1. CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
      2. ILLINOIS
    1. GARIEDNO
  1. PHASE
      1. 1133W.
      2. DECAIUR,
      3. IlLINOIS

RECEIVED
CLERK’S OFFICE
MAY
13
2005
BEFORE
THE ILLTh4OIS POLLUTION CONTROL
BO~lfRrE
OF ILLINOIS
Pollution
Control Board
KAPP,
INC., an Illinois
)
Corporation,
)
)
Complainant,
)
PCBO5-
_____
)
HARTLEY
CARLTON,
individually,
)
(Enforcement
Land)
and d/b/a ONE HOUR CLEANERS,
)
)
Respondent.
)
NOTICE
OF FILING
TO:
SEE PERSONS ON ATTACHED
SERVICE LIST
PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that Ihave today filedwith the Office ofthe Clerk of
the Illinois Pollution Control Board an original and nine copies each ofthe
COMPLAINT of KAPP, INC., ENTRY OF APPEARNACE
OF
CHRISTINE
G.
ZEMAN and ENTRY
OF
APPEARANCE
OF J.
RANDLE
SCifiCK,
copies of
which are herewith served upon you.
Failure to file an answer to this complaint within 60 days may have severe
consequences.
Failure to answer will mean that all allegations in the complaint will be
taken as if admitted for purposes ofthis proceeding.
If you have any questions about this
procedure, you should contact the hearing officer assigned to this proceeding, the Clerk’s
Office or an attorney.
Respectfully submitted,
KAPP, INC.,
Complainant,
Dated:
May 11, 2005
By:
__________________
.~)neof Its Attorneys
Christine G. Zeman
J. Randle Schick
Of Counsel
HODGE DWYER ZEMAN
3150 Roland Avenue
Post Office Box
5776
Springfield, Illinois
62705-5776
(217)
523-4900
THIS FILING SUBMITTED ON RECYCLED PAPER

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
I, J. Randle Schick, the undersigned, certify that I have served the attached
COMPLAINT, ENTRY OF APPEARANCE
OF CHRISTINE G. ZEMAN and ENTRY
OF APPEARANCE OF J. RANDLE SCHICK, upon:
Ms. Dorothy M. Gunn
Clerk ofthe Board
Illinois Pollution Control Board
James R. Thompson Center
100 West Randolph Street
Suite 11-500
Chicago, Illinois
60601
by placing said copies
in the United States Mail, postage prepaid, in
Springfield, Illinois
on May 11, 2005;
and, upon:
Mr. Hartley L. Canton
91
Ridge Lane Drive
Decatur, Illinois
62521
by registered certifiedmail by placing said copies in the United States Mail, postage
prepaid, in Springfield, Illinois on May 11, 2005.
J. Randle Schick
KAPP:OO1/Fil/NOF &
COS
-
Complaint
2

RECEIVED
CLERK’S OFFICE
MAY
132005
BEFORE THE ILLINOIS POLLUTION CONTROL
1~TA1~E~OF
ILLINOIS
Pollution
Control Board
KAPP, INC., an Illinois
)
Corporation,
)
)
Complainant,
)
v.
)
PCBO5-
_____
)
HARTLEY CARLTON, individually,
)
(Enforcement
Land)
and dlb/a ONE HOUR CLEANERS,
)
)
Respondent.
)
COMPLAINT
NOW COMES the Complainant, KAPP,
INC., by its attorneys, HODGE
DWYER ZEMAN, pursuant to Section 31(d) ofthe Illinois Environmental Protection Act
(“Act”)
(415
ILCS
5/31(d)),
and 35
Ill. Admin. Code
§
103.200, and for its Complaint
against HARTLEY CARLTON, individually,
and dib/a ONE HOUR CLEANERS, states
as follows:
GENERAL
ALLEGATIONS
1.
Complainant,
KAPP, INC.,
(hereinafter referred to as “Kapp”) is an
Illinois
Corporation in good standing.
2.
Respondent, HARTLEY CARLTON, is an individual person, and at all
time relevant herein was doing business as One Hour Cleaners (hereinafter referred to
as
“Canton”).
3.
At all times relevantherein, Kapp has owned real estate which is located
at the southwest corner ofWest Grand Avenue and North Oakland Avenue in Decatur,
Macon County,
Illinois (hereinafter referred to as “the Site” or “Kapp’s property.”)

