used as mulch, and that it therefore
had value and was not "waste" or "litter."
Id.
In its finding of a Section 21(p)(1) violation, the Board ruled that the pile of landscape material was "waste," both
because it constituted "landscape waste," a subset of "waste," and "other discarded material," and that the pile
constituted "litter."
Id
., slip op. at 9-10.
The Board issued its final opinion and order on January 26, 2007. IEPA v. NISC
(Jan. 26, 2007 final order).
Because there were two violations of Section 21(p) and the violations are first offenses, the Board found that under
Section 42(b)(4-5) of the Act, the total civil penalty due was $3,000. 415 ILCS 5/42(b)(4-5) (2006). The Board
also found that because Northern did not succeed at hearing, it was required to pay the hearing costs of both the
IEPA and the Board, totaling $672.75. 35 Ill. Adm. Code 108.502, 108.504. IEPA v. NISC
(Jan. 26, 2007 final
order), slip op. at 2. In response to motion by NISC, on April 19, 2007 the Board modified its final order to stay
payment of the hearing costs and $1,500 for the contested Section 21(p)(1) violation pending appeal. But the Board
did not stay payment of the $1,500 for the uncontested Section 21(p)(7) violation. IEPA v. NISC
(Apr. 29, 2007
order), slip op. at 3.
The Court’s Decision: NISC (2d. Dist.)
After a brief recitation of the facts of the case and synopsis of the Board’s interim opinion (id. at 1-4), the Second
District Appellate Court commenced its analysis by addressing the parties’ arguments concerning standard of
review. The court declined to select a standard of review to apply, finding that the Board would prevail under either
a "manifest weight of the evidence" standard or a "de novo" standard.
Id.
, slip op.at 5. Next, interpreting the
Illinois Supreme Court's decision in Alternate Fuels, Inc. v. Director of the Illinois Environmental Protection
Agency, 215 Ill. 2d 219, 237-38 (2004), the Second District held that the trees were "discarded material" within the
Act's definition of "waste." The court stated:
Here, there was no evidence presented that the trees had ever been “collected, separated or
processed and returned to the economic mainstream in the form of raw materials or products.”
415 ILCS 5/3.380 (West 2004)[quoting portion of definition of "recycling, reclamation or reuse."].
[IEPA inspector] Jacobsen testified that they showed evidence of decay and did not change
position between the July and October inspections. The trees “were not processed. They were
just laid there to rot.” In addition, NISC admitted that trees were present at the site when it
acquired the property 10 years ago and that it had been placing trees on the site ever since. ***
Accordingly, we conclude that the uprooted, dead trees on NISC's property fall within the
definition of waste as other discarded material. We reject NISC's argument that, because [NISC
witness] Foss testified that the trees have market value as mulch, they cannot be deemed
discarded. Whether an item has value has no bearing on whether it is discarded."
NISC (2d.
Dist.), slip op. at 8-9 (emphasis added).
The court then applied the same analysis as did the Board in distinguishing City of Lake Forest v. Pollution Control
Board, 146 Ill. App. 3d 848 (2nd Dist. 1986) from this case. NISC argued that trees are not "waste" because they
are unlike other items specifically mentioned in the definition of "waste," such as "garbage" and "sludge from a
waste treatment plant."
Id.
, slip op. 9. The court disagreed, stating that in Lake Forest
:
"We found that, because leaves grow and fall from trees naturally, leaves are not 'of the same
nature as garbage or sludge which is generated and discarded by people.' Lake Forest
, 146 Ill.
App. 3d at 855. Here, however, unlike in Lake Forest
, the trees did not appear in the Roscoe
Quarry naturally; rather, NISC uprooted whole trees and hauled them to a pile in the Roscoe
Quarry in the course of its excavation business. Put another way, the trees were 'generated [in that
they were uprooted] and discarded [in that they were placed in a pile and left to decay] by people.'
