ILLINOIS POLLUTION CONTROL
BOARD
August
13, 1992
IN THE MATTER OF:
)
R92—8
AMENDMENTS TO 35 ILL.
ADM. CODE
)
(Rulemaking)
SUBTITLE C (Water Toxics and
)
Bioaccumulation)
ORDER OF THE
BOARD
(by R.
C.
Flemal):
On July 21,
1992,
Illinois Chapter of the Sierra Club,
Citizens for a Better Environment, Lake Michigan Federation,
and
NcHenry County Defenders (collectively “joint proponents”),
filed
a proposal to amend 35
Ill. Adm. Code.Subtitle C
(Water
Pollution).
Accompanying the proposal is a motion that 35 Ill. Adm.
Code 102.120 be waived for Exhibit C.
The joint proponents
request that they be allowed to file only one original of Exhibit
C, rather than an original and nine copies, due to Exhibit C’s
“extremely voluminous” nature.
(proposal at 2.)
In addition to
the filing requirements for the Board,
Section 102.120 requires
that the Illinois Environmental Protection Agency (Agency),
Attorney General, and Department of Energy and Natural Resources-
(ENR) be served one copy of the proposal.
Also accompanying the proposal is a request to waive 35
Ill.
Adm. Code 102.121(h), which requires that the regulatory
proposal be accompanied by a petition signed by 200 persons.
The
joint proponents are environmental organizations active in
Illinois and represent a collective membership of “many tens of
thousands of Illinois citizens”.
(proposal at 2.)
It is on this
basis that the joint proponents request relief from Section
121(h)
On July 29,
1992,
the Agency filed a “Motion Requesting
the Board to Require Proper Filing of the Regulatory Proposal”.
The Board construes this. as a response to the joint proponent’s
request to file only an original of Exhibit
C.
The Agency states
that it did not receive a full copy of the proposal, noting that
the attachments were omitted.
The Agency requests that the Board
require that the joint proponents properly file the proposal as
set forth at 35 Ill.
Adm. Code 102.120.
The Board grants in part the motion for waiver of
35 Ill.
Adm. Code 102.120.
The joint proponents must file one additional
copy of Exhibit C with the Board.
That copy is.necessary for use
in the Board’s downstate offices.
The Board also requires the
proponents to supply the Agency with a complete copy of the
regulatory proposal.
The joint proponents shall also file a copy
of the proposal with the Attorney General and ENR.
However,
01 35-Ot~63
—2—
because of the voluminous nature of Exhibit C, and in the case of
ENR, because economic impact studies are not relevant to this
type of rulemaking, the Board will not require that the Attorney
General and ENR be supplied with a copy of Exhibit C, unless
requested.
The Board waives the requirement to supply a petition
signed by 200 persons.
The Board also notes that the proposal is deficient in
that it is not accompanied by a synopsis of all testimony to be
presented at hearing,
as required by 35
Ill. Adm. Code
102.121(d),
or a justification that the synopsis is unavailable
(See 35
Ill.
Adm. Code 102.121(i)).
After the joint proponents have satisified the remainder
of the requirements as outlined in this order, the Board may
accept the proposal.
Failure to correct the above noted
deficiencies may subject the proposal to dismissal pursuant to 35
Ill.
Adm. Code 102.122(a).
As a final matter, the Board notes that the proposal was
accompanied by a recommendation of whether an economic impact
study is advisable.
PA 87—860, effective July
1,
1992,
deletes
the portions of the Environmental Protection Act that pertain to
economic impact studies for this type of rulemaking.
Therefore,
any actions previously required regarding economic impact studies
are no longer required.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
I, Dorothy M. Gunn,
Clerk of the Illinois Pollution
Control Board, hereby certify that the above order was adopted on
the
/3~
day of
-~--..-4-
,
1992,
by a vote of
7~
Dorothy N. ,~(inn, Clerk
Illinois Pá-llution Control Board
0J35-0t~6L~