c ~ r~v
    D
    BEFORE THE ILLINOIS POLLUTION CONTROL BOARD
    CLERK’S OFFCE
    PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF ILLINOIS,
    )
    JAN
    05
    2005
    by LISA MADIGAN, Attorney General
    STATE
    OF ~LLJNOIS
    of the State of Illinois,
    PoI1ut~onControl Boarc~
    Complainant,
    PCB No.
    05-92
    vs.
    )
    (Enforcement
    -
    Air)
    SPECIALTY PROMOTIONS,
    INC. d/b/a
    SPECIALTY PRINTING COMPANY,
    a Foreign Corporation,
    Respondent.
    NOTICE OF
    FILING
    TO:
    Adam M. Lefébvre,
    President
    Specialty Printing Company
    6019 West Howard Street
    Niles,
    IL 60714
    PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that
    I have today,
    January
    5,
    2005,
    filed
    with the Office of the Clerk of the Illinois Pollution Control
    Board the
    Stipulation and Proposal for Settlement and Motion for
    Relief from Hearing Requirement,
    true and correct copies of which
    are attached hereto and herewith served upon you.
    PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF ILLINOIS,
    by LISA
    MADIGAN,
    Attorney General
    of the State of Illinois
    BY:
    _________________
    MICHAEL
    C.
    PARTEE
    Assistant Attorney General
    Environmental Bureau/North
    188 West Randolph Street,
    Suite 2001
    Chicago,
    Illinois 60601
    Tel.:
    (312)814-2069

    BEFORE THE ILLINOIS POLLUTION CONTROL BOA~EC~E~V~ED
    CLERK’S OFFICE
    PEOPLE OF
    TIE
    STATE OF ILLINOIS,
    )
    ~
    ‘rn~r
    by
    LISA
    MADIGAN,
    Attorney
    General
    )
    ~
    L~
    w~J
    of
    the State of Illinois,
    STATE
    OF ILLJNOIS
    PoUution Control Board
    Complainant,
    PCB No.
    05-92
    vs.
    )
    (Enforcement
    Air)
    SPECIALTY PROMOTIONS,
    INC. d/b/a
    SPECIALTY PRINTING COMPANY,
    a Foreign Corporation,
    Respondent.
    MOTION FOR RELIEF FROM HEARING REQUIREMENT
    NOW COMES the Complainant, PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF ILLINOIS, by
    LISA
    MADIGAN,
    Attorney General of the State of Illinois,
    and hereby
    moves for relief from the hearing requirement in this case pursuant
    to Section 31(c) (2)
    of the Illinois Environmental Protection Act
    (“Act”), 415 ILCS 5/31(c) (2)
    (2002),
    and Section 103.300 of the
    Illinois Pollution Control Board (“Board”)
    Procedural Rules,
    35
    Ill.
    Adm. Code 103.300.
    In support of this Motion, the Complainant
    states as follows:
    1.
    Section 31(c) (2)
    of the Act allows the parties in certain
    enforcement cases to request relief from the mandatory hearing
    requirement where the parties submit to the Board a Stipulation and
    Proposal for Settlement.
    Section 31(c) (2) provides as follows:
    Notice; complaint;
    hearing.
    *
    *
    *
    (c) (2) Notwithstanding the provisions of subdivision
    (1)
    of this subsection
    (c),
    whenever a complaint has been
    filed on behalf of the Agency or by the People of the
    State of Illinois, the parties may file with the Board a
    stipulation and proposal for settlement accompanied by a
    request for relief from the requirement of a hearing
    pursuant to subdivision
    (1). Unless the Board,
    in its
    discretion,
    concludes that a hearing will be held,
    the

