ILLINOIS POLLUTION CONTROL BOARD
September 18, 1975
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY,
)
Complainant,
v.
)
PCB 75—113
)
VILLAGE OF
KANE,
Respondent.
Ms. Marilyn B.
Resch, Assistant Attorney General, appeared
on behalf of the Complainant;
Mr. Hugh Strickland, McDonald and Strickland,
appeared on
behalf of the Respondent.
OPINION AND ORDER OF THE BOARD
(by Mr. Goodman):
This matter
coi’~tes before the Pollution Control Board
(Board)
upon the May 20,
1975, Amended Complaint of the
Environmental Protection Agency
(Agency)
against the Village
of Kane
(Kane).
The original complaint was filed March
10,
1975,
charging Kane with violating Section
I of an Act to
Regulate the Ope~ationof a Public Water Supply,
Ill.
Rev.
Stat.
Chapter 111 1/2 Par.
501
(1973),
in that Kane operated
a public water supply from on or about June 11,
1974,
to the
date of filing of the complaint without a certified Class B
or Class A operator.
The Amended Complaint added a viola-
tion of Rule 302 of the Public Water Supplies Regulations
from December 21,
1974,
to the date of filing.
A hearing
was held July
23,
1975,
at Carrollton,
Illinois.
Rule
302,
in pertinent part,
states:
“All provisions
of An Act to Regulate the Operating of
a Public Water Supply
.shall be met.”
Paragraph 501(b) of the Public Water Supply Act states:
(b) Each public water supply which includes
filtration, aeration and filtration,
or ion ex-
change equipn.ent as a part of its primary treat-
ment shall
hai.e
in its employ at least one natural
person certifisd as competent as a Class B or
Class A water supply operator.
18—530
—2—
Kane is
located in Greene County,
Illinois,
and has
a
population of 473 ~R.38).
Kane admits that its public water
supply utilizes fiitration equipment as part of the primary
treatment of its well water
(Comp.
Ex.
1).
It also admits
that between June II,
1974, and March
10,
1975,
the Village
had no certified water supply operator
(R.3).
In addition,
Kane admits that several letters, including a notice of
violation, had been sent to it by the Agency
(Comp.
Ex.
1).
The Board must find that Kane has violated both Para-
graph 501 of the Public Water Supply Act and Rule 302 of the
Public Water Supply Regulations.
Prior to June
11, 1974, John Elmor was the certified
water supply operatcr for the Village.
When he died in June
of 1974,
his son-in-law, Delbert Allan, became the operator
although he was not certified
(R.19).
On June
4,
1975, Kane
hired Jack Shafer as operator.
Mr.
Shafer, who also oper-
ates the Jerseyville water supply,
holds
a Class A certi-
fication
(R.33,
42).
The Board notes that the requirements for obtaining a
Class B certificate includes three years of on the job
training plus
a high school education or four years actual
training and a grade school education.
After being trained,
the prospective operator must pass a written examination.
A
certified operator is necessary in order
to assure safe
water production and to maintain the water quality until
it
reaches the consumer.
The minimum penalty set by law for the violations found
herein is
$100.00.
The Board finds that as Kane now has
a
certified operator and as no citizen complaints were filed,
a penalty of $100.00
is appropriate.
This Opinion constitutes the Board’s findings of fact
and conclusions of law
in this matter.
ORDER
It
is the Order of the Pollution Control Board that:
1)
Respondent Village of Kane is
found to have vio-
lated Paragraph 501 of the Public Water Supply Act and Rule
302 of the Public Water Supply Regulations during the period
between June
11,
1974,
and March 10,
1975; and
18—531
—3—
2)
Respondent Village of Kane shall pay as
a penalty
the
sum
of $100.00, payment to be made within
35 days of
the date of this Order, by certified check or money order
to:
State of Illinois
Fiscal Services Division
Environmental Protection Agency
2200 Churchill Road
Springfield, Illinois
62706
I, Christan L.
Moffett, Clerk of the Illinois Pollution
Control Board, hereby certify the above Opini
n and Order
were adopted on the
~3P*~
day of
_________
1975 by a
vote of
~
Illinois Pollution
rol Board