ILLINOIS POLLUTION CONTROL BOARD
    August 15, 1985
    VILLAGE OF OS~1EGO,
    )
    Petitioner,
    vs.
    )
    PCB 85—106
    ILLINOIS ENVIRONMENTAL
    )
    PROTECTION AGENCY,
    )
    Respondent.
    INTERIM ORDER OF THE BOARD
    (by R.
    C. Flemal):
    By action of the Board
    this day pursuant to Section 5.02 of
    the Illinois Administrative Procedure Act as provided
    in
    ill.
    Rev. Stat.
    ch.
    lll’/2par.
    1027(c), the Proposed Amendments to
    Public water Supply Regulations
    (35 Ill. Adm. Code 602.105 and
    602.106), docketed
    as R85—14,
    have been enacted as
    an emergency
    rule.
    The emergency rule provision was invoked
    to allow
    temporary adoption of the provisions of R85—l4 pending ultimate
    and permanent resolution of this matter.
    The effect of the Board’s immediate action
    is that for the
    next 150 days,
    no community may be denied an Agency permit
    required for water main extensions for the reason of delivering
    finished water containing levels of fluoride, combined
    radium 226
    and radium
    228, or gross
    alpha particle activity in excess of the
    Board’s regulations,
    as long as the delivered water has:
    1)
    a fluoride concentration less than or equal
    to
    4 mg/l;
    and
    2)
    a combined radium 226 and radium
    228 concentration less
    than or
    equal
    to
    20 pCi/l;
    and
    3)
    gross alpha particle activity (including
    radium 226 but
    excluding
    radon and uranium) concentration less than or
    equal
    to
    60 pCi/i.
    Moreover,
    any community whose only violations are within the
    parameters outlined above will not be placed on Restricted Status
    during
    the 150 day period.
    Thus, during this period water main
    extensions, previously denied under
    35
    Ill.
    Adm, Code 602.105 an~3
    602.106 solely because of fluoride, combined radium,
    or gross
    alpha violations,
    singly or
    in combination and subject to the
    above limitations, will
    be permitted.
    Because Petitioner’s
    variance request
    is based on delivered water with combined radium
    226 and radium 228 greater than
    5 pCi/l but less than 20 pCi/l,
    65-295

    —2—
    the Board
    notes
    that during
    the 150 day pendency
    of the emergency
    rule Petitioner does not need
    the variance
    it has requested.
    The Board further notes that
    if the Proposed Amendments to
    Public dater Supply Regulations are adopted as
    a permanent rule
    Petitioner will have relief identical
    to its variance request
    until January
    1,
    1989, and Board consideration of the requested
    variance would be duplicitous.
    Due
    to the uncertainty regarding
    the timeframe for final action on R85—14,
    however,
    the Board
    cannot definitively state that the amendments proposed
    in R85—14
    will be promulgated by the end of the
    150 day period.
    It appears
    to the Board that
    in light these considerations,
    Petitioner has three options respecting
    its pending variance
    request.
    First, Petitioner could move
    to withdraw its
    petition.
    Such withdrawal would be without prejudice,
    and
    Petitioner would thereby retain the right to refile
    the petition
    at
    a later date.
    Second, Petitioner could elect to waive the time for
    decision on
    its pending variance petition,
    thereby removing the
    deadl~nethe Board
    faces regarding issuance of
    a final decision
    on the\petition.
    The amount of time waived for decision,
    if
    any,
    is wholly
    at the discretion of
    the
    Petitioner.
    Eithe’~of these two options would afford Petitioner the
    opportunity
    to consider
    a response appropriate
    to the ultimate
    resolution of R85—14,
    or
    to such other actions
    as might bear on
    Petitioner’s need for variance relief.
    Finally, Petitioner could choose neither
    of the options
    described above and stand by its petition as presently filed with
    the Board.
    In that case,
    the Board will take final action on the
    petition within the statutory 90 day decision period.
    Should Petitioner
    desire either
    to move for withdrawal or
    waive
    the time for
    decision,
    it should do so within
    15 days from
    the date of this Order.
    IT IS SO ORDERED.
    I, Dorothy M.
    Gunn, Clerk of the Illinois Pollution Control
    Board, herebj~certifythat the ~bove Interim Order was adopted on
    the
    /5~i~~
    day of
    ~-i~,-t~-.-4-
    ,
    1985,
    by
    a vote
    of
    7—O
    .
    Dorothy N. Gunn, Clerk
    Illinois Pollution Control Board
    65-296

    Back to top