    Board shall cause notice of the stipulation, proposal and
    request for relief to be published and sent
    in the same
    manner as is required for hearing pursuant to subdivision
    (1)
    of this subsection. The notibe shall include
    a
    statement that any person may file a written demand for
    hearing within 21 days after receiving the notice.
    If any
    person files
    a timely written demand.for hearing, the
    Board shall deny the request for relief from a hearing
    and shall hold a hearing in accordance with the
    provisionsof subdivision
    (1).
    2.
    Board Procedural Rule 103.300 provides,
    in relevant part,
    as follows
    (emphasis in original)
    Request for Relief from Hearing Requirement in State
    Enforcement Proceeding.
    (a)
    Whenever a complaint has been filed on behalf of the
    Agency or by the People of the State of Illinois,
    the
    parties may file with the Board a proposed stipulation
    and settlement accompanied by a request for relief from
    the requirement of a hearing
    pursuant to Section 31(c)
    (2)
    of the Act
    .
    .
    .
    3.
    On November 15,
    2004,
    the Complaint was filed on behalf
    of the People of the State of Illinois with the Board.
    4.
    Simultaneous with the filing of this Motion,
    a
    Stipulation and Proposal for Settlement was filed with the Boa.rd,
    and no hearing is currently scheduled in this case.
    WHEREFORE,
    the Complainant,
    PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF ILLINOIS, by
    LISA MADIGAN, Attorney General of the State of Illinois,
    respectfully moves
    for relief from the requirement of a hearing
    pursuant to Section 31(c) (2)
    of the Act and Board Procedural Rule
    103.300.
    2

    Respectfully submitted,
    PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF ILLINOIS,
    by LISA MADIGAN, Attorney General
    of the State of Illinois
    BY:
    MICHAEL
    C. PARTEE
    Assistant Attorney. General
    Environmental Bureau/North
    188 West Randolph Street,
    Suite 2001
    Chicago,
    Illinois 60601
    Tel.:
    (312)814-2069
    3

    r’~
    2/’c~
    BEFORE THE ILLINOIS POLLUTION CONTROL BOARD
    “~
    j~r~i
    ~ ~
    20P~
    PEOPLE OF
    THE
    STATE
    OF ILLINOIS,
    )
    by LISA MADIGAN, Attorney General
    )
    STATE
    OF
    ILLJN0~S
    of the State of Illinois,
    )
    pouution Control Board
    Complainant,
    PCB No.
    05-92
    vs.
    )
    (Enforcement
    Air)
    SPECIALTY PROMOTIONS,
    INC. d/b/a
    SPECIALTY PRINTING COMPANY,
    a Foreign Corporation,
    Respondent.
    STIPULATION A~DPROPOSAL FOR SETTLEMENT
    Complainant,
    PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF ILLINOIS, by LISA MADIGAN,
    Attorney General of the State of Illinois, the Illinois
    Environmental Protection Agency (“Illinois EPA”), and Respondent,
    SPECIALTY PROMOTIONS,
    INC. d/b/a SPECIALTY PRINTING COMPANY,
    a
    foreign corporation, have agreed to the making of this Stipulation
    and Proposal for Settlement
    (“Stipulation”) and submit it to the
    Illinois Pollution Control Board
    (“Board”)
    for approval.
    The
    parties agree that the statement of facts contained herein
    represents
    a fair summary of the evidence and testimony which would
    be introduced by the parties if
    a hearing were held.
    The parties
    further stipulate that this statement of facts is made and agreed
    upon for purposes of settlement only and that neither the fact that
    a party has entered into this Stipulation, nor any of the facts
    stipulated herein,
    shall be introduced into evidence in any other
    proceeding regarding the claims asserted in the Complaint except as
    otherwise provided herein.
    If the Board approves and enters this
    Stipulation, Respondent agrees to be bound by the Stipulation and

