ILLINOIS POLLUTION CONTROLBOARD
    R
    E C E ~V E D
    CLERK’S OFFICE
    COUNTY OF VERMILION, ILLINOIS,
    )
    )
    OCT-12004
    Complainant,
    STATE OF
    ILLINOIS
    )
    AC No.
    04-22
    Pollution Control Board
    v.
    )
    )
    County File No. 03-03
    VILLAGE OF
    TILTON,
    )
    )
    Respondent.
    )
    BRIEF OF COMPLAINANT
    On June
    25,
    2003, Doug Toole, a health inspectorwith the Vermilion County
    Health Department, inspected the propertyof Mildred Butler,
    located near the corner of
    15th
    Street and
    1st
    Street in the Village of Tilton, Vermilion County, Illinois.
    Doug Toole
    inspected the property due to a complaint that the Health Department had received
    concerning solid waste on the property.
    Upon inspection, Doug Toole observed waste on
    the property.
    As a result ofthis inspection, Mildred Butler was given a compliance
    date
    forwhen she needed
    to have her property cleaned up, and the waste properly disposed of.
    In July 2003, Mildred Butler told Doug Toole that the Village ofTilton had an option to
    purchase her property, and that they were now in charge ofcleaning up the property.
    Doug Toole spoke to David Phillips, Mayor of the Village ofTilton, on July 7, 2003 and
    he confirmed that the Village of Tilton had an option to purchase Mildred Butler’s
    property, and was in the process of cleaningup the property.
    On August
    25,
    2003, Doug Toole re-inspected the property ofMildred Butler, to
    confirm that the Village ofTilton had removed the solid waste from the property.
    Upon
    arrival, Doug Toole observed that the items that had been scattered throughout the

    property at the June
    25,
    2003 inspection had now been centralized in one pile and had
    been burned.
    In the pile ofwaste was brush, branches, scrap metal, demolition debris,
    boards, fencing, and rims and
    steel belts
    from tires.
    Doug Toole observed the pile of
    waste to be smoldering,
    observed scorch marks, and could smell smoke emanating from
    the pile ofwaste.
    Doug Toole then spoke to Mayor Phillips on August 26, 2003
    concerning the burning pile ofwaste that he had observed on the property on August 25,
    2003.
    Mayor Phillips told Doug Toole that workers from the Village ofTilton piled the
    debris and burned the brush and other items.
    As
    a result of the Village of Tilton’s
    actions, the Village was cited with violating the Environmental Protection Act,
    415
    ILCS
    5/21
    @)(3).
    The Environmental Protection Act provides that no person shall “cause or allow
    the open dumping of any waste in a maimer which results in.. .open burning,”
    415
    ILCS
    5/21 (p)(3).
    The Environmental Protection Act defines “open dumping” as “the
    consolidation ofrefuse from one or more sources at a disposal
    site that does not fulfill the
    requirements ofa sanitary landfill,”
    415
    ILCS
    5/3.305.
    “Refuse” means “waste,”
    415
    ILCS
    5/3.3
    85.
    “Waste” is defined as “any garbage.
    .
    .or other discarded material,
    including
    solid, liquid, semi-solid, or contained gaseous material resulting from
    industrial, commercial, mining and
    agricultural operations, and from community
    activities..
    .,“
    415
    ILCS
    5/3.535.
    The Village of Tilton caused or allowed open dumping of waste on the property
    ofMildred Butler.
    It is not disputed that during all times relevant to this complaint,
    Mildred Butler owned the property at issue.
    It is also not in dispute, that the Village of

    Tilton, during all times relevant to this complaint, had an option to purchase the property
    at issue and had taken control ofcleaning up the property.at issue.
    Environmental Protection Agency v. Pollution Control Board and John Vander,
    579
    N.E.2d 1215 (1991), speaks directly to the issue
    at hand.
    In this case, John Vander
    demolished two buildings
    and then set fire to the debris on the site where the buildings
    had stood.
    The Environmental Protection Agency then issued an administrative citation
    against John Vander charging him with “having caused or allowed the open dumping of
    waste in a maimer which resulted in litter and open burning...”
    Id. at
    1216.
    The
    Pollution Control Board ruled that John Vander had not violated the Environmental
    Protection Act because his conduct did not constitute “open dumping” within the
    Environmental Protection Act’s definition.
    However, the Appellate Court reversed the
    Pollution Control Board’s ruling and found that John Vander’s actions did constitute
    “open dumping.”
    The Court held that” ‘open dumping’ happens not when refuse is
    consolidated at the point ofdemolition, but when it is consolidated at a
    disposal
    site.
    .
    .Thus, there must be more than demolition.
    There must also be
    ‘disposal,’, which is
    defined as ‘the discharge, deposit, injection,
    dumping, spilling,
    leaking or placing of any
    waste.
    .
    .into or on any land.
    .
    .
    so that such waste.
    .
    .may enter the environment or be
    emitted into the air...”
    Id. at 1217.
    “The demolition site became the disposal site when
    Vander decided to incinerate the debris there instead ofmoving it away.”
    Id. at 1218.
    In the case at hand,
    the property became a disposal sitewhen the Village ofTilton
    deposited and burned the pile ofwaste, therefore causing the waste to
    enter the
    environment and be emitted into the
    air.
    Since the Village ofTilton’s actions caused the
    property to be a disposal site, and the Village of Tilton consolidated the waste from the

    property into one pile on the land, the Village ofTilton caused or allowed open dumping.
    Whether the Village of Tilton placed the waste on the property is not an issue.
    The
    Village ofTilton had control ofthe property from at least July 7, 2003 until the
    inspection ofAugust 25, 2003.
    The Village of Tilton gathered the items that were
    scattered across the property and placed them in one pile ofwaste,
    therefore
    consolidating the waste.
    The pile ofwaste observed by Doug Toole on August 25, 2003
    clearly meets the definition of “open dumping,” the Village ofTilton engaged in open
    burning by burning the pile ofwaste; therefore the Village ofTilton is in violation ofthe
    Environmental Protection Act, 415 ILCS
    5/21 (p)(3).
    ~
    ‘1
    i;~4
    U
    ~
    ~
    C
    Frank R
    Young
    State’s Attorney for Vermilion County
    By:
    Jennifeji’~igg~)’
    U
    Assist(~State’s Attorney
    Prepared by:
    Jennifer Riggs
    Office ofthe State’s Attorney
    7 N. Vermilion St.
    Danville, IL 61832
    217-554-7750

    Back to top