ilLINOIS POLLUTION CONTROL BOARD
May 2,
1985
SPI\D()NI,
FRANKIEWICZ
& ZULLO,
Complainants,
)
PCB 84—167
BOLl
~)STi~E,; GREEK ORTHODOX
CHURCFU
Respondent.
ORDER OF THE BOARD
(by J, Marlin):
rhjs matter comes before the Board upon
the November ~l, 1984
fi1:~ngof
a complaint by Don and Carol Spadoni, Bob and Beth
Frankiewicz, and Don and Diane
Zullo (complainants) against the
Holy Apostles Greek Orthodox Church (respondent).
Respondent
filed an answer on December 19, 1984 denying the complainants’
allegations while neither admitting nor denying the content of
the documents submitted with the complaint.
A hearing was held
in Westchester,
Illinois on March 18,
1985.
The complaint alleges that respondent violated the noise
regulations located
at
35 til. Adm.
Code 900.102
(old rule 102),
901,102(a)
(old rule
202), and 901.102(b)
(old rule 203).
Section
900.102 provides that
“(nb
person shall cause or allow
the emission of sound
beyond the
b~oundariesof his property,...,
so
as
to
cause noise pollution
in Illinois, or so as
to violate
any
provision
of
this Chapter.”
Sections 901.102(a)
and
(b)
contain octave
band sound pressure levels
which shall
not be
exceeded.
Respondent
is located at
2501
S. Wolf Road
in Westchester.
Complainants
Zullo, Spadoni,
and
Frankiewicz reside at
2524,
2528~, and 2532
S.
Wellington
in Westchester, respectively,
directly
east of the
respondent’s property,,
The respondent has
five
air
conditioning
units
that are located
-just
west
of
the
property lines
of
complainants and which complainants allege
are
the source of excessive noise.
Although other documents have
been filed
with the complaint,
the
parties and the
Illinois
Environmental Protection Agency
(IEPA)
have filed
a joint settlement agreement entitled
~sti.pu1ation
for settlement”
(agreement).
Although not
a party,
the IEPA assented to the agreement,
The
signatories request that
the
Board
approve
the
agreement.
The
a.qreE~er~
provides
that
the
respondent
will
move
the
existing
~r
coi~iitioners
from
the
east
to
the
west
side
of
its
64-09
2
building
or will remove
the existing units and install new units
on the south of the building.
Either option will place
the
units
at least 75
feet from the complainants’ property lines
behind
the south side of the
respondent’s building.
Residences
to
the
south
of
the
proposed unit relocation will be separated by
275
feet
and residences to the west by
150
feet.
The total cost
of respondent’s proposed actions would be
in the range of thirty
to fifty thousand dollars.
The agreement also contains
a
timetable which the Board
need not address and
a denial
by the
respondent that
it has “caused or committed” noise pollution.
Th~
Boay~
hereby rejects the settlement agreement based on
it~~or~iusion
that it lacks statutory authority to accept
~ett1ements
imposing
compliance
conditions
without
a
Board
finding
of violation.
IEPA v. Chemetco, Inc.,
PCB 83—2, February
20,
1985,
interlocutory
appeal, No.
5—85—143
(5th District);
People of the State of Illinois and IEPA
~.
Archer Daniels
Midland Corporation, PCB 83—226,
March
22,
1985,
interlocutory
~
No, 3—85—0222 (3rd District),
In order
to bring this proceeding
to
a áonclusion
the
parties may file an amended settlement agreement containing
sufficient
admissions of violation for~theBoard
to order
implementation of the agreed modifications and schedule.
Alternatively,
the parties
may wish to draft
a private settlement
agreement between themselves
and when
the controversy has been
resolved,
to seek
a joint dismissal of the action before the
Board,
IT
IS SO ORDERED.
Board Member J.D. Dumelle dissented.
Dorothy
M.
Gunn,
Clerk of the Illinois Pollution Control
hereby
certify
that
the
above
Order
was
adopted
on
_____________
day of
__________________,
1985 by
a vote
-
-
~.
~
~.
Dorothy M. Gunn, Clerk
Illinois Pollution Control Board
64-10