    Board
    Order
    arid
    not
    to
    contest
    their
    validity
    in any subsequent
    proceeding to implement or enforce their terms.
    I.
    JURISDICTION
    The Board has jurisdiction of the subject matter herein and of
    the
    parties
    consenting
    hereto
    pursuant
    to
    the
    Illinois
    Environmental
    Protection
    Act
    (“Act”),
    415
    ILCS
    5/1
    et seq.
    (2002)
    II.
    AUTHORIZATION
    The undersigned representatives for each party certify that
    they are fully authorized by the party whom they represent to enter
    into the terms and conditions of this Stipulation and to legally
    bind them to it.
    III.
    STATEMENT OF FACTS
    A.
    Parties
    1.
    Simultaneous with the filing of this Stipulation,
    a
    Complaint, was filed on behalf of the People of the State of Illinois
    by Lisa Madigan, Attorney General of the State of Illinois,
    on her
    own motion and at the request of the Illinois EPA, pursuant to
    Section 31 of the Act,
    415 ILCS 5/31
    (2002),
    against the Respondent.
    2.
    The Illinois EPA is an administrative agency of the
    State of Illinois, created pursuant to Section 4 of the Act,
    415
    ILCS 5/4
    (2002)
    2

    3.
    At
    all
    times
    relevant
    to
    the
    Complaint,
    Respondent
    was
    and
    is
    a
    Texas
    corporation
    that
    is
    authorized
    to transact business
    in Illinois.
    B.
    Site Description
    1.
    Specialty owns and operates a commercial printing
    facility
    located
    at
    6019
    West
    Howard
    Street, Niles, Cook County,
    Illinois.
    2.
    On
    November
    13,
    1998,
    the
    Illinois
    EPA
    issued
    lifetime
    operating
    permit
    no.
    98080009
    to
    Specialty
    for
    commercial
    printing
    equipment
    that
    included
    one
    heatset
    offset
    printing
    press,
    five
    sheetfed
    offset
    printing
    presses,
    and
    one
    letter
    press.
    3.
    The
    commercial
    printing
    equipment
    covered
    by
    lifetime
    operating
    permit
    no.
    98080009
    emits
    volatile
    organic
    material
    (“VOM”)
    to
    the
    atmosphere.
    4.
    Between
    about
    March
    2002
    and
    August
    2002,
    Specialty
    constructed
    and
    began
    operating
    additional
    commercial
    printing
    equipment,
    including
    one
    coldset
    lithographic
    printing
    press,
    an
    oxidizer,
    and
    one
    heatset
    web
    press
    with
    oxidizer,
    all
    without
    obtaining construction permits from the Illinois EPA and without
    either modifying lifetime operating permit no.
    98080009 or obtaining
    new operating permits from the Illinois EPA.
    5.
    This additional commercial printing equipment also emits
    VOM to the atmosphere.
    C.
    Allegations of Non-Compliance
    ,
    Complainant
    contends
    that
    the Respondent violated the following
    provisions
    of the Act and Board regulations:
    3

    Count
    I:
    Causing or allowing air pollution in
    violation
    of
    Section
    9(a)
    of
    the
    Act
    (415
    ILCS
    5/9(a)
    (2002))
    and
    Section
    201.141
    of
    the
    Board’s
    Air
    Pollution
    Regulations
    (35
    Ill.
    Adm.
    Code
    201.141);
    Count
    II.:
    Constructing
    new
    emission
    sources
    and
    new
    air
    pollution
    control
    equipment
    without
    construction
    permits
    in
    violation
    of
    Section
    9(b)
    of
    the
    Act
    (415
    ILCS
    5/9(b)
    (2002))
    and
    Section
    201.142
    of
    the
    Board’s
    Air
    Pollution
    Regulations
    (35’
    Ill.
    Adm.
    Code
    201.142);
    Count
    III:
    Operating
    new
    emission
    sources
    and
    new
    air
    pollution
    control
    equipment
    without
    operating
    permits
    in
    violation
    of
    Section
    9(b)
    of
    the
    Act
    and
    Section
    201.143
    of
    the
    Board’s
    Air
    Pollution
    Regulations
    (35
    Iii.
    Adm.
    Code
    201.143’);
    Count
    IV:
    Constructing a major source of VOM without
    CAAPP
    permits
    in
    violation
    of
    Section
    9(b)
    of
    the
    Act
    and
    Section
    203.201
    of
    the
    Board’s
    Air
    Pollution
    Regulations
    (35
    Ill.
    Adm.
    Code
    203.201);
    Count
    V:
    Operating a major source of VOM without
    CAAPP
    permits
    new
    emission
    sources
    and
    new
    air
    pollution
    control
    equipment
    without
    operating
    permits
    in
    violation
    of
    Section
    39.5(5)
    (x)
    of
    the
    Act
    (415
    ILCS
    5/39.5(5)
    (x)
    (2002))
    and
    Section
    270.301
    of
    the
    Illinois
    EPA’s
    Air
    Pollution
    Regulations
    (35
    Ill.
    Adm.
    Code
    270.301);
    Count
    VI:
    Failing
    to
    achieve
    90
    reduction
    in
    emissions
    in
    violation
    of
    Section
    9(a)
    of
    the
    Act
    and
    Section
    218.407
    (a)
    (1)
    (C)
    of
    the
    Board’s
    Air
    Pollution
    Regulations
    (35
    Ill. Adm. Code
    218.407(a)
    (1)(Cfl;
    Count
    VII:
    Failing to certify compliance with
    lithographic printing rules in violation
    of Section 9(a)
    of theAct and Section
    218.411(b)
    of the Board’s Air Pollution
    ‘Regulations
    (35 Ill.
    Adm. Code
    218.411(b))
    Count VIII:
    Failing to file complete annual’emission
    report
    in violation of Section
    9(a)
    of the
    Act and Section 254.303(b)
    of the Board’s
    4