Indeed, at least some portion of the trees had been present for over 10 years. Therefore, we find
that, under the facts presented, unlike the leaves in Lake Forest
, the uprooted trees here are 'of the
same nature as garbage or sludge which is generated and discarded by people.'" Lake Forest
, 146
Ill. App. 3d at 855." NISC
(2d. Dist.), slip op. at 9-10.

 
Environmental Register – March 2008
8
The court then ruled that it need not reach the issue of whether the trees qualified as "landscape waste" under the
Act because the court had already concluded that the trees were "other discarded material" within the meaning of
"waste."
Id.
, slip op. at 10. The court quoted the definition of “litter’ contained in the Litter Control Act, 415 ILCS
105/3(a) (2006), and then concluded that "the trees fall within the definition of litter as 'any discarded, used or
unconsumed substance or waste.'"
Id.
For all of these reasons, the court affirmed the Board.
Id.
, slip op. at 11.
Board Actions
March 6, 2008
Chicago, Illinois
Rulemakings
R07-20
In the Matter of: Procedures Required by PA 94-849 for Reporting
Releases of Radionuclides at Nuclear Power Plants: New 35 Ill.
Adm. Code Part 1010 – The Board adopted a second notice opinion
and order in this rulemaking to set new standards for detecting and
reporting unpermitted releases of radionuclides from nuclear power
plants.
4-0
Other
R08-5
R08-7
R08-13
Wastewater Pretreatment Update, USEPA Amendments (January 1,
2007 through June 30, 2007); SDWA Update, USEPA Amendments
(January 1, 2007 through June 30, 2007); SDWA Update, USEPA
Amendments (July 1, 2007 through December 31, 2007) – The Board
on its own motion consolidated these “identical-in-substance”
rulemakings to amend the Board’s wastewater pretreatment and
drinking water regulations and extended the deadline for completion
of amendments from March 12, 2008 to August 15, 2008.
4-0
Water
PWS
PWS
R08-10
UST Update, USEPA Amendments (July 1, 2007 through December
31, 2007) – The Board dismissed this reserved identical-in-substance
docket because the United States Environmental Protection Agency
did not amend its exemptions from the definition of underground
storage tank during the update period of July 1, 2007 through
December 31, 2007.
4-0
Land
R08-11
Wastewater Pretreatment Update, USEPA Amendments (July 1, 2007
through December 31, 2007) – The Board dismissed this reserved
identical-in-substance docket because the United States
Environmental Protection Agency did not amend its wastewater
pretreatment regulations during the update period of July 1, 2007
through December 31, 2007.
4-0
Water
R08-12
Definition of VOM Update, USEPA Amendments (July 1, 2007
through December 31, 2007) – The Board dismissed this reserved
identical-in-substance docket because the United States
Environmental Protection Agency did not amend its volatile organic
emission regulations during the update period of July 1, 2007 through
December 31, 2007.
4-0
Air

Environmental Register – March 2008
9
R08-14
UIC Update, USEPA Amendments (July 1, 2007 through December
31, 2007) – The Board dismissed this reserved identical-in-substance
docket because the United States Environmental Protection Agency
did not amend its underground injection control regulations during
the update period of July 1, 2007 through December 31, 2007.
4-0
Land
R08-15
RCRA Subtitle D (Municipal Solid Waste Landfill) Update, USEPA
Amendments (July 1, 2007 through December 31, 2007) – The Board
dismissed this reserved identical-in-substance docket because the
United States Environmental Protection Agency did not amend its
municipal solid waste landfill regulations during the update period of
July 1, 2007 through December 31, 2007.
4-0
Land
R08-16
RCRA Subtitle C (Hazardous Waste) Update, USEPA Amendments
(July 1, 2007 through December 31, 2007) – The Board requested
public comments by April 7, 2008 concerning its intent to dismiss this
“identical-in-substance” rulemaking to update the Board’s hazardous
waste regulations.
4-0
Land
Adjudicatory Cases
PCB 06-177
People of the State of Illinois v. Sheridan Sand & Gravel Co.
