ILLINOIS POLLUTION CONTROL BOARD
    July
    3,
    1990
    CITY OF WHITE HALL,
    Petitioner,
    v.
    )
    PCB 90—123
    (Provisional Variance)
    ILLINOIS ENVIRONMENTAL
    PROTECTION AGENCY,
    Respondent.
    ORDER OF THE BOARD
    (J.
    Marlin):
    This matter comes before the Board on receipt of an Agency
    Recommendation dated July
    2,
    1990.
    The recommendation refers to
    a request from Petitioner,
    City of White Hall, for a provisional
    variance from the wastewater effluent biochemical oxygen demand
    (BOD)
    and total suspended solids
    (TSS)
    limitations,
    as set forth
    in 35
    Ill.
    Adm.
    Code 304.120 and 304.141(a).
    The City seeks a
    provisional variance for the period from June 29,
    1990 to July
    20, 1990 or until the City of White Hall returns its activated
    sludge plant to service, whichever comes first.
    The City of White Hall owns and operates
    a wastewater
    treatment plant that discharges effluent to Seminary Creek which,
    in turn,
    discharges to Apple Creek and the Illinois River.
    The
    plant consists of
    a bar screen aerated grit chamber,
    a primary
    clarifier,
    an activated sludge plant,
    a clarifier,
    an aerobic
    digester,
    tertiary filtration, and effluent chlorination.
    NPDES
    Permit 1L0022390 presently requires the City to discharge
    effluent with no greater than 10 mg/l BOD and 12 mg/i TSS
    content,
    on a monthly average basis.
    The City claims to have experienced breakage problems with
    the clarifier drive mechanism on the activated sludge plant.
    The
    mechanism failed on April
    8,
    1990,
    and the City replaced it on
    May 9,
    1990.
    It failed again on June 21,
    1990.
    Shear pin
    failure on the clarifier drive units preceded both failures.
    The
    drive mechanism has been repaired and installed,
    but the City
    is
    concerned that another problem may have caused the failures.
    The City claims that
    it is necessary to dewater the
    clarifier to determine
    if another problem exists.
    This would
    require the City to dewater all compartments of the treatment
    plant because the internal dividers would not withstand the
    pressures resulting from dewatering the individual compartment.
    This would place the activated sludge unit out of
    service during
    dewatering and repairs.
    During such
    a period, however,
    the City
    could provide partial treatment by screening,
    grit removal,
    flow
    measurement, primary settling, aeration in the excess flow tank,
    rapid sand filtration,
    and final settling.
    This would result in
    113—97

    2
    an effluent that would
    not exceed 25 mg/i BOD and 40 mg/i TSS
    during the period of repairs.
    The City asserts that there is no available alternative
    method to correct the situation with its plant.
    It predicts that
    far above average amounts of rainfall would result in no adverse
    environmental effects.
    Upon receipt of the request, the Agency issued its
    recommendation,
    concluding that the lack of an available
    alternative method for correcting the situation with the City’s
    plant “creates
    a hardship adequate enough to justify granting”
    the requested provisional variance.
    The Agency concurs in the
    City’s assessment as to the availability of an alternative method
    ~or correction and as to the prospective environmental impact of
    grant of a pr
    i—&i-ona-l
    variance.
    Th~Agency asserts that a
    ~enia1of the requested provisional variance would impose an
    arbitrary and unreasonable hardship on the City.
    The Agency
    states that no federal laws would preclude a grant of the
    requested provisional variance, and the Agency is of no public
    water supply that such a grant would adversely affect.
    The
    Agency recommends that the Board grant the requested provisional
    variance with conditions.
    In light of the Agency Recommendation,
    the Board hereby
    grants the City of
    White
    Hall a provisional variance from the BOD
    and TSS requirements of 35 Iii. Adm. Code 304.120 and 304.141(a)
    on the following conditions:
    1.
    The term of this provisional variance shall commence on
    June 29,
    1990 and continue until the City of White Hall
    returns its activated sludge plant to service,
    or until July
    20,
    1990, whichever occurs first;
    2.
    The City of White Hall shall discharge no effluent that
    exceeds 25 mg/i BOD or 40 mg/i TSS content during the term
    of this provisional variance;
    3.
    The City of White Hall shall notify Bud Bridgewater by
    telephone,
    at 217-786-6892, when it begins dewatering the
    activated sludge plant and when it returns that unit to
    service;
    4.
    The City of White Hall shall verify each notification
    made by telephone pursuant to condition number
    3
    in writing
    within five days of such telephone notification, addressed
    as follows:
    Illinois Environmental Protection Agency
    Division of Water Pollution Control
    2200 Churchill Road
    P.O. Box 19276
    113-98

    3
    Springfield,
    Illinois
    62794—9276
    Attn:
    Pat Lindsey
    5.
    The City of White Hall shall return its activated
    sludge plant to service as soon as is possible and shall
    provide the best treatment practicable during the term of
    this provisional variance;
    6.
    The City of White Hall shall execute a Certificate of
    Acceptance and Agreement in the following form:
    CERTIFICATION
    I
    (We),
    hereby accept and agree to be bound by all terms and
    conditions
    of the Order of the Pollution Control Board in
    PCB 90—123,
    dated July
    3,
    1990.
    Petitioner
    Authorized Agent
    Title
    Date
    7.
    The City of White Hall shall forward to the Agency an
    executed copy of the Certificate executed pursuant to
    condition number
    6 within 10 days of the date of this Order
    addressed as indicated in condition number
    4.
    IT IS SO ORDERED.
    113—99

    4
    I, Dorothy M.
    Gunn,
    Clerk of the
    I11ino:~sPollution Control
    Board,
    do hereby certi
    hat the above Order was adopted on the
    J1~
    day of __________________________,
    1990, by a vote of
    Ill
    erk
    Control Board
    113-100

    Back to top