ILLINOIS
POLLUTION CONTROL BOARD
January 30, 1973
DEAN PENN and
WALTER
DEENIE
)
#72—432
V.
ENVIRONMENTAL
PROTECTION
AGENCY
DEAN
PENN
and
WALTER
DEEMIE,
PRO
SE
LARRY
EATON,
ASST.
ATTORNEY
GENERAL,
ON
BEHALF
OF
ENVIRONMENTAL
PROTECTION
AGENCY
OPINION AND ORDER OF THE BOARD
(BY SAMUEL T.
LAWTON,
JR.):
On August 15,
1972,
in case entitled Environment Protection Agency
v. Dean N.
Penn and Walter Deemie, #72—189, we entered the following
order:
“1.
Respondents shall cease and desist from causing or allowing
open dumping of garbage and refuse in their dump site
located near Peoria,
Illinois.
2.
Respondents shall apply for an Agency permit to conduct
fill
operations
no later than August 31,
1972.
3.
In the event that as a result of failure or inaction on
the part of Respondents no permit
is obtained by December 31,
1972,
the dump site will be closed permanently with final
cover.
4.
Respondents shall within 35 days after receipt of this Order
pay a penalty of $750.00 by check payable to Fiscal Services
Division, Environmental Protection Agency,
2200 Churchill
Drive, Springfield,
Illinois 62706.
This shall be the respon-
sibility of Respondents jointly and severally.”
On November
3,
1972,
we received a petition for variance.
It is
difficult to tell from the petition precisely what relief the petition-
ers seek.
The record indicates that while paragraph
4 of the Order
with respect to the fine has been complied with,
the petitioners
have not ceased dumping at the site and have not obtained a permit
from the Agency to continue the operation of the facility as a
dump
site.
The substance of petitionerst request appears
to be that they
are seeking the right to continue the operation of the dump site
facility without a permit from the Agency.
Discussion
between
6
—
669
petitioners and Agency personnel has taken place since the August 15,
1972 Order.
The Agency has proposed that the dump site be improved
with a clay filler to prevent leachate into the underlying aquifer.
This proposal did not meet with petitioner’s approval and evidently,
the discussions with respect to the permit ceased.
Testimony at the hearing brought out that the landfill site
is
an abandoned sand pit in which approximately 85 feet of fill has al-
ready been deposited,
leaving approximately 15 or 20 feet remaining.
Both petitioners and Agency personnel questioned the suitability of
placing the clay floor on top of the already deposited refuse.
The
suggestion was made that final cover and compacting might achieve
the same purpose.
However., evidence indicates that petitioner’s desire
to continue the dumping of refuse for as long as two years, during which
time no
final cover would be applied and during which time the perco-
lation and leachate conditions would continue.
Accordingly, we do
not feel that an adequate demonstration of hardship has been made
before us on which a variance could be granted.
In any event, we are
certainly not disposed to authorizing petitioners to operate
their facility without a permit from the Agency if, indeed,
this
is what
is being sought by the variance.
The variance petition filed by Dean Penn and Walter Deemie is
denied.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
I,
Christa:
~linois Pollution Control Boa~rd,
certify
thL
..
tne abovt~~~ion
and Order was adopted on the
.3~
‘~‘
day
of
January,
1973,
by
a
vote
of
‘~
—
to
~
~
—2—
6
—
670