    Air Pollution Regulations
    (35 Ill.
    Adrn.
    Code 254.303(b));
    Count
    IX:
    Violating special condition no.
    2 of
    operating permit in violation of Section
    9(b)
    of the Act;
    Count
    X:
    Violating special condition no.
    5 of
    operating
    permit
    in
    violation
    of
    Section
    9(b) of the Act;
    Count XI:
    Violating special condition no.
    7 of
    operating
    permit
    in
    violation
    of
    Section
    9(b)
    of the Act;
    Count XII:
    Failing to maintain and operate continuous
    emission
    monitoring
    equipment
    in
    violation
    of
    Section
    9(a)
    of
    the
    Act
    and
    Section
    218.407
    (a)
    (1)
    (D)
    of
    the
    Board’s
    Air
    Pollution
    Regulations
    (35
    Ill.
    Adm.
    Code
    218.407
    (a)
    (1)
    (D))
    D.
    Non-Admission
    of Violations
    The Respondent neither admits nor denies the violations alleged
    in Counts
    I through XII of the Complaint filed in this matter and
    referenced
    within
    Section
    III.C
    herein.
    E.
    Compliance Activities
    to Date
    In August 2004, prior to the filing of this Stipulation,
    Respondent submitted a Clean Air Act Permit Program
    (“CAAPP”)
    permit
    application
    covering
    all
    equipment
    at
    its
    facility.
    IV.
    APPLICABILITY
    This
    Stipulation
    shall
    apply to and be binding upon the
    Complainant
    and
    the
    Respondent,
    and
    any
    officer,
    director,
    agent,
    or
    employee
    of
    the
    Respondent,
    as
    well
    as
    any
    successors
    or
    assigns
    of
    the
    Respondent.
    The
    Respondent
    shall
    not
    raise as ‘a defense to any
    enforce~nent
    action
    taken
    pursuant
    to
    this
    Stipulation
    the
    failure
    of
    5