– In this
land enforcement action concerning a LaSalle County facility, the
Board granted relief from the hearing requirement of Section 31(c)(1)
of the Environmental Protection Act (415 ILCS 5/31(c)(1) (2006)),
and accepted a stipulation and settlement agreement, ordering the
respondent to pay a total civil penalty of $10,000, and to cease and
desist from further violations.
4-0
L-E
PCB 07-143
Joe's Midtown Auto Repair v. IEPA
– The Board granted this Bureau
County facility’s motion for voluntary dismissal of this underground
storage tank appeal.
4-0
UST
Appeal
PCB 08-42
Tom Edwards/River Rescue v. IEPA and Peoria Disposal Company
The Board accepted petitioner’s amended petition, restarting the
decision timeclock.
4-0
P-A,
RCRA
PCB 08-46
People of the State of Illinois v. Rancho Amigo, LLC
– Upon receipt
of a proposed stipulation and settlement agreement and an agreed
motion to request relief from the hearing requirement in this water
enforcement action involving a Jo Daviess County facility, the Board
ordered publication of the required newspaper notice.
4-0
W - E
PCB 08-47
Metropolitan Water Reclamation District of Greater Chicago v.
Illinois Environmental Protection Agency – The Board accepted for
hearing this permit appeal involving a Cook County facility.
4-0
P-A,
Water
PCB 08-48
Vesuvius USA Corporation v. IEPA
– The Board accepted for
hearing this permit appeal involving a Coles County facility.
4-0
P-A, Air

 
Environmental Register – March 2008
10
March 20, 2008
Chicago, Illinois
Rulemakings
R07-5
R07-14
In the Matter of: RCRA Subtitle C (Hazardous Waste) Update,
USEPA Amendments (January 1, 2006 through June 30, 2006)
In the Matter of: RCRA Subtitle C (Hazardous Waste) Update,
USEPA Amendments (July 1, 2006 through December 31, 2006) –
The Board adopted a proposal for public comment in this “identical-
in-substance” consolidated rulemaking to amend the Board’s
hazardous waste regulations and extended the deadline for
completion of rulemaking from April 16, 2008 to July 14, 2008.
4-0
Land
R08-18
In the Matter of: Proposed Amendments to Groundwater Quality
Standards, 35 Il. Adm. Code 620 – The Board accepted for hearing
the Illinois Environmental Protection Agency’s February 19, 2008
proposal to amend the Board’s groundwater quality regulations. The
Board also granted the motion for waiver of certain filing
requirements.
4-0
PWS
Adjusted Standards
AS 08-3
In the Matter of: Petition for Adjusted Standard from 35 Ill. Adm.
Code 620.420 for Nobel Risley's Landfill #2 – The Board accepted
petitioner’s second amended petition for hearing.
4-0
PWS
Administrative Citations
AC 07-54
IEPA v. Adolph M. Lo
– In response to a joint stipulation and
settlement agreement in this administrative citation action involving a
Champaign County facility, the Board found that respondent violated
Section 21(p)(1) of the Environmental Protection Act (415 ILCS
5/21(p)(1) (2006)) and ordered him to pay a civil penalty of $1,500.
The Board also granted the parties’ joint motion to dismiss
respondent’s petition for review and the alleged violation of Sections
21(p)(3) and (p)(7) of the Act (415 ILCS 5/21(p) (p)(3), (p)(7)
(2006)).
4-0
AC 08-11
IEPA v. Ken and Ella Cook
– The Board found that these respondents
violated Sections 21(p)(1) and (7) of the Act (415 ILCS 5/21(p)(1),
(7) (2006)), assessing a penalty of $3,000 in this administrative
citation involving a Williamson County facility.
4-0
AC 08-12
IEPA v. Norma Eddington and Cecil Eddington
– The Board found
that these respondents violated Sections 21(p)(1) of the Act (415
ILCS 5/21(p)(1) (2006)), assessing a penalty of $1,500 in this
administrative citation involving a Cass County facility.