4.
The Site encompasses more than one
(1) acre and is composed ofeight (8)
parcels, as shown on the plat and legal description attached hereto and made a parthereof
as Exhibit A.
5.
At all relevanttimes herein, Kapp has rented commercial retail and office
space to various businesses and not-for-profit entities at each offive
(5)
addresses at the
Site, and these five
(5)
rental spaces are depicted in Exhibit B, attached hereto and made
a part hereof.
6.
Starting on or before 1979, Carlton operated a coin operated Laundromat
at the
1285 North Oakland address, and from 1989 to November 2001, Canton operated a
dry cleaning business at the
1133 West Grand address, depicted in Exhibit B,
which he
rented from Kapp (“Carlton’s facility”).
7.
On or about May 2000, Kapp entered into negotiations with a potential
buyer to purchase all or a portion ofthe Site from Kapp.
8.
Preliminary to that sale of the Site, Kapp and potential buyer cOntracted
with Environmental Audits and Consultants,
Inc. (“EACI”) to conduct a Phase I
Environmental Site Assessment (“ESA” or “Phase I Report”) ofthe Site.
9.
The purpose of the ESA was to gather background information about the
Site and the surrounding area and to identify any present or potential sources ofadverse
environmental impact on the soil, air, surface water and/or groundwater at, or adjacent to
the Site.
10.
Based upon its investigation, EACI found evidence ofrecognized
environmental conditions at the Site, including Canton’s dry cleaning facility, that could
potentially have impacted the Site and sale.
2

11.
In its Phase I Report, dated May 18, 2000, EACI stated that at the Carlton
dry cleaning facilitythat it found one (1)
100-gallon tank, which Mr. Carlton stated had
contained and stored tetrachioroethene (“PERC”) several months ago.
EACI also
found
other chemicals in the chemical storage area ofthe Canton facility, including bleach and
tnichioroethene (“TCE”), and observed staining on the concrete in this area.
12.
Based on a recommendation in its Phase IReport, EACI conducted a
Phase II Environmental Site Assessment (“Phase II Report”) for Carlton’s dry cleaning•
facility on June 7, 2000.
13.
Two (2) soil borings were obtained by EACIfrom the south side ofthe
Carlton facility at the location as shown in Exhibit B,
and both borings exhibited dry
cleaning contaminants (PERC
and TCE) in excess ofthe 35
Ill. Admin. Code Part 742,
Tier I Soil Remediation Objectives for Migration to Class I Groundwater and one (1) of
the borings was found to contain groundwater with concentrations ofPERC, ICE and
chloroform in excess ofTier I groundwater remediation objectives.
14.
The source ofthe release was identified in EACI’s June 27, 2000, Phase II
Report as Carlton’s dry cleaning facility.
15.
On or about June 2002, Carlton retained Northern Environmental
Technologies, Inc.
(“Northern”) to conduct a Focused Site Investigation (“FSI”) at 1133
West Grand Avenue, Decatur, Illinois.
16.
Northern advanced fifteen
(15)
soil boreholes and installed ten (10)
monitoring wells,
and sampled them to investigate the horizontal and vertical extent of
released PERC and TCE.
3