    any. of its officers,
    directors,
    agents,
    employees or successors or
    assigns to take such action as shall be required to comply with the
    provisions
    of
    this
    Stipulation.
    1.
    No
    change
    in
    ownership,
    corporate status or operator of the
    facility
    shall
    in
    any
    way
    alter the responsibilities of the
    Respondent
    under
    this
    Stipulation.
    In
    the
    event’of
    any
    conveyance
    of title,
    easement or other interest in the facility,
    the Respondent
    shall continue to be bound by and remain liable for performance of
    all obligations under this Stipulation.
    2.
    In the event that the Respondent proposes to sell or transfer
    any real property or operations subject to any Order accepting and
    adopting the terms of this Stipulation,
    the Respondent shall notify
    the Complainant 30 days prior to the conveyance of title, ownership
    or other interest,
    including a leasehold interest in the facility or
    a portion thereof.
    Such notification shall be submitted to the
    contact persons identified
    in Section VIII.A.
    The Respondent shall
    make the prospective purchaser or successor’s compliance with any
    Order accepting and adopting the terms of this Stipulation a
    condition of any such sale or transfer and shall provide a copy of
    this Stipulation and any Order accepting and adopting the terms of
    this Stipulation to any such successor in interest.
    This, provision
    does not relieve the Respondent
    from’ compliance with any regulatory
    requirement regarding notice and transfer of applicable facility
    permits.
    3.
    The Respondent shall notify each contractor to be retained to
    perform work required by any Order accepting and adopting the terms
    6

    of this Stipulation of each of the requirements of said Order
    relevant to the activities to be performed by that contractor,
    including all relevant work schedules and reporting deadlines, and
    shall provide a copy of this Stipulation and any Order accepting and
    adopting the terms of this Stipulation to each contractor already
    retained no later than 30 days after the date of adoption of this
    Stipulation.
    In addition,
    the Respondent shall provide copies of
    all schedules for implementation of the provisions of this
    Stipulation to the prime vendor(s)
    supplying the control technology
    systems and other equipment required by any Order accepting and
    adopting the terms of this Stipulation.
    V.
    COMPLIANCE WITH OTHER LAWS MID
    REGULATIONS
    This Stipulation in no way affects the responsibilities of the
    Respondent
    to comply with any other federal,
    state or local laws or
    regulations including,
    but not limited to,
    the Act and the Board
    regulations,
    35 Ill. Adm.
    Code,
    Subtitles A through H.
    VI.
    IMPACT ON
    THE
    PUBLIC RESULTING FROM ALLEGED NON-COMPLIANCE
    Section 33(c)
    of the Act, 415 ILCS 5/33(c)
    (2002), provides as
    follows:
    In making its orders and determinations,
    the Board shall
    take into consideration all the facts and circumstances
    bearing upon the reasonableness of the emissions,
    discharges, or deposits involved including,
    but not
    limited to:
    1.
    the character and degree of injury to,
    or
    interference with the protection of the health,
    general welfare and physical property of the people;
    7

    2.
    the social and economic value of the pollution
    source;
    3.
    the suitability or unsuitability of the pollution
    source to the area in which it
    is located,
    including
    the question of priority of location in the area
    involved;
    4.
    the technical practicability and economic
    reasonableness of reducing or eliminating the
    emissions, discharges or’deposits resulting from
    such pollution source; and
    5.
    any subsequent compliance.
    In response to these factors,
    the parties state the following:
    1.
    Human health and the environment were threatened and the
    Illinois EPA’s information gathering responsibilities hindered by
    the Respondent’s violations.
    2.
    There is social and economic benefit to the facility.
    3.
    Operation of the facility is suitable for the area in
    which it is located.
    4.
    Compliance with the Act and Board and Illinois EPA
    regulations was and’ is both technically practicable and economically
    reasonable.
    5.
    Respondent has subsequently complied with the Act ‘and the
    Board Regulations..
    VII.
    CONSIDERATION OF SECTION 42(h)
    FACTORS
    Section 42(h)
    of the Act, 415
    ILCS 5/42(h)
    (2002), provides
    as
    follows:
    In
    determining
    the
    appropriate
    civil penalty to be
    imposed
    under
    .
    .
    .
    this
    Section,
    the
    Board
    is
    authorized
    to
    consider
    any
    matters
    of
    record
    in
    mitigation
    or
    aggravation’
    of penalty,
    including but not limited to the
    following
    factors:
    8