4-0
AC 08-13
County of DuPage v. Margarito Sotelo
– The Board found that this
respondent violated Sections 21(p)(1) of the Act (415 ILCS
5/21(p)(1) (2006)), assessing a penalty of $1,500 in this
administrative citation involving a DuPage County facility.
4-0
AC 08-15
County of DuPage v. Jamal Abro
– The Board found that this
respondent
violated Sections 21(p)(1) and (3) of the Act (415 ILCS
4-0

Environmental Register – March 2008
11
5/21(p)(1), (3) (2006)), assessing a penalty of $3,000 in this
administrative citation involving a DuPage County facility.
AC 08-16
IEPA v. Gene Breeden
– The Board accepted respondent’s petition
for review in this administrative citation involving an Iroquois
County facility, and set the matter for hearing.
4-0
Adjudicatory Cases
PCB 04-65
Champion Laboratories, Inc. v. IEPA
– The Board granted this
Edwards County facility’s motion for voluntary dismissal of this
permit appeal.
4-0
P-A, Air
PCB 05-154
McLean County Asphalt v. IEPA
– The Board granted this Cass
County facility’s motion for voluntary dismissal of this underground
storage tank appeal.
4-0
UST
Appeal
PCB 07-144
People of the State of Illinois by Lisa Madigan, Attorney General of
the State of Illinois v. Mick Morfey, individually and William
Knauer, individually – The Board granted the complainant’s motions
to deem facts admitted and for summary judgment. The Board found
respondent Knauer violated Sections 9(a), 9.1(d), 9.13(a) and 9(c) of
the Environmental Protection Act (Act), 415 ILCS 5/9(a), 9.1 (d), 9.
13(a), 9(c) (2006), and Sections 61.145(a) and (b), 61.145(c)(i),
(c)(2), (c)(6) and (c)(8), 61.150(b) of the National Emissions
Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants for asbestos, 40 C.F.R.
61.145(a) and (b), 61.145(c)(i), (c)(2), (c)(6) and (c)(8), 61.150(b). as
alleged in the complaint and assessed the requested civil penalty of
$100,000.
4-0
E – Air
PCB 07-147
L. Keller Oil Properties, Inc. / Farina v. IEPA
– The Board denied
petitioner’s motion for reconsideration and affirmed its December 6,
2007 opinion and order in its entirety. In addition, the Board denied
petitioner’s request for oral argument.
4-0
P-A, Land
PCB 08-17
People of the State of Illinois v. Felker Pharmacy, Inc.and Rod
Bennett Construction, Inc.v. McClellan Blakemore Architects, Inc.
and Wendler Engineering Services, Inc. – The Board accepted third
party complainant Rod Bennett Construction, Inc.’s third-party
complaint for hearing.
4-0
W-E
PCB 08-27
People of the State of Illinois v. City of Hometown
– Upon receipt of
a proposed stipulation and settlement agreement and an agreed
motion to request relief from the hearing requirement in this public
water supply enforcement action involving a Cook County facility,
the Board ordered publication of the required newspaper notice.
4-0
E-PWS
PCB 08-32
Partylite Worldwide, Inc. v. IEPA
– The Board found that the Illinois
Environmental Protection Agency (IEPA) failed to take action on
petitioner’s completed application for a Clean Air Act Permit
Program (CAAPP) permit as required by Section 39.5(5)(j) of the Act
(415 ILCS 5/39.5(5)(j) (2006)). The Board directed the IEPA to take
action on petitioner’s application for a CAAPP permit by July 18,
2008.
4-0
P-A, Air

Environmental Register – March 2008
12
PCB 08-37
Woodworth & Sons, Inc. v. IEPA
– Having previously granted a
request for a 90-day extension, the Board dismissed this matter
because no underground storage tank appeal was filed on behalf of
this Champaign County facility.
4-0
UST
Appeal
PCB 08-49
Joyce Farms Recycling, Inc. v. IEPA
– The Board granted this
request for a 90-day extension of time to file an underground storage
tank appeal on behalf of this Kankakee County facility.
