ILLINOIS POLLUTION CONTROL BOARD
February 2, 2006
WESLEY BRAZAS, JR.,
Petitioner,
v.
MR. JEFF MAGNUSSEN, president,
VILLAGE OF HAMPSHIRE, and THE
ILLINOIS ENVIRONMENTAL
PROTECTION AGENCY,
Respondents.
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
PCB 06-131
(Third-Party NPDES Permit Appeal –
Water)
ORDER OF THE BOARD (by N.J. Melas):
On January 13, 2006, Mr. Wesley Brazas, Jr. filed a petition asking the Board to review a
December 9, 2005 determination of the Illinois Environmental Protection Agency (Agency).
The Agency granted National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit No. IL
0020281 to the Village of Hampshire for its wastewater treatment plant in Kane County. Mr.
Brazas appeals on the grounds that the permit is “not sufficiently protective of the environment
and not in accord with the law.” Pet. at 8. For the reasons set forth below, the Board finds the
petition deficient, and requests more information from the petitioner before the Board can
consider whether the petition is duplicative or frivolous or accept the matter for hearing.
THIRD-PARTY APPEAL
Section 40(e)(1) of the Environmental Protection Act (Act) (415 ILCS 5/40(e)(1) (2004))
allows certain third parties to appeal Agency determinations to grant NPDES permits. The third
party’s petition to the Board must contain:
a demonstration that the petitioner raised the issues contained within the petition
during the public notice period or during the public hearing on the NPDES permit
application, if a public hearing was held; and
a demonstration that the petitioner is so situated as to be affected by the
permitted facility. 415 ILCS 5/40(e)(2) (2004);
see also
35 Ill. Adm. Code
105.210(d).
The petition also must satisfy the requirements of the Board’s procedural rules for service and
filing under Part 101.Subpart C as well a the content requreiments of Section 105.210. Among
other things, the petition must specify the grounds for appeal and include a copy of the issued
permit. 35 Ill. Adm. Code 105.210(a), (c). The third party must file the petition within 35 days
after the “date of issuance of the Agency’s decision.” 415 ILCS 5/40(e)(1) (2004);
see also
35
2
Ill. Adm. Code 105.206(b). If the Board determines that the third party’s petition for review is
not “duplicative or frivolous,” the Board will hear the petition. 415 ILCS 5/40(e)(3) (2004);
see
also
35 Ill. Adm. Code 105.214(d).
An action before the Board is duplicitous if it is “identical or substantially similar to one
brought before the Board or another forum.” 35 Ill. Adm. Code 101.202. An action before the
Board is frivolous if it is “a request for relief that the Board does not have the authority to grant”
or “fails to state a cause of action upon which the Board can grant relief.”
Id.
Only the Village of Hampshire, the permit applicant, may extend by waiver (
see
35 Ill.
Adm. Code 101.308). If the Board fails to take final action by the decision deadline, the Village
of Hampshire “shall be entitled to an Appellate Court order pursuant to subsection (d) of Section
41 [415 ILCS 5/41(d) (2004)].” 415 ILCS 5/40(a)(3) (2004).
THIS PETITION
Mr. Brazas’ petition is clearly deficient because it does not include a copy of the issued
permit. 35 Ill. Adm. Code 105.210(a). Accordingly, the Board cannot determine whether the
petition was timely filed. Further, the petition does not include a certificate of service pursuant
to Section 101.304(d). 35 Ill. Adm. Code 101.304(d). As a result, the Board cannot determine
whether both respondents, the Agency and the Village of Hampshire, were properly served. For
these reasons, the Board cannot make a duplicative or frivolous determination until it receives
the additional information identified above.
The Board orders Mr. Brazas to file and properly serve an amended petition in
accordance with the Board’s procedural rules including, the issued permit as well as the
certificate of service. This amended petition must be postmarked no later than February 17,
2006, or this matter will be subject to dismissal. The Board requires Mr. Brazas to act promptly
to cure the deficiencies of the petition because a 120-day deadline applies to the Board’s decision
should the Board accept the petition for hearing. Assuming Mr. Brazas’ original petition was
timely filed on January 13, 2006, the Board’s decision deadline would be May 13, 2006, the
120th day after January 13, 2006.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
I, Dorothy M. Gunn, Clerk of the Illinois Pollution Control Board, certify that the Board
adopted the above order on February 2, 2006, by a vote of 4-0.
Dorothy M. Gunn, Clerk
Illinois Pollution Control Board