ILLINOIS POLLUTION CONTROL BOARD
June
20,
1991
SAFETY—KLEEN CORP.,
Petitioner,
V.
)
PCB 91—94
)
(Permit Appeal)
ILLINOIS ENVIRONMENTAL
PROTECTION AGENCY,
)
)
Respondent.
ORDER OF THE BOARD
(by B.
Forcade):
On June 12,
1991,
Safety—Kleen Corp.
filed a petition for
hearing to review certain conditions imposed by the Illinois
Environmental Protection Agency in its RCRA closure plan-
permit.
This matter
is accepted for hearing.
This matter concerns closure and post—closure care issues,
and the parties are particularly directed to Board Opinions and
Orders
in Browning—Ferris Industries
v.
EPA,
PCB
84—136, May
5,
1988,
aff’d,
179 Iii. App.
3d 598,
534 N.E.2d 616
(2d Dist.
1989); Marley—Ingrid (USA),
Inc.
v. EPA, PCB 88—17, January 19,
1989;
and Testor Corp.
v.
EPA, PCB 88—191, November 2,
1989 for
discussions of standards of review and burdens of proof.
The
only issues before the Board are whether correct permitting
procedures were followed and whether the application demonstrates
that the Environmental Protection Act and Board regulations will
or will not be violated.
For each contested condition,
the Board expects, and
strongly encourages the parties to state the applicable
regulatory law and relevant facts,
with appropriate record
citations, which demonstrate that a violation is likely or
unlikely to occur.
The parties are urged to focus on RCRA
Update, USEPA Regulations, R87—39, February 25,
1988 and June 16,
1988 and R87—26, December
3,
1987.
Hearing must be scheduled within 14 days of the date of this
Order and completed within 60 days of the date of this Order.
The hearing officer
shall inform the Clerk of the Board of the
time and location of the hearing as expeditiously as possible but
at least
40 days
in advance of hearing so that public notice of
hearing may be published.
After hearing, the hearing officer
shall submit an exhibit list, and all actual exhibits to the
Board within
5 days
of the hearing.
Any briefing schedule shall
provide for final filings as expeditiously as possible and in
rio
event later than 70 days from the date of this Order.
—2—
If after appropriate consultation with the parties,
the
parties fail
to provide an acceptable hearing date
or
if after an
attempt the hearing officer
is unable to consult with the
parties, the hearing officer
shall unilaterally set a hearing
date in conformance with the schedule above.
This schedule will
tnly provide the Board a very short time period to deliberate and
reach a decision before the due date.
The hearing officer and
the parties are encouraged to expedite this proceeding as much as
possible.
Within 10 days
of accepting this case,
the Hearing Officer
shall enter
a Hearing Officer Scheduling Order governing
completion of the record.
That Order
shall
set a date certain
for each aspect of the case
including:
briefing schedule,
hearing date(s), completion of discovery
(if
necessary) and pre—
hearing conference
(if necessary).
The Hearing Officer
Scheduling Order may be modified
by entry of a complete new
scheduling order conforming with the time requirements belcw.
The hearing officer may extend this schedule only on a
waiver of the decision deadline by the petitioner and only
for
the equivalent or fewer number of days that the decision deadline
is waived.
Such waivers must be provided in writing
to the Clerk
of the Board.
Any waiver must be an
t1open waiver”
or
a waiver
of
decision until a date certain.
Because of requirements regarding the publication of notice
of hearing,
no scheduled hearing may be canceled unless the
petitioner provides an open waiver or
a waiver to a date at
least
120 days beyond the date of the motion to cancel hearing.
This
should allow ample time for the Board to republish notice of
hearing and receive transcripts from the hearing before the due
date.
Any order by the hearing officer granting cancellation of
hearing shall include a complete new scheduling order with a new
hearing date at least 40 days in the future and at least
30 days
prior
to the new due date and the Clerk of the Board shall be
promptly informed of the new schedule.
Because this proceeding
is
the type for which the Illinois
Environmental Protection Act sets
a very short statutory deadline
for making a decision, absent a waiver,
the Board will grant
extensions or modifications only in unusual circumstances.
Any
such motion must set forth an alternative schedule for notice,
hearing, and final submissions, as well as the deadline for
decision, including response time to such a motion.
However, no
such motion shall negate the obligation of
the hearing officer
to
establish a Scheduling Order pursuant to the requirements of this
Order, and to adhere to that Order until modified.
This Order will not appear
in the Board’s Opinion Volumes.
IT
IS SO ORDERED.
—3—
I,
Dorothy M. Gunn,
Clerk of the Illinois Pollution Control
Board, hereby certi,~that the above Order was adopted on9e
~
day of
__________________,
1991, by a vote of
_______
Illinois
lution Control Board