ILLINOIS POLLUTION CONTROL BOARD
March 11, 1976
CLINTON SANITARY DISTRICT,
)
Petitioner,
V.
)
P03 75—498
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY,
Respondent.
OPINION AND ORDER OF THE BOARD
(by Mr. Young):
This matter comes before the Board on the variance peti-
tion filed December
23,
1975 by the Clinton Sanitary District
(District)
seeking relief from Rule 602(d) (3)
of the Board’s
Water Pollution Rules and Regulations
(Rules).
An Agency
Recommendation was
filed with the Board on January
23,
1976.
No hearing was held in this matter.
Rule 602(d) (3) establishes
a compliance date of December
31,
1975 for Rule 602(c), which requires
in part that all
combined sewer overflows and treatment plant bypasses shall
be given sufficient treatment to prevent pollution or
a
violation of applicable water quality standards.
The Clinton Sanitary District provides wastewater treat-
ment for an area which
is comprised primarily by the City of
Clinton, which has a population of 7,500.
The District owns
and operates
a sewage treatment plant and interceptor sewers,
on which are presently located six storm water overflows, one
of which
is at the plant while the other five are on the
interceptor sewers.
The overflow at the plant is being elimi-
nated by the construction of additional wastewater treatment
facilities.
The District’s treatment plant is
also being
upgraded
to increase its capacity to 4.9 MGD, an almost
threefold increase in plant capacity.
The five other combined
sewer overflows remain
a problem, however,
and the District
alleges
that it will cost $2,400,000
to bring the system into
compliance.
The District alleges that
it
is now bonded to the legal
limit in order
to finance the present plant improvements;
and absent a Section 46 Order of the Board the District
is
not able to raise more money.
North Shore Sanitary District
v.
Pollution Control Board,
302 NE
2d
50
(1973)
.
Thus,
the
20—287
—2—
District alleges it cannot solve the overflow problem until
it receives
an IEPA and/or USEPA construction grant.
The
District applied for such funding on March 12,
1975, but
received a priority position of 768 on the priority grant
list.
The Agency has recognized the fact that many munici-
palities and sanitary districts
throughout the State have
not met and cannot presently meet the December 31,
1975
compliance date.
On December
31,
1975,
the Agency filed an
Amended Petition for Regulatory Change
(R75-15) with the
Board specifically requesting that the date for complying
with Rule 602(d) (3) be extended until July
1,
1977, provided
a grant application had been filed before December
31,
1975.
The Board has not taken final action on this proposal.
We are disposed to grant relief.
The District is
currently bonded to its normal legal limits to pay for other
treatment plant improvements.
It has applied for state and
federal grants in an effort
to solve the problem of combined
sewer overflows,
but many other projects will be funded be-
fore
the District’s project.
In view of these efforts, we
believe an arbitrary and unreasonable hardship would be
placed on the District by requiring the capital outlays
necessary for compliance without first allowing the District
to obtain assistance from existing grant programs,
and par-
ticularly so when the District would be precluded from any
reimbursement from grant funds
if they were
to proceed in
absence of
a grant award.
This Opinion constitutes
the Board’s findings of fact and
conclusions of law in this matter.
ORDER
1.
The Clinton Sanitary District
is granted variance
from the compliance date for combined sewer overflows
as
established by Rule 602(d) (3)
of the Water Pollution Rules
and Regulations.
Such variance is qranted until July
1,
1977,
or such date as may be adopted by the Board in consideration
of the Agency Regulatory Proposal
(R75-l5), whichever
is later.
2.
The District is required during this period to main-
tain optimum operating efficiency and convey as much combined
sewer flow to its plant for treatment as
is possible.
3.
This variance will immediately terminate
if the Dis-
trict
is offered a grant during this period and the District
does not respond with appropriate action
to bring it into
compliance.
20—288
—3—
IT
IS SO ORDERED.
I, Christan
L. Moffett,
Clerk of the Illinois Pollution
Control Board, hereby certify the above Opinion and Order were
adopted on the
jj’f’~
day of
/)‘)t4~~iJ~
,
1976
by a vote of ~p
Christan L. Moffe
lerk
Illinois Pollution
ntrol Board
20—289