17.
Northern in its June
18,
2002, FSI concluded from its investigation that the
primary source of the release ofPERC and ICE
is located immediately outside the rear
doorof Canton’s dry cleaning facility, and that secondary sources ofPERC and ICE
contamination include the former coin-operated dry cleaning operations, sanitary sewer
lines and the former dry cleaning machine and hazardous waste storage associated with
Canon’s business.
18.
Northern concluded in its June 18, 2002, FSI that approximately 15,000
cubic yards ofsoil at the Site exceed the 35 Ill.
Admin. Code Part 742 Tier I Soil
Component ofthe Groundwater Ingestion Remedial Objectives for Class II Groundwater
for PERC and ICE,
as well as the Remedial Objectives for residential inhalation and
ingestion, industrial/commercial inhalation and ingestion and construction worker
inhalation route for PERC.
ICE in the soil at the Site also exceeds the Tier I Soil
Component ofthe Groundwater Ingestion Remedial Objective for Class II groundwater,
as well as chloroform in the soil at the
Site for that objective.
19.
Northern also
concluded in the FSI that concentrations ofPERC
exceeded
the Tier I Groundwater Remediation Objectives for Class II groundwater in an off-site
monitoring well located south
of 1133 West Grand Avenue.
20.
Despite a fmding ofa “significantvolume of contaminated soil at the Site”
in the June 2002,
FSI, Canton has failed to initiate remedial actions, despite numerous
communications from Kapp urging him to do so, at the Site.
21.
Canlton has not prepared a final corrective action plan that has been
approved by IEPA for the remediation of the PERC, ICE and chloroform contaminating
the Kapp property and property adjoining it.
4

22.
Canton has filed claims forreimbursement and received reimbursement
for the Focused Site Investigation and a Remedial Objectives Report, dated June 18,
2002, also prepared by Northern from the Drycleaners Environmental Response Trust
Fund Council ofIllinois.
23.
The contamination of the Site was caused by the acts and omissions of
Canton, in whole on in part, in causing or allowing the improperdisposal and release of
PERC, TCE and chloroform waste into the environment from his dry cleaning and coin
operated laundromat businesses.
COUNT I:
415
ILCS
5/12(a)
1-23.
Complainant hereby realleges and incorporates
the allegations of
Paragraphs
1
through 23 ofthe General Allegations above as Paragraphs
1
through 23 of
Count I.
24.
Section 12(a) of the Act, 415 ILCS
5/12(a), provides that no person shall:
(a)
Cause
on
threaten or allow the
discharge of any
contaminants
into the
environment in any
State
so as to
cause or tend to
cause
water pollution
in
Illinois,
either
alone
on
in
combination
with
matter
from
other
sources,
or
so
as
to
violate
regulations
or
standards adoptedby the Pollution Control Board under this Act.
415 ILCS 5/12(a).
25.
Section 3.165 of the Act, 415 ILCS 5/3.165, defmes “contaminant” as
follows:
5

“CONTAMINANT” is any solid, liquid, orgaseous matter, any odor, or
any form of energy, from whatever source.
415 ILCS 5/3.165.
26.
Section 3.185 ofthe Act, 415 ILCS 5/3.185, defines “disposal” as follows:
“DISPOSAL” means the discharge, deposit,
injection,
dumping,
spilling,
leaking or placing of any waste or hazardous waste into or on any land or
water or
into
any
well
so
that
such
waste
on
hazardous
waste
on
any
constituent thereofmay enter the environment or be emitted into the air or
discharged into
any waters, including ground waters.
415 ILCS 5/3.185..
27.
Section 3.545 ofthe Act, 415
ILCS
5/3.545,
defines “water pollution” as
follows:
“WATER
POLLUTION”
is
such
alteration
of
the
physical,
thermal,
chemical, biological or radioactive properties of any waters ofthe State, or
such discharge of any contaminant into
any waters of the
State, as will or
is likely to
create a nuisance or render such waters harmful or detrimental
or
injurious
to
public
health,
safety
or
welfare,
or
to
domestic,
commercial, industrial,
agricultural,
recreational, or other legitimate uses,
orto livestock, wild animals, birds, fish, or other aquatic life.
415
ILCS
5/3.545.
28.
Section 3.550 ofthe Act, 415
ILCS
5/3.550,
defines “water” as follows:
“WATER”
means
all
accumulations of water,
surface
and
underground,
natural,
and
artificial,
public
and
private,
or
parts
thereof,
which
are
wholly on partially within, flow through, orborder upon this State.
415
ILCS
5/3.550.
29.
The PCE, TCE and chloroform released and disposed ofat the Site by
Canton’s dry cleaning business, resulting in levels ofthose chemicals in soil and
groundwater above TACO Tier I levels, constitute “contaminants” as that term is defined
in the Act,
415 ILCS5/3.165.
6

