ILLINOIS POLLUTION CONTROL BOARD
July 13,
1989
ILLINOIS ENVIRONMENTAL
PROTECTION AGENCY,
Complainant,
V.
)
PCB 88—201
CITY OF MARION, a municipal
corporation, and MARION PEPSI
COLA BOTTLING COMPANY,
INC.,
a Missouri corporation,
Respondents.
OPINION AND ORDER OF THE BOARD (by J.
Anderson):
On December 14,
1988,
the Illinois Environmental Protection
Agency (Agency) and the City
of Marion
(Marion) and the Marion
Pepsi Cola Bottling Company
(Company)
filed
a Stipulation and
Proposal
for Settlement
(Stipulation).
On May 11,
1989, the Board issued an Interim Order directing
the parties
to explain certain aspects of
the Stipulation,
namely:
1.
The intention of the parties regarding the effect of the
clause providing that
the Board
is
to “retain
jurisdiction” for certain purposes;
2.
The enforceability of the provision allowing the Board
to “extend
the time for performance”
of obligations
under
the Stipulation;
3.
The statutory and factual justification for the
provision
in the Stipulation that $3,000 of
the total
$14,000 penalty
is
to
be deposited
into the Hazardous
Waste Fund;
and
4.
Clarification of the provision that the penalty checks
be delivered
to the Environmental Control Division of
the Office of the Attorney General,
rather than
to the
Agency.
Responses
to the Board’s Interim Order were timely filed
by
all three parties.
The responses are
in general accord on all
of
the aspects under scrutiny.
As
to the provisions
for
the Board to “retain jurisdiction”
and
to “extend the time
for performance”,
the parties advise the
101—5°
—2—
Board
that, performance having already been achieved in a timely
manner “retention of jurisdiction by the Board is not necessary”
(Agency Resp.,
p.
1).
As to payment of the $3,000 penalty into the Hazardous Waste
Fund,
the Attorney General, on behalf of the Agency,
states that
this “reflects the costs of a removal/remedial action incurred by
the Agency which the Board may order paid into the Hazardous
Waste Fund pursuant to Section 22.2(f) and
(1) of the Act”
(Agency Resp.,
pp.
1—2).
The other parties do not object to this
characterization, or to the disposition of the funds accordingly
(City of Marion Resp.).
With respect
to the delivery of checks
to the At?orney
General’s Office rather than to the Agency,
the Attorney General,
on behalf of the Agency, specifies that this requirement of the
Stipulation was inserted “to allow the Attorney General
to
respond more quickly to failure to make penalty payments by the
required date by eliminating the need for IEPA to inform the
Attorney General that a payment had not been received”,
rather
than to “usurp the IEPA’s authority as coordinator
for handling
receipts for the Environmental Protection Trust Fund”
(Agency
Resp.,
p.
2).
The Board is satisfied that the Stipulation, as clarified,
is an acceptable basis
for resolution of this matter.
However,
insofar as the responses indicate that all obligations under
the
Stipulation, including payment of penalties and reimbursement of
costs, have already been performed,
those aspects of the
Stipulation relating
to continuing Board oversight appear
to be
unnecessary; further,
the deposit into the Hazardous Waste Fund
should be correctly referred to as
a
reimbursement, rather than
a
penalty.
The Board accordingly construes the responses to its
Interim Order of May 11,
1989,
as a
joint revision
to the
Stipulation.
This revision consists of deletion of
item
3 of
Article VII
(which item provides
that the parties may under
certain circumstances request
the Board to extend the time for
performance), deletion of all of Article
IX (Retention of
Jurisdiction), and reclassification of
the deposit into the
Hazardous Waste Fund as reimbursement
for costs,
not as a
penalty).
The Board finds the Stipulation,
as thus revised, acceptable
under
35
Iii. Adm. Code
103.180.
This Opinion constitutes the Board’s findings of fact and
conclusions of law in this matter.
ORDER
It is the Order of the Illinois Pollution Control Board
that:
101—60
—3—
1)
The Board hereby accepts the Stipulation and Proposal
for Settlement executed by the City of Marion,
the
Marion Pepsi Cola Bottling Company and the Illinois
Environmental Protection Agency,
filed with the Board on
December
14, 1988,
and revised by the parties
in their
responses to the Board’s Interim Order
of May 11,
1989.
The Stipulation and Proposal for Settlement,
except
for deletion of item
2 of Article VII, deletion
of all of Article
IX,
and reclassification of the
deposit into the Hazardous Waste Fund
to reimbursement
for costs
rather
than as payment of
a penalty
is
incorporated by reference as though set forth herein.
2)
Marion Pepsi Cola Bottling Company shall pay
a civil
penalty of eleven thousand dollars
($11,000) for
its
violations of the Illinois Environmental Protection Act
and the applicable regulations.
Marion shall pay
a
penalty of one thousand dollars
($1,000.00)
for
its
violations of
the Illinois Environmental Protection Act
and applicable regulations.
Each penalty shall be paid
within ninety
(90) days
of the date of entry of this
order
by certified check made payable to the
Environmental Protection Trust
Fund.
In addition,
Marion Pepsi Cola Bottling Company shall pay three
thousand dollars
($3,000)
as reimbursement for
costs
incurred by the State of Illinois for removal/remedial
action as a result of
a release
or substantial thread of
release of hazardous substance.
Payment shall
be made
within ninety
(90) days of the date
of entry of this
order
by certified check made payable to the Hazardous
Waste Fund.
Each check shall be delivered to:
Environmental Control Division
Office of the Attorney General
500 South Second Street
Springfield,
IL
62706
Attn.:
James
L.
Morgan
Assistant Attorney General
3)
This docket
is hereby closed.
Section
41 of
the Environmental Protection Act,
Ill.
Rev.
Stat.
1987 ch.
111 1/2 par.
1041,
provides for appeal of Final
Orders of the Board within 35 days.
The Rules of the Supreme
Court of
Illinois establish filing requirements.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
J.
T. Meyer dissented.
101—61
—4—
I, Dorothy M. Gunn,
Clerk of the Illinois Pollution Control
Board, hereby cer~ij.ythat the a~oveOpinion and Order was
adopte~on the
~
day of
_____________,
1989,
by a vote
of
&2/
.
~1.
Dorothy M.4unn, Clefk
Illinois Pdllution Control Board
101—62