1. 0135-0185

ILLINOIS POLLUTION CONTROL BOARD
July 30,
1992
CITY OF FREEPORT,~
)
)
Petitioner,
)
v.
)
PCB 92—103
(Underground Storage
ILLINOIS ENVIRONMENTAL
)
Tank Reimbursement)
PROTECTION AGENCY,
)
)
Respondent.
ORDER OF THE BOARD
(by B. Forcade):
On July 15,
1992, City of Freeport filed a petition for
review of an Underground Storage Tank Reimbursement Determination
for its facility located at 1001 North Island.
This matter
is
accepted for hearing.
A review of the correspondence filed to date in this matter
indicates there may be some confusion as to the nature of a
proceeding of this type before the Board.
In proceedings before
the Board, the buraen is upon the petitioner to establish at a
formal hearing, by oral testimony under oath or by properly
submitted written documents,
that the disputed costs should be
paid under the terms of the Environmental Protection Act, and
applicable regulations.
Petitioner must present facts and
arguments as to why those costs should be paid in order to
prevail.
The initial burden at hearing to explain why the costs
were not paid is not upon the Agency.
Hearing must be scheduled within 14 days of the date of thjs
order and completed within 60 days of the date of this order.
The hearing officer shall inform the Clerk of the Board of the
time and location of the hearing at least 40 days in advance of
hearing so that public notice of hearing may be published.
After
hearing, the hearing officer shall submit an exhibit list, and
all actual exhibits to the Board within
5 days of the hearing.
Any briefing schedule shall provide for final filings as
expeditiously as possible and in no event later than 70 days from
the date of this order.
If after appropriate consultation with the parties, the
parties fail to provide an acceptable hearing date or if after an
attempt the hearing officer is unable to consult with the
parties,
the hearing officer shall unilaterally set a hearing
date in conformance with the schedule above.
This schedule will
only provide the Board a very short time period to deliberate and
reach a decision before the due date.
The hearing officer and
the parties are encouraged to expedite this proceeding as much as
possible.
0135-0185

2
Within 10 days of accepting this case, the Hearing Officer
shall enter a Hearing Officer Scheduling order governing
completion of the record.
Thatorder shall set a date certain
for each aspect of the case including:
briefing schedule,
hearing date(s), completion of discovery
(if necessary)
and pre—
hearing conference
(if necessary).
The Hearing Officer
Scheduling order may be modified by entry of a complete new
scheduling order conforming with the time requirements below.
The hearing officer may extend this schedule only on a
waiver of the decision deadline by the petitioner and only for
the equivalent or fewer number of days that the decision deadline
is waived.
Such waivers must be provided in writing to the Clerk
of the Board.
Any waiver must be an “open waiver” or a waiver of
decision until a date certain.
Because of requirements regarding the publication of notice
of hearing, no scheduled hearing may be canceled unless the
petitioner provides an open waiver or a waiver to a date at least
120 days beyond the date of the motion to cancel hearing.
This
should allow ample time for the Board to republish notice of
hearing and receive transcripts from the hearing before the due
date.
Any order by the hearing officer granting cancellation of
hearing shall include a complete new scheduling order with a new
hearing date at least 40 days in the future and at least 30 days
prior to the new due date and the Clerk of the Board shall be
promptly informed of the new schedule.
Because this proceeding is the type for which the Illinois
Environmental Protection Act sets avery short statutory deadline
for making a decision, absent a waiver, the Board will grant
extensions or modifications only in unusual circumstances.
Any
such motion must set forth an alternative schedule for notice,
hearing, and final submissions, as well as the deadline for
decision, including response time to such a motion.
However, no
such motion shall negate the obligation of the hearing officer to
establish a Scheduling order pursuant to the requirements of this
order, and to adhere to that order until modified.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
I,
Dorothy M. Gunn,
Clerk of the Illinois Pollution Control
~
hereby certif
hat the above order was adopted on ~he
~1(’~-i~
day of
___________________,
1992, by a vote of
~
~Dorothy
M.
Gupfi,
Clerk
Illinois Pol(y’tion
Control Board
0135-0186

Back to top