    1.
    ‘the duration and gravity of the violation;
    2..
    the presence or absence of due diligence on the part
    of the respondent
    in attempting to comply with
    requirements of this Act and regulations thereunder
    or to secure relief therefrom as provided by this
    Act;
    3.
    any economic benefits accrued by the respondent
    because of delay in compliance with requirements,
    in
    which case the economic benefits shall be determined
    by the lowest cost alternative for achieving
    compliance;
    4.
    the amount of monetary penalty which will serve to
    deter further violations by the respondent and to
    otherwise aid in enhancing voluntary compliance with
    this Act by the respondent and other persons
    similarly subject to the Act;
    5.
    the number, proximity in time,
    and gravity of
    previously adjudicated violations
    of this Act by the
    respondent;
    6.
    whether the respondent voluntarily self-disclosed,
    in accordance with subsection
    (i)
    of this Section,
    the non-compliance to the Agency; and
    7.
    whether the respondent has agreed to undertake
    a
    “supplemental environmental project,” which means an
    environmentally beneficial project that a respondent
    agrees to undertake in settlement of an enforcement
    action brought under this Act, but which the
    respondent
    is not otherwise legally required to
    perform.
    In response to these factors, the parties state as follows:
    1.
    The Respondent failed to obtain permits prior to
    construction and operation of additional commercial printing
    equipment at its facility,
    failed to timely obtain CAAPP permits,
    failed to certify compliance with certain requirements and
    accurately report emissions, and violated provisions of the Act,
    Board’s Air Pollution Regulations,
    Illinois EPA’s Air Pollution
    Regulations, and lifetime operating permit no. 98080009.
    The
    9

    violations began between about March 2002 and August 2002 and will
    be resolved when the CAAPP permit application that was submitted by
    Respondent
    in August 2004 is granted by the Illinois EPA.
    2.
    Respondent was diligent in attempting to come back into
    compliance with the’ Act, Board regulations, and Illinois EPA
    regulations,
    once the Illinois EPA notified it of its noncompliance.
    3.
    The economic benefit to Respondent from its delay in
    compliance is nominal.
    4.
    Complainant has determined, based upon the specific facts
    of this matter,
    that a penalty of Seventy-Five Thousand Dollars
    ($75,000.00)
    will serve to deter further violations and aid in
    future voluntary compliance with the Act and Board regulations.
    5.
    To Complainant’s knowledge, Respondent has no previously
    adjudicated violations of the Act.
    6.
    Self-disclosure is not at issue in this matter.
    7.
    The settlement of this matter does not include a
    supplemental environmental project.
    VIII.
    TERMS OF SETTLEMENT
    A.
    Penalty Payment
    1.
    The Respondent shall pay a civil penalty in the sum of
    Seventy-Five
    Thousand
    Dollars
    ($75,000.00)
    in
    two
    installments
    of
    Thirty-Seven
    Thousand
    Five
    Hundred
    Dollars
    ($37,500.00)
    each.
    The
    first
    payment
    shall
    be
    made
    within
    30
    calendar
    days
    from
    the
    date
    the
    Board
    adopts
    and
    accepts
    this
    Stipulation.
    The
    second payment
    10

    shall be made within 90 calendar days from the date the Board adopts
    and accepts this Stipulation.
    2.
    The two penalty payments described in the immediately
    preceding paragraph shall be paid by certified check, money order or
    electronic funds transfer payable to the Illinois EPA, designated to
    the Illinois Environmental Protection Trust Fund and submitted to:
    Illinois Environmental Protection Agency
    Fiscal Services
    1021 North Grand Avenue East
    P.O. Box 19276
    Springfield,
    IL 62794-9276
    The name and number of the case and Respondent’s Federal Employer
    Identification Number
    (“FEIN”), 752655558,
    shall appear on the check
    or money order.
    A copy of the certified check, money order or
    record of electronic funds transfer and any transmittal letter shall
    be sent to:
    Michael
    C.
    Partee
    (or designee)
    Assistant Attorney General
    Environmental Bureau North
    188 West Randolph Street, Suite 2001
    Chicago,
    IL 60601
    Maureen Wozniak
    (or designee)
    Assistant Counsel
    Illinois Environmental Protection Agency
    1021 North Grahd Avenue East
    P.O. Box 19276
    Springfield,
    IL 62794-9276
    3.
    Pursuant to Section 42(g)
    of the Act,
    415 ILCS
    5/42(g)
    (2002), interest shall accrue on any payment not paid within the
    time period prescribed above at the maximum rate allowable under
    Section 1003(a)
    of the Illinois Income Tax Act,
    35 ILCS 5/1003
    (2002).
    Interest on any unpaid payment
    shall begin to accrue from
    the date the payment is due and continue to accrue until the date
    11

