ILLINOIS POLLUTION CONTROL BOARD
June
18,
1976
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY,
)
Complainant,
v.
)
PCB 75—353
)
EDWARD H.
WEIDE,
)
Respondent.
Mr. Steven Watts, Assistant Attorney General, appeared on behalf
of Complainant
Mr. Paul Perona, Perona and Perona, appeared on behalf of
Respondent.
OPINION
AND
ORDER OF THE BOARD
(by Mr. Goodman):
This matter comes before the Pollution Control Board
(Board)
upon the September
9,
1975 Complaint of the Environmental Protection
Agency
(Agency)
charging that Mr. Edward H. Weide
(Weide) violated
Rule
203(a)
of the Water Regulations and Section 12(a)
of the
Environmental Protection Act
(Act)
on or about August
9,
1974.
Weide
is accused of causing or allowing the discharge of corn silage wastes
into an unnamed tributary of Big Sandy Creek resulting in unnatural
sludge or bottom deposits,
odor, unnatural color,
and a fish kill.
Respondent is also charged with violation of Water Rules
203(f)
(causing said stream’s ammonia nitrogen level to exceed acceptable
levels)
and 203(d)
(causing said stream’s dissolved oxygen to be
less than 5.0 mg/i).
Mr. Michael Conlin testified that he was called to investigate
a fish kill in August,
1974.
Mr. Conlin traced the upper
limit of
the fish kill to the entrance of an unnamed tributary to Big Sandy
Creek
(R.l5-16).
The fish kill covered 2.6 miles.
The water being
cloudy, dirty,
and milky,
and having a putrid odor
(R.16).
Mr.
Conlin followed the unnamed tributary by sight and smell
to
white turbid water on Weide’s pasture
(R.17).
He found the banks
to be saturated with waste material
(R.l7).
Mr. Conlin spoke
to
Weide, who admitted placing corn silage at that spot two days be-
fore
(R.l8).
22—123
—2—
Mr. Conlin set up three sampling areas each consisting of 150
feet,
in
light, moderate and heavy kill areas respectively
(R.30-31)
Mr.
Conliri then counted the fish in these areas and projected a
fish
kill of approximately 25,000
fish
(R.15 Comp.
Ex.
1).
Mr. Conlin
testified that corn silage has a high BOD which could result in oxy-
gen depletion thereby suffocating fish (R.23).
Mr. Weide testified that on August
9,
1974, he cleaned his silo
putting the waste in a manure spreader.
Using the manure spreader,
Weide placed the siiage in the ditch to help stop erosion;
no water
was seen in the ditch at that time.
Mr. Weide neither cultivated
under the silage nor seeded on top.
A total of
6
to
8
cubic
yards
of silage was deposited, having a fairly high moisture content.
The
silage was placed on top of soil and concrete foundations which had
been placed previously to control erosion
(R.58-68,
129).
Mr.
William Tucker testified that high organic material, such
as corn silage, will cause oxygen depletion and could cause an in-
stantaneous fish kill
(R.81—86).
In addition, he testified that
the stream could recover in
as little as
1
1/2 days
(R.109).
He
measured the dissolved oxygen
(DO)
to be 9.3
+
10.3 ppm upstream
and downstream from the discharge.
At the point of discharge the
DO was 0.6 ppm
(Comp.
Ex.
4, R.121).
On the 10th of August
.60 inches of rain fell
(Camp.
Ex.
3).
Mr. Weide testified that usually the ditch has water in the spring
or after a hard rain
(R.62).
He estimated that 2 to
2
1/2 inches of
rain fell two days after he spread the silage
(R.128).
Mr.
Jim Frank,
an Agency Agricultural Advisor, testified that
the best way to spread silage
is with a manure spreader but that
nc
silage should be spread closer than two to three hundred yards from
any stream
(R.73).
Although corn silage
is an acceptable cover
material,
it should be used on dry land; without cultivation or seed-
ing,
it would have minimal effect on erosion
(R.75).
Mr. Weide testified that he is purchasing the 647 acre farm
one mile south of Magnolia, Marshall County,
Illinois.
In 1974,
40
acres were planted in beans,
230 in corn,
20-25
in alfalfa.
Three
hundred acres were in pasture land
(R.57).
The area is rolling
pasture with some timber
(R.58).
Mr. Weide also testified that the
placement area was
three hundred to four hundred feet from the
flow-
ing portion of the unnamed tributary
(R.127).
No information was
22—124
—3—
presented to the Board concerning the Respondent’s financial condi-
tion.
We must presume that Respondent could have placed the silage
in an area farther from the stream at little or no additional
cost.
Complainant’s Exhibit
4 shows violation of Rules 203(d)
and
203(f)
as alleged in the Complaint.
The Board also finds that
Respondent has violated Rule 203(a) of the Water Regulations and
Section 12(a)
of the Act.
Complainant asks that a penalty be assessed on the basis
of
the cost of replacing the fish killed.
The Agency estimates that
25,002 fish were killed having a value of $4,354.76 (Complainant
Ex.
1).
The Board finds that the sampling method utilizing 450 feet
as against
2 1/2 miles leaves an excessive margin for error.
In
consideration thereof,
the Board finds that an assessment of
$2600.00 is appropriate.
This Opinion constitutes the Board’s findings of fact and con-
clusions of law in this matter.
ORDER
It is
the Order of the Pollution Control Board that:
1.
Weide is found to have violated Rule
203(a),
(d)
and
(f)
of the Water Regulations and Section
12(a)
of the
Act.
2.
Weide shall pay,
as
a reasonable value of the
fish
killed through said violations,
$2600.00 by certified
check or money order payable to the Game and Fish Fund,
State of Illinois, 2200 Churchill Road, Springfield,
Illinois
62706 within thirty-five days of the date of
this Order.
3.
Weide shall cease and desist from depositing corn
silage wastes in such a way as to contaminate the un-
named tributary to Big Sandy Creek.
Mr.
Young abstained.
22— 125
—4—
I, Christan L.
Moffett, Clerk of the Illinois Pollution Control
Board,
hereby certif
the above Opinion and Order were adopted on the
___________day of
,
1976 by a vote of
~
Christan L. Moffett,
k
Illinois Pollution
ol Board
22—126