30.
The PCE, ICE and chloroform were disposed, deposited and placed upon
or beneath the surface ofthe Site, and therefore were “discharged” into the environment.
31.
As
a result of his deposit of those material into the environment at the Site,
Carlton caused or tended to cause water pollution as that term is defmed in the Act, 415
ILCS
5/3.545.
.
32.
By not removing the PCE, ICE and chloroform from the soil and
groundwater ofthe Site and adjacent to the Site, Canton continues to threaten and allow
the discharge ofsuch contaminants into the environment, so as to cause ortend to cause
waterpollution in the
State ofIllinois,
and thereby continues to
violate Section
12(a) of
the Act, 415 ILCS
5/12(á).
WHEREFORE, for the above reasons, Complainant, Kapp prays that this Board
enter an order on this Count I declaring, adjudging and decreeing as follows:
(a)
that Respondent violated Section
12(a) ofthe Illinois
Environmental Protection Act, 415 ILCS 5/12(a);
(b)
that Respondent shall pay a civil penalty of$50,000 for each such
violation, pursuant to Section 42(a) ofthe Illinois Environmental
Protection Act, 415 ILCS
5/42(a);
(c)
that Respondent shall pay an additional civil penalty of$10,000 for
each day during which each such violation continued, pursuant to
Section 42(a) ofthe Illinois Environmental Protection Act, 415
ILCS 5/42(a);
(d)
that Respondent shall cease and desist from further violations of
Section
12(a) and all other Sections ofthe Illinois Environmental
Protection Act and the regulations promulgated under that Act, and
shall remediate any contamination remaining on Kapp’s Property
and adjacent to
Kapp’s property to levels less than the TACO Tier
I Residential Site Remediation Objective Levels for the Ingestion
Exposure Route, contained in 35 Ill. Admin.
Code Part 742, and
shall take any other remedial actions in response to the
contamination ofKapp’s Property and
adjacentto
Kapp’s property
that the Board deems appropriate; and
7

(e)
that Complainant, Kapp, shall be entitled to recover all other relief
that the Board deemsjust and proper in the premises.
COUNT H:
415
ILCS
5/12(d)
1-23.
Complainant hereby realleges and incorporates the allegations of
Paragraphs
1
through 23
ofthe General Allegations
above as Paragraphs
1
through 23
of
Count II and herebyrealleges and incorporates the allegations ofParagraphs
25 through
33 ofCount I as Paragraphs
25 through 33
of Count II.
34.
Section
12(d) ofthe Act, 415 ILCS 5/12(d), provides that no person shall:
(d)
Deposit any contaminants upon the land in such place
and
maimer so as to create a water pollution hazard.
415
ILCS 5/12(d).
35.
By not removing the PERC, ICE and chloroform deposited upon the land
in an uncontrolled or uncontained manner, Respondent allowed such contaminants to
remain deposited upon the land, so as to create a water pollution hazard, and
thereby
violated Section 12(d) ofthe Act, 415 ILCS 5/12(d).
WHEREFORE, for the above reasons, Complainant, Kapp, prays that this Board
enter an order on this Count II declaring, adjudging and
decreeing as follows:
(a)
that Respondent violated Section 12(d) ofthe Illinois
Environmental Protection Act,
415 ILCS 5/12(d);
(b)
that Respondent shall pay a civil penalty of $50,000 for each such
violation, pursuant to Section 42(a) of the Illinois Environmental
Protection Act, 415 .ILCS
5/42(a);
(c)
that Respondent shall pay an additional civil penalty of $10,000 for
each day during which each such violation continued, pursuant to
Section 42(a) of the Illinois Environmental Protection Act, 415
ILCS
5/42(a);
•.
8

