ILLINOIS POLLUTION CONTROL BOARD
    April
    1,
    1987
    DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY,
    )
    Petitioner,
    v.
    )
    PCB 87—38
    ILLINOIS ENVIRONMENTAL
    )
    PROTECTION AGENCY,
    )
    )
    Respondent.
    ORDER
    OF THE BOARD
    (by
    B.
    Forcade):
    On March
    23, 1987,
    the Department of
    the Army
    (“Army”)
    filed
    a petition for extension of prior variance.
    That petition
    seeks
    a five—year extension of
    a variance granted
    in PCB 84—86
    (October
    25,
    1984).
    The Board has reviewed the variance petition
    in light of the
    relief requested and the terms
    of the prior variance and finds
    that the petition
    is deficient in several respects:
    1.
    Paragraph
    8
    of
    the petition makes refer-
    ence
    to
    the
    sampling
    and
    analysis
    data
    acquired
    under
    the
    terms
    of
    the
    prior
    variance, but fails to include the data.—
    The
    Army
    must
    provide
    all
    testing
    and
    analysis
    data
    which
    was
    acquired
    under
    the
    prior variance
    to
    the
    Board,
    as well
    as any reports evaluating that data;
    2.
    Paragraph
    5(c)
    of
    the
    petition
    makes
    reference
    to
    the
    planning
    for
    confined
    upland
    disposal
    facilities
    required
    by
    paragraph
    7 of the
    prior Order but
    fails
    to
    include
    that
    information.
    The
    Board
    will
    be
    unable
    to
    determine whether con-
    fined upland disposal would constitute
    an
    arbitrary or unreasonable hardship to the
    Army
    unless
    detailed
    information
    on
    the
    cost
    estimates
    and
    implementation
    dif-
    ficulties
    is presented
    to the Board;
    and
    77-60

    —2—
    3.
    Paragraph
    3
    of
    the petition requests in-
    corporation
    by
    reference
    of
    the
    entire
    record
    from
    the
    prior
    proceedings;
    this
    is not possible.
    In the prior proceeding
    (PCB
    84—86),
    the
    Army
    filed
    an
    amended
    petition supplying the Board with
    a large
    amount
    of
    information.
    That
    amended
    petition
    requested
    (
    3,
    Amend.
    Pet.,
    filed
    August
    13,
    1984),
    that
    the docu-
    ments
    be
    returned
    to
    the
    Army when
    they
    had
    served
    the
    Board’s
    purpose.
    The
    Board,
    in
    its
    October
    25,
    1984,
    Order
    denied
    the
    request
    to withdraw the docu-
    ments
    but
    invited
    the Army to borrow the
    documents and return clear
    photocopies
    to
    the
    Board.
    The
    Board
    has
    not been
    able
    to
    determine
    whether
    the
    Army
    borrowed
    the
    documents,
    but
    in
    any
    event,
    the
    documents
    are
    not
    presently
    in
    the
    Board’s
    possession.
    The
    Board
    has
    the
    complete
    set
    of
    documents
    introducted
    in
    the
    1983 proceeding
    (PCB
    83—25),
    but
    the
    documents
    from
    the
    1984
    proceeding
    are
    missing.
    A list of the missing documents
    is
    attached
    to
    today’s Order.
    As
    a con-
    sequence,
    the Board cannot incorporate
    by
    reference
    the
    record
    from prior proceed-
    ings.
    The
    Board
    will
    incorporate
    by
    reference
    prior Opinions and Orders.
    If
    the
    Army
    believes
    there
    are
    documents
    upon which
    the
    Board must rely
    to make
    a
    final determination
    in this matter,
    those
    documents must be physically submitted
    in
    this proceeding.
    Unless
    an amended petition
    is filed within
    45 days curing
    the above—noted defects,
    this matter will be subject
    to dismis-
    sal.
    Additionally, paragraph
    7
    of the petition seems to
    request
    variance
    to allow dredging
    in the LaGrange pool area pursuant
    to
    401 Water Quality Certification Log.
    No. C—157—82
    (revised).
    The
    Army
    is free to conduct
    its maintenance dredging and correlated
    discharge of dredge material without Board
    action
    for those
    sediments and disposal procedures which pass the Agency 401
    Certification procedures
    (Department of the Army v.
    IEPA,
    PCB 83—
    25, July
    26,
    1983,
    p.
    4).
    The Army is requested
    to elaborate on
    what relief
    is
    being requested as
    it relates
    to the LaGrange
    pool.
    IT
    IS
    SO ORDERED.
    77-61

    —3—
    I, Dorothy
    M.
    Gunn, Clerk
    of the Illinois Pollution Control
    Board, hereby certify that the above
    Order was adopted on
    the
    ~
    day of
    ______________,
    1987,
    by a vote ~f
    ~—.C
    ~4k;~~7
    ~2)
    Dorothy
    M.
    Gunn, Clerk
    Illinois Pollution Control Board
    77-62

    Back to top