4-0
90-Day
Ext, UST
Appeal
PCB 08-50
Jet Farm
– Prophetstown v. IEPA – Upon receipt of the Illinois
Environmental Protection Agency’s recommendation, the Board
found and certified that specified facilities of Jet Farm, located in
Whiteside County, are pollution control facilities for the purpose of
preferential tax treatment under the Property Tax Code (35 ILCS
200/11-10 (2006)).
4-0
T-C, W
PCB 08-51
People of the State of Illinois v. Highland Baking Company, Inc.
The Board accepted for hearing this water enforcement action
involving a site located in Cook County.
4-0
E-Air
PCB 08-52
People of the State of Illinois v. Dr. Charles R. Boyce, d/b/a Chatham
Veterinary Clinic – The Board accepted for hearing this water
enforcement action involving a site located in Sangamon County.
4-0
E-Land
New Cases
March 6, 2008 Board Meeting
08-46
People of the State of Illinois v. Prairie Material Sales, Inc., – The Board accepted for hearing this water
enforcement action involving a site located in DuPage County.
08-47
People of the State of Illinois v. Distinctive Homes, Ltd. and Distinctive Companies, Ltd
– The Board
accepted for hearing this water enforcement action involving a site located in Cook County.
08-48
People of the State of Illinois v. Distinctive Homes, Ltd. and Distinctive Companies, Ltd
– The Board
accepted for hearing this water enforcement action involving a site located in Cook County.
AC 08-17
City of Chicago Department of Environment v. Crystal IL 98LLC.
– The Board accepted an
administrative citation against this Cook County respondent.
AC 08-18
IEPA v. Carol G. Prieb
– The Board accepted an administrative citation against this Union County
respondent.
AC 08-19
IEPA v. C. John Blickham
– The Board accepted an administrative citation against this Adams County
respondent.
AC 08-20
County of Jackson v. James Moake
– The Board accepted an administrative citation against this
Jackson County respondent.
AC 08-21
County of Jackson v. Jack Reeves and Jacqueline Watkins
– The Board accepted an administrative
citation against these Jackson County respondents.
R 08-18
In the Matter of: Proposed Amendments to Groundwater Quality Standards, 35 Il. Adm. Code 620
– No
action taken.

 
Environmental Register – March 2008
13
March 20, 2008 Board Meeting
08-49
Joyce Farms Recycling, Inc. v. IEPA – The Board granted this request for a 90-day extension of time to file
an underground storage tank appeal on behalf of this Kankakee County facility.
08-50
Jet Farm – Prophetstown v. IEPA
– Upon receipt of the Illinois Environmental Protection Agency’s
recommendation, the Board found and certified that specified facilities of Jet Farm, located in Whiteside County,
are pollution control facilities for the purpose of preferential tax treatment under the Property Tax Code (35 ILCS
200/11-10 (2006)).
08-51
People of the State of Illinois v. Highland Baking Company, Inc.
– The Board accepted for hearing this water
enforcement action involving a site located in Cook County.
08-52
People of the State of Illinois v. Dr. Charles R. Boyce, d/b/a Chatham Veterinary Clinic
– The Board
accepted for hearing this water enforcement action involving a site located in Sangamon County.
Calendar
4/3/08
11:00 AM
Illinois Pollution Control Board Meeting
James R. Thompson Center
100 W. Randolph Street
Chicago
4/9/08
9:00 AM
R07-19
In the Matter of: Section 27 Proposed
Rules for Nitrogen Oxide (NOx)
Emissions From Stationary Reciprocating
Internal Combustion Engines and
Turbines: Amendments to 35 Ill. Adm.
Code Parts 211 and 217
Madison County Administration
Building
Room 203 157 N. Main Street
Edwardsville
4/10/08
9:00 AM
R07-19
In the Matter of: Section 27 Proposed
Rules for Nitrogen Oxide (NOx)
Emissions From Stationary Reciprocating
Internal Combustion Engines and
Turbines: Amendments to 35 Ill. Adm.
