ILLINOIS POLLUTION CONTROL BOARD
April
9, 1992
JAMES W. TURNER,
SR.,
)
Complainant,
v
)
PCB 91—148
(Enforcement)
DON FRA~KE,
)
Respondent.
ORDER OF THE BOARD
(by R.C. Flemal):
This matter comes before the Board on a motion for rehearing
filed by Don Franke
(Franke)
on March 25,
1992.
Franke states
that he retained counsel seven days before the hearing,
and did
not have adequate time to prepare his defense.
Franke also
alleges that although he did engage in discovery with the
complainant, complainant did not fully comply.
Franke requests a
rehearing in this matter pursuant to 35 Ill.
Adm. Code 103.240,
further asserting that the hearing was conducted in an unfair
manner.
Upon review of the record, the Board finds that the hearing
was conducted in a fair manner and that Franke had adequate
opportunity to present his defense.
In its February 27,
1992
opinion, the Board addressed the issue of an additional hearing:
At points during the hearing, the attorneys for
respondents in PCB 91-146 and PCB 91—148 joined in
objecting to certain dates of alleged noise occurrences
attested to by witnesses.
The objection was based on
the fact that these dates were not disclosed prior to
hearing through discovery and in the complaint,
resulting in alleged surprise.
The hearing officer
gave the respondents opportunity to come back on
another date to rebut anything they had heard.
The
attorney for respondent Franke refused, stating that no
rebuttal is necessary.
(Tr.
122.)
The Board finds
that there was an opportunity to cure any alleged
surprise; therefore the objection fails.
It is only after the Board rendered its determination in
favor of the complainant that Franke now desiresan additional
hearing.
The motion for rehearinq is denied.~
IT IS SO ORDERED.
132—75
—2—
Section 41 of the Environmental Protection Act,
Ill.
Rev.
Stat. 1991
ch.
111½ par.
1041, provides for appeal of final
orders of the Board within 35 days.
The Rules of the Supreme
Court of Illinois establish filing requirements.
I, Dorothy M. Gunn,
Clerk of the Illinois Pollution Control
Board~hereby certify
t t1~eabove order was adopted on the
~
day of
_________________,
1992, by a vote of
A
Il
Control Board
132—76