(d)
that Respondent shall cease and desist from
further violations of
Section
12(d) and all other Sections of the Illinois Environmental
Protection Act and the regulations promulgated under that Act, and
shall remediate any contamination remaining on Kapp’s Property
and property adjacent to it to levels less than the TACO Tier I
Residential Site Remediation Objective Levels forthe Ingestion
Exposure Route, contained in 35
Ill. Admin.
Code Part 742, and
shall take any other remedial actions in response to the
contamination ofKapp’s Property and property adjacent to it that
the Board deems appropriate; and
(e)
that Complainant, Kapp, shall be entitled to
recover all other relief
that the Board deemsjust and proper in the premises.
COUNT III:
415 ILCS
5/21(e)
1-23.
Complainant hereby realleges and incorporates the allegations of
Paragraphs
1 through 23 ofthe General Allegations above as Paragraphs
1
through 23 of
Count III.
43.
Section 21(e) ofthe
Act, 415 ILCS
5/21(e), provides that:
No person shall:
(e)
Dispose, treat, store or abandon any waste.
.
.
except at a
site or facility which meets the requirements ofthis Act and
ofregulations and standards thereunder.
415 ILCS
5/21(e).
44.
Section 3.535 ofthe Act, 415 ILCS
5/3.535, defines “waste” as follows:
“WASTE” means any garbage, sludge from a waste treatment plant, water
supply treatment plant,
or air pollution control
facility or other discarded
material,
including solid,
liquid, semi-solid, or contained gaseous material
resulting
from industrial,
commercial,
mining and agricultural operations,
and
from
community
activities,
but
does
not
include
solid
or dissolved
material
in domestic
sewage, or solid or dissolved materials in irrigation
return flows, or coal combustion by-products
as
defined in
Section
3.135,
or industrial
discharges which
are point sources subject to permits
under
Section
402
of
the
Federal
Water
Pollution
Control
Act,
as
now
or
hereafter
amended,
or
source,
special
nuclear, or by-product materials
as
defined by the Atomic
Energy Act of 1954,
as amended
(68
Stat. 921) or
any
solid
or dissolved
material
from
any
facility subject to the Federal
Surface Mining
Control and Reclamation Act of 1977
(P.L.
95-87) or the
9

rules
and regulations thereunder or any law or rule or regulation adopted
by the State of Illinois pursuant thereto.
415 ILCS
5/3.535.
45.
Section 3.540 of the Act, 415 ILCS
5/3.540, defmes “waste disposal site”
as follows:
“WASTE DISPOSAL SITE” is a site on which
solid waste is disposed.
415 ILCS 5/3.540.
46.
Section 3.470 ofthe Act, 415 ILCS
5/3.470, defines “solid waste” as
follows:
“SOLID WASTE” means waste.
415 ILCS
5/3.470.
47.
Section 3.185 ofthe Act, 415 ILCS 5/3.185,
defines “disposal” as follows:
“DISPOSAL” means the discharge,
deposit, injection,
dumping,
spilling,
leaking or placing of any
waste or hazardous waste into or on
any land or
water or
into
any
well
so
that
such
waste
or
hazardous
waste
or
any
constituent thereofmay enter the environment
or be emitted into the air on
discharged into any waters, including ground waters.
415 ILCS 5/3.185.
48.
Section 3.445 of the Act, 415
ILCS 5/3.445, defines “sanitary landfill” as
follows:
“SANITARY LANDFILL” means a facility permitted by the Agency for
the disposal of waste
on
land meeting the requirements
of the Resource
Conservation and Recovery Act,
P.L.
94-580, and regulations
thereunder,
and
without creating nuisances
or hazards to public
health or safety, by
confining the refuse to the smallest practical volume and
covering it with a
layer of earth at the conclusion of each day’s operation, or by such other
methods and intervals as the Board may provide by regulation.
415 ILCS 5/3.445.
10