Code Parts 211 and 217
Madison County Administration
Building
Room 203 157 N. Main Street
Edwardsville
4/16/08
10:00 AM
PCB 08-42
Tom Edwards/River Rescue v. IEPA and
Peoria Disposal Company
Peoria County Courthouse
County Board Room 403
324 Main Street
Peoria
4/17/08
11:00 AM
Illinois Pollution Control Board Meeting
James R. Thompson Center
Room 09-040
100 W. Randolph Street
Chicago
4/23/08
11:30 AM
R08-09
In the Matter of: Water Quality
Standards for Effluent Limitations for the
Chicago Area Waterway System and the
Lower Des Plaines River: Proposed
Amendments to 35 Ill. Adm. Code 301,
302, 303, and 304
Environmental Protection Agency
Des Plains Regional Office
LGI Room, Second Floor
9511 West Harrison
Des Plaines
4/24/08
9:00 AM
R08-09
In the Matter of: Water Quality
Standards for Effluent Limitations for the
Chicago Area Waterway System and the
Lower Des Plaines River: Proposed
Amendments to 35 Ill. Adm. Code 301,
302, 303, and 304
Environmental Protection Agency
Des Plains Regional Office
LGI Room, Second Floor
9511 West Harrison
Des Plaines

 
Environmental Register – March 2008
14
4/30/08
9:00 AM
R08-17
In the Matter of: Standards and
Limitations for Organic Material
Emissions for Area Sources Proposed
New 35 Ill. Adm. Code Part 223
IEPA Office Building
Training Room 1214 West
1021 N. Grand Avenue East
(North Entrance)
Springfield
5/1/08
9:00 AM
R08-17
In the Matter of: Standards and
Limitations for Organic Material
Emissions for Area Sources Proposed
New 35 Ill. Adm. Code Part 223
IEPA Office Building
Training Room 1214 West
1021 N. Grand Avenue East
(North Entrance)
Springfield
5/1/08
11:00 AM
Illinois Pollution Control Board Meeting
Illinois Pollution Control Board
Hearing Room
1021 North Grand Avenue East
North Entrance
Springfield
5/7/08
9:00 AM
R07-19
In the Matter of: Section 27 Proposed
Rules for Nitrogen Oxide (NOx)
Emissions From Stationary Reciprocating
Internal Combustion Engines and
Turbines: Amendments to 35 Ill. Adm.
Code Parts 211 and 217
James R. Thompson Center
Room 9-034
100 W. Randolph Street
Chicago
5/8/08
9:00 AM
R07-19
In the Matter of: Section 27 Proposed
Rules for Nitrogen Oxide (NOx)
Emissions From Stationary Reciprocating
Internal Combustion Engines and
Turbines: Amendments to 35 Ill. Adm.
Code Parts 211 and 217
James R. Thompson Center
Room 9-034
100 W. Randolph Street
Chicago
5/15/08
9:00 AM
AS 08-05
In the Matter of: Petition of BFI Waste
Systems of North America, Inc. for
Waste Delisting
Ogle County Judicial Center
Room 301
106 South Fifth Street
Oregon
5/15/08
11:00 AM
Illinois Pollution Control Board Meeting
James R. Thompson Center
Room 09-040
100 W. Randolph Street
Chicago

 
------------------------------------------------CUT HERE------------------------------------------------
Environmental Register Comment Card

The Illinois Pollution Control Board is an independent five-member board
that adopts environmental control standards, rules on enforcement actions,
and other environmental disputes for the State of Illinois.
The
Environmental Register
is published monthly by the Board, and
contains
updates on rulemakings, descriptions of final decisions, the Board’s hearing
calendar, and other environmental law information.
------------------------------------------------CUT HERE------------------------------------------------
Illinois Pollution Control Board
Environmental Register Coordinator
1021 N. Grand Avenue East
P.O. Box 19274
Springfield, Illinois 62794-9274

Back to top