    payment is received.
    When partial payment(s)
    is made,
    such partial
    payment shall be first applied to any interest on unpaid payment
    then due and owing.
    All interest on payment owed shall be paid by
    certified check, money order or electronic funds transfer, payable
    to the Illinois EPA,
    designated to the Illinois Environmental
    protection Trust Fund and delivered to the address and in the manner
    described above.
    4.
    For purposes of payment and collection, Respondent may be
    reached at the following address:
    Adam LeFebvre, President
    Specialty Printing Company
    6019 West Howard Street
    Niles,
    IL 60714
    5.
    In the event of default of this Section VIII.A,
    the
    Complainant shall be entitled to all available relief including,
    but
    not limited to,
    reasonable costs of collection and reasonable
    attorney’s fees.
    B.
    Future Use
    Notwithstanding any other language in this Stipulation to the
    contrary, and in consideration of the mutual promises and conditions
    contained in this Stipulation, including the Release from Liability
    contained in Section VIII.D below, the Respondent hereby agrees that
    this Stipulation may be used against the Respondent in any
    subsequent enforcement action or permit proceeding as proof of a
    past adjudication of violation of the Act and the Board Regulations
    promulgated thereunder for all violations alleged in the Complaint
    in this matter,
    for purposes of Sections 39(a)
    and
    (i) and/or 42(h)
    of the Act, 415 ILCS 5/39(a)
    and(i) and/or 5/42(h)
    (2002).
    Further,
    12

    Respondent agrees to waive any rights to contest,
    in any subsequent
    enforcement action or permit proceeding,
    any allegations that these
    alleged violations were adjudicated.
    C.
    Cease and Desist
    The Respondent shall cease and desist from future violations
    of
    the Act and Board Regulations that were the subject matter of the
    Complaint as outlined in Section III.C
    (Allegations of Non-
    Compliance)
    of this Stipulation.
    D.
    Release from Liability
    In
    consideration
    of
    the
    Respondent’s
    payment
    of
    the
    $75,000.00
    penalty
    and
    any
    specified
    costs and accrued interest,
    completion of
    all
    activities
    required
    hereunder,
    to
    Cease
    and
    Desist
    as
    contained
    in
    Section
    VIII.C
    and
    upon
    the
    Board’s
    acceptance and approval of
    the terms of
    this
    Stipulation,
    the
    Complainant
    releases,
    waives and
    discharges the Respondent from any further liability or penalties
    for violations of the Act and Board Regulations that were the
    subject matter of the Complaint herein.
    The release set forth above
    does not extend to any matters other than those expressly specified
    in Complainant’s Complaint filed simultaneous with this Stipulation.
    The Complainant reserves,
    and this Stipulation’ is without prejudice
    to,
    all rights of the State of Illinois against the Respondent with
    respect to all other matters,
    including but not limited to, the
    following:
    a.
    criminal liability;
    b.
    liability for future violation of state,
    federal,
    local,
    and common laws and/or regulations;
    13