49.
The PCE, ICE and chloroform disposed ofat the Site was “discarded
material,” and therefore “waste” as that term is defined in
Sections 3.535 ofthe Act, 415
ILCS
5/3.535.
50.
By allowing such materials to be deposited at the Site, Respondent
allowed the materials to remain in or on the land so that suchmaterials and/or
constituents thereofcould enter the environment, and Kapp’s Property therefore
constitutes a “waste disposal site” forpurposes of415 ILCS 5/21(e).
51.
At the time that Respondent allowed the materials to be deposited on
Kapp’s Property, the Site was not permitted as a sanitary landfill by the Illinois
Environmental Protection Agency (“Agency” or “IEPA”) forthe disposal ofwaste
On
land, and thus the Site does not meet the requirements ofthe Act or the regulations for
waste disposal for purposes of415 ILCS 5/21(e).
52.
By allowing the disposal ofwaste PCE, ICE and chloroform at a disposal
site that does not fulfill the requirements of
a
sanitary landfill, Respondent violated~
Section 21(e) ofthe Act, 415 ILCS
5/21(e).
WHEREFORE, for the above reasons, Complainant, Kapp, prays that this Board
enter an order on this Count III declaring, adjudging and decreeing as follows:
(a)
that Respondent violated Section 21(e) ofthe Illinois
Environmental Protection Act, 415 ILCS
5/21(e);
(b)
that Respondent shall pay
a
civil penalty of$50,000 for each such
violation, pursuant to Section 42(a) ofthe Illinois Environmental
Protection Act, 415 ILCS 5/42(a);
(c)
that Respondent shall pay an additional
civil penalty of$10,000 for
each day during which each such violation continued,
pursuant to
Section 42(a) ofthe Illinois Environmental Protection Act, 415
ILCS
5/42(a);
11

(d)
that Respondent shall cease and desist from furtherviolations of
Section 21(e) and all other Sections ofthe Illinois Environmental
Protection Act and the regulations promulgatedunder that Act, and
shall remediate any contamination remaining on Kapp’s Property
and property adjacentto it to
levels less than the TACO Tier I
Residential Site Remediation
Objective Levels for the Ingestion
Exposure Route, contained in. 35 Ill. Admin.
Code Part 742,
and
shall take any other remedial actions in response to the
contamination of Kapp’s Property and property adjacent to it that
the Board deems appropriate; and
(e)
that Complainant,
Kapp, shallbe entitled to recover all other relief
that the Board deems just and proper in the premises.
Respectfully submitted,
KAPP, INC.,
Complainant,
By:________
bOne ofIts Attorneys
Dated:
May11, 2005
Christine G. Zeman
J. Randle Schick
Of Counsel
HODGE DWYER ZEMAN
3150 RolandAvenue
Post Office Box 5776
Springfield, Illinois
62705-5776
(217) 523-4900
KAPP:OOlfFil/Complaint
12

.iq.a’..
I
~—.,l,.,o.
——...
~s
~.~.54
~.._
1•-—
~
~—
.
/I~—~,j
‘a’
N
49’~.
___j..
_
-
.L1~.
_
AVE.

