ILLINOIS
POLLUTION
C3kTT~3L
ILCAPD
March
7,
1972
GODFREY
TOWNSHIP
UTILITY
BOAPD
v~
)
P0.3
72—60
EN7IRONBtENTAL
PROTECTION
hGENCY
OPINION
OF
THE
BOARD
(by
Mr;
XissaJ
The
Cod
frey
Townshio
U
LL1:L
Lv
Bcard
(
“Taavrishiu
Ii. led
a
petition
on
February
23,
3.972,
~atinrj
a
~a:ianca
loom
~t~o
Pollution
Control
Board
Lor
its
n:~—cu1i
lo~oons
at:
~aun~j~
blood,
Black
Creek
and
CoaL
Branch
arid
for
I
L5
::Lrea--ca
aacjooris
at
Waoror~—LevLs
and
Monticello,
Th~ Tomnship
asks
ala
tan
!loacd
grant
it
a
one—year
variance
is.
o~d~i that
it
con
co;alLeta
Laoa
and
cons truction
of
irapro\remnr:tn
to
3
to
nXiota::Cr
~yo
t.~-n.
The
Lcmn—
ship
on LLnateo
that
sur:h
~nrtCv3c2n;..o
c.:annou
ha
comc~.uted ostil
Februar~
1974
,
about
a
a
halL I
af
Lao
do
.na
date
in
st~7:-
14
fo~
~
~
~r:~
‘~wrnl
:r;
aloe
asks
thn~
the
Laard
lift
the
scuar
conaact
~Oa
has
~:io~~
tlinA~oncv
has
jam-
posed
ar1
the
Township
due
to
Lb
.~
an
aly
o~acv~overloacio.d
condition
of
the
lagoons
at
prenena
On
the
face
of
the
petition,
the
Board
a’cu~d have
no
caoicc
but
to
deny
the
Township~o
sequent.
ho
indication
in
g~von as
to
why
it
is
necessary
to
~ait
until
.Lobruary
,
1974,
for
ca:n::etion
of
the
new
treatment
facilities.
In
addition,
the
To.•:nnain
nra
thn~
the
Board
lift
the
newer
ban
eton
thoaql
tha
Tc.a’r:sh.In
ap:.or
:o LI
plans
no
interim
measures
to
raise
its
effluant
quaii
to.
Pal
thit~
I,
submitted
with
the
variance
petition,
praneitaJy
shows
an
cffluar~
quality
~reatly
in
eacess
of
state
standards,
Further,
we
‘aoulcli
ca3
1
thu
Township’s
attentfcn
~o
Sections
194
~c)
(iii.1
,
and
404(1)
(1)
of
the
Water
Quality
St.
r1daods
(R7l~-1.4
adc~ted
March
7,
:1.972)
~
it
nertairs
to
she
aeration
of
a
threc—stagn
lagoon.
Sa.nce
1113. a
case
doos
co~~eerri.s
municinali
tan
ehi cii
Oas
&paa;ec~tly
been
acting
in
qooJ.
faith,
we
will
not
oismii~a this
petit.~on
“uc
CL~o~5n~i
cvlnVlrrOrif
~
1(5L.~_Oi
Agency,
P0:9
72—94,
dated
enruary
2:.
,
1.C)
72,
dathor
,
a
God nitty
TcMnseop
Utility
Board
will
be
giver:
an
additional
cwcntv
(203
days
wi thin
which
to
file
an
amended
variance
etit-.:Lon
do Lail.ing
the
reasons
for
1-lu-’
delay.
I,
CI’::itafl
I..
4otfott,
ClcsrI:
cC
the
Pojiutiort
Conttol
tzr.rd,
cer’tii!Y
tn~t t.~o
Board
t~~iptc’.ithe
abn7’t
Cr~iaiofl en~ Order
this
clay
oZ
!aroh,
1972,
Is’
e’vcte
of
____
/.
s—pu