    c.
    liability
    for
    natural
    resources damage arising out of the
    alleged
    violations;
    and
    d.
    liability
    or
    claims based on the Respondent’s failure to
    satisfy
    the
    requirements of this Stipulation.
    Nothing
    in
    this
    Stipulation
    is
    intended
    as
    a
    waiver,
    discharge,
    release,
    or
    covenant
    not
    to
    sue
    for
    any
    claim or cause of action,
    administrative or judicial,
    civil or criminal,
    past or future,
    in
    law or in equity, which the State of Illinois or the Illinois EPA
    may have against any person,
    as defined by Section 3.315 of the Act,
    415 ILCS 5/3.315,
    or entity other than the Respondent.
    E.
    Right
    of Entry
    In addition to any other authority,
    the Illinois EPA,
    its
    employees and representatives,
    and the Attorney General,
    her agents
    and representatives,
    shall have the right of entry into and upon the
    Respondent’s facility which is the subject of this Stipulation,
    at
    all reasonable times for the purposes of carrying out inspections.
    In conducting such inspections,
    the Illinois EPA,
    its employees and
    representatives, and the Attorney General, her employees and
    representatives may take photographs,
    samples, and collect
    information,
    as they deem necessary.
    F.
    Modification
    of Stipulation
    The parties may, by mutual written consent,
    agree to extend any
    compliance dates or modify the terms of this Stipulation.
    A request
    for any modification shall be made in writing and submitted to the
    contact persons identified in Section VIII.A.
    Any
    such request
    shall be made by separate document,
    and shall not be submitted
    14

    within any other report or submittal required by this Stipulation.
    Any
    such agreed modification shall be in writing,
    signed by
    authorized representatives of each party, and then accompany a joint
    motion to the Board seeking a modification of the prior order
    approving and accepting the Stipulation to approve and accept the
    Stipulation as amended.
    G.
    Enforcement
    of Board Order
    1.
    Upon the entry of the Board’s
    Order
    approving
    and
    accepting this Stipulation,
    that Order is a binding and enforceable
    order of the Board and may be enforced as such through any and all
    available means.
    2.
    Respondent agrees that notice of any subsequent
    proceeding to enforce the Board Order approving and accepting this
    Stipulation may be made by mail and waives any requirement of
    service of process.
    3.
    .
    The parties agree that,
    if the Board does not approve and
    accept this Stipulation, then neither party is bound by the terms
    herein.
    4.
    It is the intent of the Complainant and Respondent that
    the provisions of this Stipulation and any Board Order accepting and
    approving such shall be severable, and should any provision be
    declared by a court of competent jurisdiction to be inconsistent
    with state or federal law, and therefore unenforceable, the
    remaining clauses shall remain in full force and effect.
    WHEREFORE,
    Complainant and Respondent request that the Board
    adopt and accept the foregoing Stipulation as written.
    15

    AGREED:
    FOR THE COMPLAINANT:
    PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF ILLINOIS
    by LISA MADIGAN, Attorney General
    of the State of Illinois
    MATTHEW
    J.
    DUNN,
    Chief
    ILLINOIS ENVIRONMENTAL
    Environmental Enforcement!
    PROTECTION AGENCY
    Asbestos Litigation Division
    BY:
    /
    ~4
    BY:
    ____________________
    ~OSEMARIE
    CAZEAU,
    ief
    J SE
    E.
    SVOBODA
    Environmental Bureau/North
    .
    hief Legal Counsel
    Assistant Attorney General
    DATE:
    ~ 3/0
    ~
    DATE:
    /
    2j
    7
    FOR THE RESPONDENT:
    SPECIALTY PROMOTIONS,
    INC. d/b/a
    SPECIALTY PRINTING COMPANY
    BY:__
    ITS:__________________________
    DATE:
    IZ.—
    Z7~Y
    16

    CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
    It is hereby certified that true and correct copies of
    Stipulation and Proposal
    for Settlement, Motion
    for Relief from
    Hearing Requirement and Notice of Filing were mailed,
    first class
    postage prepaid,
    to the person listed on the Notice of Filing on
    January
    5,
    2005.
    BY:
    ________________________
    MICHAEL
    C.
    PARTEE
    It is hereby certified that the originals plus nine
    (9)
    copies
    of the foregoing were hand-delivered to
    the’ following person on
    January
    5,
    2005:
    Pollution Control Board, Attn:
    Clerk
    James
    R. Thompson Center
    100 West Randolph Street,
    Suite 11-500
    Chicago, Illinois 60601
    BY:
    _____
    MICHAEL
    C. PARTEE

    Back to top