CHICAGO TITLE INSURANCE
COMPANY
COMMiTMENT
Folt
TITLE
INSURANCE
SCHEDULE
A(CONTINUED)
O*D$~ ?~O.,1612
12008S230
DEC
S.
TUE LAJ4D REFERREX)
TO IN
THIS
COMMITMENT
IS
DESCRLHED AS
FOLLOWSz
Parcel
1:
Coawnencing
1,75.2
feet
West
and
285
feet
South
of
the
North***t
corner
of
the
Southeast
1/4
of
Se’~tion
9,
Towpehip
16 North,
Range 2 Last of
the 3rd
P.M.,
thence South 45
feet,
thence Heat 145.2
feet,
thence North 45
fe~t.
thence
~aat to th. point
of beginning.
(gxcept coal
arid
Othet
min~ra1s
underlying
the
surface of said land and all r~ht~and eaesn~entein favor of the Estate
of
i*id
coal.
axtd other merals).
Situated in Macon County,
Illinois.
Parcel 2: Lot
1 in ~1ock
13
of 14±1192nd Addition of Outlots to the City of
Decatur,
Illinoje,
as per Plat recorded
in nook
536, Page
24
of~the
Records
in
the
Recorder’s
Office of Macon County,
I1lino~s. (Except COal. and.other minerals
underlying the surface of
said
land
and all righta and easements
in favor of the
Estate of ssid coal and other
rninex~le).
Situated
in Macon County,
tilinois.
PArcel
3:
beginning 30 feet South and 275.2 feet West of the Northeast corner
of
the Southe*at
1/4 of Secciozt
9,
Townahip 16 North,
Range 2 Eaet of
the
3rd
P.M.,
thence South 143
feet,
thenc~e14e~4S.2
feet, thence North 143 t.ct~thence
East
45.2 feet to the point of heginning.
(Except coal
arid
other
minerals underlying
the
surface
of said
land and
sU
rights and easements
in favor
~f
the Estate of
said coal and other minerals).
Situated in MacOn County,
~llinoiø,
Parcel
4.
aegiitning 30 feet
W~ac and
30
feet South of
a. scone at the Northeaec
corner of the Southeast 1/4
of Section
9, Township 16 North, Range
2 Esat of
the
3rd P.M., thence
W..t
1.45.2
feet.
thence South 140
feet1
thence
East
55.2
feet,
thence North 60 feet,
thence East
90
feet.
thence North ~O feet to the point of
~,ginning. (Except coal and
other
minerals
unida
ying
the surface of said land
and all rights and easements in favor of
the Estate of acid coal and other
minerals). Situated in Macon County,
Xlli.noia.
.
Parcel
5:
fleginning 30
feet
Webc
and
110 feet South of a atone
at
the
Northeact
corner
of the Southeast 1/4 of Section
9, Township
1.6 North,
Ra.flg~2 East of the
3cd
P.M.,
thence
South
60
feet,
thence West 90 feet,
thence North
40 feet to ~
point
ho
1~i~ ~Ut~
c5f
th~
lqb-*th
1.-me of
s-aid Sotheae-t
1/4,
thence Eaat
Spet
to
the
point
of
beginning.
(Except
coal,
and
other
minerals
underlying
the •~rface
of
~id
land and all,
rights
and
easements
in
favor
of the Estate of said coal and
other minerals)
.
Situated
in Macon County,
Illinois.
-
Parcel 6~beginning at
a point ~~75.2feet West and 173 feet South of the
Northeast
carrier of the So~thea.at 1/4 .~fSection
,,
rownehip
14
North,
Range 2
East of
the 3rd P.M.,
thence
West
145.2
feet
to
the
~ast.line of Hill Avenue,
thence South a).ong said line 112
feet.
th,n~e
East
145.2
feet.
thence North 112
feet to
the point of beginrii~g. (Except
coal, and other minerals underlying the
surface of said land and all rights and raaeii~ents
in
favor of the Estate of said
coal and other minerals).
Situated
in
Macon County,
Illinois.
Parcel
7:
fleginning
at
a
point
30
feet
West
and
170
feet South of
the Northeast
corner of the Sot*thea,~t
1/4
of
S*~ti~~ 9,
Township
16
Notch.
Range
2
East
of
the
Ird
P.M.,
thence West
145.2
feet,
thence
South
10
feet,
thence East 145.2
feet.
thence
North
to
th. point
of
beginning,
(Except coal and other minerals
under1yin~
the
surface
of
~iaid
1ar4 and
all.
rights and
easements
in
favor of the

CUCAGO
TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY
COMMITMENT
FOR
TITLE INSURANCE
SCHEDULE
A
(CONTINUED)
OR~1~~
HO..i 1612
120086230 DEC
Estate
of
said
coal.
arid
other
minerals).
Situated
in Macon County,
Il.linoie,
parcel
8:
Beginning
at
a
paint
175.2
feet
We*t
and
173
feet
South
of
the
Northeast
corner of
the
Southeast 1/4 of Section
9,
To~.mship
2.6
Nort2~, Range
2 East
of
the 3rd
P.M.,
thence
Weøt
100
feet,
thence North
2.43 feet to the South line of Grand Zwenu*,
thence East
along said
-line 100 feet,
thence
S
2~43 feet
to
the point of beginning.
(Except
coal and other minerala underlying the surf~ceof said land and all rights
and
easements
in
favor
of
the
Estate
of
said
coa..
and
ocher
minerals).
Situated
in
Macon
CouAty,
Illinois.
~1~E
A
3

FAMOUS
LEQtIORS
ENVLRONMEN1ALAUDPIS
AND
cONSULTAWIS,
INC
1111
N.
,TIH
STREET
~r::?~~=i
VANDALIA,
ILLINOIS
BEAUTY
SHOP
GARIED
NO
SCALE
W.
GRAND
AVE.
LEGEND
usr
SOILBORNG
LOCATION
PROPERTY
BOUNDARY
1N~INER~TOR
SITE
MAP
WiTH
SOIL
I3OIWiGLOCAIIONS

Back to top


PHASE
II
ESA
KAPP
PROPERTY
1133W.
GRAND
AVENUE
DECAIUR,
IlLINOIS

RECEIVED
CLERK’S OFFICE
BEFORE THE ILLiNOIS POLLUTION CONTROMYOt-\~QO5
c~4~pp,
INC.,
an Illinois
)
POHU
On COj~d
Corporation,
)
)
Complainant,
)
)
PCBO5-
_____
)
HARTLEY CARLTON, individually,
)
(Enforcement
Land)
and d!b/a ONE HOUR CLEANERS,
)
)
Respondent.
)
ENTRY OF APPEARANCE OF CHRISTINE G.
ZEMAN
NOW COMES Christine G. Zeman, ofthe law firm ofHODGE
DWYER
-
ZEMAN, and hereby enters her appearance on behalfofComplainant, KAPP, INC., in
the above-referenced matter.
Respectfully submitted,
KAPP, INC.,
Complainant,
Dated:
May 11, 2005
Christine G. Zeman
J. Randle Schick
Of Counsel
-
HODGE DWYER ZEMAN
3150
Roland Avenue
Post Office Box
5776
Springfield, Illinois
62705-5776
(217) 523-4900
KAPP:OO1IFi1IEOA
-
CGZ

BEFORE THE ILLINOIS POLLUTION CONTROL BOAR~E
C
E ~V ED
CLERK’S OFFICE
KAPP, INC., an Illinois
)
Corporation,
)
MAY
132005
TATE OF ILUNOtS
Complainant,
)
P~tIutiOn
Controt
Board
v.
)
PCBO5-
_____
)
HARTLEY CARLTON, individually,
)
(Enforcement
Land)
and dlb/a ONE HOUR CLEANERS,
)
)
-
Respondent.
)
-
ENTRY OF APPEARANCE OF J.
RANDLE
SCHICK
NOW COMES J. Randle Schick, ofcounsel to the law firm ofHODGE DWYER
ZEMAN, and hereby enters his appearance on behalfof Complainant, KAPP, iNC., in
the above-referenced matter.
Respectfully submitted,
KAPP, INC.,
Complainant,
By:__________
I
J. Randle Schick
Dated:
May 11, 2005
Christine G. Zeman
J. Randle Schick
Of Counsel
HODGE DWYER ZEMAN
3150 Roland Avenue
Post Office Box 5776
Springfield, Illinois
62705-5776
(217)
523-4900
KAPP:OO1/Fil/EOA
-
JRS

Back to top